Author Archives: author

Food Supplements in the Treatment of Ophthalmic Diseases: Preclinical and Clinical Studies

DOI: 10.31038/JPPR.2020323

Abstract

At least 2.2 billion people in the world suffer by vision impairment or blindness (World Health Organization, 2019). Apart from infective diseases amenable to antibiotic treatment, cataract and corneal diseases resolvable by surgery, or refractive defects treatable with spectacles, most of the remaining pathologies do not have a cure. They can be treated with drugs or by surgery to alleviate symptoms and to slow down progression, but the underlying cause of the disease is usually not fully resolvable. Therefore, the best strategy to limit the burden of these ophthalmic diseases is prevention. In fact, almost all ophthalmic pathologies have a known etiology and pathway of development (although often not all the elements in the different steps have been elucidated), so that they are amenable to possible preventive treatments. Aim of this review is to illustrate how food supplements might help in the prevention and treatment of these ophthalmic diseases.

Introduction

Among the 2.2 billion people in the world affected by any type of eye condition, the World Health Organization estimates 196 million with Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), 146 million with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and 76 million with glaucoma [1]. No clear estimate exists on the global presence of dry eye, though the English Agency known as Global-Data UK Ltd. in a document published on June 2018, considering the 8 more industrialised Countries (US, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK, Japan, and China), reports a prevalence of 267,680,785 cases in 2016, destined to raise to 286,308,974 cases in 2026, therefore with an annual growth rate of 0.70% [2]. Approximately 200 million eyes globally are affected by cataracts causing a visual acuity less than 6/60, which become 3-4 times more including cataracts causing an acuity below 6/18 [3], accounting for one third of the worldwide blindness [4]. Globally, over 300 millions adolescents (less than 19 years old) are affected by progressive myopia [1], which in older ages may bring serious complications, like glaucoma or retinal detachment. All these eye pathologies pose a serious threat to vision, and have a strong social and economic impact. It has been estimated in 2014 by the National Eye Institute that the annual economic burden of vision loss, eye diseases and vision disorders in the U.S. amounted to 139 billion $ [5]. Now, what all these pathologies have in common is that there is no efficient pharmacological treatment for any of them. Resolutive surgery is possible in the case of cataract, but it is not devoid of – although minimal – side effects [6]. Surgical approaches are routinary applied also to the other pathologies, but most often they are not curative, and can at best attenuate their progression [7,8]. However, for all of them there is a link with lifestyle and alimentary habits, which becomes more evident in older ages [9,10]. This opens a space for prevention, early treatment and association of dietary habits or use of food supplements with pharmacological or surgical treatments. Aim of this review is to illustrate the scientific evidence supporting the use of food supplements in the management of eye pathologies.

GLAUCOMA

Glaucoma is an optic neuropathy, including a group of similar pathologies affecting the retinal ganglion cells (RGC), the optic nerve (ON) and the connected visual structures, causing vision loss and eventually blindness [11]. Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common form of glaucoma (around 90% of the cases). It may occur in association with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), in which case it is described as hypertensive glaucoma, or with normal IOP, in which case it is designed as normal tension glaucoma (NTG) [12]. In either case, the common pathological marker is the death of RGC by apoptosis, which eventually leads to the degeneration of the whole visual pathway, including the lateral geniculate nuclei and the visual brain cortex through the mechanism known as trans-synaptic degeneration [13,14]. This mechanism is present in other neurological diseases such as Alzheimer, Parkinson and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis [13]. Therefore, also POAG is considered a slow progressing neurological disease [13]. Both extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms contribute to RGC apoptotic death. Among the first, there are mechanical and metabolic factors. The compression of the ON at the lamina cribrosa (the structure present at the optic disk through which the ON leaves the eye) due to IOP elevation, leads to a decreased axoplasm flow and neurotrophins circulation between the periphery and the nucleus of the cell, necessary for RGC survival [15]. Endothelial dysfunction and decreased blood perfusion of the ON head (ONH) is a common finding in POAG [16], and may become a dominant trigger in NTG [17]. These events may activate or aggravate the intrinsic mechanisms, like glial cell activation and neuroinflammation, glutamate excitotoxicity and calcium release from dying cells, oxidative stress, starting a domino effect of RGC death, and further aggravating the pathology [18-20]. More recently, mitochondrial dysfunction has been added as a main mechanism among the different causes that can possibly lead to RGC death and glaucoma [21]. However, from the clinical perspective, the only pharmacologic therapeutic approach is based on the reduction of the IOP, both for hypertensive POAG and for NTG [22]. However, several clinical studies have shown that IOP reduction is a necessary, but not sufficient condition to arrest POAG progression [23]. Moreover, due to the structure of the retina, and the redundance of the cell network system carrying light signals from the eye to the brain, usually more than 50% of RGCs are dead when the first visual field abnormalities are detectable [24]. Hence, a neuroprotective strategy is becoming more often associated with the classical IOP-lowering treatment to try and improve the therapeutic outcome of POAG patients [25]. We have already reported that neurodegeneration is caused by several different types of insult to RGC, therefore an effective neuroprotective treatment should be endowed with multiple effects on different targets [25]. To this purpose, a single molecule with pleiotropic effects, or an association of molecules joining together their therapeutic mechanisms, should be considered (Figure 1).

JPPR-3-2-314-g001

Figure 1. Neurodegeneration in PoAG. The main recognized mechanisms of neurodegeneration in POAG are the excessive pressure at the level of the lamina cribrosa, where the optic nerve leaves the eye globe, and/or the decreased blood perfusion at the optic nerve head (ONH) (upper panel). These events may lead to injury and apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells (RGC), and the progressive loss of sight. Indirect neuroprotective agents are those mainly acting on the IOP decrease and the improvement of blood perfusion (bottom left). Direct neuroprotection works by blunting those events directly leading to cell injury and apoptosis (bottom right).

Brimonidine is a drug and it is an α-2A adrenergic receptor agonist, present in eye drops medications either alone, or in association with other hypotonizing drugs (timolol or dorzolamide). It is a paradigm of a multipurpose molecule, being active both on the hypotonizing and the neuroprotective side, and has clearly demonstrated that neuroprotection and hypotonizing effects can be dissociated. In fact, brimonidine, beside the hypotonizing effect on IOP [26], has also shown several neuroprotective effects, such as improved perfusion pressure at the ONH [27]; rescue of RGC from apoptosis by increasing the ratio bcl2/BAX [28]; prevention of the release of pro-apoptotic intracellular calcium [29]; blunting of the excitotoxicity due to excessive glutammate release [30] and upregulation of the neurotrophin BDNF expression by RGC [31]. Brimonidine neuroprotective effects in POAG have  been demonstrated both in preclinical animal model  systems [32] and in a seminal clinical trial of several years, showing that the neuroprotective effects achieved by brimonidine were indipendent from the hypotonizing effects that could be equally achieved by timolol [33].

Food Supplements

Epigallo-catechin-gallate (EGCG) is the main catechin of green tea, and also displays several activities with neuroprotective value. It has no effect on IOP, but it improves vascular perfusion by stimulating the expression of the endothelial form of nitric oxide synthase [34]; it is an iron chelator and a potent antioxidant, reducing oxidative stress and lipoperoxidation of cell membranes, thus shielding RGC from oxidative damage [35], and it is easily absorbed and distributed throughout the body [36]; it has anti-apoptotic activities, contrasting the activation of proapoptotic genes and favoring the expression of antiapoptotic ones, thus defending RGC from traumatic apoptotic death [37,38]. Its antioxidant and neuroprotective effects on RGC have been demonstrated in a mouse model in which oxidative damage was induced by intravitreal injection of sodium nitroprusside. When EGCG was given together with SNP, apoptotic cell death of RGC was significantly blunted [39]. Accordingly, in a mouse model of retinal ischemia/reperfusion, resembling acute closed angle glaucoma, oral

administration of EGCG could rescue RGC from apoptotic death, as seen by the conserved electroretinogram (ERG) response and thickness of the ganglion cell layer, and by the decreased expression of apoptotic caspases [40]. The antioxidant activity of EGCG has been proposed as a possible remedy to blunt the effects of mytochondrial dysfunction on glaucoma progression [41]. A clinical trial on 18 patients with POAG established that EGCG oral supplementation could improve – although slightly, because of the short treatment time – their pattern electroretinogram (PERG), which is an early alteration detectable in glaucoma subjects [42].

Citicoline is the current name of cytidine-5’-diphosphocholine. Citicoline is naturally present in all cells, serving as an intermediate in the biosynthesis of phosphatidylcholine, a component of biological membranes [43]. Citicoline has been one of the first neuroprotectors proposed [44], and has shown neuroprotective effects in Alzheimer disease, stroke, and Parkinson’s disease, as well as in glaucoma and amblyopia [45]. Some citicoline neuroprotective effects are mediated by the restoration of phosphatidylcholine levels and maintainance of sphingomyelin and cardiolipin levels (constituent of the inner mitochondrial membrane, involved in the cell energetic metabolism); by anti-oxidant effects, due to the increase of glutathione reductase (GR) activity and glutathione (GSH) synthesis and the decrease of PLA2 activity and lipid peroxidation; by the restoration of Na+/ K+ ATPase activity, essential for the proper functioning of neurons and glial cells. The choline provided by citicoline is used for the biosynthesis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, the stimulation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity and dopamine release [46]. Moreover, citicoline showed antiapoptotic effects by enhancing antiapoptotic bcl2 expression in a rat model of partial ON crush [47], and by decreasing apoptotic caspases expression in explanted rat retinas cultivated in toxic high glucose cell culture medium [48]. Over the years, citicoline has been studied in several glaucoma clinical trials. Initially, it was given by intramuscular injection, with a notable improvement on both PERG (RGC function) and VEP (Visual Evoked Potentials: gives the function of the whole visual axis) response [49,50]. In a further study, it was shown that oral administration of citicoline to glaucoma patients gave the same protection as the intramuscular injection, thus improving patients’ compliance [51]. Finally, also topical citicoline formulations as eye drops were shown to be effective in improving PERG and VEP of glaucoma patients over a period of 4 months [52].

Coenzyme Q (ubiquinone) neuroprotective activity also appears to be linked with its effects on mitochondria. In fact, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10: the prevalent form found in humans) is a potent antioxidant, a membrane stabilizer and an important cofactor of the mitochondrial electron transport chain for the production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [53]. In the DBA/2J mouse model of spontaneous glaucoma, diet supplementation with CoQ10 significantly decreased the ratio between pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptocic genes in the retina, thus preventing apoptotic cell death. Moreover, mitochondrial DNA and the Tfam transcription factor of the oxydative phosphorylation system in the retina were functionally preserved. This resulted in increased RGC survival and preservation of ON axons, and blunting of astroglial activation in the retina and ONH [54]. Massive RGC death typically results in the release of an excess of glutamate, and a paroxystic activation of glutamate receptors. This leads to the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) through which cytochrome C is released, signaling for the activation of caspase 9 and the apoptotic cascade. CoQ10 showed a further specific antiapoptotic effect by maintaining MPTP in the closed conformation thus preventing the triggering of apoptotic cell death [55]. In a rat model of mechanic ON injury a topical formulation of CoQ10 + vitamin E was administered as eye drops for 4 weeks. Decreased gliosis, increased anti-apoptotic gene expression, and preserved Tfam were observed in the retina of CoQ10 treated mice, which resulted in increased RGC survival [56]. Most recently, a multicenter, controlled clinical trial on 612 POAG patients has started, having visual field progression as the primary outcome, with the aim to evaluate the neuroprotective effects of an ophthalmic solution of CoQ10 and Vitamin E [57].

Saffron (crocus sativus) is a traditional medicinal plant containing in its stigmas many metabolites, among which the carotenoids crocin, crocetin and lycopene and the xantophyl zeaxanthin [58]. Crocin and crocetin are the main bioactive components [59], which can promptly be absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract, diffuse into organs and easily traverse the blood brain barrier (BBB) [60]. They have shown a protective effect on the integrity of the BBB during cerebral ischemia [61], which effect could likely be transposed also on the protection of the blood retinal barrier (BRB) during degenerative retinopathies, such as in AMD or DR [62]. The neuroprotective properties of saffron have been demonstrated in several ophthalmic pathologies and attributed to the important anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti- apoptotic properties of its bioactive components [63]. In glaucoma, retinal ischemia triggers neuronal cell death. Crocin and crocetin blunt oxidative stress and inhibit RGC death in mouse and rat models of ischemia/reperfusion [64-66]. Excitotoxicity by N-methyl-D- aspartate (NMDA) released by dying RGC is a common event during glaucoma progression [19]. Oral administration of crocetin prevented the inner retinal damage induced by intravitreal injection of NMDA in mice, by inhibiting the caspase pathway [67]. Most recently, a mouse model of laser-induced ocular hypertension (OHT) has been used to show the anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects of a saffron extract titrated to 3% in crocin. Both gliosis and RGC death were efficiently prevented by crocin oral supplementation in OHT eyes [68]. Clinical studies with saffron used so far IOP as the sole endpoint. Daily oral administration of 30 mg of a saffron infusion for three weeks produced an IOP decrease in POAG patients [69], whilst a discontinuous (twice per week) oral treatment with an even higher amount of 1 gr for a month gave no variation on the IOP [70], suggesting that continuity of treatment rather than dose could be the relevant strategy. The toxic effects of saffron become evident for daily doses higher than 5 g [71]. Therefore, since its human therapeutic use is in the range of milligrams, it has virtually no toxicity [72].

Resveratrol (3,5,4’-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene) is a natural phenol, a phytoalexin naturally produced by several plants (it can be found in foods such as grapes, peanuts, blueberries, and dark chocolate) in response to microbiological attacks [73]. It is endowed with potent anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, which are likely responsible for its cardioprotective [74], neuroprotective [75], and anti- aging effects [76]. In fact, resveratrol has shown neuroprotective effects in neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases like stroke and Alzheimer’s disease [77,78]. Most interestingly, resveratrol has been shown to blunt the damage of ischemic brain injuries [79], likely by preserving brain mitochondria function after ischemic/reperfusion damage [80], and extend the lifespan of organisms from yeast to mammals [81]. All these beneficial activities of resveratrol appear to be mainly mediated by its stimulating effect on AMPK [82], which in turn stimulates the activity of SIRT1 (the mammal homologue of Sir2), the longevity-associated gene [83]. Several preclinical evidence support the efficacy of resveratrol in controlling the glaucomatous disease. In primary trabecular meshwork (TM) cells subjected in vitro to chronic oxidative stress (40% O2) resveratrol treatment blunted the production of free radicals and inflammatory markers (IL1α, IL6, IL8, and ELAM-1), also exerting antiapoptotic effects [84]. In a mouse model of glaucoma induced by clogging of the TM,

intraperitoneal injections of resveratrol partially protected RGC from apoptotic cell death [85]. RGC dendrites protection by resveratrol was demonstrated in mice fed for one year with a resveratrol supplement, and then subjected to ON crush, which simulates the compression at the ONH further to acute IOP elevation. In this case the protective effect appeared to be associated with increased expression of the nuclear C/EBP homologous protein and the nuclear X-box-binding protein-1 [86]. Intravitreal injection of resveratrol could mitigate the retinal ischemic injury in a rat model system of ischemia/reperfusion obtained by a sudden elevation of the IOP, simulating an angle closure glaucoma. In this case the effect was related to the containment of the upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and inducible nitric oxide synthase [87]. Mitochondrial protection by resveratrol treatment was shown in hypertensive model systems in vitro with RGC5 neuronal cells, and in vivo in rats fed with a resveratrol supplement before artificial clogging of the TM. In both systems neuronal cells improved mitochondrial function and survival was dependent on the activation of the AMPK/SIRT1/ PGC-1α signaling pathway, which is a critical pathway regulating mitochondrial biogenesis and function [88,89]. Finally, a critical process in the development of glaucoma is neuroinflammation, which is sustained by activated astrocytes producing cytotoxic mediators triggering RGC apoptosis. Resveratrol given in vitro to astrocytes under oxidative stress blunted their activation and improved their survival by decreasing caspases activation, toxic Tau processing, and neurofibrillar tangles formation [90]. Beside its direct neuroprotective activity on RGC, resveratrol may also work to decrease IOP. Topical administration of resveratrol eye drops in a rat model system of steroid-induced hypertensive glaucoma [91] could decrease by 25% the IOP via a mechanism involving adenosine receptors [92]. This hypotonizing effect was correlated with higher levels of metalloproteinase-2 in the aqueous humour (AH) and a decreased TM thickness beside a restoration of the retinal morphology and its redox status [92]. In the clinics, it has shown some degree of efficacy in neurologic pathologies such as Alzheimer disease and Friedreich ataxia [93], but no clinical data are available for glaucoma patients.

Melatonin is a very ancient molecule widely distributed in nature, in the vegetal and the animal world [94]. Melatonin is best known as a circadian regulator of sleep and other cyclical bodily functions [95]. Accordingly, melatonin is not produced only by the pineal gland, but also by several other organs, thus influencing through paracrine signaling the physiological functions of the whole organism [94] by differential binding to its three receptors MT1-3 [96]. In the eye, it is made by the retina [97], the ciliary body [98] and the lachrymal gland [99]. Melatonin and its metabolites have antioxidant and free radical scavenger activities including both reactive oxygen and nitrogen species [100,101], thus protecting from oxidative damage photoreceptors and other ocular tissues [102]. In preclinical studies melatonin showed clear neuroprotective effects. In a mouse model of ischemia/reperfusion of the retina after sudden IOP elevation, intraperitoneally injected melatonin prevented the toxicity due to the increased expression of the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF-1α) and Muller cells gliosis, thus improving RGC survival [103]. In a rat model of hypertensive glaucoma obtained by clogging of the TM, subcutaneous implantation of a pellet slowly releasing melatonin improved the antioxidant potential in the retina, decreased glutamate excitotoxicity with the final results of improving RGC survival and rescuing the retinal function as evidenced by the ERG [104]. In a rabbit model of intravitreal glutamate toxicity, simultaneous melatonin injection could blunt the oxidative stress and improve survival of RGC by decreasing their apoptotic cell death [105]. In a recent work with a rat model of hypertensive glaucoma obtained by episcleral injection of hypersaline solution, the intravitreal administration of Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid microspheres loaded with melatonin, CoQ10 and dexamethasone releasing the drugs for over 30 days, could preserve RGC from apoptotic cell death [106]. Interestingly, not only melatonin, but also agomelatine, the novel MT1/MT2 receptor agonist antidepressant, has shown significant neuroprotective features [107]. Melatonin not only shields RGC from apoptotic death, but also shows a direct effect on the IOP. Circadian changes of the IOP appear to be linked to melatonin [108], which has shown hypotensive effects on IOP [109], apparently mediated by the MT3 receptor [110,111]. Most recently, it has been shown that a nanomicellar formulation of melatonin and agomelatin given topically as eye drops is able to decrease by over 30% the IOP of normotensive rats, and by over 50% the IOP of hypertensive rats, after clogging of the TM [112]. Clinically, it has been reported that oral treatment with agomelatine could further decrease by 30% on average the IOP of 10 glaucomatous patients under maximum tolerated medical therapy (MTMT) with different hypotonizing drugs [113].

Cannabinoids are naturally present in our organism – including eye tissues and the retina – as endocannabinoids: anandamide, 2-arachidonoylglycerol and palmitoylethanolamide [114,115]. Phytocannabinoids (pCBs: agonists of the endocannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2) are the active molecules found in cannabis (Cannabis sativa), and are mainly represented by Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinol and cannabidiol. THC is the molecule mainly responsible for the psychoactive effect of marijuana, while cannabinol is much less a psychotropic agent, and cannabidiol is not psychoactive at all [116]. Phytocannabinoids (much of all THC) have shown efficacy both as modulators of the IOP [117,118] and as neuroprotective agents [119]. It is likely the interaction of pCBs with the CB1 receptor that can lower the IOP by modulating production and outflow of AH [120,121]. The neuroprotective activity possibly depends on the antioxidant and antinflammatory effects of pCBs [122]. However, their psychotropic activity did not allow their free systemic use in ophthalmic diseases [123]. A valid alternative could be a topical formulation given as eye drops. Indeed, THC in nanotechnological formulations topically administered to normotensive rabbit’s eyes could reduce the IOP by 30% of the baseline value [124]. In a case report observation, oily based galenic ophthalmic formulations of pCBs with different proportions of THC and cannabidiol were given to patients unresponsive to drug treatments, however with little effect on the IOP. Only one patient with open angle glaucoma secondary to Fuchs heterochromic iridocyclitis had a partial response, probably due to the antinflammatory effect of the formulation with a higher content of THC [125].

Forskolin is a labdane diterpene extracted from the roots of the plant Indian Plectranthus barbatum (Coleus forskohlii). It is a lipid- soluble molecule that can cross cell membranes, thus working as a receptor independent activator of adenylate cyclase, finally resulting in the intracellular increase of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cAMP-mediated functions [126]. Forskolin lowers IOP [127] by two independent and original mechanisms, both triggered by cAMP elevation: it decreases net secretion of AH by the ciliary body by a mechanism that involves the chloride channels and a reabsorption of AH from the posterior chamber into the stroma [128,129]; and by enhancing AH outflow through the TM by a mechanism that involves cell actin cytoskeleton disassembly through PKA activation and Rho kinase inhibition [130]. None of the existing glaucoma drugs (carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, beta-blockers, alfa-agonists, prostaglandin analogs) has similar mechanisms of action, therefore it might be expected that forskolin effects add upon those of such drugs. In fact, a clinical study in which POAG patients under MTMT were treated with a food supplement containing forskolin and rutin – an antioxidant and vasoactive ingredient [131] – showed that the food supplement resulted in a further decrease of the IOP, independent of the drug that the patients were taking [132,133]. Moreover, forskolin is also endowed with direct neuroprotective activities, mediated by the activation of paracrine signaling, due to the induction of the neurotrophin BDNF (brain derived neurotrophic factor) expression by astrocytes and vascular endothelial cells [134,135] and to the translocation of its receptor TrkB to the neuron cell membrane [136]. Preclinical data with a rat model system of hypertensive glaucoma obtained by clogging of the TM confirmed both the IOP control and the neuroprotective efficacy of oral forskolin [137]. Clinical data further corroborated the double efficacy of forskolin-based oral supplements. In a randomized, controlled clinical trial on 45 patients affected by POAG compensated by topical drugs, the 30 patients taking the food supplement with forskolin and rutin experienced during the 6 months of the trial a progressive decrease of the IOP and a concomitant increase of the PERG amplitude, suggesting an improvement of RGC survival [138]. Forskolin is also the basis of another association, with homotaurine – a neuroprotective compound used in Alzheimer [139] and Parkinson’s [140] disease – and carnosine, a wide spectrum antioxidant neuroprotector [141,142]. Preclinical evidence on a rat model of retinal ischemia/reperfusion obtained by sudden barometric increase of the IOP has shown a clear neuroprotective synergistic effect of the association of the three compounds intravitreally injected [143]. Improved RGC survival was reported, correlating with the induction of PI3K/Akt, the inhibition of GSK-3b and the reduction of calpain activity, all known to be linked to neurodegenerative events [143]. Results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial on 22 patients affected by POAG with IOP compensated by topical drugs, showed that patients taking the oral supplement containing the three components had a significant further decrease of their IOP, an improvement of PERG amplitude at 6, 9, and 12 months, and of foveal sensitivity at 12 months, whilst all the above values remained stable in untreated control patients [144]. Most recently, a new association of forskolin with homotaurine and spearmint extract – rich in polyphenols and rosmarinic acid with antinflammatory and anti-oxidative effects, likely preventing neuron degeneration [145] – has been tested in a mouse model of ON crush, simulating the sudden compression at the ONH during acute glaucoma. The oral supplementation of forskolin, homotaurine, spearmint extract, and vitamins of the B group resulted in a significant improvement of RGC survival, correlating with a preservation of the ERG photopic negative response, which depends on the RGC health status, and with a decrease of inflammatory cytokines and pro-apoptotic markers [146]. Similar results were also obtained in a mouse model in which RGC degeneration depends on progressive IOP elevation, obtained by intracameral injection of polyetylen-glycol, which clogs the TM and decreases AH outflow [147].

Vitamins have been suggested as potential neuroprotective agents, and a recent metanalysis found relevant associations with vitamins A and C [148]. Deficiency of vitamins of the B complex has been reported in patients with glaucoma [148,149], which specifically showed significant lower serum levels of vitamins B1 and B12 [150,151]. Insufficient amounts of vitamins B6, B9 and B12 may lead to increased levels of homocysteine [152,153], known to be toxic to RGC [154], and found in relevant amounts in the AH and plasma of POAG patients [155]. A recent meta-analysis showed a high prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia in patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma [156], which another study associated with decreased levels of vitamin B6, B9 and B12 [157]. Accordingly, increasing vitamin B9 intake appeared to lower the risk of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma probably by reducing homocysteine levels [158]. Vitamin C is an antioxidant, and an important factor involved in tissue repair [159]. Biochemical analyses have shown that the glycosaminoglycan content of TM in healthy subject is different from that of POAG patients, which contains less hyaluronic acid (HA) and more chondroitin sulfate [160]. Vitamin C stimulates the synthesis and secretion of HA in TM cells, more in those cells derived from a glaucomatous eye than from a normal eye, thus re-equilibrating the production of extracellular matrix (ECM) glycosaminoglycans [161]. Addition of vitamin C supplements was found to be associated in a dose-dependent way with decreased prevalence of glaucoma in a population sample in the United States [162]. In a large cross-sectional study on Afro-American women, a correlation has been described between higher consumption of food rich in vitamins A and C and carotenoids and a decreased incidence of glaucoma [163]. In a different epidemiologic evaluation, NTG patients were found to have lower blood levels of vitamin C and increased levels of uric acid [164]. Vitamin C has a role in maintaining lysosomal function and correct protein turnover in TM cells; therefore, an insufficient concentration of vitamin C in plasma and AH may alter the physiological function of TM cells, resulting in a decreased outflow capability and an increase of the IOP [165]. Vitamin E is a strong antioxidant [166]. Several studies on glaucoma patients have reported low levels of vitamin E in their blood [162,167] or AH [168]. A low intake of Vitamin A as retinol equivalents appears to be associated with an increased risk of POAG [150]. Vitamin D plays a role in the signaling pathways related to bone and mineral metabolism, cellular proliferation, immune modulation, and oxidative stress [169,170]. A high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is observed in patients with glaucoma, confirmed by low circulating amounts of vitamin D in these subjects [171,172]. Metabolomic analysis on plasma samples from 72 POAG patients compared to 72 healthy controls revealed alterations of vitamin D metabolic pathways correlating with vitamin D insufficiency in POAG patients [173]; moreover, the presence of specific vitamin D receptor polymorphisms were found to be relevant risk factors in the development of glaucoma [174]. Accordingly, other studies have reported low serum levels of vitamin D in POAG patients [175].

OCULAR SURFACE DYSFUNCTION(Dry Eye)

The most recent definition of the dry eye syndrome by “The Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society Dry Eye Workshop Report”, defines the key points and possible therapeutic targets of the disease. Dry eye is “a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface” leading to tear film instability in which “hyperosmolarity, ocular surface inflammation, and neurosensory abnormalities play etiological roles” [176]. The etiology of dry eye is complex, and no cure for it is available. Artificial tears provide a way to blunt signs and symptoms of the disease, but with limited efficacy, both in terms of intensity and duration. Therefore, there is an increasing interest in the use of nutritional supplements as a complementary approach for the prevention and management of the dry eye syndrome [177]. Many scientific reports have highlighted an association between incidence and severity of dry eye disease and nutritional deficiencies [178-183]. The identification and appropriate use of nutraceuticals able to work on dry eye may provide insights into dry eye pathogenesis and increase the efficacy of conventional therapies.

Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids

Among dietary supplements, there is a growing interest in the use of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) to prevent or alleviate signs and symptoms of dry eye [184,185]. PUFAs are involved in the synthesis of photoreceptor outer segment disks, and in ocular surface physiology; therefore, they are essential for proper visual development and retinal function [186]. PUFAs can be grouped into two main families: omega-3 and omega-6 [187]. The omega-3 include docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and alpha-linolenic acid (ALA), while omega-6 include linoleic acid (LA), gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) and arachidonic acid (AA). Multiple clinical trials looked at the effect of omega-3 and omega-6 supplements in the treatment of dry eye syndrome. Miljanović et al., evaluated the association between the dietary intake of different ratios of omega-3 and omega-6 and dry eye syndrome occurrence in a large cross sectional study on women. Results showed that women with a higher dietary intake of omega-3 had a lower prevalence of dry eye symptoms and that a high ratio of omega-6/omega-3 (>15:1) was associated with a greater prevalence (more than 2-folds) of dry eye syndrome [188]. A meta-analysis of 9 randomized controlled trials (collected between 2002 and 2011) on PUFAs dietary supplements reported an improvement of the burning sensation and reflex lacrimation in dry eye patients assuming PUFAs [189]. A similar meta-analysis of other 7 randomized controlled trials collected from 2007 to 2013 reported not only the improvement of the above symptoms, but also an improvement of signs like Schirmer Test and Tear Break Up Time [190].

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a chronic disease of the homonymous glands [191-193], leading to altered secretion of the tear film lipid layer, finally resulting in increased tear evaporation and tear osmolarity, a trigger for dry eye signs and symptoms [191-193]. One key factor of the potential benefits of systemic supplementation with PUFAs is the evidence that dietary fatty acids can be incorporated in lacrimal gland phospholipids [194-196]. Wojtowicz et al., explored the potential effect of dietary supplementation with omega-3 on lipid composition in a case-control trial, where treated patients received for 90 days fish oil, containing 450 mg of EPA, 300 mg of DHA, and 1000 mg of flaxseed oil (rich in ALA). At the end of the study, most of the patients (about 70%) became asymptomatic with an increment of tear secretion [197]. Another study recruiting a large sample of postmenopausal women, showed that high omega-3 consumption and moderate omega-6 consumption were protective against MGD [198]. Tear film hyperosmolarity is a focal event in dry eye syndrome [199]. In a double-blind, randomized, parallel trial, consumption of sea buckthorn oil (high in omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids) for 3 months attenuated the increase in tear film osmolarity during the cold season and positively affected symptoms in dry eye patients [200]. Furthermore, a moderate daily dose of long-chain omega-3 PUFAs given over three months reduced tear osmolarity and increased tear stability in subjects with dry-eye disease [201]. In a different clinical study on patients with contact lens associated dry eye, 6 months of oral treatment with evening primrose oil rich in the omega-6 GLA resulted in improvements in dryness symptoms at 3 and 6 months and in overall lens wearing comfort at 6 months [202]. Oleñik et al., evaluated efficacy and tolerability of a food supplement containing a combination of omega-3 and antioxidants (a mixture of DHA 1050 mg, EPA 127.5 mg, DPA 90 mg + vitamins C/E and GSH + trace elements) on dry eye related symptoms in patients under treatment with artificial tears [203]. After 12 weeks, treated patients showed a significant improvement of symptoms with a lesser need of using artificial tears and a better tolerance to contact lens wearing. Comparable outcomes were achieved with treatment administered for shorter periods of time [204] or with lower concentrations of omega-3 PUFAs [205]. In another recent study, dietary omega-3 fatty acids administration showed efficacy in alleviating computer work- related dry-eye symptoms, associated with altered tear evaporation rate (Figure 2) [206].

JPPR-3-2-314-g002

Figure 2. Eye dryness and ocular surface dysfuntion. The malfunctioning of one ore more components of the ocular surface functional unit may lead to pathologic alterations of the ocular surface eventually causing eye dryness, discomfort and pain (upper panel). Some food supplements have been shown to prevent and/or alleviate symptoms and signs of dry eye (bottom panel).

Chronic inflammatory processes associated to immunologic activation have a pivotal role in dry eye pathogenesis [207,208] and PUFAs have been shown to have significant anti-inflammatory activity [209], which might turn beneficial in avoiding the excessive damage caused by chronic inflammation. In a mouse dry eye model induced by scopolamine injection in a dry environment, treatment with topical ALA for 9 days resulted in a significant decrease of inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α, and a reduction of corneal fluorescein staining in comparison to untreated controls [210]. Barabino and colleagues investigated the efficacy and anti-inflammatory activity of oral supplements of systemic ω-6 (LA and GLA) given twice per day for 45 days, on chronic ocular inflammation in patients with dry eye. They observed an improvement in symptoms and ocular surface inflammation in the study group patients when compared to controls [211]. A recent prospective case-control study showed that patients receiving an oral combination of antioxidants and omega-3 PUFAs for 3 months displayed reduced tear levels of inflammatory mediators such as the interleukins: IL-1b, IL-6, and IL-10 [212]. Brignole-Baudouin et al., in a multicentre trial, demonstrated that supplementation with omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids can reduce the ectopic expression of the HLA-DR inflammatory marker and may help to improve dry eye symptoms [213]. Prostaglandins are well-known inflammatory mediators, playing a key role in the modulation of the inflammatory response in dry eye disease [214]. More specifically, tear levels of prostaglandin-E2 are known to be positively correlated with dry eye symptoms [215,216]. Black currant seed oil, rich in GLA and ALA, has been shown to modulate cell membrane lipid composition and eicosanoid production, finally reducing prostaglandin-E2 production [217]. Cermak et al. highlighted that in women with primary or secondary Sjögren’s syndrome (a systemic autoimmune inflammatory disease of the exocrine glands, including the lacrimal gland, thus resulting in a serious dry eye syndrome [218]), the intake of LA, and other specific PUFAs was significantly lower with respect to gender matched controls [219]. In another clinical trial involving 20 patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome, an oral mixture of omega-6 induced a significant increase in anti-inflammatory PGE-1 content in tears, improving the symptoms of ocular discomfort and the signs derived from corneal epithelial defects [220]. The drug cyclosporine, present in eye drops approved for the treatment of dry eye disease [221], prevents T-cell activation and production of inflammatory cytokines, therefore breaking the inflammatory cycle of autoimmune dry eye disease and increasing the production of tears and mucin-producing Goblet cells in the conjunctiva [222]. However, the use of cyclosporine is not free from side effects which depend on the dose used; therefore it is important to maximise its effects in order to use lower doses. To this purpose, the effects of topical cyclosporine on dry eye signs and symptoms has been evaluated either alone, or in association with a prescription-only medical food supplement containing omega-3 and omega-6 PUFAs acids. It has been reported that a proper balance of omega-3 and omega-6 essential fatty acids could indeed improve the efficacy of cyclosporine on tear break up time and patients’ symptoms [223]. PUFAs have also proven to be effective in dry eye syndrome further to autoimmune rosacea disease. In fact, in rosacea patients which develop dry eye, diet supplementation with omega-3 for 6 months ameliorated dry eye parameters such as tear breakup time and Schirmer score [224].

Vitamins D and A

A nutritional deficiency, often associated to dry eye, is the lack of vitamin D [177,178,180,182,183]. Patients with vitamin D deficiency have a higher risk to develop dry eye disease [225]. The correlation of Vitamin D levels and inadequate sunlight exposure with severity of dry eye syndrome was highlighted in a recent study on Korean adults, concluding that sufficient sunlight exposure or vitamin D supplementation may attenuate signs and symptoms of dry eye [183]. Furthermore, an interesting correlation has been shown between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the vitamin D receptor gene and the incidence of dry eye disease in the Chinese Han population [226]. Vitamin D deficiency is relatively frequent in patients with primary Sjögren syndrome and also in this case its serum levels correlate with the severity of dry eye parameters [182,227,228]. In a retrospective observational study, in which subjects were divided into 3 groups according to serum Vitamin D levels (sufficient, inadequate or deficient group), tear break-up time and tear secretion were lower in the vitamin D-deficient group compared to the sufficient group [229]. In a recent work Dikci et al. observed that vitamin D deficiency may cause conjunctival squamous metaplasia and loss of goblet cells on the ocular surface in the eyes of 36 patients with mild to severe dry eye [230]. Inflammatory reactions and oxidative damage are common findings in dry eye, and in fact a study run on 217 patients (397 eyes) either normal or with various severity of dry eye has shown a correlation between its severity and the amount of oxidative tissue damage and polymorphonuclear leucocytes infiltration [231]. Within this frame, Eksioglu et al. evaluated the antioxidant effects of active vitamin D against high-dose radioiodine therapy-associated oxidative damage of the lacrimal gland in Wistar albino rats. Radioiodine caused significant oxidative stress and inflammation in lacrimal glands and vitamin D could blunt these effects, thus showing anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and radio-protective effects [232]. As mentioned before, chronic inflammatory events further to immunologic activation have a pivotal role in dry eye pathogenesis, and vitamin D is known to have immunomodulatory properties [179]. Further research on experimental animal models has provided evidence about the antinflammatory and immunomodulatory roles of vitamin D on the ocular surface, particularly in the cornea [233,234], and clinical data confirmed that a low serum vitamin D level is associated with different pathological states, such as autoimmune diseases, lymphoma, or neuropathy [218]. Reins et al. highlighted that vitamin D modulates the expression of inflammatory cytokines and protects corneal epithelial barrier function [180,235,236]. Antigen presenting Langerhans cells resident in the ocular surface epithelia have a role in aqueous tear-deficient dry eye pathogenesis [237], and topical administration of vitamin D can suppress ocular surface inflammation via inhibition of the increased Langerhans cells migration into mouse corneas [234]. The activation of inflammatory ROS-NLRP3-IL1β signaling axis induced by hyperosmotic stress has been recognized as a key priming stage of epithelial inflammation in dry eye pathogenesis [238,239]. Vitamin D has shown the ability to inhibit this signaling axis in human corneal epithelial cells under hyperosmotic stress via the activation of a competitive antioxidant signaling cascade dependent on the activation of Nrf2, a transcription factor regulating the expression of genes coding for antioxidant proteins [240]. Shetty et al. investigated the correlation between levels of serum vitamin D and tear-inflammatory proteins. They found that decreased serum vitamin D was significantly associated with higher levels of inflammatory interleukin IL-17A/F, interferon-γ, monocyte chemotactic protein 1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, IL-4, IL-10, and decreased levels of antinflammatory IL-2 in tears of dry eye patients in comparison to healthy controls [241]. Altered tear fluid soluble factors with potential to modulate nociception exhibited a distinct association with the ocular surface discomfort status [242]. Vitamin D deficiency was found to be associated with neuralgia and chronic pain. In a case report it was observed that a vitamin D-deficient patient with corneal neuralgia had relief from burning sensation and pain by vitamin D supplementation, 1,000 IU/day, while topical therapies and lubricants were not effective [243]. It is thus probable that low vitamin D could contribute to the severity of ocular surface symptoms either by directly influencing nociceptive mechanisms or by affecting the presence of inflammatory cytokines [235,236,241,242]. Khamar et al., reported the dysregulation of tear fluid nociception-associated factors, corneal dendritic cell density, and vitamin D levels in dry eye patients. The use of lubricants (artificial tears or biological tear substitutes) is one of the strategies to manage dry eye symptoms [244,245], since tear film instability can lead to ocular surface damage [246]. Hwang et al., showed that Vitamin D enhanced the efficacy of topical carbomer- based lipid-containing artificial tears and Hyaluronic Acid (HA) in patients with dry eye and it may be a useful adjuvant therapy for patients with dry eye syndrome refractory to topical lubricants [247].

Vitamin A deficiency has also been suggested to be a contributory factor in the development of dry eye disease [248-250]. Vitamin A is essential for multiple functions in mammals including vision [251]; in fact it is a precursor in the formation of the rod photopigment rhodopsin [252]. An adequate consumption of vitamin A avoids night blindness, exophthalmia [253,254] and its deficiency is the main cause for blindness among children in third world Countries [255]. Apoptotic death of corneal epithelial cells is part of the pathological process of dry eye [256,257]. Vitamin A has been found to be able to prevent this event in a mice model of dry eye induced by benzalkonium chloride by decreasing the ratio between the pro-apoptotic gene Bax and the anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-2 [258]. In a recent clinical study on dry eye patients, tear ferning grades and tear osmolarity values were improved after vitamin A supplementation at a daily dose of 1,500 mg for 3 days [259].

lactoferrin

Lactoferrin deficiency in tears is a frequent finding in dry eye disease, especially in the elderlies [260]. Lactoferrin is a glycoprotein with several functions, including anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial, as well as promotion of cell growth, antiangiogenic and antitumoral [261]. Lactoferrin represents around 25% of tear proteins, with an average concentration in healthy subjects of 1.42 mg/ mL [262]. Its concentration decreases with prolonged closure of the eyelids, as it happens during sleep [263]. Lactoferrin concentration is also decreasing with age [264], and the decrease of its concentration in tear fluid correlates with the severity of dry eye disease [265-268]. Shimmura et al. reported a protective effect of lactoferrin against oxidative cellular damage in cultured corneal epithelial cells [269]. Accordingly, Fujihara et al. showed that lactoferrin eye drops may suppress the loss of corneal epithelial integrity produced in rabbits’ eyes by an ocular speculum blocking blinking [270]. Patients affected by Sjogren’s syndrome with dry eye symptoms and receiving 270 mg/day oral lactoferrin supplementation, showed improvements of both symptoms and tear film stability. This improvement reverted on cessation of treatment [271]. Moreover, oral lactoferrin administration preserves lacrimal gland function in aged mice by attenuating oxidative damage and suppressing subsequent gland inflammation [272]. Small incisions during cataract surgery may induce post-surgical dry eye, in which case oral lactoferrin may improve such condition [273]. Higuchi et al. showed the efficacy of Selenium-containing lactoferrin eye drops in a tobacco smoke exposure rat dry eye model and a short- term rabbit dry eye model of blinking block [274]. Rusciano et al. described the potential use of lactobionic acid, a functional mimetic of lactoferrin, in the management of age-related dry eye [260], and its efficacy is supported by the results of a recent study showing that lactobionic acid —with or without hyaluronic acid—favored wound healing both in vitro and in vivo, through an improvement of re- epithelization and the reduction of inflammatory markers [275].

Amino Acids

Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins and are essential for the construction and the functioning of the entire organism [276,277]. Amino acids are naturally present in human tears and their imbalance or deficiency could contribute to the development of the pathologies affecting the ocular surface [278]. Two different studies have reported that the concentration of amino acids is different in human tears and in serum [279,280] and that tear concentration changes in patients affected by ocular dryness [280,281]. As mentioned before, we know that chronic inflammatory events have a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of dry eye [207,208], and several studies have indicated that amino acids are involved in antinflammatory processes [282-284]. Dietary supplementation of arginine can enhance wound healing, regulate endocrine activity and potentiate immunity [285]. Glutamine may improve immunocompetence, thus reducing the susceptibility to infections and favoring the recovery of the seriously ill, therefore minimizing their hospital stay [286-292]. Branched chain amino acids (BCAAs), including leucine, isoleucine, and valine, play critical roles in the regulation of energy homeostasis, nutrition metabolism, gut health, immunity and disease in humans and animals [293]. BCAAs have shown anti-inflammatory and anti-genotoxic activity in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages [294]. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, Dunn- Lewis et al. evaluated the antinflammatory properties and the capacity of improving physical performance of a multi-nutrient supplement containing leucine, isoleucine, valine, taurine plus anti-inflammatory plant extracts, and B vitamins. They reported that the multi-nutrient supplement was effective in improving the inflammatory status in both men and women, ameliorating the markers of pain, joints’ pain, strength, and power in men only, and both anxiety and balance (a risk factor for hip fracture) in women [295]. Refractive surgery may alter ocular surface homeostasis and Meibomian gland function, thus leading to the development of dry eye signs and symptoms [296-299]. Two different studies reported that oral administration of an amino acids mixture promotes the recovery and maintenance of corneal stroma health after refractive surgery [300,301]. In the first, Vinciguerra et al., demonstrated that oral supplementation of amino acids improved the healing rate of patients subjected to photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and had shown re-epithelization defects, by favoring keratocyte growth and repopulation of the corneal stroma [300]. In the second study, Torres Munoz et al. reported that oral supplementation with a mixture of 13 different amino acids favored an active healing process and the remodelling of the stroma in patients operated of cataract surgery, by inducing growth and migration of stromal cells [301]. The identical oral supplement with 13 amino acids, used in the previous study, was also used by Roszkowska (Roszkowska, 2006, personal communication). The analyses of the corneal epithelium removed from patients during the procedure of PRK showed that amino acid treatment resulted in decreased EGF expression, suggesting a low proliferation rate of epithelial cells and keratocytes (hence, a decreased risk of scar formation); an increased expression of TGFβ, correlating again with decreased keratocyte proliferation and increased motility of epithelial cells (hence, faster re-epithelization); and a significant increase in the expression of polyamines, suggesting regulated differentiation and proliferation. Meduri et al. gave to patients undergoing PRK a cysteine oral supplement at a daily dose of 200 mg, then reporting shorter times for re-epithelization in comparison with eyes of untreated controls [302]. Observations at the confocal microscopy of the cornea of dry eye patients treated with eye drops containing HA and amino acids showed less hyper- reflecting cells in the epithelial layers (a sign of metabolic damage) in comparison to those receiving HA alone; nerve tortuosity in the subepithelial layer was also improving faster and better in the presence of topic amino acids [303]. The administration as eye drops of the amino acid taurine changed the tear proteome of contact lens wearers and dry eye patients shifting it towards the profile of healthy control subjects [304]. Taurine has then been included in a contact lens cleaning solution because of the regenerative effect on the tear film of contact lens wearers [305]. Taurine in combination with sodium hyaluronate has shown antioxidant and osmoprotective activity in in vitro and in vivo models of dry eye [306]. In albino rabbits, taurine effectively protected ocular surface tissues from chemical damage induced by hypochlorous acid, and arrested the progression of tissue damage (as measured by the level of lactate dehydrogenase activity) that had already been initiated by hypochlorous acid [307]. A mixture of taurine, alpha-ketoglutarate, pyruvate and pantothenate prevented corneal damage induced by 2-chloroethyl-ethyl sulfide [308]. Taurine could protect corneal stroma and epithelium from lactic acidosis caused by contact lens wearing [309], because of its acid buffering ability against lactic acidosis [310].

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a multifactorial microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus caused by damage to the blood vessels of the retina, the light-sensitive tissue located at the back of the eye. DR has been included by the World Health Organization in the priority list of eye diseases which can be partly prevented, but not cured yet. In its early stages, DR may cause only mild vision problems but, over time, persistent high blood sugar levels can lead to the obstruction of the tiny blood vessels that nourish the retina, cutting off its blood supply. As a result, the eye reacts by triggering an abnormal growth of new retinal vessels, causing micro-hemorrhages and edemas in the macular region, thus leading to severe visual impairment and eventually blindness. These intra-retinal microvascular changes are used to classify DR into non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). NPDR is characterized by a complex array of vasodegenerative lesions within the retinal microvascular bed, such as thickening of capillary basement membranes (BMs), loss of pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells, capillary occlusion and microaneurysms [311]. PDR is caused by an abnormal growth of new blood vessels (retinal neovascularization) in response to inflammation and/or ischemic damage and hypoxia, eventually giving rise to vitreous hemorrhages and tractional retinal detachment. A direct consequence of inner blood–retinal barrier (iBRB) breakdown is the development of macular edema. Retinal neovascularization and macular edema are the result of increasing secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and pro-angiogenic growth factors, among which predominates the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [312]. The retina is a highly metabolic active tissue, and high-glucose concentrations are particularly detrimental to its functioning. As reported by Sayin and collegues, chronic hyperglycemia is the main risk factor for DR because of its toxic effects on pericytes, to which vascular endothelial dysfunction may follow, also involving the retina [313]. A chronic hyperglycemic status will activate alternative energetic and metabolic pathways besides glycolysis, generating a toxic oxidative stress leading pericytes to apoptotic death, and causing vascular degeneration in the retina [314-316]. The physiopathology of DR could be represented by a pyramidal scheme in which the hyperglycemic state is at the bottom of the pyramid, immediately topped by oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, apoptosis, mytochondrial alterations, leading to endothelial dysfunction and finally to retinal damage and neurodegeneration [317-319]. Under normal conditions, a certain amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can be tolerated, because they derive from the metabolic processes necessary to sustain cellular proliferation, differentiation and their physiological activities; however, if the production of free radicals overwhelms the capacity of the antioxidant defenses, the normal cellular metabolism will be disrupted by oxidative stress, degrading nucleic acids, proteins and enzymes, eventually leading to organ and tissue pathologies, such as DR [320]. Kowluru et al. [321] and Kaštelan et al. [322] have demonstrated that oxidative stress not only is involved in the physiopathology of DR, but also hinders its remission when glycemic values return within the normal interval. Typically, metabolic pathways altered in DR (polyol, hexosamine and protein kinase C pathways) lead to ROS imbalance, or result from oxidative stress, giving rise to advanced glycation end products (AGE). It is well known that visual impairment is already manifest in the early stages of DR, but currently no efficient treatment has been found to arrest its progression. Treatments have been developed for the late stages, and PDR can be treated or at least contained by pan-retinal laser photocoagulation, vitreoretinal surgery, or intravitreal injections of anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic drugs, even though retinal and visual function integrity cannot be preserved. Therefore, effective treatments for all stages of DR are needed to help in preventing or delaying the development and progression of this diabetes-induced visual dysfunction [323]. Most recently [324], it has been suggested to implement the use of nutraceuticals, which may act upstream the disease, reducing neuronal stress and favoring neuroprotection, in order to slow down its progression. Considering that antioxidants can act as free radical scavengers providing protection against oxidative stress, a good strategy could be to use nutrients with antioxidant and/ or anti-inflammatory activity and a good safety profile. In fact, in the last years the optimization of the glycemic and lipidemic control by a correct dietetic regimen has been shown to be of great relevance in controlling diabetes progression and its complications [325,326]. Thanks to their low toxicity in comparison to drugs, the use of food- derived bioactive molecules can be considered a good strategy to contrast the risk factors contributing to DR. In this paragraph, we will sum up the effects of nutritional strategies used as adjuvant therapies, on the different pathways involved in the physiopathology of DR (Figure 3).

JPPR-3-2-314-g003

Figure 3. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic retinopathy is a frequent complication of diabetes, and mainly results from the oxidative stress and the inflammatory events triggered by the continuous hyperglycemic state of the organism and the retinal vasculature. Initially, local injuries are visible (NPDR), eventually leading to the proliferation of new vessels in the macular area (PDR) and the loss of sight (upper panel). The food supplements that have been shown some efficacy in slowing down the progression of DR have antioxidant, antinflammatory and vasoprotective activities (bottom panel).

Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs)

A healthy diet widely known and appreciated is the Mediterranean diet, rich in vegetables, fish and extra virgin olive oil containing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory factors. Among these, we can find phenolic antioxidants; gamma- and delta-tocopherols and tocotrienols; long chain PUFAs: omega-6 and mostly omega-3, from which DHA and EPA are derived; several carotenoids of which lycopene may be the most active; isothiocyanates from cruciferous vegetables; sulfur compounds from allium vegetables; terpenoids. Interestingly, most of these health-promoting nutrients function, at least in part, by raising the nuclear factor Nrf2 (nuclear erythroid factor 2-related factor 2), responsible for the transcription of over 500 genes in the human genome, most of which have cytoprotective functions [327]. The role of PUFAs in the retina has been intensely studied for their involvement in regulating vascular function and angiogenesis. Tikhonenko et al. have demonstrated, by transcriptomic analysis in diabetic rats, that diabetes induced a downregulation of retinal enzymes known as elongases, necessary to metabolize PUFAs. This event resulted in a decreased content of retinal DHA, as well as decreased incorporation of very long-chain poly unsaturated fatty acids, particularly 32:6n3, into retinal phosphatidylcholine. This decrease in n3 PUFAs was coupled with the presence of an inflammatory status in diabetic retina, reflected by an increase in gene expression of the proinflammatory markers IL6, VEGF, and ICAM-1 [328]. Similar results were obtained by a lipidomic analysis showing that the omega-3 long-chain poly unsaturated fatty acids metabolites derived from the activity of cyclooxygenases and lipoxygenases, inhibit inflammation and angiogenesis [329]. Connor and colleagues showed that in mouse models of oxygen-induced retinopathy the dietary intake of omega-3- and omega-6 PUFAs decreased the avascular area of the retina and increased vessel regrowth after injury, thereby reducing the hypoxia- induced pathological neovascularization. Moreover, while the intake of omega-6 PUFAs increased the microglial production of the pro- inflammatory and pro-angiogenic cytokine TNF-α, such increase was prevented by the intake of omega-3 PUFAs, which are the precursors of the mediators neuroprotectin-D1, resolvin-D1 and resolvin-E1, known to be potent inhibitors of neovascularization [330]. This anti- angiogenic effect induced by omega-3 PUFAs on retinopathy in the mouse eye is comparable in magnitude to treatment with an inhibitor of VEGF [331]. Therefore, increased dietary intake of omega-3 PUFAs could be a useful addition to anti-VEGF therapy to control pathological retinal angiogenesis. Another important function of omega-3 PUFAs is correlated with the attenuation of apoptotic events induced by mytochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum oxidative stress by a reduction of caspase-3 activity in adipocytes via AMPK activation, and increased production of resolvins, a family of neuroprotector molecules derived from EPA and DHA [332]. Overall, omega-3 fatty acids act on different pathophysiological pathways of DR such as inflammation, oxidative stress and neoangiogenesis, showing a remarkable potential in the prevention of retinal disease progression.

Polyphenols

Polyphenols belong to a family of natural compounds characterized by one or more hydroxyl groups (OH) linked to a benzene ring. These natural substances are present in a variety of foods including grapes, berries, dark chocolate, coffee and tea to mention a few, and are characterized by strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory power, so that they are widely used in the prevention and/or treatment of different pathologies [316,324]. Several studies have shown that dietary polyphenols exert a protective effect against progression of age-related ocular abnormalities such as cataract, glaucoma, DR and macular degeneration [333]. Based on their structure, polyphenols are classified into non-flavonoid and flavonoid compounds. Flavonoids consist of two phenolic rings linked to a pyranosic ring and are highly represented in fruits, vegetables, roots, and wine.

Anthocyanins (anthos = flower and kyanos = blue) are a subgroup of flavonoids, water-soluble pigments very common in the plant kingdom and in many typical foods of the Mediterranean diet such as blueberries, aubergines, peaches, oranges, figs, cherries and olives. Consumption of foods rich in anthocyanins has been associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular diseases. As reported by Fang and colleagues [334] anthocyanins can be absorbed as such through the gastrointestinal wall, where they undergo an extensive first- pass metabolism and the metabolites so formed enter the systemic circulation. In fact, anthocyanin metabolites were detected in the blood stream in much higher concentrations than their parent compounds. Several studies reported that dietary intake of anthocyanins may confer benefits in different brain functions, including vision. For example, in blueberry-fed pigs, which are a suitable model to mimic human digestive absorption, anthocyanins were detected in all examined tissues, including brain and eyes, thus indicating that anthocyanins can accumulate also in tissues beyond the blood-brain barrier [335]. Other studies have shown the role of anthocyanins as antioxidants in the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) where they can neutralize the ROS formed by the metabolic activity of photoreceptors thus playing a role in neuroprotection as also shown by their protective effect in a model system of rat retinal neurons damaged by N-methyl- N-nitrosourea [336]. Song and colleagues [337] addressed the effects of blueberry anthocyanins on retinas of diabetic rats subjected to oxidative stress and inflammation, demonstrating their antioxidant potency resulting in increased expression of HO-1 and nuclear localization of the transcription factor Nrf2 (which controls the expression of antioxidant response element-dependent genes) finally resulting in increased expression of GSH and glutathione peroxidase, and reduced levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and ROS. Moreover, cyanidins and the orthodihydroxy group of anthocyanins can inhibit lipid peroxidation by chelation of metal ions [338].

Another flavonoid with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties in the retina is quercetin. It has been reported that in mouse retinal photoreceptor cells, quercetin inactivated the pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB through inhibition of both mitogen- activated protein kinases (MAPK) and Akt, reducing in this way VEGF-induced inflammation [339]. Kumar et al. [340] demonstrated the retinal neuroprotective effects of quercetin. In streptozotocin- induced diabetic rats, quercetin blunted inflammation and glyosis decreasing the retinal expression level of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and NF-κB in specific retinal layers, such as the nerve fiber layer, the inner plexiform layer, and the inner nuclear layer. The effect of quercetin on NF-κB was also associated with decreased levels of TNFα and IL-1β. Resveratrol (3,5,4’-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene) is a non-flavonoid polyphenol, and a phytoalexin found in red wine and grape skin. Many studies demonstrated its antioxidative and anti- inflammatory properties, so that it has been often used to mitigate those eye diseases with a prevalence of oxidative stress, such as DR. In vitro studies have shown that resveratrol prevents ROS-induced apoptosis in retinal capillary endothelial cells stressed by high glucose, through the activation of the AMPK/Sirt1/PGC-1α pathway [341]. Other in vitro studies on the human pigmented epithelium ARPE-19 cell line put under chemically mimicked hypoxia by cobalt chloride have demonstrated that resveratrol could reduce oxidative stress and the production of pro-angiogenic and pro-fibrotic factors [342]. In the same model system, hower subjected to high glucose oxidative stress, resveratrol inhibited the stimulated secretion of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8, and prevented the downregulation of gap junction associated connexin 43 while inducing the activation of TGFβ, PKCβ, and COX-2 [343]. In vivo studies by Chen and colleagues with streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats, have revealed the effects of paraoxonase-1 (PON1) as an intermediary in the protective effects exerted by resveratrol. In fact, oral resveratrol treatment – via induction of PON1 in the retina – blunted the increased retinal vascular permeability, pro-apoptotic caspase-3 activity, retinal damage, as well as clearly showed an inhibitory effect on inflammatory markers, such as IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα, VEGF, IFN-γ and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Therefore, these data suggest that PON1 induction by resveratrol in the retina may be a promising therapeutic strategy to prevent the progression of diabetes-related retinopathy [344]. Curcumin (1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)- 1,6-heptadiene-3,5-dione) is another non-flavonoid polyphenol extracted from the root of Curcuma longa and exhibits a wide range of pharmacological properties, which include antioxidant, anti- inflammatory, antimutagenic, antimicrobial and anticancer activities. For its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, curcumin is exploited as oral supplementation therapy for retinal degenerative diseases, including DR [345]. The World Health Organization stated that an acceptable daily intake of curcumin can be up to 3mg/kg as a food additive [346]. However, this “golden spice” despite a good efficacy has a limited bioavailability due to poor absorption and rapid metabolism and elimination. Clinical trials have shown that curcumin is safe in humans and well tolerated up to doses of 12g/day [347]. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of curcumin (10 µM) have been tested on human retinal pigmented epithelial cells, human retinal endothelial cells and human retinal pericytes exposed to oxidative stress with high glucose. Results demonstrated a significant decrease of ROS concentration in retinal pigmented epithelial cells and of TNF-α release in retinal endothelial cells, while protecting retinal pericytes from high-glucose damage [348-349]. Human retinal endothelial cells exposed to high glucose and treated with curcumin (10 µM) showed an increase of HO-1 expression [350], a stress response protein that is highly inducible under various conditions, such as oxidative or heat stress. This observation suggests that curcumin may have both a direct and indirect antioxidant activity, due to the activation of Nrf2. Once activated, Nrf2 translocates into the nucleus and promotes the transcription of genes that encode antioxidant enzymes including HO-1 [351,352]. In vivo studies have been done in rats with STZ-induced diabetes and treated with curcumin given by different routes. Intraperitoneal injections of curcumin (80mg/ kg, once a day), prevented the retinal increase of malondialdehyde (MDA: a marker of oxidative stress) and the decrease of antioxidant GSH levels [353]. In the same model, Gupta et al. [354] have shown that oral curcumin (1 gr/Kg) showed hypoglycemic activity, decreased significantly the superoxide dismutase and catalase activities and prevented the increase of the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and VEGF in diabetic retinae. Moreover, they observed increased antioxidant levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and GSH and a lesser increase of retinal nitrotyrosine, a marker of oxidative protein damage, and of 8-hydroxy-20-deoxyguanosine, a marker of oxidative DNA damage [355].

Carotenoids

Carotenoids are naturally occurring pigments found in fruits and vegetables, but also in plants, algae, and photosynthetic bacteria. Carotenoids can be divided into two main classes: carotenes (precursors of vitamin A) and xanthophylls (non precursors  of vitamin A). Carotenes are non-polar molecules, containing only carbon and hydrogen atoms, while xanthophylls are polar carotenoids, containing at least one oxygen atom [356]. Several studies demonstrated the beneficial power of carotenoids on human health and more specifically on eye health, exerting primarily antioxidant effects against AMD, age-related cataract (ARC), uveitis and DR [357]. Humans cannot synthesize carotenoids which must be supplemented by foods in order to be distributed to various tissues, especially to the retina. Lutein and zeaxanthin are non-provitamin A carotenoids from the xanthophyll family. These carotenoids are characterized by OH groups on each end. Their amphipathic character allows them to be inserted into the lipid bilayer of cell membranes and in the outer monolayer of lipoproteins. These xanthophylls have been found in the human retina, particularly in the macular region [358]. The highest concentration is found in the fovea, and in primates they are responsible for the characteristic central yellow coloration known as the macula lutea. The fovea contains approximately 13ng/ mm2 of carotenoids, compared with approximately 0.05ng/mm2 in the peripheral retina [359]. The main mechanism by which lutein and zeaxanthin are involved in the prevention of retinal diseases appears to be due to their local antioxidant activity and their capacity to filter the blue light, responsible of photo-oxidative damage [360]. Elimination of lutein from the diet of experimental animals resulted in early degenerative signs in the retina, and patients with an acquired condition of macular pigment loss (Macular Telangiectasia) showed a serious visual handicap, highlighting the importance of macular pigment. Accordingly, a recent clinical study reported that thanks to lutein capacity of filtering short-wavelenght light, its administration to patients with NPDR led to some improvement in glare sensitivity [361]. Another study on diabetic rats treated with zeaxanthin has shown its ability to bring the retinal concentration levels of VEGF and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1: related to the inflammatory state of the tissue) to values comparable to healthy controls. Moreover, zeaxanthin supplementation prevented diabetes-associated retinal damage by decreasing nitrotyrosine levels, DNA oxidative damage, lipid peroxidation and the decrease of retinal SOD [362]. Similarly, lutein administration to diabetic mice resulted to prevent retinal oxidative stress and restored normal retinal ROS levels [363]. Hu et al. addressed the potential benefits of supplementation with lutein and zeaxanthin in type 2 diabetic patients with diagnosed NPDR [364]. In this study, plasma concentration of these carotenoids was substantially lower in the diabetic group than in normal subjects at baseline. After 3 months treated patients presented higher plasma concentrations in comparison to untreated controls, correlating with reduction of the macular edema and improvement of visual acuity. Overall, these data indicate that lutein and zeaxanthin are main actors on the photo-oxidative stage, by quenching oxygen singlets, scavenging free radicals and protecting retinal cells from oxidative damage. Their dietary intake may be used to ameliorate or even to reverse vision loss in DR patients. Astaxanthin is a third member of the xanthophyll family, a ketocarotenoid generated by the oxidation of β-carotene, and is a common pigment in algae, fishes, and birds. One of the most important properties of astaxanthin is a potent antioxidant activity, almost 10 times higher than other known compounds such as polyphenols or β-carotene [365]. Because of this property, astaxanthin has been studied, mainly in animal and cell models, for its possible role in the treatment of chronic diseases involving oxidative stress, such as in diabetes and its complications. Yeh et al. [366] addressed the effect of orally administered astaxanthin on STZ-induced diabetic rats. Ocular tissues from astaxanthin and lutein treated rats showed a significant reduction of oxidative stress and inflammatory mediators depending on NF-κB transcription activity, and increased levels of antioxidant enzymes, thus preserving retinal architecture and function. Zhou and colleagues further demonstrated that astaxanthin can regulate the glycemic state and reduce insulin resistance, and can also exert an anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic effect by decreasing the expression of NF-κβ and TNF-α, thus inhibiting the expression of proinflammatory molecules such as ICAM-1, the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and VEGF [367]. In conclusion, several studies indicate that astaxanthin, zeaxanthin and lutein may blunt the generation of oxidation products in the retina, so that their oral uptake could be a good strategy to control the development of DR by reducing the oxidative damage to DNA, proteins, and lipids.

Vitamin c

Vitamin C is a water-soluble vitamin that exists in two main forms, ascorbic and dehydroascorbic acid. It is an important nutraceutical used as a support to therapy to treat oxidative-stress-induced diseases. Vitamin C scavenges ROS such as superoxide and peroxynitrite in plasma and cells (thus avoiding damage to proteins, lipids and DNA), prevents occludin dephosphorylation and the loosening of tight junctions. Several studies have reported that serum vitamin C levels were lower in diabetic patients in comparison to healthy subjects [368], and these levels were much lower in diabetic patients with DR [369]. The vitreous level of vitamin C is responsible for the regulation of oxygen tension and oxidative stress in the eye, which are implicated in retinal ischemia and the development of PDR [370]. Duarte et al. have demonstrated that in healthy individuals the concentration of vitamin C in vitreous humor is remarkably higher as compared to that in serum [371]. In patients with PDR, the vitreous level of vitamin C was decreased up to tenfold compared to healthy controls and was associated with the degree of macular ischemia, suggesting that vitreous vitamin C depletion may contribute to macular ischemia in PDR patients [370]. Ascorbic acid (AsA) has anti-inflammatory, immunostimulant, and antibacterial properties, and is used as adjuvant therapy in many inflammatory disorders [372]. In a double- blind cross-over trial [373], 8 diabetic patients were treated with AsA tablets showing that the supplementation of 1000 mg AsA/day for 2 weeks reduced the activity of the enzyme aldose reductase thus inhibiting the polyol pathway, which is activated in DR. Diabetic hyperglycemia triggers apoptosis of vascular pericytes thus impairing vascular regulation and weakening vessels, especially in brain and retina. May et al. demonstrated that vitamin C prevented high glucose- induced perycytes apoptosis, that was largely due to the activation of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) [374]. AsA may also have a role in angiogenesis. A recent study conducted on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) has shown that AsA prevented the increase of endothelial barrier permeability induced by VEGF. This effect may contribute to reduce the macular edema in DR [375].

Alpha-lipoic Acid

Alpha-Lipoic Acid (1,2 dithiolane-3-pentanoic acid) (aLA), also known as thioctic acid, is a natural thiol antioxidant. After oral supplementation, it is quickly transported to intracellular compartments and reduced by enzymes to dihydrolipoic acid. This reduced form has many biochemical functions. It acts as biological antioxidant, metal chelator, and regenerates by reducing their oxidized forms other antioxidant agents such as vitamin C, E and GSH. It also functions as modulator of the signaling transduction of pathways involving insulin or NF-kB [376]. aLA plays an essential role in mitochondrial bioenergetic reactions, which makes it useful in managing diabetic vascular complications such as retinopathy and peripheral neuropathy. In an in vivo study [377], the mitochondrial functional integrity, biogenesis and DNA copy number were analyzed in the retina of STZ-diabetic rats. Animals under good glycemic control and fed with aLA have shown a lesser dysregulation of retinal mitochondrial biogenesis as measured by citrase synthase (a marker of mitochondria functional integrity) and the presence of fewer acellular capillaries (a marker of DR). In another experimental study [378], Wistar rats were treated with aLA (60 mg/kg bodyweight) i.p. daily for 30 weeks. Results demonstrated that aLA treatment reduced oxidative stress, NF-kB activation and angiopoietin-2 expression, and reduced the amount of VEGF in the diabetic retina by 43%. In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study, 32 patients with preretinopathic diabetes were treated with aLA (400 mg/daily) in combination with other antioxidants (genistein and vitamins). Oxidative stress levels in plasma and changes in the full field ERG were evaluated. Results revealed that the oral treatment with antioxidants in preretinopathic diabetes subjects may have a protective effect on retinal cells, as detected by ERG analyses observed after 30 days of treatment [379]. In conclusion, several studies show that nutritional supplementation of natural molecules, as discussed above, protects neuronal and vascular cells from inflammatory damage and mitochondrial degeneration, thus slowing down DR progression and helping diabetic patients to spare their vision for longer times [380].

AGE-RELATED-MACULAR DEGENERATION

AMD is a progressive degenerative disease of the retina principally affecting the macula, a highly specialized region of the central retina responsible for fine and colour vision. It is currently considered the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness among patients over 60 years [381]. AMD can occur in two distinct forms: the most frequent (roughly 90% of the cases) is the dry (atrophic, non- exudative) form, characterized by diffuse insoluble debris (known as drusen) causing the death of RPE cells and photoreceptors [381]; the wet (neovascular, exudative) form is less frequent (roughly 10% of the cases) but still responsible of the majority of blindness cases, and is characterized by the development of abnormal new vessels inside the macular region (choroidal neovascularisation) [382]. Oxidative stress and inflammation along with genetic risk factors are all involved in AMD pathogenesis [383]. An important and characteristic clinical hallmark of AMD is the presence of drusen – small yellow or whitish accumulations of extracellular debris (made of proteins and lipids) located between the basal lamina of the RPE and the inner collagenous layer of Bruch’s membrane [382,384]. In particular, these protein/ lipid deposits are associated with an inefficient metabolism of RPE cells, which cannot get rid of catabolic products which then tend to accumulate in the extracellular spaces giving rise to drusen bodies [385]. Another early molecular event of AMD is the accumulation within RPE cells of lipofuscin, a remnant of the recycling of photoreceptor outer segments, that contributes to RPE degeneration [386]. Oxidative stress is a leading mechanism in the generation and progression of AMD, therefore antioxidant self-defense mechanisms are crucial for the mainteinance of retinal health. Two main targets of oxidative stress in RPE cells are the elements involved in autophagy and the transcription factor Nrf2. Dysregulation of both autophagy and the induction of antioxidant enzymes regulated by Nrf2 may trigger the cascade of events finally leading to lipofuscin and drusen generation, and start the inflammatory process causing AMD [387]. Inflammation processes thus induced occur through recruitment of macrophages and microglia, and complement activation [388]. Allelic variations of genes coding for complement factors, beside those participating in lipid metabolism or angiogenesis, constitute risk factors for AMD development [389]. Other risk factors include age, genetic predisposition, exposure to light, race, smoking habit, altered body/mass index, and diet [390-392]. Currently, the only therapy approved for the treatment of the dangerous wet form of AMD involves the inhibition of the pro-angiogenic factor VEGF in the retina. However, the search for more effective treatments of dry AMD is actively ongoing (Figure 4) [387].

JPPR-3-2-314-g004

Figure 4. Age related macular degeneration. Oxidative stress and inflammation further to ageing, a wrong lifestyle and hyper reactivity of the natural immunity (mainly the complement system) may lead to the accumulation of catabolic debris (drusen) between the RPE and the Bruch’s membrane (dry or atrophic MD), and eventually to the rupture of the Bruch’s membrane and the invasion of new blood vessels into the macular area (wet or neovascular MD) (upper panel). Food supplements that may be useful to blunt these events have antioxidant, antinflammatory, antiapoptotic and antiangiogenic effects (bottom panel).

Food Supplements

In recent years, epidemiological and clinical studies have suggested the importance of nutrients and food supplements to prevent or slow down the progression of AMD in the elderly. In particular, since free radicals and ROS are known to be the principal factors behind this pathology, most of the nutrients studied have antioxidant and free radical scavenger characteristics [382,393]. They belong to several classes: polyphenols (anthocyanins, tannic acid, quercetin, curcumin, EGCG, resveratrol and herb rosemary), carotenoids (lutein, zeaxanthin, and β-carotene), vitamins (A, C, D and E) and minerals (zinc, selenium and copper). Other molecules with relevant antiaging and antioxidant properties used for AMD are aLA, omega-3 fatty acids and Lactobacillus paracasei KW3110 [382,394-396]. The first important trial evaluating food supplements for AMD prevention has been the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) started in 1992. Results have shown that a formulation with vitamin C (500 mg), vitamin E (400 IU), β-carotene (15 mg) and zinc (zinc oxide 80 mg and cupric oxide 2 mg) showed a 25% risk reduction of the progression to advanced AMD over 5 years in patients with intermediate or advanced AMD [397]. A second trial, designated AREDS2, conducted between 2006 and 2012, was carried out to explore the added benefits of lutein, zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids to the AREDS1 diet [398]. This study provided an opportunity to further refine the original AREDS formulation by eliminating ß-carotene (because of increasing risk of lung cancer in smokers) and lowering the dose of zinc (because of the potential health risks of taking large quantities of zinc). AREDS2 found that lutein and zeaxanthin reduced the risk of developing advanced AMD by a further 10 per cent. For participants who had a poor dietary intake of lutein and zeaxanthin a further decrease of 20% of the risk of progression to advanced AMD was observed; omega-3 fatty acids did not appear to further improve the efficacy of the AREDS1 diet, and the reduced amount of zinc conserved the same effects of the original higher amount [398,399].

Polyphenols

Anthocyanins (a subgroup of flavonoids, with cyanidin and delphinidin among the most common) are red–purple pigments found in plants [400]. Berries, such as blueberry, blackcurrant, strawberry, and wolfberry (better known as ‘goji berry’), are all rich in anthocyanins [401]. They have shown favorable effects on AMD for their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, as demonstrated by both in vitro and in vivo models. Anthocyanins such as cyanidin 3-glucoside (C3G) promote regeneration and new synthesis of rhodopsin (the photosensible pigment of rod photoreceptor cells) and protect the retina from overexposure to visible and UV light [402-404]. A clinical study on 72 post-menopausal women showed that combining anthocyanin supplements with lutein and zeaxanthin did not influence their uptake in serum and macular pigment, so that an additive protection effect could be expected [405]. Tannic acid (a tannin derivative) contained in the polyphenolic extract of some plants, has been shown to protect human RPE cells from UVB damage, by inhibiting the activation of the transcription factor STAT3 and the downstream induction of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and downregulating the expression of the complement factor B, also involved in the inflammatory cascade leading to AMD [406]. Quercetin is an another natural polyphenol with known antioxidant and anti-apoptotic properties, the protective efficacy of which has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo models. RPE exposed to cytotoxic and inflammatory effects induced by 4-  hydroxynonenal [407] or by blue light [408] were prevented by quercetin. In a different model of peroxide-induced oxidative stress model in RPE cells [409] quercetin treatment influenced the transcription of genes involved in apoptosis regulation, including the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and the pro- apoptotic BAX and FADD, and the effectors of apoptosis Caspase-3 and Caspase-9. Intraperitoneal administration of quercetin blunted the photo-oxidative damage of rat retinas’ photoreceptors exposed to intense light [410]. Curcumin, a polyphenol from Curcuma longa (turmeric plant) belonging to the ginger family, is also able to modulate apoptosis, inflammation and oxidative stress defense proteins [411]; these effects follow the upregulation of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl- 2, the downregulation of the pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-kB, and the upregulation of the antioxidant proteins SOD, GR and HO-1, as shown in human retinal cell models exposed to oxidative damage [350,412]. An active phenolic component of green tea, EGCG, protected human ARPE19 cells from UVA-induced damage by decreasing both the production of hydrogen peroxide and the activation of the pro-inflammatory MAPK and COX-2 [413]; moreover, it has shown a protective effect in RPE cells against oxidative stress-induced damage by modulating the expression of the transcription factor Nrf2 [414]. Resveratrol (3,4,5-trihydroxystilbene), a polyphenolic antioxidant belonging to the stilbene family and commonly found in grape skin and seeds, has been shown to be protective against UVA-induced damage in ARPE19 cells [415] and to prevent the development of choroidal neovascularization by modulating protein kinase A (PKA) in macrophages [416]. A recent study has suggested that resveratrol could mitigate the adverse effects induced by repeated injections of bevacizumab (anti-VEGF antibody) in wet-AMD therapy [417]. One of the major limitations of anti-VEGF therapy is an excessive reduction of the available secreted VEGF, which is also important to maintain the homeostatic function of the RPE. In ARPE-19 cells, various combinations of resveratrol and bevacizumab prevented VEGF reduction observed after bevacizumab alone treatment [417]. A prospective, randomized clinical trial (NCT02625376) started on August 2015, the results of which have not been released yet, aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of resveratrol to reduce the progression of exudative AMD between two groups of patients, either receiving 250mg of resveratrol or placebo, after 24 months of follow-up. The common herb rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) contains a variety of polyphenolic compounds which, combined with zinc, decreased the amount of CEP-proteins (carboxyethyl-pyrrole modified proteins, found in drusen and considered a significant risk factor for the development of AMD), and improved photoreceptor cell survival in rat retinas exposed to photo-oxidative damage [418]. Chronic supplementation with rosemary antioxidants has been suggested to be a useful addition to the therapeutic benefits of AREDS supplements in slowing down the progression of AMD [419,420].

carotenoids

Lutein, zeaxanthin and meso-zeaxanthin are carotenoids present in high concentration in the macula where they form the macular pigment protecting the retina from the oxidative stress constantly induced by light [421]. They are not synthesized by mammalian cells but found in egg yolk and vegetables such as fruits, spices, lettuce, broccoli, and spinach [422]. In an oxidative stress model obtained in manganese superoxide dismutase knockout mice, zeaxanthin supplementation blunted the oxidative stress and preserved the structure of the RPE [423]. Human clinical studies demonstrated that lutein and zeaxanthin, as well as β–carotene supplementations have protective effects on AMD, improving visual performance measured as contrast sensitivity, glare tolerance, and photo-stress recovery [396,424]. Several other studies have shown that high blood levels of lutein and zeaxanthin correlate with a significant lower risk of AMD [425,426].

Vitamins

Vitamins A, C and E appeared to reduce the risk of macular degeneration according to the AREDS studies I and II [397,398]. Positive outcomes concerning high dietary intakes of fruits and vegetables rich in pro vitamin A and vitamin C have been reported [394,427]. Vitamin C is known to be a potent antioxidant protecting proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and nucleic acids from free radicals and ROS damage [428]. Moreover, the AREDS Study Group has revealed that high vitamin C intake is associated with a reduced likelihood of neo-vascular AMD [429]. Vitamin E, similarly to vitamin C, is a powerful antioxidant. Its deprivation leads to lipofuscin accumulation [430], retinal damage [431] and loss of photoreceptors [432]. High dietary intakes of vitamin E have been clinically correlated with a slower progression of AMD [433]. Vitamin D may exert beneficial effects on AMD prevention by modulating the immune system and inhibiting inflammation and angiogenesis. The role of vitamin D in the progression of AMD has been addressed recently, because the cognate receptor is expressed by mammalian RPE [434]. However, among the many clinical observations and studies run on the efficacy of vitamins A, C, E, not all the results could confirm their efficacy on the decourse of AMD [396]. As to vitamin D, its role in the prevention of AMD seems to be ascertained, though the amount to be given as food supplement is still in need of better clarification [435].

Minerals

Zinc, copper and selenium play important roles in the normal functioning of antioxidant enzymes and in retinal cell survival [436,437]. Supplementation of zinc and copper decreases the risk of AMD progression suggesting that these metals play an important role in the homeostasis of AMD and in retinal health [438]. In particular, zinc supplementation effectively blunts the risk of AMD and visual loss by its antioxidant properties, and by intervening in the regulation of the light-rhodopsin reaction, in the modulation of synaptic transmission and of complement activation [438]. Selenium is a well-known anti-oxidant agent, and may reduce the risk of AMD by blunting the oxidative damage of membrane lipids and by participating in the activity of GSH antioxidant defense [437]. Moreover, a diet deficient in vitamin E and selenium in laboratory animals resulted in a consistent decrease of total PUFAs in RPE and in retinal rod outer segments, which could be recovered by an adequate diet supplementation [439]. However, more clinical evidence has to be raised in order to better understand the role, the efficacy and the dietary doses of these minerals in the prevention and treatment of AMD.

Alpha-Lipoic Acid

aLA is a naturally occurring fatty acid found in some foods such as yeast, spinach, broccoli and potatoes [376]. It works as a cofactor of mitochondrial dehydrogenase and as a free radical scavenger, regenerating endogenous antioxidant systems like vitamins C and E and the enzyme SOD [440]. aLA dietary supplementation has been shown to improve vision-related quality of life in dry AMD patients most likely by improving the antioxidant defense [441]. aLA entered a phase 2 clinical trial in May of 2016 sponsored by the University of Pennsylvania (NCT02613572), with the aim of assessing safety and tolerability of the 800 and 1200 mg daily doses in patients affected by geographic atrophy [417].

Omega-3 Fatty Acids

The deficiency of omega-3 fatty acids DHA and EPA in photoreceptor membrane lipids play an important role in the pathogenesis of AMD because their imbalance contribute to drusen formation in the RPE and sub-RPE layers [442]. Oral treatment with a complex mixture of fatty acids (commercially available as Macular- FAG®) has been used in a mouse model system of AMD induced by subretinal injection of polyethylene glycol (PEG-400). Results have shown a blunting of complement-mediated inflammation, a decrease of macrophage recruitment and modulation of the production of pro-inflammatory and angiogenic cytokines, finally resulting in a functional rescue of retinal electrophysiology [443].

Lactobacillus Paracasei KW3110

Anti-inflammatory agents appear to be optimal candidates for AMD prevention or slowing of its progression. Most recently, Morita et al. have demonstrated that Lactobaciullus paracasei KW3110 (a lactic acid bacterium) may activate M2 macrophages (macrophages associated with anti-inflammatory reactions), thus suppressing blue light-induced retinal inflammation both in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest that L. paracasei KW3110 may have a preventive effect against degenerative retinal diseases, including AMD [395].

MYOPIA

Aristotle is considered to be the first person who described myopia. The term myopia derives from the Greek’s verb μύειν, which means ‘to close’ and ωψ which means ‘eye’, and together describe a typical action of myopic individuals who squeeze their eyes to improve farsight vision. This action reduces the opening of the iris diaphragm, thus increasing the focal depth. Scientifically, myopia (near-sightdness) is a spherical refractive error that occurs when rays of light running parallel to the optic axis focus the image anterior to the retinal plane [444]. This disorder is mostly due to an over-growth of the eyeball, which brings the retina behind the focal plan [445]. According to the recent definition by the IMI (International Myopia Institute), myopia can be divided into low myopia and high myopia, in which the spherical equivalent refractive error is ≤ −0.50 diopters (D) and ≤ −6.00 D, respectively [445]. Myopia is among the most common ocular disorders causing visual loss. In 2010 a systematic analysis estimated that 1.9 billion of people in the world were myopic (about 27% of the world’s population), among which 70 million had high myopia [446]. Holden et al. estimated that in 2050 there will be almost 5 billion myopic people (50% of world’s population) among which almost 1 billion with high myopia [447]. However, myopia is not equally distributed worldwide; 90% of the youngsters are myopic in East Asian countries, while in the United States and Europe their proportion remains around 50% [448]. The prevalence of myopia also varies with age. In the Beaver Dam Eye Study, data suggested that the prevalence of myopics decreased from 42.9% among adults aged 43-54 years to 14% in individuals older than 75 years [449]. To date, hundreds of genes and around twenty chromosomal loci have been identified to be associated with the occurrence of refractive error and myopia, although they cannot fully explain it [450-452]. A seminal study published in 1969 concerning Inuit people living in North Alaska, showed that only 2 out of 131 adults, grown up in an isolated group, were myopic. On the contrary, about 50% of the next generation individuals were shortsighted [453], demonstrating that genes alone cannot explain such increase in just one generation, because genetic changes require longer times. However, genes can determine the individual susceptibility to environmental factors, and familiarity is evident within families and within populations [454-456]. Environmental factors including socio-economic and the time spent in outdoor activities have also been correlated with myopia development. While the time spent indoor represents an environmental risk, the concomitant outdoor time may be an important protective factor [457-458]. High level of outdoor activity is positively correlated with lower odds of myopia in different epidemiological studies [459-461]. The idea that outdoor activities reduce the onset of myopia, introduces the concept that the amount of exposition to bright light has a pivotal role in this prevention. In fact, light stimulates the release of dopamine and its accumulation in the retina, which starts a signaling cascade involving the retinal pigmented epithelium, finally slowing down the growth of the eye globe [462-465]. The molecular etiology of myopia is not clear yet. In a recent study, we observed that atropine, a molecule used to slow down myopia progression in children and teenagers, increased extra-cellular matrix production from scleral fibroblasts in vitro, thus contrasting the scleral thinning often observed during myopia progression; on the contrary, atropine effect on choroidal fibroblasts resulted in a decrease of ECM components production, suggesting an alternative mechanism, by which atropine might improve choroidal blood perfusion, known to be reduced in myopic eyes [466]. Further investigations are needed to better clarify the physio-pathological events leading to myopia. Current anti-myopic treatments include: use of eye-glasses or soft contact lenses, orthokeratology, topical administration of low dose atropine or pirenzepine, oral administration of 7-methylxanthine, corrective surgery. However, in many cases a “rebound effect” can be observed after interruption of treatment (Figure 5) [467-470].

JPPR-3-2-314-g005

Figure 5. Myopia. Myopia mostly results from the elongation of the eye globe, which brings the macular region of the retina out of focus, and puts a mechanical stress on this delicate tissue, increasing the risk of a retinal detachment and/or laceration (upper panel). Food supplements that might be useful are those reinforcing the matrix of the sclera, thus retarding its abnormal growth and elongation (bottom panel).

Nutrition and Food Supplements

The use of food supplements to correct nutrition deficiencies is a strategy widely accepted and used to improve the general health and try to prevent many different pathologies, also including eye diseases. Eating brightly colored foods like green vegetables and fresh fruits, loaded with vitamins, is highly recommended also to intervene on eye growth. Moreover, the consumption of fish like salmon, tuna and mackerel is very important for a sufficient intake of omega-3 fatty acids, needful to the brain and the eye to modulate neuronal cell membrane activity and their kinetics of transport systems [471]. In the study KNHANES VII (Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2016-2017) the prevalence of high and low grade myopia among South Korean children 5-18 years of age and the associated risk factors were analyzed. In this study, a correlation was noted between high body mass index and high myopia [472]. In another study on Asian children a high dietary intake of cholesterol and fat was found to be associated with myopia progression [473]. Glycemic index can be regarded as a risk factor for myopia and refractive error is more frequent in young patients with newly diagnosed type I diabetes mellitus [474,475].

Microelements: Microelements are important during the entire life, since they are essential co-factors for many enzymes, and more specifically they have a critical role to support a normal growth in children. Fedor and coworkers [476] found an association between low serum concentration of zinc and selenium, and a high Cu/Zn ratio in a cohort of 83 Polish myopic children aged 7-17 years, which might suggest that a dietary supplement of Zinc and Selenium could be indicated in myopic children. However, the finding was not confirmed by another study on American children [477], and more clinical data are necessary to consider microelements as a necessary supplement in the control of myopia progression in children.

Vitamin D: Although there is no direct evidence on the effect of vitamins on myopia progression, some studies have shown a correlation between vitamin D and myopia. The biosynthesis of vitamin D is promoted by sunlight exposure, and might be related to the time that individuals spend outdoor. Intake of folate and calcium also correlate with the amount of circulating vitamin D. In a study on 22 young American students (13 to 25 years old) the 14 myopes showed lower blood levels of vitamin D (average of 3.4 ng/ml) compared with non-myopes when adjusted for age and dietary intakes, despite the fact that both groups spent similar amounts of time outdoor [478]. In a Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study, Yzar and co-workers [479] analyzed 946 children during a follow-up of 20 years. Among these, 23.4% were myopic and had lower serum vitamin D3 concentrations compared to non-myopic individuals. Univariate analysis showed that lower serum vitamin D3 concentration was associated with higher risk of progressive myopia (with a cut-off value of 50 nmol/L the odds ratio for developing myopia with low vitamin D3 was 2.63). Two more studies investigated the correlation between low serum levels of vitamin D3 and myopia. A first study analyzed 2,666 European children aged 6 years [480], and the second study enrolled more than 15,000 Korean young adults (aged 20 years or more) [481]. Both studies found an association between low serum levels of vitamin D3 and presence of myopia, independently from the time spent outdoor.

7-Methylxanthine: 7-Methylxanthine (7-MX) is an intermediate metabolite in the synthesis of caffeine in plants, and a product of the metabolism of caffeine in humans [482]. Unpublished evidence by K. Trier had shown an effect of caffeine on the production of ECM components in the sclera of treated rabbits. Further evidence by the same author has shown that 7-MX – a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist – may have a role in the retardation of myopia progression. 7-MX effects resemble those of atropine (a muscarinic receptor antagonist), both increasing ECM production and collagen fibril diameter, thus increasing thickness of the sclera [483,484]. A thicker sclera should be less prone to axial elongation, which is the main cause of myopia development. In a recent study, infant macaques with myopia induced by the use of corrective lenses were treated with 100 mg/kg of oral 7-MX twice daily, demonstrating the ability of 7-MX to retard myopia progression in primate puppets [483]. 7-MX is a common human dietary ingredient for coffee drinkers, which has shown no significant side effects during long term treatment. In a clinical study, it has been shown to limit eye elongation and myopia progression in childhood myopia [485].

crocetin: Another promising natural compound is crocetin, a carotenoid compound consisting of a C-20 carbon chain contained in saffron and used in traditional herbal medicine [486]. This powerful compound is able to delay the growth of cancer cells by inhibiting the synthesis of nucleic acids and the activation of defense anti-oxidative systems, interfering with growth factor signaling pathways and finally inducing cancer cells apoptosis [487]. In a murine model of lens-induced myopia, a dietary crocetin supplement delayed myopia progression. Compared to controls (n = 14), crocetin administration resulted in a significant smaller change of refractive errors and axial elongation [488]. In a randomized clinical trial, 69 myopic children aged 6 to 12 years received either a placebo or oral crocetin for 24 weeks. The spherical equivalent refractive error progressed during the 6 months of the study by -0.41± 0.05 Diopters in placebo controls, and by −0.33 ± 0.05 Diopters in crocetin treated (p < 0.05); the axial length increased by 0.21 ± 0.02 mm in placebo controls, and by 0.18 ± 0.02 mm in crocetin treated (p < 0.05), thus showing the potential effects of crocetin in slowing down myopia progression [489].

CATARACT

Cataract is the opacification of the normally transparent lens of the eye, which may occur centrally (nuclear and posterior subcapsular) thus impairing vision, or in periphery (cortical cataract) [490]. Oxidative stress in the lens, occurring as consequence of normal aging, or accelerated by genetic and environmental causes, plays an important role in the onset and progression of cataract [491,492]. Currently, the only treatment for cataract is surgical removal of the cloudy lens, which typically is then replaced with an intraocular lens (IOL) during cataract surgery (Figure 6).

JPPR-3-2-314-g006

Figure 6. Cataract. Oxidative damage is the main and only recognized factor for lens opacification (upper panel). Antioxidants like vitamin C, lutein and zeaxanthin are the only food supplements that have shown some efficacy in retarding the insurgence of cataract (bottom panel).

Food Supplements

Despite the evidence indicating oxidative damage to lens epithelial cells as a likely common cause for cataractogenesis, the efficacy of nutritional supplements and antioxidants in the management of age- related cataracts is still under debate. Several studies reported that nutritional supplements showed a long-term inhibitory effect on the development of sight threatening cataract. A randomized clinical trial enrolling 14,000 U.S. male physicians older than 50 years with a follow-up of 11 years indicated that long-term daily multivitamin use had a slight, though significant effect in decreasing the risk of cataract [493]. A nutrition survey including more than 30,000 women older than 49 years followed for over 7 years detected a 13% lesser risk of developing cataract among those indicating a higher dietary intake of antioxidants. The main contributors to dietary total antioxidant capacity in the study population were fruit and vegetables (44.3%), whole grains (17.0%) and coffee (15.1%) [494]. Another large study of adult women in the United States correlated the eating of foods rich in a variety of vitamins and minerals with the delay of cataracts development [495]. A 10-year study of more than 2,400 older adults in Australia found that participants with the highest quintile of total intake (diet + supplements) of vitamin C had a reduced risk of incident nuclear cataract. An above-median intake of combined antioxidants (vitamins C and E, beta-carotene, and zinc) was associated with a reduced risk of incident nuclear cataract. Antioxidant intake was not associated with incident cortical or posterior sub-capsular cataract [496]. A large study of female health professionals in the United States enrolled 1802 women aged 50 to 79 years with intakes of lutein and zeaxanthin above the 78th (high) and below the 28th (low) percentiles. Four to seven years later, it was found that diets rich in lutein and zeaxanthin are moderately associated with a decreased prevalence of nuclear cataract in older women [497]. However, a Cochrane metanalysis including 9 clinical trials involving more than 117,000 patients concluded that dietary supplements of beta-carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C had no clear beneficial effects on the inhibition of ARC development [498]. It has to be considered though that clinical studies on cataract development and progression require several years of observation, during which time the compliance of patients to treatment indications can be less tight, and that the endpoint parameters of such studies can be highly subjective. Most recently, a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo controlled human clinical trial has been launched to test the efficacy of a 6 months treatment with a nutritional supplement in inhibiting nuclear cataract progression on 20 patients subjected to Pars Plana Vitrectomy surgery. The nutritional supplement contained 11 compounds with reported cataract inhibitory properties: Riboflavin, L-GSH, C-Phycocyanin (as Spirulina Algae Extract), LA, Pyruvate (as Calcium Pyruvate), aLA, Quercetin, Turmeric, Silybin (as Milk Thistle Extract), Lutein, Zeaxanthin, and Astaxanthin [499]. In this study, cataract formation and progression were monitored by the serial Pentacam Nuclear Staging measurements (Oculus, Arlington, Wash.), supposed to be an objective, quantitative, and reproducible measurement of nuclear cataract density. Results showed a marginal borderline effect of the nutritional supplement, which however might suggest some efficacy, given the short observation time and the paucity of enrolled patients [499]. All nutrients associated with cataract prevention in clinical studies can be found in eye vitamins and vision supplements. Many experts believe these substances should be acquired from a healthy diet rather than from nutritional supplements. However, very often it happens that common dietary habits may lack key nutrients because not containing enough fruits and vegetables. In such occurrence, it could be wise to consider taking one or more daily nutritional supplements to assure the organism the intake of all the nutrients needed for optimum eye health. Antioxidant vitamins and phytochemicals that are supposed to reduce the risk of cataracts include vitamins A, C and E, lutein and zeaxanthin; consumption of fish high in omega-3 fatty acids has also been linked to a potential reduction of the risk of cataracts or their progression [500]. Here follows a sample of recent research suggesting the role of such nutrients in the prevention of cataracts.

Antioxidants and Vitamins

Seminal preclinical studies performed in the 80’s of the past century on cataract induced in mice by hyperbaric oxygen exposure [501] or by photo-oxidative stress in isolated rat lenses [502] have highlighted the potential protective activity of antioxidants, also including vitamin C, against cataract. The level of AsA is known to be low or absent in cataractous patients, with a concomitant increase of di-hydro-AsA (the oxidized form of ascorbic acid) [503]. However, the concentration of vitamin C in the aqueous humor and lens of human subjects could be increased after supplementation of 2 gr per day for 2 to 4 weeks prior to lens removal [504]. Along the same line, the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey reported an inverse association between serum AsA and self-reported cataract [505], confirmed by the findings of the Nutrition and Vision Project, in which the inverse association between cortical and posterior subcapsular cataract with the use of long-term vitamin C supplement was evidenced [506]. These results are also consistent with those from the Beaver Dam Eye study where the 5-year risk to develop nuclear or cortical cataract was 40% and 60% lower among individuals who reported the abitual use of multivitamins or any other supplement containing vitamin C [507]. Daily oral use for 3 years of a mixture of antioxidant micronutrients including vitamin C produced a small deceleration in the progression of ARC [508]. In a population-based cross-sectional analytic study, which included 5638 people (aged ≥60 years), a strong inverse association between vitamin C and cataract was described [509]. Finally, a recent prospective cohort study, has shown that vitamin C protected against nuclear cataract progression as evaluated approximately 10 years after the baseline [510].

lutein and Zeaxanthin

Lutein and zeaxanthin are the main carotenoids found in the eye and look like promising nutrients in the fight against cataracts. Recent preclinical and clinical works have addressed the risk of developing cataracts in relation to dietary assumption of these nutrients.

Diabetic cataract is a frequent eye complication in diabetes. Dietary lutein effects on the prevention of diabetic cataract have been addressed in a rat model of diabetes induced by streptozotocin [511]. An oral lutein supplement (0.5 mg/kg) did not significantly affect blood glycemic values or body weights in diabetic rats. Most (81%) of diabetic rats’ eyes developed lens opacity and 43% developed mature cataract. Diabetic rats treated with lutein, developed lens opacity in 38% of the eyes and no mature cataracts were observed. Diabetic rats’ lenses showed a parallel increase of MDA and a decrease of GSH levels. Lutein treatment blunted MDA levels, though not raising GSH, hence indicating that lutein effects on the prevention of diabetic cataract may work through the inhibition of lipid peroxidation, finally suggesting that a lutein dietary supplement, combined with glycemic control, might work in the prevention of diabetic cataract [511]. The Nurses’ Health Study enrolled over 77,000 US female nurses aged 45- 71 y, and observed for 12 years. Results showed that those subjects with a dietary intake of high amounts of lutein+zeaxanthin (more than the average amount of 6 mg/day registered in the study) had a reduced need for cataract surgery [511]. The POLA (Pathologies Oculaires Liées à l’Age) study evaluated the associations of plasma lutein and zeaxanthin and other carotenoids with the risk of age- related maculopathy and cataract in 899 residents in the south of France and aged > 60 years. Results were strongly suggestive of a protective role of the xanthophylls, in particular zeaxanthin, for the development and progression of age-related maculopathy and nuclear cataract [512]. The Melbourne Visual Impairment Project recruited 2322 permanent residents aged > 40 years, with a follow-up of 2 years. This study confirmed the inverse association between high dietary zeaxanthin intake and prevalence of nuclear cataract [513]. On the contrary, the AREDS2 study concluded that daily supplementation with lutein/zeaxanthin had no detectable effects on rates of cataract surgery or vision [514]. However, these results are biased by the fact that the enrolled population was relatively well nourished and given at baseline a multivitamin supplement which could already have a protective effect on cataract progression, thus masking the effects of lutein and zeaxanthin [515].

Conclusion

Most often pathologies result from the loss of homeostasis of the whole organism, and may involve one or more organs at a time. Pache and Flammer defined POAG as “a sick eye in a sick body” [516], and indeed this definition might be extended to more ophthalmic pathologies, which can be derived or aggravated by imbalances of the homeostatic equilibrium of the body. Food supplements aim at re-establishing such equilibrium, both at the organism level, and sometimes specifically at the organ level, in case an organ is in major need of some specific nutrients or defense molecules that can be delivered by the food supplement. In fact, medical treatments are specifically aimed at the diseased organ, and their effect might be potentiated by food supplements cooperating with the drug(s) both at the specific site, and more generally at the organism level. Several decades of preclinical and clinical research have substantiated this hypothesis, telling us that nutrition is the most important element in our lifestyle influencing our health and disease status. Food supplements can thus be seen as nutritional aids to prevent disease, but also to cooperate with the treatment of diseases, of the eyes, but of other organs as well.

Abbreviations

JPPR-3-2-314-g007

References

  1. World report on vision (2019) World Health Organization: Geneva; ISBN 978-92-4-151657-0.
  2. Dry Eye Syndrome: Epidemiology Forecast to 2026. GlobalData Report Store.
  3. VISION 2020: THE CATARACT CHALLENGE. Community Eye Health 2000, 13, 17-19.
  4. Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite, T, et al. (2017) Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health5.
  5. National Eye Institute, National Eye Institute Available online.
  6. Liu YC,Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta JS (2017) Cataracts. Lancet 390: 600-612.
  7. Singh RP, Lewis H (2006) Innovations in Eye Surgery. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 22:659-675.
  8. Hooper P (2010) Next generation eye surgery and drug delivery. Can. J. Ophthalmol45. [crossref]
  9. Lawrenson JG, Downie LE (2019) Nutrition and Eye Health. Nutrients 11. [crossref]
  10. Bunce GE (1994) Nutrition and eye disease of the elderly. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 5: 66-77.
  11. Coleman AL, Brigatti L (2001) The glaucomas. Minerva Med92: 365-379. [crossref]
  12. Mroczkowska S, Benavente-Perez A, Negi A, Sung V, Patel SR, et al. (2013)Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma vs Normal-Tension Glaucoma: The Vascular Perspective. JAMA Ophthalmol 131: 36-43. [crossref]
  13. Yücel Y,Gupta N (2008) Glaucoma of the brain: a disease model for the study of transsynaptic neural degeneration. In:Nucci C, Cerulli L, Osborne NN, Bagetta G(eds.).Progress in Brain Research; Glaucoma: An Open Window to Neurodegeneration and Neuroprotection.Elsevier173: 465-478.
  14. Lawlor M, Danesh-Meyer H, Levin LA, Davagnanam I., Vita ED,et al. (2018) Glaucoma and the brain: Trans-synaptic degeneration, structural change, and implications for neuroprotection. Survey of Ophthalmology 63: 296-306. [crossref]
  15. Salinas-Navarro M, Alarcón-Martínez L, Valiente-Soriano FJ, Jiménez-López M, Mayor-Torroglosa S, et al. (2010) Ocular hypertension impairs optic nerve axonal transport leading to progressive retinal ganglion cell degeneration. Experimental Eye Research90: 168-183. [crossref]
  16. Pasquale LR (2016) Vascular and autonomic dysregulation in primary open-angle glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 27: 94-101. [crossref]
  17. Fan N, Wang P, Tang, L, Liu X (2015) Ocular Blood Flow and Normal Tension Glaucoma. Biomed Res Int. [crossref]
  18. Russo R, Varano GP, Adornetto A, Nucci C, Corasaniti MT,et al. (2016) Retinal ganglion cell death in glaucoma: Exploring the role of neuroinflammation. European Journal of Pharmacology 787: 134-142.[crossref]
  19. Seki M, LiptonSA(2008) Targeting excitotoxic/free radical signaling pathways for therapeutic intervention in glaucoma. Progress in Brain Research, 173: 495-510.
  20. Chrysostomou V,RezaniaF, Trounce I.A, CrowstonJG (2013)Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in glaucoma. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 13: 12-15. [crossref]
  21. OsborneNN (2010) Mitochondria: Their role in ganglion cell death and survival in primary open angle glaucoma. Experimental Eye Research90: 750-757. [crossref]
  22. Drugs for common eye disorders. (c2019)Med Lett Drugs Ther61: 187-194.
  23. Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA(2014) The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA 311: 1901-1911. [crossref]
  24. Tatham AJ, Weinreb RN, Medeiros FA (2014) Strategies for improving early detection of glaucoma: the combined structure-function index. Clin Ophthalmol8: 611-621. [crossref]
  25. Rusciano D, Pezzino S, Mutolo MG, Giannotti R, Librando A, et al. (2017) Neuroprotection in Glaucoma: Old and New Promising Treatments. Adv Pharmacol Sci. [crossref]
  26. Oh DJ, Chen JL, Vajaranant TS, DikopfMS (2018) Brimonidine tartrate for the treatment of glaucoma. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 20: 115-122. [crossref]
  27. Vetrugno M (2001) Acute and chronic effects of brimonidine 0.2% on intraocular pressure and pulsatile ocular blood flow in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: an open-label, uncontrolled, prospective study. Clinical Therapeutics23:1519-1528. [crossref]
  28. Tatton WG, Chalmers-Redman RM, Tatton NA (2001) Apoptosis and anti-apoptosis signalling in glaucomatous retinopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol 11. [crossref]
  29. Dong CJ,Guo Y, Wheeler L, Hare WA (2007) α2 Adrenergic Receptor-Mediated Modulation of Cytosolic Ca++Signals at the Inner Plexiform Layer of the Rat Retina. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science48.
  30. Dong, CJ, GuoY, Agey P, Wheeler L, Hare WA(2008) α2 Adrenergic Modulation of NMDA Receptor Function as a Major Mechanism of RGC Protection in Experimental Glaucoma and Retinal Excitotoxicity. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science49.
  31. Gao H, Qiao X, Cantor LB, WuDunn D(2002) Up-regulation of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Expression by Brimonidine in Rat Retinal Ganglion Cells. Arch Ophthalmol120: 797-803. [crossref]
  32. Wheeler L, WoldeMussie E, Lai R (2003) Role of Alpha-2 Agonists in Neuroprotection. Survey of Ophthalmology 48. [crossref]
  33. Krupin T, Liebmann JM, Greenfield DS, Ritch R, Gardiner mS (2011) A Randomized Trial of Brimonidine Versus Timolol in Preserving Visual Function: Results From the Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study. American Journal of Ophthalmology 151: 671-681. [crossref]
  34. Potenza MA, Marasciulo FL, Tarquinio M, Tiravanti E, Colantuono G,et al. (2007) EGCG, a green tea polyphenol, improves endothelial function and insulin sensitivity, reduces blood pressure, and protects against myocardial I/R injury in SHR. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism292. [crossref]
  35. Kim E, Han S, Hwang K, Kim D, Kim EM,et al. (2019) Antioxidant and Cytoprotective Effects of (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-(3″-O-methyl) Gallate. Int J Mol Sci 20. [crossref]
  36. Yokotani K, Umegaki K (2017) Evaluation of plasma antioxidant activity in rats given excess EGCg with reference to endogenous antioxidants concentrations and assay methods. Free Radical Research 51: 193-199.[crossref]
  37. Peng PH, Chiou LF, Chao HM, Lin S, Chen CF, et al.(2010)Effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate on rat retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve axotomy. Experimental Eye Research90: 528-534.
  38. Singh NA, Mandal AKA, Khan ZA (2016) Potential neuroprotective properties of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG). Nutr J 15. [crossref]
  39. Zhang B, Osborne NN (2006) Oxidative-induced retinal degeneration is attenuated by epigallocatechin gallate. Brain Research 1124: 176-187. [crossref]
  40. Zhang B, Rusciano D, Osborne NN (2008) Orally administered epigallocatechin gallate attenuates retinal neuronal death in vivo and light-induced apoptosis in vitro. Brain Research 1198: 141-152. [crossref]
  41. Osborne NN (2008) Pathogenesis of ganglion “cell death” in glaucoma and neuroprotection: focus on ganglion cell axonal mitochondria. Progress in Brain Research 173: 339-352. [crossref]
  42. Falsini B, Marangoni D, Salgarello T, Stifano G, MontroneL,et al. (2009) Effect of epigallocatechin-gallate on inner retinal function in ocular hypertension and glaucoma: A short-term study by pattern electroretinogram. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 247: 1223-1233. [crossref]
  43. Roberti G, Tanga L, Michelessi M, Quaranta L, Parisi V,et al. (2015) Cytidine 5’-Diphosphocholine (Citicoline) in Glaucoma: Rationale of Its Use, Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 16: 28401-28417. [crossref]
  44. Manaka S, Sano K, Fuchinoue T, Sekino H (1974) Mechanism of action of CDP-choline in parkinsonism. Experientia 30: 179-180.
  45. Chitu I, Tudosescu R, Leasu-Branet C, Voinea LM (2017) Citicoline – a neuroprotector with proveneffects on glaucomatous disease. Romanian Journal of Ophthalmology61: 152-158.[crossref]
  46. Hatcher JF, Dempsey RJ (2002) Citicoline: neuroprotective mechanisms in cerebral ischemia. Journal of Neurochemistry 80: 12-23. [crossref]
  47. Schuettauf F, Rejdak R, Thaler S, Bolz S, Lehaci C, et al. (2006) Citicoline and lithium rescue retinal ganglion cells following partial optic nerve crush in the rat. Experimental Eye Research83: 1128-1134. [crossref]
  48. Oshitari T, Yoshida-Hata N, Yamamoto S(2010) Effect of neurotrophic factors on neuronal apoptosis and neurite regeneration in cultured rat retinas exposed to high glucose. Brain Research 1346: 43-51. [crossref]
  49. Parisi V, Manni G, Colacino G, Bucci MG (1999) Cytidine-5′-diphosphocholine (citicoline) improves retinal and cortical responses in patients with glaucoma11The authors have no proprietary interest in the development or marketing of this or a competing drug. Ophthalmology 106: 1126-1134. [crossref]
  50. Parisi V (2005) Electrophysiological Assessment of Glaucomatous Visual Dysfunction During Treatment with Cytidine-5′-diphosphocholine (citicoline): A Study of 8 years of Follow-up. Documenta Ophthalmologica110: 91-102. [crossref]
  51. Parisi V, Coppola G, Centofanti M, Oddone F, Maria Angrisani A,et al. (2008) Evidence of the neuroprotective role of citicoline in glaucoma patients. Progress in Brain Research 173: 541-554. [crossref]
  52. Parisi V, Centofanti M, Ziccardi L, Tanga L, Michelessi M, et al. (2015)Treatment with citicoline eye drops enhances retinal function and neural conduction along the visual pathways in open angle glaucoma. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 253: 1327-1340. [Crossref]
  53. Ernster L, Dallner G (1995) Biochemical, physiological and medical aspects of ubiquinone function. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Molecular Basis of Disease, 1271: 195-204. [crossref]
  54. Lee D, Shim MS, Kim KY, Noh YH, Kim H (2014). Coenzyme Q10 inhibits glutamate excitotoxicity and oxidative stress-mediated mitochondrial alteration in a mouse model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci55: 993-1005. [crossref]
  55. Papucci L, Schiavone, N, Witort E, Donnini M, Lapucci A, et al. (2003)Coenzyme Q10Prevents Apoptosis by Inhibiting Mitochondrial Depolarization Independently of Its Free Radical Scavenging Property. Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:28220-28228. [crossref]
  56. Ekicier Acar S, Sarıcaoğlu MS, Çolak A, Aktaş Z, Sepici Dinçel A (2019) Neuroprotective effects of topical coenzyme Q10 + vitamin E in mechanic optic nerve injury model. European Journal of Ophthalmology30.
  57. Quaranta L, Riva I, Biagioli E, Rulli E, Poli D,et al. (2019) Evaluating the Effects of an Ophthalmic Solution of Coenzyme Q10 and Vitamin E in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients: A Study Protocol. Advances in Therapy36: 2506-2514. [crossref]
  58. Karimi E, Oskoueian E, Hendra R, Jaafar HZE (2010) Evaluation of Crocus sativus L. stigma phenolic and flavonoid compounds and its antioxidant activity. Molecules 15: 6244-6256. [crossref]
  59. Hashemi M, Hosseinzadeh H(2019) A comprehensive review on biological activities and toxicology of crocetin. Food and Chemical Toxicology 130: 44-60. [crossref]
  60. Karkoula E, Lemonakis N, Kokras N, Dalla C, Gikas E,et al. (2018) Trans-crocin 4 is not hydrolyzed to crocetin following i.p. administration in mice, while it shows penetration through the blood brain barrier. Fitoterapia129: 62-72. [crossref]
  61. Zhang X, Fan Z, Jin T (2017) Crocin protects against cerebral- ischemia-induced damage in aged rats through maintaining the integrity of blood-brain barrier. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 35: 65-75. [crossref]
  62. Fernández-Albarral JA, de Hoz R,Ramírez AI, López-Cuenca I., Salobrar-García E, et al.(2020) Beneficial effects of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in ocular pathologies, particularly neurodegenerative retinal diseases. Neural Regen Res 15: 1408-1416.[crossref]
  63. Heitmar R, Brown J, Kyrou I. (2019) Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in Ocular Diseases: A Narrative Review of the Existing Evidence from Clinical Studies. Nutrients 11. [crossref]
  64. Ishizuka F, Shimazawa M, Umigai N, Ogishima H, Nakamura S,et al. (2013) Crocetin, a carotenoid derivative, inhibits retinal ischemic damage in mice. European Journal of Pharmacology703: 1-10. [crossref]
  65. Qi Y, Chen L, Zhang L, Liu WB, Chen XY,et al. (2013) Crocin prevents retinal ischaemia/reperfusion injury-induced apoptosis in retinal ganglion cells through the PI3K/AKT signalling pathway. Experimental Eye Research 107: 44-51. [crossref]
  66. Chen L, Qi Y, Yang X (2015) Neuroprotective Effects of Crocin against Oxidative Stress Induced by Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Rat Retina. Ophthalmic Research54: 157-168. [crossref]
  67. Ohno Y, Nakanishi T, Umigai N, Tsuruma K, Shimazawa M,et al. (2012) Oral administration of crocetin prevents inner retinal damage induced by N-methyl-d-aspartate in mice. European Journal of Pharmacology 690: 84-89.[crossref]
  68. Fernández-AlbarralJA, Ramírez AI,de Hoz R, López-Villarín N, Salobrar-García E, et al. (2019) Neuroprotective and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Hydrophilic Saffron Extract in a Model of Glaucoma. Int JMol Sci20.
  69. Jabbarpoor Bonyadi MH, Yazdani S, Saadat(2014) The ocular hypotensive effect of saffron extract in primary open angle glaucoma: a pilot study. BMC Complement Altern Med 14: 399-399. [crossref]
  70. Hecht I, Achiron A, Bartov E, Maharshak I, Mendel L,et al. (2019) Effects of dietary and lifestyle recommendations on patients with glaucoma: A randomized controlled pilot trial. European Journal of Integrative Medicine 25: 60-66. [crossref]
  71. Schmidt M, Betti G, Hensel A (2007) Saffron in phytotherapy: Pharmacology and clinical uses. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 157: 315-319. [crossref]
  72. Modaghegh, M.-H.; Shahabian, M.; Esmaeili, H.-A.; Rajbai, O.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Safety evaluation of saffron (Crocus sativus) tablets in healthy volunteers. Phytomedicine 2008, 15, 1032-1037, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2008.06.003.
  73. Langcake, P.; Pryce, R.J. A new class of phytoalexins from grapevines. Experientia 1977, 33, 151-152, http://doi.org/10.1007/bf02124034.
  74. Wu, J.M.; Hsieh, T. Resveratrol: a cardioprotective substance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2011, 1215, 16-21, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05854.x.
  75. Richard, T.; Pawlus, A.D.; Iglésias, M.-L.; Pedrot, E.; Waffo-Teguo, P.; Mérillon, J.-M.; Monti, J.-P. Neuroprotective properties of resveratrol and derivatives. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2011, 1215, 103-108, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05865.x.
  76. Alarcón de la Lastra, C.; Villegas, I. Resveratrol as an anti-inflammatory and anti-aging agent: Mechanisms and clinical implications. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 2005, 49, 405-430, http://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200500022.
  77. Lopez, M.S.; Dempsey, R.J.; Vemuganti, R. Resveratrol neuroprotection in stroke and traumatic CNS injury. Neurochem Int 2015, 89, 75-82, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2015.08.009.
  78. Sun, A.Y.; Wang, Q.; Simonyi, A.; Sun, G.Y. Resveratrol as a therapeutic agent for neurodegenerative diseases. Mol Neurobiol 2010, 41, 375-383, http://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-010-8111-y.
  79. Raval, A.; Lin, H.; Dave, K.; DeFazio, R.; Morte, D.; Kim, E.; Perez-Pinzon, M. Resveratrol and Ischemic Preconditioning in the Brain. Current Medicinal Chemistry 2008, 15, 1545-1551, http://doi.org/10.2174/092986708784638861.
  80. Morin, C.; Zini, R.; Albengres, E.; Bertelli, A. a. E.; Bertelli, A.; Tillement, J.P. Evidence for resveratrol-induced preservation of brain mitochondria functions after hypoxia-reoxygenation. Drugs Exp Clin Res 2003, 29, 227-233.
  81. Bhullar, K.S.; Hubbard, B.P. Lifespan and healthspan extension by resveratrol. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Molecular Basis of Disease 2015, 1852, 1209-1218, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.01.012.
  82. Park, S.-J.; Ahmad, F.; Philp, A.; Baar, K.; Williams, T.; Luo, H.; Ke, H.; Rehmann, H.; Taussig, R.; Brown, A.L.; et al. Resveratrol ameliorates aging-related metabolic phenotypes by inhibiting cAMP phosphodiesterases. Cell 2012, 148, 421-433, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.017.
  83. Wang, Y. Molecular Links between Caloric Restriction and Sir2/SIRT1 Activation. Diabetes Metab J 2014, 38, 321-329, http://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2014.38.5.321.
  84. Luna, C.; Li, G.; Liton, P.B.; Qiu, J.; Epstein, D.L.; Challa, P.; Gonzalez, P. Resveratrol prevents the expression of glaucoma markers induced by chronic oxidative stress in trabecular meshwork cells. Food Chem Toxicol 2009, 47, 198-204, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.10.029.
  85. Pirhan, D.; Yüksel, N.; Emre, E.; Cengiz, A.; Kürşat Yıldız, D. Riluzole- and Resveratrol-Induced Delay of Retinal Ganglion Cell Death in an Experimental Model of Glaucoma. Current Eye Research 2015, 41, 59-69, http://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2015.1004719.
  86. Lindsey, J.D.; Duong-Polk, K.X.; Hammond, D.; Leung, C.K.; Weinreb, R.N. Protection of injured retinal ganglion cell dendrites and unfolded protein response resolution after long-term dietary resveratrol. Neurobiology of Aging 2015, 36, 1969-1981, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.12.021.
  87. Liu, X.-Q.; Wu, B.-J.; Pan, W.H.T.; Zhang, X.-M.; Liu, J.-H.; Chen, M.-M.; Chao, F.-P.; Chao, H.-M. Resveratrol mitigates rat retinal ischemic injury: the roles of matrix metalloproteinase-9, inducible nitric oxide, and heme oxygenase-1. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2013, 29, 33-40, http://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2012.0141.
  88. Zhang, X.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xiang, D.; Niu, W.; Yuan, F. Resveratrol ameliorates disorders of mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics in a rat chronic ocular hypertension model. Life Sciences 2018, 207, 234-245, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.06.010.
  89. Khan, R.S.; Fonseca-Kelly, Z.; Callinan, C.; Zuo, L.; Sachdeva, M.M.; Shindler, K.S. SIRT1 activating compounds reduce oxidative stress and prevent cell death in neuronal cells. Front Cell Neurosci 2012, 6, 63-63, http://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2012.00063.
  90. Means, J.C.; Lopez, A.A.; Koulen, P. Resveratrol Protects Optic Nerve Head Astrocytes from Oxidative Stress-Induced Cell Death by Preventing Caspase-3 Activation, Tau Dephosphorylation at Ser422 and Formation of Misfolded Protein Aggregates. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology 2020, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-019-00781-6.
  91. Clark, A.F.; Wordinger, R.J. The role of steroids in outflow resistance. Experimental Eye Research 2009, 88, 752-759, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2008.10.004.
  92. Razali, N.; Agarwal, R.; Agarwal, P.; Kumar, S.; Tripathy, M.; Vasudevan, S.; Crowston, J.G.; Ismail, N.M. Role of adenosine receptors in resveratrol-induced intraocular pressure lowering in rats with steroid-induced ocular hypertension. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 2014, 43, 54-66, http://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12375.
  93. Ramírez-Garza, S.L.; Laveriano-Santos, E.P.; Marhuenda-Muñoz, M.; Storniolo, C.E.; Tresserra-Rimbau, A.; Vallverdú-Queralt, A.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Health Effects of Resveratrol: Results from Human Intervention Trials. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1892, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu10121892.
  94. Pandi-Perumal, S.R.; Srinivasan, V.; Maestroni, G.J.M.; Cardinali, D.P.; Poeggeler, B.; Hardeland, R. Melatonin. FEBS Journal 2006, 273, 2813-2838, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05322.x.
  95. Czeisler, C.A. Stability, Precision, and Near-24-Hour Period of the Human Circadian Pacemaker. Science 1999, 284, 2177-2181, http://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5423.2177.
  96. Ng, K.Y.; Leong, M.K.; Liang, H.; Paxinos, G. Melatonin receptors: distribution in mammalian brain and their respective putative functions. Brain Structure and Function 2017, 222, 2921-2939, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1439-6.
  97. Tosini, G.; Menaker, M. The clock in the mouse retina: melatonin synthesis and photoreceptor degeneration. Brain Research 1998, 789, 221-228, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(97)01446-7.
  98. Martin, X.D.; Malina, H.Z.; Brennan, M.C.; Hendrickson, Ph.H.; Lichter, P.R. The Ciliary Body – The Third Organ Found to Synthesize Indoleamines in Humans. European Journal of Ophthalmology 1992, 2, 67-72, http://doi.org/10.1177/112067219200200203.
  99. Mhatre, M.C.; van Jaarsveld, A.S.; Reiter, R.J. Melatonin in the lacrimal gland: First demonstration and experimental manipulation. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 1988, 153, 1186-1192, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-291x(88)81353-6.
  100. Peyrot, F.; Ducrocq, C. Potential role of tryptophan derivatives in stress responses characterized by the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Journal of Pineal Research 2008, 45, 235-246, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079x.2008.00580.x.
  101. Hardeland, R.; Tan, D.-X.; Reiter, R.J. Kynuramines, metabolites of melatonin and other indoles: the resurrection of an almost forgotten class of biogenic amines. Journal of Pineal Research 2009, 47, 109-126, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079x.2009.00701.x.
  102. Siu, A.W.; Maldonado, M.; Sanchez-Hidalgo, M.; Tan, D.-X.; Reiter, R.J. Protective effects of melatonin in experimental free radical-related ocular diseases. Journal of Pineal Research 2006, 40, 101-109, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079x.2005.00304.x.
  103. Park, S.-W.; Lee, H.-S.; Sung, M.-S.; Kim, S.-J. The effect of melatonin on retinal ganglion cell survival in ischemic retina. Chonnam Med J 2012, 48, 116-122, http://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2012.48.2.116.
  104. Belforte, N.A.; Moreno, M.C.; de Zavalía, N.; Sande, P.H.; Chianelli, M.S.; Keller Sarmiento, M.I.; Rosenstein, R.E. Melatonin: a novel neuroprotectant for the treatment of glaucoma. Journal of Pineal Research 2010, 48, 353-364, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079x.2010.00762.x.
  105. del Valle Bessone, C.; Fajreldines, H.D.; de Barboza, G.E.D.; Tolosa de Talamoni, N.G.; Allemandi, D.A.; Carpentieri, A.R.; Quinteros, D.A. Protective role of melatonin on retinal ganglionar cell: In vitro an in vivo evidences. Life Sciences 2019, 218, 233-240, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.12.053.
  106. Arranz-Romera, A.; Davis, B.M.; Bravo-Osuna, I.; Esteban-Pérez, S.; Molina-Martínez, I.T.; Shamsher, E.; Ravindran, N.; Guo, L.; Cordeiro, M.F.; Herrero-Vanrell, R. Simultaneous co-delivery of neuroprotective drugs from multi-loaded PLGA microspheres for the treatment of glaucoma. Journal of Controlled Release 2019, 297, 26-38, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.01.012.
  107. Gressens, P.; Schwendimann, L.; Husson, I.; Sarkozy, G.; Mocaer, E.; Vamecq, J.; Spedding, M. Agomelatine, a melatonin receptor agonist with 5-HT2C receptor antagonist properties, protects the developing murine white matter against excitotoxicity. European Journal of Pharmacology 2008, 588, 58-63, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.04.016.
  108. Rowland, J.M.; Potter, D.E.; Reiter, R.J. Circadian rhythm in intraocular pressure: A rabbit model. Current Eye Research 1981, 1, 169-173, http://doi.org/10.3109/02713688109001822.
  109. Samples, J.R.; Krause, G.; Lewy, A.J. Effect of melatonin on intraocular pressure. Current Eye Research 1988, 7, 649-653, http://doi.org/10.3109/02713688809033192.
  110. Serle, J.B.; Wang, R.-F.; Peterson, W.M.; Plourde, R.; Yerxa, B.R. Effect of 5-MCA-NAT, a Putative Melatonin MT3 Receptor Agonist, on Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Monkey Eyes. Journal of Glaucoma 2004, 13, 385-388, http://doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000133150.44686.0b.
  111. Pintor, J.; Martin, L.; Pelaez, T.; Hoyle, C.H.V.; Peral, A. Involvement of melatonin MT3 receptors in the regulation of intraocular pressure in rabbits. European Journal of Pharmacology 2001, 416, 251-254, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2999(01)00864-0.
  112. Dal Monte, M.; Cammalleri, M.; Pezzino, S.; Corsaro, R.; Pescosolido, N.; Bagnoli, P.; Rusciano, D. Hypotensive Effect of Nanomicellar Formulation of Melatonin and Agomelatine in a Rat Model: Significance for Glaucoma Therapy. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 138, http://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10030138.
  113. Pescosolido, N.; Gatto, V.; Stefanucci, A.; Rusciano, D. Oral treatment with the melatonin agonist agomelatine lowers the intraocular pressure of glaucoma patients. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2015, 35, 201-205, http://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12189.
  114. Chen, J.; Matias, I.; Dinh, T.; Lu, T.; Venezia, S.; Nieves, A.; Woodward, D.F.; Di Marzo, V. Finding of endocannabinoids in human eye tissues: Implications for glaucoma. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2005, 330, 1062-1067, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.095.
  115. Matias, I.; Wang, J.W.; Moriello, A.S.; Nieves, A.; Woodward, D.F.; Di Marzo, V. Changes in endocannabinoid and palmitoylethanolamide levels in eye tissues of patients with diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids 2006, 75, 413-418, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2006.08.002.
  116. Kuepper, R.; Morrison, P.D.; van Os, J.; Murray, R.M.; Kenis, G.; Henquet, C. Does dopamine mediate the psychosis-inducing effects of cannabis? A review and integration of findings across disciplines. Schizophrenia Research 2010, 121, 107-117, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2010.05.031.
  117. Tomida, I.; Pertwee, R.G.; Azuara-Blanco, A. Cannabinoids and glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2004, 88, 708-713, http://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2003.032250.
  118. Tomida, I.; Azuara-Blanco, A.; House, H.; Flint, M.; Pertwee, R.G.; Robson, P.J. Effect of Sublingual Application of Cannabinoids on Intraocular Pressure: A Pilot Study. Journal of Glaucoma 2006, 15, 349-353, http://doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000212260.04488.60.
  119. Rapino, C.; Tortolani, D.; Scipioni, L.; Maccarrone, M. Neuroprotection by (endo)Cannabinoids in Glaucoma and Retinal Neurodegenerative Diseases. Curr Neuropharmacol 2018, 16, 959-970, http://doi.org/10.2174/1570159X15666170724104305.
  120. Njie, Y.F.; Kumar, A.; Qiao, Z.; Zhong, L.; Song, Z.-H. Noladin Ether Acts on Trabecular Meshwork Cannabinoid (CB1) Receptors to Enhance Aqueous Humor Outflow Facility. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 2006, 47, 1999, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0729.
  121. Chien, F.Y. Effect of WIN 55212-2, a Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist, on Aqueous Humor Dynamics in Monkeys. Archives of Ophthalmology 2003, 121, 87, http://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.121.1.87.
  122. Panahi, Y.; Manayi, A.; Nikan, M.; Vazirian, M. The arguments for and against cannabinoids application in glaucomatous retinopathy. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2017, 86, 620-627, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2016.11.106.
  123. Purnell, W.D.; Gregg, J.M. Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol,, euphoria and intraocular pressure in man. Ann Ophthalmol 1975, 7, 921-923.
  124. Taskar, P.S.; Patil, A.; Lakhani, P.; Ashour, E.; Gul, W.; ElSohly, M.A.; Murphy, B.; Majumdar, S. Δ(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol Derivative-Loaded Nanoformulation Lowers Intraocular Pressure in Normotensive Rabbits. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2019, 8, 15-15, http://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.5.15.
  125. Pescosolido, N.; Stefanucci, A.; Librando, A.; Pezzino, S.; Rusciano, D. Evaluation of cannabinoid eye drops on five patients with intractable hypertensive open angle glaucoma. The Ophthalmologist: Clinical and Therapeutic Journal 2018, 2, 1-3.
  126. Wagh, V.; Patil, P.; Surana, S.; Wagh, K. Forskolin: Upcoming antiglaucoma molecule. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 2012, 58, 199, http://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.101396.
  127. Caprioli, J.; Sears, M. FORSKOLIN LOWERS INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN RABBITS, MONKEYS, AND MAN. The Lancet 1983, 321, 958-960, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92084-6.
  128. Caprioli, J.; Sears, M.; Bausher, L.; Gregory, D.; Mead, A. Forskolin lowers intraocular pressure by reducing aqueous inflow. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1984, 25, 268-277.
  129. Lee, P.Y.; Podos, S.M.; Mittag, T.; Severin, C. Effect of topically applied forskolin on aqueous humor dynamics in cynomolgus monkey. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1984, 25, 1206-1209.
  130. Shen, X.; Koga, T.; Park, B.-C.; SundarRaj, N.; Yue, B.Y.J.T. Rho GTPase and cAMP/protein kinase A signaling mediates myocilin-induced alterations in cultured human trabecular meshwork cells. J Biol Chem 2008, 283, 603-612, http://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M708250200.
  131. Ganeshpurkar, A.; Saluja, A.K. The Pharmacological Potential of Rutin. Saudi Pharm J 2017, 25, 149-164, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2016.04.025.
  132. Vetrugno, M.; Uva, M.G.; Russo, V.; Iester, M.; Ciancaglini, M.; Brusini, P.; Centofanti, M.; Rossetti, L.M. Oral Administration of Forskolin and Rutin Contributes to Intraocular Pressure Control in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Patients Under Maximum Tolerated Medical Therapy. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2012, 28, 536-541, http://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2012.0021.
  133. Pescosolido, N.; Librando, A. Oral administration of an association of forskolin, rutin and vitamins B1 and B2 potentiates the hypotonising effects of pharmacological treatments in POAG patients. Clin Ter 2010, 161, e81-85.
  134. Jurič, D.M.; Lončar, D.; Čarman-Kržan, M. Noradrenergic stimulation of BDNF synthesis in astrocytes: Mediation via α1- and β1/β2-adrenergic receptors. Neurochemistry International 2008, 52, 297-306, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2007.06.035.
  135. Nakahashi, T.; Fujimura, H.; Altar, C.A.; Li, J.; Kambayashi, J.; Tandon, N.N.; Sun, B. Vascular endothelial cells synthesize and secrete brain-derived neurotrophic factor. FEBS Letters 2000, 470, 113-117, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01302-8.
  136. Meyer-Franke, A.; Wilkinson, G.A.; Kruttgen, A.; Hu, M.; Munro, E.; Hanson, M.G.; Reichardt, L.F.; Barres, B.A. Depolarization and cAMP Elevation Rapidly Recruit TrkB to the Plasma Membrane of CNS Neurons. Neuron 1998, 21, 681-693, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80586-3.
  137. Pescosolido, N.; Scarsella, G.; Rusciano, D. Oral administration of forskolin decreases retinal damage after experimental induction of ocular hypertension in the rat. In; 2015; pp. 31-50.
  138. Sisto, D.; Lavermicocca, N.; Errico, D.; Rusciano, D. Oral Administration of Forskolin and Rutin Contributes to Reduce Intraocular Pressure and Improve PERG (Pattern Electroretinogram) Amplitude in Glaucomatous Patients. JSM Biotechnology & Biomedical Engineering.
  139. Tsolaki, M. Future strategies of management of Alzheimer’s Disease. The role of homotaurine. Hell J Nucl Med 2019, 22 Suppl, 82-94.
  140. Ricciardi, L.; De Nigris, F.; Specchia, A.; Fasano, A. Homotaurine in Parkinson’s disease. Neurological Sciences 2015, 36, 1581-1587, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2201-6.
  141. Berezhnoy, D.S.; Stvolinsky, S.L.; Lopachev, A.V.; Devyatov, A.A.; Lopacheva, O.M.; Kulikova, O.I.; Abaimov, D.A.; Fedorova, T.N. Carnosine as an effective neuroprotector in brain pathology and potential neuromodulator in normal conditions. Amino Acids 2018, 51, 139-150, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-018-2667-7.
  142. Schön, M.; Mousa, A.; Berk, M.; Chia, W.L.; Ukropec, J.; Majid, A.; Ukropcová, B.; de Courten, B. The Potential of Carnosine in Brain-Related Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1196, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu11061196.
  143. Russo, R.; Adornetto, A.; Cavaliere, F.; Varano, G.P.; Rusciano, D.; Morrone, L.A.; Corasaniti, M.T.; Bagetta, G.; Nucci, C. Intravitreal injection of forskolin, homotaurine, and L-carnosine affords neuroprotection to retinal ganglion cells following retinal ischemic injury. Mol. Vis. 2015, 21, 718-729.
  144. Mutolo, M.G.; Albanese, G.; Rusciano, D.; Pescosolido, N. Oral Administration of Forskolin, Homotaurine, Carnosine, and Folic Acid in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: Changes in Intraocular Pressure, Pattern Electroretinogram Amplitude, and Foveal Sensitivity. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2016, 32, 178-183, http://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2015.0121.
  145. Nieman, K.M.; Sanoshy, K.D.; Bresciani, L.; Schild, A.L.; Kelley, K.M.; Lawless, A.L.; Ceddia, M.A.; C. Maki, K.; Del Rio, D.; Herrlinger, K.A. Tolerance, bioavailability, and potential cognitive health implications of a distinct aqueous spearmint extract. Functional Foods in Health and Disease 2015, 5, 165, http://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v5i5.181.
  146. Locri, F.; Cammalleri, M.; Dal Monte, M.; Rusciano, D.; Bagnoli, P. Protective Efficacy of a Dietary Supplement Based on Forskolin, Homotaurine, Spearmint Extract, and Group B Vitamins in a Mouse Model of Optic Nerve Injury. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2931, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu11122931.
  147. Cammalleri, M.; Dal Monte, M.; Amato, R.; Bagnoli, P.; Rusciano, D. A dietary combination of forskolin with homotaurine, spearmint and B vitamins protects injured retinal ganglion cells in a rodent model of hypertensive glaucoma. Nutrients 2020.
  148. Ramdas, W.D.; Schouten, J.S.A.G.; Webers, C.A.B. The Effect of Vitamins on Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2018, 10, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu10030359.
  149. Coleman, A.L. Glaucoma. Lancet 1999, 354, 1803-1810, http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04240-3.
  150. Ramdas, W.D.; Wolfs, R.C.W.; Kiefte-de Jong, J.C.; Hofman, A.; de Jong, P.T.V.M.; Vingerling, J.R.; Jansonius, N.M. Nutrient intake and risk of open-angle glaucoma: the Rotterdam Study. Eur J Epidemiol 2012, 27, 385-393, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-012-9672-z.
  151. Asregadoo, E.R. Blood levels of thiamine and ascorbic acid in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Ann Ophthalmol 1979, 11, 1095-1100.
  152. Cumurcu, T.; Sahin, S.; Aydin, E. Serum homocysteine, vitamin B 12 and folic acid levels in different types of glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol 2006, 6, 6, http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-6-6.
  153. Franken, D.G.; Blom, H.J.; Boers, G.H.; Tangerman, A.; Thomas, C.M.; Trijbels, F.J. Thiamine (vitamin B1) supplementation does not reduce fasting blood homocysteine concentration in most homozygotes for homocystinuria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1317, 101-104, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-4439(96)00033-6.
  154. Navneet, S.; Zhao, J.; Wang, J.; Mysona, B.; Barwick, S.; Ammal Kaidery, N.; Saul, A.; Kaddour-Djebbar, I.; Bollag, W.B.; Thomas, B.; et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia-induced death of retinal ganglion cells: The role of Müller glial cells and Nrf2. Redox Biol 2019, 24, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2019.101199.
  155. Roedl, J.B.; Bleich, S.; Reulbach, U.; von Ahsen, N.; Schlötzer-Schrehardt, U.; Rejdak, R.; Naumann, G.O.H.; Kruse, F.E.; Kornhuber, J.; Jünemann, A.G.M. Homocysteine levels in aqueous humor and plasma of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2007, 114, 445-450, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-006-0556-9.
  156. Xu, F.; Zhang, L.; Li, M. Plasma homocysteine, serum folic acid, serum vitamin B12, serum vitamin B6, MTHFR and risk of pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: a meta-analysis. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2012, 250, 1067-1074, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1877-4.
  157. Roedl, J.B.; Bleich, S.; Reulbach, U.; Rejdak, R.; Naumann, G.O.H.; Kruse, F.E.; Schlötzer-Schrehardt, U.; Kornhuber, J.; Jünemann, A.G.M. Vitamin deficiency and hyperhomocysteinemia in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2007, 114, 571-575, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-006-0598-z.
  158. Kang, J.H.; Loomis, S.J.; Wiggs, J.L.; Willett, W.C.; Pasquale, L.R. A prospective study of folate, vitamin B6 and vitamin B12 in relation to exfoliation glaucoma or exfoliation glaucoma suspect. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014, 132, 549-559, http://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.100.
  159. Moores, J. Vitamin C: a wound healing perspective. Br J Community Nurs 2013, Suppl, S6, S8-11, http://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2013.18.sup12.s6.
  160. Knepper, P.A.; Goossens, W; Hvizd, E, Palmberg, P.F. Glycosaminoglycans of the human trabecular meshwork in primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1996, Jun;37(7):1360-7.
  161. Schachtschabel, D.O.; Binninger, E. Stimulatory effects of ascorbic acid on hyaluronic acid synthesis of in vitro cultured normal and glaucomatous trabecular meshwork cells of the human eye. Z Gerontol 1993, 26, 243-246.
  162. Wang, S.Y.; Singh, K.; Lin, S.C. Glaucoma and vitamins A, C, and E supplement intake and serum levels in a population-based sample of the United States. Eye 2013, 27, 487-494, http://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2013.10.
  163. Giaconi, J.A.; Yu, F.; Stone, K.L.; Pedula, K.L.; Ensrud, K.E.; Cauley, J.A.; Hochberg, M.C.; Coleman, A.L.; Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group The association of consumption of fruits/vegetables with decreased risk of glaucoma among older African-American women in the study of osteoporotic fractures. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 154, 635-644, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.048.
  164. Yuki, K.; Murat, D.; Kimura, I.; Ohtake, Y.; Tsubota, K. Reduced-serum vitamin C and increased uric acid levels in normal-tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2010, 248, 243-248, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1183-6.
  165. Xu, P.; Lin, Y.; Porter, K.; Liton, P.B. Ascorbic acid modulation of iron homeostasis and lysosomal function in trabecular meshwork cells. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2014, 30, 246-253, http://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2013.0183.
  166. Traber, M.G.; Atkinson, J. Vitamin E, Antioxidant and Nothing More. Free Radic Biol Med 2007, 43, 4-15, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.03.024.
  167. López-Riquelme, N.; Villalba, C.; Tormo, C.; Belmonte, A.; Fernandez, C.; Torralba, G.; Hernández, F. Endothelin-1 levels and biomarkers of oxidative stress in glaucoma patients. Int Ophthalmol 2015, 35, 527-532, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-014-9979-8.
  168. Goyal, A.; Srivastava, A.; Sihota, R.; Kaur, J. Evaluation of oxidative stress markers in aqueous humor of primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle closure glaucoma patients. Curr. Eye Res. 2014, 39, 823-829, http://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2011.556299.
  169. Hossein-nezhad, A.; Holick, M.F. Vitamin D for health: a global perspective. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2013, 88, 720-755, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.05.011.
  170. Dalan, R.; Liew, H.; Tan, W.K.A.; Chew, D.E.K.; Leow, M.K.-S. Vitamin D and the endothelium: basic, translational and clinical research updates. IJC Metabolic & Endocrine 2014, 4, 4-17, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcme.2014.06.003.
  171. Goncalves, A.; Milea, D.; Gohier, P.; Jallet, G.; Leruez, S.; Baskaran, M.; Aung, T.; Annweiler, C. Serum vitamin D status is associated with the presence but not the severity of primary open angle glaucoma. Maturitas 2015, 81, 470-474, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.05.008.
  172. Kim, H.T.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, M.Y.; Won, Y.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, K.H. The Relationship between Vitamin D and Glaucoma: A Kangbuk Samsung Health Study. Korean J Ophthalmol 2016, 30, 426-433, http://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2016.30.6.426.
  173. Burgess, L.G.; Uppal, K.; Walker, D.I.; Roberson, R.M.; Tran, V.; Parks, M.B.; Wade, E.A.; May, A.T.; Umfress, A.C.; Jarrell, K.L.; et al. Metabolome-Wide Association Study of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 5020-5028, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-16702.
  174. Lv, Y.; Yao, Q.; Ma, W.; Liu, H.; Ji, J.; Li, X. Associations of vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D receptor (Cdx-2, Fok I, Bsm I and Taq I) polymorphisms with the risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol 2016, 16, http://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0289-y.
  175. Vuković Arar, Ž.; Knežević Praveček, M.; Miškić, B.; Vatavuk, Z.; Vuković Rodriguez, J.; Sekelj, S. Association Between Serum Vitamin D Level and Glaucoma in Women. Acta Clin Croat 2016, 55, 203-208, http://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2016.55.02.04.
  176. Craig, J.P.; Nichols, K.K.; Akpek, E.K.; Caffery, B.; Dua, H.S.; Joo, C.-K.; Liu, Z.; Nelson, J.D.; Nichols, J.J.; Tsubota, K.; et al. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. The Ocular Surface 2017, 15, 276-283, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008.
  177. Rand, A.L.; Asbell, P.A. Nutritional supplements for dry eye syndrome. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2011, 22, 279-282, http://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283477d23.
  178. Askari, G.; Rafie, N.; Miraghajani, M.; Heidari, Z.; Arab, A. Association between vitamin D and dry eye disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2020, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2020.03.001.
  179. Prietl, B.; Treiber, G.; Pieber, T.R.; Amrein, K. Vitamin D and Immune Function. Nutrients 2013, 5, 2502-2521, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu5072502.
  180. Reins, R.Y.; McDermott, A.M. Vitamin D: Implications for ocular disease and therapeutic potential. Exp. Eye Res. 2015, 134, 101-110, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.02.019.
  181. Sheppard, J.D.J.; Singh, R.; McClellan, A.J.; Weikert, M.P.; Scoper, S.V.; Joly, T.J.; Whitley, W.O.; Kakkar, E.; Pflugfelder, S.C. Long-term Supplementation With n-6 and n-3 PUFAs Improves Moderate-to-Severe Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Cornea 2013, 32, 1297-1304, http://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318299549c.
  182. Yildirim, P.; Garip, Y.; Karci, A.A.; Guler, T. Dry eye in vitamin D deficiency: more than an incidental association. Int J Rheum Dis 2016, 19, 49-54, http://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.12727.
  183. Yoon, S.Y.; Bae, S.H.; Shin, Y.J.; Park, S.G.; Hwang, S.-H.; Hyon, J.Y.; Wee, W.R. Low Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels Are Associated with Dry Eye Syndrome. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147847, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147847.
  184. Al Mahmood, A.M.; Al-Swailem, S.A. Essential fatty acids in the treatment of dry eye syndrome: A myth or reality? Saudi J Ophthalmol 2014, 28, 195-197, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.06.004.
  185. Roncone, M.; Bartlett, H.; Eperjesi, F. Essential fatty acids for dry eye: A review. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 2010, 33, 49-54, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2009.11.002.
  186. Swanson, D.; Block, R.; Mousa, S.A. Omega-3 Fatty Acids EPA and DHA: Health Benefits Throughout Life. Adv Nutr 2012, 3, 1-7, http://doi.org/10.3945/an.111.000893.
  187. Saini, R.K.; Keum, Y.-S. Omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids: Dietary sources, metabolism, and significance – A review. Life Sci. 2018, 203, 255-267, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.04.049.
  188. Miljanović, B.; Trivedi, K.A.; Dana, R.M.; Gilbard, J.P.; Buring, J.E.; Schaumberg, D.A. The relationship between dietary n-3 and n-6 fatty acids and clinically diagnosed dry eye syndrome in women. Am J Clin Nutr 2005, 82, 887-893.
  189. Zhu, W.; Wu, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, J.; Li, X. Efficacy of polyunsaturated fatty acids for dry eye syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Rev. 2014, 72, 662-671, http://doi.org/10.1111/nure.12145.
  190. Liu, A.; Ji, J. Omega-3 Essential Fatty Acids Therapy for Dry Eye Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies. Med Sci Monit 2014, 20, 1583-1589, http://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.891364.
  191. Chan, T.C.Y.; Chow, S.S.W.; Wan, K.H.N.; Yuen, H.K.L. Update on the association between dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction. Hong Kong Med J 2019, 25, 38-47, http://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj187331.
  192. Chhadva, P.; Goldhardt, R.; Galor, A. Meibomian Gland Disease: The Role of Gland Dysfunction in Dry Eye Disease. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, S20-S26, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.031.
  193. Driver, P.J.; Lemp, M.A. Meibomian gland dysfunction. Surv Ophthalmol 1996, 40, 343-367, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(96)80064-6.
  194. Schnebelen, C.; Viau, S.; Grégoire, S.; Joffre, C.; Creuzot-Garcher, C.P.; Bron, A.M.; Bretillon, L.; Acar, N. Nutrition for the eye: different susceptibility of the retina and the lacrimal gland to dietary omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid incorporation. Ophthalmic Res. 2009, 41, 216-224, http://doi.org/10.1159/000217726.
  195. Schnebelen, C.; Fourgeux, C.; Pasquis, B.; Creuzot-Garcher, C.P.; Bron, A.M.; Bretillon, L.; Acar, N. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids reduce retinal stress induced by an elevation of intraocular pressure in rats. Nutr Res 2011, 31, 286-295, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.03.011.
  196. Viau, S.; Maire, M.-A.; Pasquis, B.; Grégoire, S.; Acar, N.; Bron, A.M.; Bretillon, L.; Creuzot-Garcher, C.P.; Joffre, C. Efficacy of a 2-month dietary supplementation with polyunsaturated fatty acids in dry eye induced by scopolamine in a rat model. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2009, 247, 1039-1050, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1080-z.
  197. Wojtowicz, J.; Butovich, I.; Uchiyama, E.; Aronowicz, J.; Agee, S.; McCulley, J. Pilot, Prospective, Randomized, Double-masked, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial of an Omega-3 Supplement for Dry Eye. Cornea 2011, 30, 308-314, http://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181f22e03.
  198. Ziemanski, J.F.; Wolters, L.R.; Jones-Jordan, L.; Nichols, J.J.; Nichols, K.K. Relation Between Dietary Essential Fatty Acid Intake and Dry Eye Disease and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Postmenopausal Women. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 189, 29-40, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.004.
  199. Potvin, R.; Makari, S.; Rapuano, C.J. Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol 2015, 9, 2039-2047, http://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S95242.
  200. Larmo, P.S.; Järvinen, R.L.; Setälä, N.L.; Yang, B.; Viitanen, M.H.; Engblom, J.R.K.; Tahvonen, R.L.; Kallio, H.P. Oral sea buckthorn oil attenuates tear film osmolarity and symptoms in individuals with dry eye. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 1462-1468, http://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.118901.
  201. Deinema, L.A.; Vingrys, A.J.; Wong, C.Y.; Jackson, D.C.; Chinnery, H.R.; Downie, L.E. A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Two Forms of Omega-3 Supplements for Treating Dry Eye Disease. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, 43-52, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.023.
  202. Kokke, K.H.; Morris, J.A.; Lawrenson, J.G. Oral omega-6 essential fatty acid treatment in contact lens associated dry eye. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2008, 31, 141-146; quiz 170, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2007.12.001.
  203. Oleñik, A. Effectiveness and tolerability of dietary supplementation with a combination of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and antioxidants in the treatment of dry eye symptoms: results of a prospective study. Clin Ophthalmol 2014, 8, 169-176, http://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S54658.
  204. Bhargava, R.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, M.; Mehra, N.; Mishra, A. A randomized controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids in dry eye syndrome. Int J Ophthalmol 2013, 6, 811-816, http://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.06.13.
  205. Kangari, H.; Eftekhari, M.H.; Sardari, S.; Hashemi, H.; Salamzadeh, J.; Ghassemi-Broumand, M.; Khabazkhoob, M. Short-term consumption of oral omega-3 and dry eye syndrome. Ophthalmology 2013, 120, 2191-2196, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.006.
  206. Bhargava, R.; Kumar, P.; Phogat, H.; Kaur, A.; Kumar, M. Oral omega-3 fatty acids treatment in computer vision syndrome related dry eye. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2015, 38, 206-210, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2015.01.007.
  207. Baudouin, C.; Irkeç, M.; Messmer, E.M.; Benítez‐del‐Castillo, J.M.; Bonini, S.; Figueiredo, F.C.; Geerling, G.; Labetoulle, M.; Lemp, M.; Rolando, M.; et al. Clinical impact of inflammation in dry eye disease: proceedings of the ODISSEY group meeting. Acta Ophthalmol 2018, 96, 111-119, http://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13436.
  208. Hessen, M.; Akpek, E.K. Dry Eye: an Inflammatory Ocular Disease. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2014, 9, 240-250.
  209. Calder, P.C. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and immunity. Lipids 2001, 36, 1007-1024, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11745-001-0812-7.
  210. Rashid, S.; Jin, Y.; Ecoiffier, T.; Barabino, S.; Schaumberg, D.A.; Dana, M.R. Topical omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids for treatment of dry eye. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2008, 126, 219-225, http://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.61.
  211. Barabino, S.; Rolando, M.; Camicione, P.; Ravera, G.; Zanardi, S.; Giuffrida, S.; Calabria, G. Systemic linoleic and gamma-linolenic acid therapy in dry eye syndrome with an inflammatory component. Cornea 2003, 22, 97-101, http://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200303000-00002.
  212. Pinazo-Durán, M.D.; Galbis-Estrada, C.; Pons-Vázquez, S.; Cantú-Dibildox, J.; Marco-Ramírez, C.; Benítez-del-Castillo, J. Effects of a nutraceutical formulation based on the combination of antioxidants and &omega;-3 essential fatty acids in the expression of inflammation and immune response mediators in tears from patients with dry eye disorders Available online: https://www.dovepress.com/effects-of-a-nutraceutical-formulation-based-on-the-combination-of-ant-peer-reviewed-article-CIA (accessed on Apr 8, 2020).
  213. Brignole‐Baudouin, F.; Baudouin, C.; Aragona, P.; Rolando, M.; Labetoulle, M.; Pisella, P.J.; Barabino, S.; Siou‐Mermet, R.; Creuzot‐Garcher, C. A multicentre, double-masked, randomized, controlled trial assessing the effect of oral supplementation of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids on a conjunctival inflammatory marker in dry eye patients. Acta Ophthalmologica 2011, 89, e591-e597, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02196.x.
  214. Ricciotti, E.; FitzGerald, G.A. Prostaglandins and Inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2011, 31, 986-1000, http://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.207449.
  215. Lekhanont, K.; Sathianvichitr, K.; Pisitpayat, P.; Anothaisintawee, T.; Soontrapa, K.; Udomsubpayakul, U. Association between the levels of prostaglandin E2 in tears and severity of dry eye. Int J Ophthalmol 2019, 12, 1127-1133, http://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2019.07.12.
  216. Shim, J.; Park, C.; Lee, H.S.; Park, M.S.; Lim, H.T.; Chauhan, S.; Dana, R.; Lee, H.; Lee, H.K. Change in prostaglandin expression levels and synthesizing activities in dry eye disease. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 2211-2219, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.05.038.
  217. Wu, D.; Meydani, M.; Leka, L.S.; Nightingale, Z.; Handelman, G.J.; Blumberg, J.B.; Meydani, S.N. Effect of dietary supplementation with black currant seed oil on the immune response of healthy elderly subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 70, 536-543, http://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/70.4.536.
  218. Tincani, A.; Andreoli, L.; Cavazzana, I.; Doria, A.; Favero, M.; Fenini, M.-G.; Franceschini, F.; Lojacono, A.; Nascimbeni, G.; Santoro, A.; et al. Novel aspects of Sjögren’s syndrome in 2012. BMC Medicine 2013, 11, 93, http://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-93.
  219. Cermak, J.M.; Papas, A.S.; Sullivan, R.M.; Dana, M.R.; Sullivan, D.A. Nutrient intake in women with primary and secondary Sjögren’s syndrome. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003, 57, 328-334, http://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601543.
  220. Aragona, P.; Bucolo, C.; Spinella, R.; Giuffrida, S.; Ferreri, G. Systemic omega-6 essential fatty acid treatment and pge1 tear content in Sjögren’s syndrome patients. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2005, 46, 4474-4479, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-1394.
  221. de Paiva, C.S.; Pflugfelder, S.C.; Ng, S.M.; Akpek, E.K. Topical cyclosporine A therapy for dry eye syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019, 9, CD010051, http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010051.pub2.
  222. Oliveira, R.C. de; Wilson, S.E. <p>Practical guidance for the use of cyclosporine ophthalmic solutions in the management of dry eye disease</p> Available online: https://www.dovepress.com/practical-guidance-for-the-use-of-cyclosporine-ophthalmic-solutions-in-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH (accessed on Apr 15, 2020).
  223. Jackson, M.A.; Burrell, K.; Gaddie, I.B.; Richardson, S.D. Efficacy of a new prescription-only medical food supplement in alleviating signs and symptoms of dry eye, with or without concomitant cyclosporine A Available online: https://www.dovepress.com/efficacy-of-a-new-prescription-only-medical-food-supplement-in-allevia-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH (accessed on Apr 8, 2020).
  224. Bhargava, R.; Chandra, M.; Bansal, U.; Singh, D.; Ranjan, S.; Sharma, S. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Omega 3 Fatty Acids in Rosacea Patients with Dry Eye Symptoms. Curr. Eye Res. 2016, 41, 1274-1280, http://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2015.1122810.
  225. Demirci, G.; Karaman Erdur, S.; Ozsutcu, M.; Eliacik, M.; Olmuscelik, O.; Aydin, R.; Kocabora, M.S. Dry Eye Assessment in Patients With Vitamin D Deficiency. Eye Contact Lens 2018, 44 Suppl 1, S62-S65, http://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000325.
  226. Meng, B.; LI, S.-M.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Z.-R.; Sun, F.; Kang, M.-T.; Sun, Y.-Y.; Ran, A.-R.; Wang, J.-N.; Yan, R.; et al. The association of TGFB1 genetic polymorphisms with high myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015, 8, 20355-20367.
  227. Kurtul, B.E.; Özer, P.A.; Aydinli, M.S. The association of vitamin D deficiency with tear break-up time and Schirmer testing in non-Sjögren dry eye. Eye (Lond) 2015, 29, 1081-1084, http://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.96.
  228. Lee, J.H.; Kim, S.J.; Byun, Y.-S.; Lee, J.; Park, S.-H.; Chung, S.-H. The Association of Serum Vitamin D Level With the Severity of Dry Eye Parameters in Primary Sjögren Syndrome. Cornea 2019, http://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002234.
  229. Jin, K.W.; Ro, J.W.; Shin, Y.J.; Hyon, J.Y.; Wee, W.R.; Park, S.G. Correlation of vitamin D levels with tear film stability and secretion in patients with dry eye syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol 2017, 95, e230-e235, http://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13241.
  230. Dikci, S.; Akatlı, A.N.; Yıldırım, T. Conjunctival impression cytology and tear-film changes in cases with vitamin D deficiency. Int Ophthalmol 2020, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01336-1.
  231. Augustin, A.J.; Spitznas, M.; Kaviani, N.; Meller, D.; Koch, F.H.; Grus, F.; Göbbels, M.J. Oxidative reactions in the tear fluid of patients suffering from dry eyes. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1995, 233, 694-698, http://doi.org/10.1007/bf00164671.
  232. Eksioglu, U.; Atilgan, H.I.; Yakin, M.; Yazihan, N.; Altiparmak, U.E.; Yumusak, N.; Korkmaz, M.; Demir, A.; Ornek, F.; Aribal Ayral, P.; et al. Antioxidant effects of vitamin D on lacrimal glands against high dose radioiodine-associated damage in an animal model. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2019, 38, 18-24, http://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2018.1498507.
  233. Dang, S.-T.; Lu, X.-H.; Zhou, J.; Bai, L. [Effects of 1alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the acute immune rejection and corneal neovascularization in high-risk penetrating keratoplasty in rats]. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao 2004, 24, 892-896, 903.
  234. Suzuki, T.; Sano, Y.; Kinoshita, S. Effects of 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 on Langerhans Cell Migration and Corneal Neovascularization in Mice. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 154-158.
  235. Reins, R.Y.; Mesmar, F.; Williams, C.; McDermott, A.M. Vitamin D Induces Global Gene Transcription in Human Corneal Epithelial Cells: Implications for Corneal Inflammation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016, 57, 2689-2698, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19237.
  236. Reins, R.Y.; Baidouri, H.; McDermott, A.M. Vitamin D Activation and Function in Human Corneal Epithelial Cells During TLR-Induced Inflammation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015, 56, 7715-7727, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-17768.
  237. Lin, H.; Li, W.; Dong, N.; Chen, W.; Liu, J.; Chen, L.; Yuan, H.; Geng, Z.; Liu, Z. Changes in Corneal Epithelial Layer Inflammatory Cells in Aqueous Tear-Deficient Dry Eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010, 51, 122-128, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-3629.
  238. Niu, L.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y. Upregulation of NLRP3 Inflammasome in the Tears and Ocular Surface of Dry Eye Patients. PLoS One 2015, 10, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126277.
  239. Zheng, Q.; Tan, Q.; Ren, Y.; Reinach, P.S.; Li, L.; Ge, C.; Qu, J.; Chen, W. Hyperosmotic Stress-Induced TRPM2 Channel Activation Stimulates NLRP3 Inflammasome Activity in Primary Human Corneal Epithelial Cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018, 59, 3259-3268, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-23965.
  240. Dai, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, D.; Xu, J. Calcitriol inhibits ROS-NLRP3-IL-1β signaling axis via activation of Nrf2-antioxidant signaling in hyperosmotic stress stimulated human corneal epithelial cells. Redox Biol 2018, 21, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2018.101093.
  241. Shetty, R.; Sethu, S.; Chevour, P.; Deshpande, K.; Pahuja, N.; Nagaraja, H.; Pindipapanahalli, N.; Ghosh, A. Lower Vitamin D Level and Distinct Tear Cytokine Profile Were Observed in Patients with Mild Dry Eye Signs but Exaggerated Symptoms. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2016, 5, http://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.6.16.
  242. Khamar, P.; Nair, A.P.; Shetty, R.; Vaidya, T.; Subramani, M.; Ponnalagu, M.; Dhamodaran, K.; D’souza, S.; Ghosh, A.; Pahuja, N.; et al. Dysregulated Tear Fluid Nociception-Associated Factors, Corneal Dendritic Cell Density, and Vitamin D Levels in Evaporative Dry Eye. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 2532-2542, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.19-26914.
  243. Singman, E.L.; Poon, D.; Jun, A.S. Putative Corneal Neuralgia Responding to Vitamin D Supplementation. Case Rep Ophthalmol 2013, 4, 105-108, http://doi.org/10.1159/000354965.
  244. Ngo, W.; Srinivasan, S.; Houtman, D.; Jones, L. The relief of dry eye signs and symptoms using a combination of lubricants, lid hygiene and ocular nutraceuticals. J Optom 2017, 10, 26-33, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2016.05.001.
  245. Rolando, M.; Autori, S.; Badino, F.; Barabino, S. Protecting the ocular surface and improving the quality of life of dry eye patients: a study of the efficacy of an HP-guar containing ocular lubricant in a population of dry eye patients. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2009, 25, 271-278, http://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2008.0026.
  246. Pflugfelder, S.C.; de Paiva, C.S. The pathophysiology of dry eye disease: What we know and future directions for research. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, S4-S13, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.07.010.
  247. Hwang, J.S.; Lee, Y.P.; Shin, Y.J. Vitamin D Enhances the Efficacy of Topical Artificial Tears in Patients With Dry Eye Disease. Cornea 2019, 38, 304-310, http://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001822.
  248. Faustino, J.F.; Ribeiro-Silva, A.; Dalto, R.F.; Souza, M.M. de; Furtado, J.M.F.; Rocha, G. de M.; Alves, M.; Rocha, E.M.; Faustino, J.F.; Ribeiro-Silva, A.; et al. Vitamin A and the eye: an old tale for modern times. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia 2016, 79, 56-61, http://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20160018.
  249. Gilbert, C. The eye signs of vitamin A deficiency. Community Eye Health 2013, 26, 66-67.
  250. Lanska, D.J. Vitamin A-Deficiency Eye Disease Among Soldiers in the U.S. Civil War: Spectrum of Clinical Disease. Mil Med 2015, 180, 774-779, http://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00642.
  251. Tanumihardjo, S.A. Vitamin A: biomarkers of nutrition for development. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 94, 658S-65S, http://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.110.005777.
  252. Wässle, H.; Boycott, B.B. Functional architecture of the mammalian retina. Physiol. Rev. 1991, 71, 447-480, http://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1991.71.2.447.
  253. Reddy, V. HYPOVITAMINOSIS A. In Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition (Second Edition); Caballero, B., Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, 2003; pp. 3212-3219 ISBN 978-0-12-227055-0.
  254. Underwood, B.A. Hypovitaminosis A and its control. Bull World Health Organ 1978, 56, 525-541.
  255. Smith, J.; Steinemann, T.L. Vitamin A Deficiency and the Eye. International Ophthalmology Clinics 2000, 40, 83-91.
  256. Dua, H.S.; Gomes, J.A.; Singh, A. Corneal epithelial wound healing. Br J Ophthalmol 1994, 78, 401-408.
  257. Li, B.; Sheng, M.; Li, J.; Yan, G.; Lin, A.; Li, M.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y. Tear proteomic analysis of Sjögren syndrome patients with dry eye syndrome by two-dimensional-nano-liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Sci Rep 2014, 4, http://doi.org/10.1038/srep05772.
  258. Zhang, W.; Li, W.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, C.; Yi, X.; Zhou, Y.; Lv, Y. Effects of Vitamin A on Expressions of Apoptosis Genes Bax and Bcl-2 in Epithelial Cells of Corneal Tissues Induced by Benzalkonium Chloride in Mice with Dry Eye. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 4583-4589, http://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.913478.
  259. Alanazi, S.A.; El-Hiti, G.A.; Al-Baloud, A.A.; Alfarhan, M.I.; Al-Shahrani, A.; Albakri, A.A.; Alqahtani, S.; Masmali, A.M. Effects of short-term oral vitamin A supplementation on the ocular tear film in patients with dry eye. Clin Ophthalmol 2019, 13, 599-604, http://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S198349.
  260. Rusciano, D.; Pezzino, S.; Olivieri, M.; Cristaldi, M.; Gagliano, C.; Lupo, G.; Anfuso, C.D. Age-Related Dry Eye Lactoferrin and Lactobionic Acid. Ophthalmic Res. 2018, 60, 94-99, http://doi.org/10.1159/000489093.
  261. Giansanti, F.; Panella, G.; Leboffe, L.; Antonini, G. Lactoferrin from Milk: Nutraceutical and Pharmacological Properties. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2016, 9, http://doi.org/10.3390/ph9040061.
  262. Janssen, P.T.; van Bijsterveld, O.P. A simple test for lacrimal gland function: a tear lactoferrin assay by radial immunodiffusion. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1983, 220, 171-174, http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02186663.
  263. Willcox, M.D.; Morris, C.A.; Thakur, A.; Sack, R.A.; Wickson, J.; Boey, W. Complement and complement regulatory proteins in human tears. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1997, 38, 1-8.
  264. McGill, J.I.; Liakos, G.M.; Goulding, N.; Seal, D.V. Normal tear protein profiles and age-related changes. Br J Ophthalmol 1984, 68, 316-320.
  265. Danjo, Y.; Lee, M.; Horimoto, K.; Hamano, T. Ocular surface damage and tear lactoferrin in dry eye syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1994, 72, 433-437, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1994.tb02791.x.
  266. Mt, K.; Pc, F.; Tl, C.; A, C.; Yh, L.; Yt, H.; Cy, T. Tear Proteomics Approach to Monitoring Sjögren Syndrome or Dry Eye Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2019, 20, http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081932.
  267. Sonobe, H.; Ogawa, Y.; Yamada, K.; Shimizu, E.; Uchino, Y.; Kamoi, M.; Saijo, Y.; Yamane, M.; Citterio, D.; Suzuki, K.; et al. A novel and innovative paper-based analytical device for assessing tear lactoferrin of dry eye patients. Ocul Surf 2019, 17, 160-166, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2018.11.001.
  268. Yanwei, L.; Wei, Z.; Yu, Z. The relationship between dry eye and lactoferrin levels in tears. Asian Biomedicine 2012, 6, 81-85, http://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0601.130.
  269. Shimmura, S.; Shimoyama, M.; Hojo, M.; Urayama, K.; Tsubota, K. Reoxygenation injury in a cultured corneal epithelial cell line protected by the uptake of lactoferrin. INVEST.OPHTHAL.VISUAL SCI 1998, 39, 1346-1351.
  270. Fujihara, T.; Nagano, T.; Nakamura, M.; Shirasawa, E. Lactoferrin suppresses loss of corneal epithelial integrity in a rabbit short-term dry eye model. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1998, 14, 99-107, http://doi.org/10.1089/jop.1998.14.99.
  271. Dogru, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Goto, E.; Saiki, M.; Shimazaki, J.; Takebayashi, T.; Tsubota, K. Lactoferrin in Sjögren’s syndrome. Ophthalmology 2007, 114, 2366-2367, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.027.
  272. Kawashima, M.; Kawakita, T.; Inaba, T.; Okada, N.; Ito, M.; Shimmura, S.; Watanabe, M.; Shinmura, K.; Tsubota, K. Dietary Lactoferrin Alleviates Age-Related Lacrimal Gland Dysfunction in Mice. PLOS ONE 2012, 7, e33148, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033148.
  273. Devendra, J.; Singh, S. Effect of Oral Lactoferrin on Cataract Surgery Induced Dry Eye: A Randomised Controlled Trial. J Clin Diagn Res 2015, 9, NC06-NC09, http://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/15797.6670.
  274. Higuchi, A.; Inoue, H.; Kaneko, Y.; Oonishi, E.; Tsubota, K. Selenium-binding lactoferrin is taken into corneal epithelial cells by a receptor and prevents corneal damage in dry eye model animals. Sci Rep 2016, 6, 36903, http://doi.org/10.1038/srep36903.
  275. Olivieri, M.; Cristaldi, M.; Pezzino, S.; Lupo, G.; Anfuso, C.; Gagliano, C.; Genovese, C.; Rusciano, D. Experimental Evidence of the Healing Properties of Lactobionic Acid for Ocular Surface Disease. Cornea 2018, 37, 1058-1063, http://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001594.
  276. Bröer, S.; Bröer, A. Amino acid homeostasis and signalling in mammalian cells and organisms. Biochem J 2017, 474, 1935-1963, http://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160822.
  277. Wu, G. Amino acids: metabolism, functions, and nutrition. Amino Acids 2009, 37, 1-17, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-009-0269-0.
  278. Rusciano, D.; Roszkowska, A.M.; Gagliano, C.; Pezzino, S. Free amino acids: an innovative treatment for ocular surface disease. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 787, 9-19, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.04.029.
  279. ChenZhuo, L.; Murube, J.; Latorre, A.; del Río, R.M. Different concentrations of amino acids in tears of normal and human dry eyes. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2002, 506, 617-621.
  280. Nakatsukasa, M.; Sotozono, C.; Shimbo, K.; Ono, N.; Miyano, H.; Okano, A.; Hamuro, J.; Kinoshita, S. Amino Acid profiles in human tear fluids analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography and electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 151, 799-808.e1, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.003.
  281. ChenZhuo, L.; Murube, J.; Latorre, A.; del Río, R.M. Different concentrations of amino acids in tears of normal and human dry eyes. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2002, 506, 617-621, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0717-8_87.
  282. Calder, P.C. Branched-Chain Amino Acids and Immunity. J Nutr 2006, 136, 288S-293S, http://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.1.288S.
  283. Cruzat, V.F.; Krause, M.; Newsholme, P. Amino acid supplementation and impact on immune function in the context of exercise. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2014, 11, http://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-014-0061-8.
  284. McGaha, T.L.; Huang, L.; Lemos, H.; Metz, R.; Mautino, M.; Prendergast, G.C.; Mellor, A.L. Amino acid catabolism: a pivotal regulator of innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol Rev 2012, 249, 135-157, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01149.x.
  285. Efron, D.; Barbul, A. Role of arginine in immunonutrition. J. Gastroenterol. 2000, 35 Suppl 12, 20-23.
  286. Jones, C.; Palmer, T.E.; Griffiths, R.D. Randomized clinical outcome study of critically ill patients given glutamine-supplemented enteral nutrition. Nutrition 1999, 15, 108-115.
  287. Lacey, J.M.; Wilmore, D.W. Is glutamine a conditionally essential amino acid? Nutr. Rev. 1990, 48, 297-309.
  288. Houdijk, A.P.; Rijnsburger, E.R.; Jansen, J.; Wesdorp, R.I.; Weiss, J.K.; McCamish, M.A.; Teerlink, T.; Meuwissen, S.G.; Haarman, H.J.; Thijs, L.G.; et al. Randomised trial of glutamine-enriched enteral nutrition on infectious morbidity in patients with multiple trauma. Lancet 1998, 352, 772-776, http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02007-8.
  289. Bollhalder, L.; Pfeil, A.M.; Tomonaga, Y.; Schwenkglenks, M. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of parenteral glutamine supplementation. Clin Nutr 2013, 32, 213-223, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2012.11.003.
  290. Atkinson, M.; Worthley, L.I.G. Nutrition in the critically ill patient: part I. Essential physiology and pathophysiology. Crit Care Resusc 2003, 5, 109-120.
  291. Platell, C.; Kong, S.E.; McCauley, R.; Hall, J.C. Branched-chain amino acids. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2000, 15, 706-717.
  292. De Bandt, J.-P.; Cynober, L. Therapeutic use of branched-chain amino acids in burn, trauma, and sepsis. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 308S-13S.
  293. Nie, C.; He, T.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, G.; Ma, X. Branched Chain Amino Acids: Beyond Nutrition Metabolism. Int J Mol Sci 2018, 19, http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19040954.
  294. Lee, J.H.; Park, E.; Jin, H.J.; Lee, Y.; Choi, S.J.; Lee, G.W.; Chang, P.-S.; Paik, H.-D. Anti-inflammatory and anti-genotoxic activity of branched chain amino acids (BCAA) in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 1371-1377, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-017-0165-4.
  295. Dunn-Lewis, C.; Kraemer, W.J.; Kupchak, B.R.; Kelly, N.A.; Creighton, B.A.; Luk, H.-Y.; Ballard, K.D.; Comstock, B.A.; Szivak, T.K.; Hooper, D.R.; et al. A multi-nutrient supplement reduced markers of inflammation and improved physical performance in active individuals of middle to older age: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutr J 2011, 10, 90, http://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-10-90.
  296. Kohlhaas, M. Corneal sensation after cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998, 24, 1399-1409.
  297. Cho, Y.K.; Kim, M.S. Dry eye after cataract surgery and associated intraoperative risk factors. Korean J Ophthalmol 2009, 23, 65-73, http://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2009.23.2.65.
  298. Han, K.E.; Yoon, S.C.; Ahn, J.M.; Nam, S.M.; Stulting, R.D.; Kim, E.K.; Seo, K.Y. Evaluation of dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction after cataract surgery. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 157, 1144-1150.e1, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.02.036.
  299. Li, X.-M.; Hu, L.; Hu, J.; Wang, W. Investigation of dry eye disease and analysis of the pathogenic factors in patients after cataract surgery. Cornea 2007, 26, S16-20, http://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31812f67ca.
  300. Vinciguerra, P.; Camesasca, F.I.; Ponzin, D. Use of amino acids in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2002, 18, S374-377.
  301. Torres Munoz, I.; Grizzi, F.; Russo, C.; Camesasca, F.I.; Dioguardi, N.; Vinciguerra, P. The role of amino acids in corneal stromal healing: a method for evaluating cellular density and extracellular matrix distribution. J Refract Surg 2003, 19, S227-230.
  302. Meduri, A.; Grenga, P.L.; Scorolli, L.; Ceruti, P.; Ferreri, G. Role of cysteine in corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmic Res. 2009, 41, 76-82, http://doi.org/10.1159/000187623.
  303. Aragona, P.; Rania, L.; Roszkowska, A.M.; Spinella, R.; Postorino, E.; Puzzolo, D.; Micali, A. Effects of amino acids enriched tears substitutes on the cornea of patients with dysfunctional tear syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol 2013, 91, e437-444, http://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12134.
  304. Funke, S.; Azimi, D.; Wolters, D.; Grus, F.H.; Pfeiffer, N. Longitudinal analysis of taurine induced effects on the tear proteome of contact lens wearers and dry eye patients using a RP-RP-Capillary-HPLC-MALDI TOF/TOF MS approach. J Proteomics 2012, 75, 3177-3190, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2012.03.018.
  305. Grus, F.H.; Kramann, C.; Bozkurt, N.; Wiegel, N.; Bruns, K.; Lackner, N.; Pfeiffer, N. Effects of multipurpose contact lens solutions on the protein composition of the tear film. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2005, 28, 103-112, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2005.06.004.
  306. Bucolo, C.; Fidilio, A.; Platania, C.B.M.; Geraci, F.; Lazzara, F.; Drago, F. Antioxidant and Osmoprotecting Activity of Taurine in Dry Eye Models. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2018, 34, 188-194, http://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2017.0008.
  307. Koyama, I.; Nakamori, K.; Nagahama, T.; Ogasawara, M.; Nemoto, M. The reactivity of taurine with hypochlorous acid and its application for eye drops. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1996, 403, 9-18.
  308. Varma, S.D.; Devamanoharan, P.S.; Ali, A.H.; Brozetti, J.; Petrali, J.; Lehnert, E.; Weir, A. Half mustard (CEES) induced damage to rabbit cornea: attenuating effect of taurine-pyruvate-alpha-ketoglutarate-pantothenate mixture. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1998, 14, 423-428.
  309. Bonanno, J.A.; Polse, K.A. Corneal acidosis during contact lens wear: effects of hypoxia and CO2. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1987, 28, 1514-1520.
  310. Nakada, T.; Hida, K.; Kwee, I.L. pH-lactate dissociation during anoxic insult: taurine effect. Neuroreport 1991, 2, 325-328.
  311. Gardiner, T.A.; Archer, D.B.; Curtis, T.M.; Stitt, A.W. Arteriolar Involvement in the Microvascular Lesions of Diabetic Retinopathy: Implications for Pathogenesis. Microcirculation 2007, 14, 25-38, http://doi.org/10.1080/10739680601072123.
  312. Feenstra, D.J.; Drawnel, F.M.; Jayagopal, A. Imaging of Hypoxia in Retinal Vascular Disease. Early Events in Diabetic Retinopathy and Intervention Strategies 2018, http://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72252.
  313. Sayin, N.; Kara, N.; Pekel, G. Ocular complications of diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 2015, 6, 92-108, http://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i1.92.
  314. Whitehead, M.; Wickremasinghe, S.; Osborne, A.; Van Wijngaarden, P.; Martin, K.R. Diabetic retinopathy: a complex pathophysiology requiring novel therapeutic strategies. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2018, 18, 1257-1270, http://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2018.1545836.
  315. Semeraro, F.; Morescalchi, F.; Cancarini, A.; Russo, A.; Rezzola, S.; Costagliola, C. Diabetic retinopathy, a vascular and inflammatory disease: Therapeutic implications. Diabetes & Metabolism 2019, 45, 517-527, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2019.04.002.
  316. Robles-Rivera, R.R.; Castellanos-González, J.A.; Olvera-Montaño, C.; Flores-Martin, R.A.; López-Contreras, A.K.; Arevalo-Simental, D.E.; Cardona-Muñoz, E.G.; Roman-Pintos, L.M.; Rodríguez-Carrizalez, A.D. Adjuvant Therapies in Diabetic Retinopathy as an Early Approach to Delay Its Progression: The Importance of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2020, 2020, 3096470-3096470, http://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3096470.
  317. Oguntibeju, O.O. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, oxidative stress and inflammation: examining the links. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol 2019, 11, 45-63.
  318. Kowluru, R.A.; Kowluru, A.; Mishra, M.; Kumar, B. Oxidative stress and epigenetic modifications in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015, 48, 40-61, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.05.001.
  319. Schlotterer, A.; Kolibabka, M.; Lin, J.; Acunman, K.; Dietrich, N.; Sticht, C.; Fleming, T.; Nawroth, P.; Hammes, H.-P. Methylglyoxal induces retinopathy-type lesions in the absence of hyperglycemia: studies in a rat model. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 4141-4153, http://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201801146RR.
  320. Zhong, Q.; Mishra, M.; Kowluru, R.A. Transcription factor Nrf2-mediated antioxidant defense system in the development of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013, 54, 3941-3948, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-11598.
  321. Kowluru, R.A.; Chan, P.-S. Oxidative stress and diabetic retinopathy. Exp Diabetes Res 2007, 2007, 43603-43603, http://doi.org/10.1155/2007/43603.
  322. Kaštelan, S.; Tomić, M.; Gverović Antunica, A.; Salopek Rabatić, J.; Ljubić, S. Inflammation and pharmacological treatment in diabetic retinopathy. Mediators Inflamm 2013, 2013, 213130-213130, http://doi.org/10.1155/2013/213130.
  323. Curtis, T.M.; Gardiner, T.A.; Stitt, A.W. Microvascular lesions of diabetic retinopathy: clues towards understanding pathogenesis? Eye 2009, 23, 1496-1508, http://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.108.
  324. Rossino, M.G.; Casini, G. Nutraceuticals for the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy. Nutrients 2019, 11, 771, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu11040771.
  325. Wong, M.Y.Z.; Man, R.E.K.; Fenwick, E.K.; Gupta, P.; Li, L.-J.; van Dam, R.M.; Chong, M.F.; Lamoureux, E.L. Dietary intake and diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review. PLoS One 2018, 13, e0186582-e0186582, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186582.
  326. Orwell, G. Introduction: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018. Dia Care 2018, 41, S1-S2, http://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-Sint01.
  327. Pall, M.L.; Levine, S. Nrf2, a master regulator of detoxification and also antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and other cytoprotective mechanisms, is raised by health promoting factors. Sheng Li Xue Bao 2015, 67, 1-18.
  328. Tikhonenko, M.; Lydic, T.A.; Wang, Y.; Chen, W.; Opreanu, M.; Sochacki, A.; McSorley, K.M.; Renis, R.L.; Kern, T.; Jump, D.B.; et al. Remodeling of retinal Fatty acids in an animal model of diabetes: a decrease in long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids is associated with a decrease in fatty acid elongases Elovl2 and Elovl4. Diabetes 2010, 59, 219-227, http://doi.org/10.2337/db09-0728.
  329. Gong, Y.; Fu, Z.; Liegl, R.; Chen, J.; Hellström, A.; Smith, L.E. ω-3 and ω-6 long-chain PUFAs and their enzymatic metabolites in neovascular eye diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 2017, 106, 16-26, http://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.117.153825.
  330. Connor, K.M.; SanGiovanni, J.P.; Lofqvist, C.; Aderman, C.M.; Chen, J.; Higuchi, A.; Hong, S.; Pravda, E.A.; Majchrzak, S.; Carper, D.; et al. Increased dietary intake of omega-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids reduces pathological retinal angiogenesis. Nat Med 2007, 13, 868-873, http://doi.org/10.1038/nm1591.
  331. Aiello, L.P.; Pierce, E.A.; Foley, E.D.; Takagi, H.; Chen, H.; Riddle, L.; Ferrara, N.; King, G.L.; Smith, L.E. Suppression of retinal neovascularization in vivo by inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) using soluble VEGF-receptor chimeric proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995, 92, 10457-10461, http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.23.10457.
  332. Lepretti, M.; Martucciello, S.; Burgos Aceves, M.A.; Putti, R.; Lionetti, L. Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Insulin Resistance: Focus on the Regulation of Mitochondria and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Nutrients 2018, 10, 350, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu10030350.
  333. Bungau, S.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Tit, D.M.; Ghanem, E.; Sato, S.; Maruyama-Inoue, M.; Yamane, S.; Kadonosono, K. Health Benefits of Polyphenols and Carotenoids in Age-Related Eye Diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2019, 2019, 9783429-9783429, http://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9783429.
  334. Fang, J. Bioavailability of anthocyanins. Drug Metabolism Reviews 2014, 46, 508-520, http://doi.org/10.3109/03602532.2014.978080.
  335. Kalt, W.; Blumberg, J.B.; McDonald, J.E.; Vinqvist-Tymchuk, M.R.; Fillmore, S.A.E.; Graf, B.A.; O’Leary, J.M.; Milbury, P.E. Identification of Anthocyanins in the Liver, Eye, and Brain of Blueberry-Fed Pigs. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2008, 56, 705-712, http://doi.org/10.1021/jf071998l.
  336. Paik, S.-S.; Jeong, E.; Jung, S.W.; Ha, T.J.; Kang, S.; Sim, S.; Jeon, J.H.; Chun, M.-H.; Kim, I.-B. Anthocyanins from the seed coat of black soybean reduce retinal degeneration induced by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. Experimental Eye Research 2012, 97, 55-62, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2012.02.010.
  337. Song, Y.; Huang, L.; Yu, J. Effects of blueberry anthocyanins on retinal oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetes through Nrf2/HO-1 signaling. Journal of Neuroimmunology 2016, 301, 1-6, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.11.001.
  338. Wang, H.; Nair, M.G.; Strasburg, G.M.; Chang, Y.-C.; Booren, A.M.; Gray, J.I.; DeWitt, D.L. Antioxidant and Antiinflammatory Activities of Anthocyanins and Their Aglycon, Cyanidin, from Tart Cherries. Journal of Natural Products 1999, 62, 294-296, http://doi.org/10.1021/np980501m.
  339. Lee, M.; Yun, S.; Lee, H.; Yang, J. Quercetin Mitigates Inflammatory Responses Induced by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Mouse Retinal Photoreceptor Cells through Suppression of Nuclear Factor Kappa B. Int J Mol Sci 2017, 18, 2497, http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112497.
  340. Kumar, B.; Gupta, S.K.; Nag, T.C.; Srivastava, S.; Saxena, R.; Jha, K.A.; Srinivasan, B.P. Retinal neuroprotective effects of quercetin in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Experimental Eye Research 2014, 125, 193-202, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2014.06.009.
  341. Li, J.; Yu, S.; Ying, J.; Shi, T.; Wang, P. Resveratrol Prevents ROS-Induced Apoptosis in High Glucose-Treated Retinal Capillary Endothelial Cells via the Activation of AMPK/Sirt1/PGC-1α Pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017, 2017, 7584691-7584691, http://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7584691.
  342. Chang, Y.-C.; Lin, C.-W.; Hsieh, M.-C.; Wu, H.-J.; Wu, W.-S.; Wu, W.-C.; Kao, Y.-H. High mobility group B1 up-regulates angiogenic and fibrogenic factors in human retinal pigment epithelial ARPE-19 cells. Cellular Signalling 2017, 40, 248-257, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.09.019.
  343. Losso, J.N.; Truax, R.E.; Richard, G. trans-Resveratrol Inhibits Hyperglycemia-Induced Inflammation and Connexin Downregulation in Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2010, 58, 8246-8252, http://doi.org/10.1021/jf1012067.
  344. Chen, Y.; Meng, J.; Li, H.; Wei, H.; Bi, F.; Liu, S.; Tang, K.; Guo, H.; Liu, W. Resveratrol exhibits an effect on attenuating retina inflammatory condition and damage of diabetic retinopathy via PON1. Experimental Eye Research 2019, 181, 356-366, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2018.11.023.
  345. Jiménez-Osorio, A.S.; González-Reyes, S.; Pedraza-Chaverri, J. Natural Nrf2 activators in diabetes. Clinica Chimica Acta 2015, 448, 182-192, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2015.07.009.
  346. Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: eightieth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives: Rome, 16-25 June 2015; WHO technical report series; WHO: Geneva, 2016; ISBN 978-92-4-120995-3.
  347. Radomska-Leśniewska, D.M.; Osiecka-Iwan, A.; Hyc, A.; Góźdź, A.; Dąbrowska, A.M.; Skopiński, P. Therapeutic potential of curcumin in eye diseases. Cent Eur J Immunol 2019, 44, 181-189, http://doi.org/10.5114/ceji.2019.87070.
  348. Platania, C.B.M.; Fidilio, A.; Lazzara, F.; Piazza, C.; Geraci, F.; Giurdanella, G.; Leggio, G.M.; Salomone, S.; Drago, F.; Bucolo, C. Retinal Protection and Distribution of Curcumin in Vitro and in Vivo. Front Pharmacol 2018, 9, 670-670, http://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00670.
  349. Premanand, C.; Rema, M.; Sameer, M.Z.; Sujatha, M.; Balasubramanyam, M. Effect of Curcumin on Proliferation of Human Retinal Endothelial Cells under In Vitro Conditions. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 2006, 47, 2179, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0580.
  350. Woo, J.M.; Shin, D.-Y.; Lee, S.J.; Joe, Y.; Zheng, M.; Yim, J.H.; Callaway, Z.; Chung, H.T. Curcumin protects retinal pigment epithelial cells against oxidative stress via induction of heme oxygenase-1 expression and reduction of reactive oxygen. Mol Vis 2012, 18, 901-908.
  351. Li, Y.; Zou, X.; Cao, K.; Xu, J.; Yue, T.; Dai, F.; Zhou, B.; Lu, W.; Feng, Z.; Liu, J. Curcumin analog 1, 5-bis (2-trifluoromethylphenyl)-1, 4-pentadien-3-one exhibits enhanced ability on Nrf2 activation and protection against acrolein-induced ARPE-19 cell toxicity. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2013, 272, 726-735, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2013.07.029.
  352. Yang, C.; Zhang, X.; Fan, H.; Liu, Y. Curcumin upregulates transcription factor Nrf2, HO-1 expression and protects rat brains against focal ischemia. Brain Research 2009, 1282, 133-141, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.009.
  353. Zuo, Z.-F.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X.-Z. Protective effects of curcumin on retinal Müller cell in early diabetic rats. Int J Ophthalmol 2013, 6, 422-424, http://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.04.02.
  354. Gupta, S.K.; Kumar, B.; Nag, T.C.; Agrawal, S.S.; Agrawal, R.; Agrawal, P.; Saxena, R.; Srivastava, S. Curcumin Prevents Experimental Diabetic Retinopathy in Rats Through Its Hypoglycemic, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms. Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2011, 27, 123-130, http://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2010.0123.
  355. Kowluru, R.A.; Kanwar, M. Effects of curcumin on retinal oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetes. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2007, 4, 8-8, http://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-4-8.
  356. Bone, R.A.; Landrum, J.T.; Hime, G.W.; Cains, A.; Zamor, J. Stereochemistry of the human macular carotenoids. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1993, 34, 2033-2040.
  357. Jia, Y.-P.; Sun, L.; Yu, H.-S.; Liang, L.-P.; Li, W.; Ding, H.; Song, X.-B.; Zhang, L.-J. The Pharmacological Effects of Lutein and Zeaxanthin on Visual Disorders and Cognition Diseases. Molecules 2017, 22, 610, http://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22040610.
  358. Bone, R.A.; Landrum, J.T.; Tarsis, S.L. Preliminary identification of the human macular pigment. Vision Research 1985, 25, 1531-1535, http://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(85)90123-3.
  359. Bone, R.A.; Landrum, J.T.; Fernandez, L.; Tarsis, S.L. Analysis of the macular pigment by HPLC: retinal distribution and age study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1988, 29, 843-849.
  360. Kijlstra, A.; Tian, Y.; Kelly, E.R.; Berendschot, T.T.J.M. Lutein: More than just a filter for blue light. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2012, 31, 303-315, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.03.002.
  361. Zhang, P.-C.; Wu, C.-R.; Wang, Z.-L.; Wang, L.-Y.; Han, Y.; Sun, S.-L.; Li, Q.-S.; Ma, L. Effect of lutein supplementation on visual function in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2017, 26, 406-411, http://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.032016.13.
  362. Kowluru, R.A.; Menon, B.; Gierhart, D.L. Beneficial Effect of Zeaxanthin on Retinal Metabolic Abnormalities in Diabetic Rats. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 2008, 49, 1645, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0764.
  363. Sasaki, M.; Ozawa, Y.; Kurihara, T.; Kubota, S.; Yuki, K.; Noda, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Ishida, S.; Tsubota, K. Neurodegenerative influence of oxidative stress in the retina of a murine model of diabetes. Diabetologia 2010, 53, 971-979, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-009-1655-6.
  364. Hu, B.-J.; Hu, Y.-N.; Lin, S.; Ma, W.-J.; Li, X.-R. Application of Lutein and Zeaxanthin in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. Int J Ophthalmol 2011, 4, 303-306, http://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2011.03.19.
  365. Sila, A.; Ghlissi, Z.; Kamoun, Z.; Makni, M.; Nasri, M.; Bougatef, A.; Sahnoun, Z. Astaxanthin from shrimp by-products ameliorates nephropathy in diabetic rats. European Journal of Nutrition 2014, 54, 301-307, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-014-0711-2.
  366. Yeh, P.-T.; Huang, H.-W.; Yang, C.-M.; Yang, W.-S.; Yang, C.-H. Astaxanthin Inhibits Expression of Retinal Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Mediators in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. PLoS One 2016, 11, e0146438-e0146438, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146438.
  367. Zhou, X.; Zhang, F.; Hu, X.; Chen, J.; Wen, X.; Sun, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tang, R.; Zheng, K.; Song, Y. Inhibition of inflammation by astaxanthin alleviates cognition deficits in diabetic mice. Physiology & Behavior 2015, 151, 412-420, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.015.
  368. Will, J.C.; Byers, T. Does Diabetes Mellitus Increase the Requirement for Vitamin C? Nutrition Reviews 2009, 54, 193-202, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03932.x.
  369. Sinclair, A.J.; Girling, A.J.; Gray, L.; Le Guen, C.; Lunec, J.; Barnett, A.H. Disturbed handling of ascorbic acid in diabetic patients with and without microangiopathy during high dose ascorbate supplementation. Diabetologia 1991, 34, 171-175, http://doi.org/10.1007/bf00418271.
  370. Park, S.W.; Ghim, W.; Oh, S.; Kim, Y.; Park, U.C.; Kang, J.; Yu, H.G. Association of vitreous vitamin C depletion with diabetic macular ischemia in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. PLoS One 2019, 14, e0218433-e0218433, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218433.
  371. Duarte, T.L.; Lunec, J. ReviewPart of the Series: From Dietary Antioxidants to Regulators in Cellular Signalling and Gene ExpressionReview: When is an antioxidant not an antioxidant? A review of novel actions and reactions of vitamin C. Free Radical Research 2005, 39, 671-686, http://doi.org/10.1080/10715760500104025.
  372. Sorice, A.; Guerriero, E.; Capone, F.; Colonna, G.; Castello, G.; Costantini, S. Ascorbic Acid: Its Role in Immune System and Chronic Inflammation Diseases. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry 2014, 14, 444-452, http://doi.org/10.2174/1389557514666140428112602.
  373. Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wen, R.; Chen, J. Experimental and clinical studies on the reduction of erythrocyte sorbitol-glucose ratios by ascorbic acid in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 1995, 28, 1-8, http://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8227(95)01059-m.
  374. May, J.M.; Jayagopal, A.; Qu, Z.-C.; Parker, W.H. Ascorbic acid prevents high glucose-induced apoptosis in human brain pericytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014, 452, 112-117, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.08.057.
  375. Ulker, E.; Parker, W.H.; Raj, A.; Qu, Z.; May, J.M. Ascorbic acid prevents VEGF-induced increases in endothelial barrier permeability. Mol Cell Biochem 2016, 412, 73-79, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-015-2609-6.
  376. Gomes, M.B.; Negrato, C.A. Alpha-lipoic acid as a pleiotropic compound with potential therapeutic use in diabetes and other chronic diseases. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2014, 6, 80-80, http://doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-6-80.
  377. Santos, J.M.; Kowluru, R.A. Role of mitochondria biogenesis in the metabolic memory associated with the continued progression of diabetic retinopathy and its regulation by lipoic acid. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011, 52, 8791-8798, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8203.
  378. Lin, J.; Bierhaus, A.; Bugert, P.; Dietrich, N.; Feng, Y.; vom Hagen, F.; Nawroth, P.; Brownlee, M.; Hammes, H.-P. Effect of R-(+)-α-lipoic acid on experimental diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia 2006, 49, 1089-1096, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0174-y.
  379. Nebbioso, M.; Federici, M.; Rusciano, D.; Evangelista, M.; Pescosolido, N. Oxidative Stress in Preretinopathic Diabetes Subjects and Antioxidants. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics 2012, 14, 257-263, http://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2011.0172.
  380. Kowluru, R.A.; Zhong, Q.; Santos, J.M.; Thandampallayam, M.; Putt, D.; Gierhart, D.L. Beneficial effects of the nutritional supplements on the development of diabetic retinopathy. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2014, 11, 8-8, http://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-11-8.
  381. Waugh, N.; Loveman, E.; Colquitt, J.; Royle, P.; Yeong, J.L.; Hoad, G.; Lois, N. Treatments for dry age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt disease: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2018, 22, 1-168, http://doi.org/10.3310/hta22270.
  382. Pawlowska, E.; Szczepanska, J.; Koskela, A.; Kaarniranta, K.; Blasiak, J. Dietary Polyphenols in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Protection against Oxidative Stress and Beyond. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2019, 2019, 9682318-9682318, http://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9682318.
  383. Kauppinen, A.; Paterno, J.J.; Blasiak, J.; Salminen, A.; Kaarniranta, K. Inflammation and its role in age-related macular degeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci 2016, 73, 1765-1786, http://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-016-2147-8.
  384. Wang, L.; Clark, M.E.; Crossman, D.K.; Kojima, K.; Messinger, J.D.; Mobley, J.A.; Curcio, C.A. Abundant lipid and protein components of drusen. PLoS One 2010, 5, e10329-e10329, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010329.
  385. Wong, W.L.; Su, X.; Li, X.; Cheung, C.M.G.; Klein, R.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Wong, T.Y. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Global Health 2014, 2, e106-e116, http://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(13)70145-1.
  386. Sparrow, J.R.; Boulton, M. RPE lipofuscin and its role in retinal pathobiology. Experimental Eye Research 2005, 80, 595-606, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2005.01.007.
  387. Abokyi, S.; To, C.-H.; Lam, T.T.; Tse, D.Y. Central Role of Oxidative Stress in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Evidence from a Review of the Molecular Mechanisms and Animal Models. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2020, 2020, 7901270-7901270,http://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7901270.
  388. Johnson, L.V.; Leitner, W.P.; Staples, M.K.; Anderson, D.H. Complement Activation and Inflammatory Processes in Drusen Formation and Age Related Macular Degeneration. Experimental Eye Research 2001, 73, 887-896, http://doi.org/10.1006/exer.2001.1094.
  389. Shaw PX, Stiles T, Douglas C, Ho D, Fan W, Du H, Xiao X. Oxidative stress, innate immunity, and age-related macular degeneration. AIMS Mol Sci. 2016, 3:196-221. http://doi.org/10.3934/molsci.2016.2.196.
  390. Ho, L.; van Leeuwen, R.; de Jong, P.T.V.M.; Vingerling, J.R.; Klaver, C.C.W. Epidemiology of AMD. Age-related Macular Degeneration 2012, 3-32, http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22107-1_1.
  391. Holz, F.G.; Strauss, E.C.; Schmitz-Valckenberg, S.; van Lookeren Campagne, M. Geographic Atrophy. Ophthalmology 2014, 121, 1079-1091, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.023.
  392. Hanus, J.; Zhao, F.; Wang, S. Current therapeutic developments in atrophic age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2016, 100, 122-127, http://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306972.
  393. Brown, E.E.; DeWeerd, A.J.; Ildefonso, C.J.; Lewin, A.S.; Ash, J.D. Mitochondrial oxidative stress in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) led to metabolic dysfunction in both the RPE and retinal photoreceptors. Redox Biol 2019, 24, 101201-101201, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2019.101201.
  394. Andreatta, W.; El-Sherbiny, S. Evidence-Based Nutritional Advice for Patients Affected by Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmologica 2014, 231, 185-190, http://doi.org/10.1159/000357528.
  395. Morita, Y.; Miwa, Y.; Jounai, K.; Fujiwara, D.; Kurihara, T.; Kanauchi, O. Lactobacillus paracasei KW3110 Prevents Blue Light-Induced Inflammation and Degeneration in the Retina. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1991, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu10121991.
  396. Khoo, H.E.; Ng, H.S.; Yap, W.-S.; Goh, H.J.H.; Yim, H.S. Nutrients for Prevention of Macular Degeneration and Eye-Related Diseases. Antioxidants (Basel) 2019, 8, 85, http://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8040085.
  397. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Trial of High-Dose Supplementation With Vitamins C and E, Beta Carotene, and Zinc for Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Vision Loss: AREDS Report No. 8. Arch Ophthalmol 2001, 119, 1417-1436, http://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.10.1417.
  398. Lutein + Zeaxanthin and Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2013, 309, 2005-2015, http://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.4997.
  399. Carneiro, Â.; Andrade, J.P. Erratum to “Nutritional and Lifestyle Interventions for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Review.” Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017, 2017, 2435963-2435963, http://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2435963.
  400. Khoo, H.E.; Azlan, A.; Tang, S.T.; Lim, S.M. Anthocyanidins and anthocyanins: colored pigments as food, pharmaceutical ingredients, and the potential health benefits. Food Nutr Res 2017, 61, 1361779-1361779, http://doi.org/10.1080/16546628.2017.1361779.
  401. Sin, H.P.Y.; Liu, D.T.L.; Lam, D.S.C. Lifestyle modification, nutritional and vitamins supplements for age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmologica 2012, 91, 6-11, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02357.x.
  402. Matsumoto, H.; Nakamura, Y.; Tachibanaki, S.; Kawamura, S.; Hirayama, M. Stimulatory Effect of Cyanidin 3-Glycosides on the Regeneration of Rhodopsin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2003, 51, 3560-3563, http://doi.org/10.1021/jf034132y.
  403. Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Lu, F.; Yang, X.; Deng, Q.; Ji, B.; Huang, F. Retinoprotective Effects of Bilberry Anthocyanins via Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Anti-Apoptotic Mechanisms in a Visible Light-Induced Retinal Degeneration Model in Pigmented Rabbits. Molecules 2015, 20, 22395-22410, http://doi.org/10.3390/molecules201219785.
  404. Silván, J.M.; Reguero, M.; de Pascual-Teresa, S. A protective effect of anthocyanins and xanthophylls on UVB-induced damage in retinal pigment epithelial cells. Food & Function 2016, 7, 1067-1076, http://doi.org/10.1039/c5fo01368b.
  405. Olmedilla-Alonso, B.; Estévez-Santiago, R.; Silván, J.-M.; Sánchez-Prieto, M.; de Pascual-Teresa, S. Effect of Long-Term Xanthophyll and Anthocyanin Supplementation on Lutein and Zeaxanthin Serum Concentrations and Macular Pigment Optical Density in Postmenopausal Women. Nutrients 2018, 10, 959, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu10080959.
  406. Chou, W.-W.; Wang, Y.-S.; Chen, K.-C.; Wu, J.-M.; Liang, C.-L.; Juo, S.-H.H. Tannic acid suppresses ultraviolet B-induced inflammatory signaling and complement factor B on human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Cellular Immunology 2012, 273, 79-84, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellimm.2011.11.003.
  407. Hytti, M.; Piippo, N.; Salminen, A.; Honkakoski, P.; Kaarniranta, K.; Kauppinen, A. Quercetin alleviates 4-hydroxynonenal-induced cytotoxicity and inflammation in ARPE-19 cells. Experimental Eye Research 2015, 132, 208-215, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2015.02.001.
  408. Kim, J.; Jin, H.L.; Jang, D.S.; Jeong, K.W.; Choung, S.-Y. Quercetin-3-O-α-l-arabinopyranoside protects against retinal cell death via blue light-induced damage in human RPE cells and Balb-c mice. Food & Function 2018, 9, 2171-2183, http://doi.org/10.1039/c7fo01958k.
  409. Cao, X.; Liu, M.; Tuo, J.; Shen, D.; Chan, C.-C. The effects of quercetin in cultured human RPE cells under oxidative stress and in Ccl2/Cx3cr1 double deficient mice. Exp Eye Res 2010, 91, 15-25, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2010.03.016.
  410. Koyama, Y.; Kaidzu, S.; Kim, Y.-C.; Matsuoka, Y.; Ishihara, T.; Ohira, A.; Tanito, M. Suppression of Light-Induced Retinal Degeneration by Quercetin via the AP-1 Pathway in Rats. Antioxidants (Basel) 2019, 8, 79, http://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8040079.
  411. López-Malo, D.; Villarón-Casares, C.A.; Alarcón-Jiménez, J.; Miranda, M.; Díaz-Llopis, M.; Romero, F.J.; Villar, V.M. Curcumin as a Therapeutic Option in Retinal Diseases. Antioxidants (Basel) 2020, 9, 48, http://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9010048.
  412. Mandal, M.N.A.; Patlolla, J.M.R.; Zheng, L.; Agbaga, M.-P.; Tran, J.-T.A.; Wicker, L.; Kasus-Jacobi, A.; Elliott, M.H.; Rao, C.V.; Anderson, R.E. Curcumin protects retinal cells from light-and oxidant stress-induced cell death. Free Radic Biol Med 2009, 46, 672-679, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.12.006.
  413. Chan, C.-M.; Huang, J.-H.; Lin, H.-H.; Chiang, H.-S.; Chen, B.-H.; Hong, J.-Y.; Hung, C.-F. Protective effects of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate on UVA-induced damage in ARPE19 cells. Mol. Vis. 2008, 14, 2528-2534.
  414. Sampath, C.; Zhu, Y.; Sang, S.; Ahmedna, M. Bioactive compounds isolated from apple, tea, and ginger protect against dicarbonyl induced stress in cultured human retinal epithelial cells. Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 200-213, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2015.12.013.
  415. Chan, C.-M.; Huang, C.-H.; Li, H.-J.; Hsiao, C.-Y.; Su, C.-C.; Lee, P.-L.; Hung, C.-F. Protective effects of resveratrol against UVA-induced damage in ARPE19 cells. Int J Mol Sci 2015, 16, 5789-5802, http://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16035789.
  416. Nagai, N.; Kubota, S.; Tsubota, K.; Ozawa, Y. Resveratrol prevents the development of choroidal neovascularization by modulating AMP-activated protein kinase in macrophages and other cell types. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2014, 25, 1218-1225, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2014.05.015.
  417. Subramani, M.; Ponnalagu, M.; Krishna, L.; Jeyabalan, N.; Chevour, P.; Sharma, A.; Jayadev, C.; Shetty, R.; Begum, N.; Archunan, G.; Das, D. Resveratrol reverses the adverse effects of bevacizumab on cultured ARPE-19 cells. Scientific reports 2017, 7(1), 12242, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12496-z.
  418. Organisciak, D.T.; Darrow, R.M.; Rapp, C.M.; Smuts, J.P.; Armstrong, D.W.; Lang, J.C. Prevention of retinal light damage by zinc oxide combined with rosemary extract. Mol. Vis. 2013, 19, 1433-1445.
  419. Belmonte, M.A.; Santos, M.F.; Kihara, A.H.; Yan, C.Y.I.; Hamassaki, D.E. Light-Induced Photoreceptor Degeneration in the Mouse Involves Activation of the Small GTPase Rac1. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 2006, 47, 1193, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0446.
  420. Haruta, M.; Bush, R.A.; Kjellstrom, S.; Vijayasarathy, C.; Zeng, Y.; Le, Y.-Z.; Sieving, P.A. Depleting Rac1 in mouse rod photoreceptors protects them from photo-oxidative stress without affecting their structure or function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106, 9397-9402, http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808940106.
  421. Ma, L.; Liu, R.; Du, J.H.; Liu, T.; Wu, S.S.; Liu, X.H. Lutein, Zeaxanthin and Meso-zeaxanthin Supplementation Associated with Macular Pigment Optical Density. Nutrients 2016, 8, 426, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu8070426.
  422. Bernstein, P.S.; Li, B.; Vachali, P.P.; Gorusupudi, A.; Shyam, R.; Henriksen, B.S.; Nolan, J.M. Lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin: The basic and clinical science underlying carotenoid-based nutritional interventions against ocular disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 2016, 50, 34-66, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.10.003.
  423. Biswal, M.R.; Justis, B.D.; Han, P.; Li, H.; Gierhart, D.; Dorey, C.K.; Lewin, A.S. Daily zeaxanthin supplementation prevents atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in a mouse model of mitochondrial oxidative stress. PLoS One 2018, 13, e0203816-e0203816, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203816.
  424. Hammond, B.R.; Fletcher, L.M.; Roos, F.; Wittwer, J.; Schalch, W. A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study on the Effects of Lutein and Zeaxanthin on Photostress Recovery, Glare Disability, and Chromatic Contrast. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2014, 55, 8583-8589, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-15573.
  425. Krinsky, N.I.; Landrum, J.T.; Bone, R.A. BIOLOGICMECHANISMS OF THEPROTECTIVEROLE OFLUTEIN ANDZEAXANTHIN IN THEEYE. Annual Review of Nutrition 2003, 23, 171-201, http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.23.011702.073307.
  426. Thurnham, D.I. Macular zeaxanthins and lutein – a review of dietary sources and bioavailability and some relationships with macular pigment optical density and age-related macular disease. Nutrition Research Reviews 2007, 20, 163-179, http://doi.org/10.1017/s0954422407842235.
  427. de Koning-Backus, A.P.M.; Buitendijk, G.H.S.; Kiefte-de Jong, J.C.; Colijn, J.M.; Hofman, A.; Vingerling, J.R.; Haverkort, E.B.; Franco, O.H.; Klaver, C.C.W. Intake of Vegetables, Fruit, and Fish is Beneficial for Age-Related Macular Degeneration. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2019, 198, 70-79, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.09.036.
  428. Zampatti, S.; Ricci, F.; Cusumano, A.; Marsella, L.T.; Novelli, G.; Giardina, E. Review of nutrient actions on age-related macular degeneration. Nutrition Research 2014, 34, 95-105, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2013.10.011.
  429. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group; SanGiovanni, J.P.; Chew, E.Y.; Clemons, T.E.; Ferris, F.L.; Gensler, G.; Lindblad, A.S.; Milton, R.C.; Seddon, J.M.; Sperduto, R.D. The relationship of dietary carotenoid and vitamin A, E, and C intake with age-related macular degeneration in a case-control study: AREDS Report No. 22. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2007, 125, 1225-1232, http://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.9.1225.
  430. Robison, W.G.; Kuwabara, T.; Bieri, J.G. The roles of vitamin E and unsaturated fatty acids in the visual process. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 1982, 2, 263-281.
  431. Tanito, M.; Yoshida, Y.; Kaidzu, S.; Chen, Z.-H.; Cynshi, O.; Jishage, K.; Niki, E.; Ohira, A. Acceleration of Age-Related Changes in the Retina in α-Tocopherol Transfer Protein Null Mice Fed a Vitamin E-Deficient Diet. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 2007, 48, 396, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0872.
  432. Katz, M.L.; Eldred, G.E. Failure of vitamin E to protect the retina against damage resulting from bright cyclic light exposure. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1989, 30, 29-36.
  433. Belda, J.I.; Romá, J.; Vilela, C.; Puertas, F.J.; Dı́az-Llopis, M.; Bosch-Morell, F.; Romero, F.J. Serum vitamin E levels negatively correlate with severity of age-related macular degeneration. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 1999, 107, 159-164, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-6374(98)00144-4.
  434. Alsalem, J.A.; Patel, D.; Susarla, R.; Coca-Prados, M.; Bland, R.; Walker, E.A.; Rauz, S.; Wallace, G.R. Characterization of vitamin D production by human ocular barrier cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 2140-2147, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-13019.
  435. Kaarniranta, K.; Pawlowska, E.; Szczepanska, J.; Jablkowska, A.; Błasiak, J. Can vitamin D protect against age-related macular degeneration or slow its progression? Acta Biochimica Polonica 2019, http://doi.org/10.18388/abp.2018_2810.
  436. Ugarte, M.; Osborne, N.N.; Brown, L.A.; Bishop, P.N. Iron, zinc, and copper in retinal physiology and disease. Survey of Ophthalmology 2013, 58, 585-609, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.12.002.
  437. Arteel, G.E.; Sies H. The biochemistry of selenium and the glutathione system. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2001, 10(4):153‐158, http://doi.org/10.1016/s1382-6689(01)00078-3.
  438. Erie, J.C.; Good, J.A.; Butz, J.A.; Pulido, J.S. Reduced Zinc and Copper in the Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Choroid in Age-related Macular Degeneration. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2009, 147, 276-282.e1, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.014.
  439. Farnsworth, C.C.; Stone, W.L.; Dratz, E.A. Effects of vitamin E and selenium deficiency on the fatty acid composition of rat retinal tissues. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Biomembranes 1979, 552, 281-293,http://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(79)90283-9.
  440. Sun, Y.-D.; Dong, Y.-D.; Fan, R.; Zhai, L.-L.; Bai, Y.-L.; Jia, L.-H. Effect of (R)-α-Lipoic Acid Supplementation on Serum Lipids and Antioxidative Ability in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 2012, 60, 293-297, http://doi.org/10.1159/000338444.
  441. Tao, Y.; Jiang, P.; Wei, Y.; Wang, P.; Sun, X.; Wang, H. α-Lipoic Acid Treatment Improves Vision-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine 2016, 240, 209-214, http://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.240.209.
  442. Querques, G.; Merle, B.M.J.; Pumariega, N.M.; Benlian, P.; Delcourt, C.; Zourdani, A.; Leisy, H.B.; Lee, M.D.; Smith, R.T.; Souied, E.H. Dynamic Drusen Remodelling in Participants of the Nutritional AMD Treatment-2 (NAT-2) Randomized Trial. PLoS One 2016, 11, e0149219-e0149219, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149219.
  443. Cammalleri, M.; Dal Monte, M.; Locri, F.; Lardner, E.; Kvanta, A.; Rusciano, D.; André, H.; Bagnoli, P. Efficacy of a Fatty Acids Dietary Supplement in a Polyethylene Glycol-Induced Mouse Model of Retinal Degeneration. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1079, http://doi.org/10.3390/nu9101079.
  444. Williams, K.M.; Bertelsen, G.; Cumberland, P.; Wolfram, C.; Verhoeven, V.J.M.; Anastasopoulos, E.; Buitendijk, G.H.S.; Cougnard-Grégoire, A.; Creuzot-Garcher, C.; Erke, M.G.; et al. Increasing Prevalence of Myopia in Europe and the Impact of Education. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 1489-1497, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.018.
  445. Flitcroft, D.I.; He, M.; Jonas, J.B.; Jong, M.; Naidoo, K.; Ohno-Matsui, K.; Rahi, J.; Resnikoff, S.; Vitale, S.; Yannuzzi, L. IMI – Defining and Classifying Myopia: A Proposed Set of Standards for Clinical and Epidemiologic Studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2019, 60, M20-M30, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25957.
  446. Bourne, R.R.A.; Stevens, G.A.; White, R.A.; Smith, J.L.; Flaxman, S.R.; Price, H.; Jonas, J.B.; Keeffe, J.; Leasher, J.; Naidoo, K.; et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health 2013, 1, e339-e349, http://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(13)70113-x.
  447. Holden, B.A.; Fricke, T.R.; Wilson, D.A.; Jong, M.; Naidoo, K.S.; Sankaridurg, P.; Wong, T.Y.; Naduvilath, T.J.; Resnikoff, S. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 1036-1042, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006.
  448. Dolgin, E. The myopia boom. Nature 2015, 519, 276-278, http://doi.org/10.1038/519276a.
  449. Wang, Q.; Klein, B.E.; Klein, R.; Moss, S.E. Refractive status in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1994, 35, 4344-4347.
  450. Verhoeven, V.J.M.; Hysi, P.G.; Wojciechowski, R.; Fan, Q.; Guggenheim, J.A.; Höhn, R.; MacGregor, S.; Hewitt, A.W.; Nag, A.; Cheng, C.-Y.; et al. Genome-wide meta-analyses of multi-ethnic cohorts identify multiple new susceptibility loci for refractive error and myopia. Nat Genet 2013, 45, 314-318, http://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2554.
  451. Fan, Q.; Barathi, V.A.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Zhou, X.; Meguro, A.; Nakata, I.; Khor, C.-C.; Goh, L.-K.; Li, Y.-J.; Lim, W.; et al. Genetic variants on chromosome 1q41 influence ocular axial length and high myopia. PLoS Genet 2012, 8, e1002753-e1002753, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002753.
  452. Li, J.; Zhang, Q. Insight into the molecular genetics of myopia. Mol Vis 2017, 23, 1048-1080.
  453. Young, F.A.; Leary, G.A.; Baldwin, W.R.; West, D.C.; Box, R.A.; Harris, E.; Johnson, C. THE TRANSMISSION OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS WITHIN ESKIMO FAMILIES. Optometry and Vision Science 1969, 46, 676-685, http://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-196909000-00005.
  454. Cai, X.-B.; Shen, S.-R.; Chen, D.-F.; Zhang, Q.; Jin, Z.-B. An overview of myopia genetics. Experimental Eye Research 2019, 188, 107778, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2019.107778.
  455. Zhang, X.; Qu, X.; Zhou, X. Association between parental myopia and the risk of myopia in a child. Exp Ther Med 2015, 9, 2420-2428, http://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2415.
  456. Mutti, D.O.; Mitchell, G.L.; Moeschberger, M.L.; Jones, L.A.; Zadnik, K. Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children’s refractive error. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 3633-3640.
  457. Huang, H.-M.; Chang, D.S.-T.; Wu, P.-C. The Association between Near Work Activities and Myopia in Children-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2015, 10, e0140419-e0140419, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140419.
  458. Deng, L.; Pang, Y. Effect of Outdoor Activities in Myopia Control. Optometry and Vision Science 2019, 96, 276-282, http://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0000000000001357.
  459. Rose, K.A.; Morgan, I.G.; Ip, J.; Kifley, A.; Huynh, S.; Smith, W.; Mitchell, P. Outdoor Activity Reduces the Prevalence of Myopia in Children. Ophthalmology 2008, 115, 1279-1285, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.12.019.
  460. Guo, Y.; Liu, L.J.; Tang, P.; Lv, Y.Y.; Feng, Y.; Xu, L.; Jonas, J.B. Outdoor activity and myopia progression in 4-year follow-up of Chinese primary school children: The Beijing Children Eye Study. PLoS One 2017, 12, e0175921-e0175921, http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175921.
  461. Jin, J.-X.; Hua, W.-J.; Jiang, X.; Wu, X.-Y.; Yang, J.-W.; Gao, G.-P.; Fang, Y.; Pei, C.-L.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.-Z.; et al. Effect of outdoor activity on myopia onset and progression in school-aged children in northeast China: the Sujiatun Eye Care Study. BMC Ophthalmol 2015, 15, 73-73, http://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0052-9.
  462. Zhou, X.; Pardue, M.T.; Iuvone, P.M.; Qu, J. Dopamine signaling and myopia development: What are the key challenges. Prog Retin Eye Res 2017, 61, 60-71, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.06.003.
  463. Feldkaemper, M.; Schaeffel, F. An updated view on the role of dopamine in myopia. Experimental Eye Research 2013, 114, 106-119, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2013.02.007.
  464. Rymer, J.; Wildsoet, C.F. The role of the retinal pigment epithelium in eye growth regulation and myopia: A review. Visual Neuroscience 2005, 22, 251-261, http://doi.org/10.1017/s0952523805223015.
  465. Tan, J.; Deng, Z.; Liu, S.; Wang, J.; Huang, C. TGF-β2 in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells: Expression and Secretion Regulated by Cholinergic Signals In Vitro. Current Eye Research 2009, 35, 37-44, http://doi.org/10.3109/02713680903374190.
  466. Cristaldi, M.; Olivieri, M.; Pezzino, S.; Spampinato, G.; Lupo, G.; Anfuso, C.D.; Rusciano, D. Atropine Differentially Modulates ECM Production by Ocular Fibroblasts, and Its Ocular Surface Toxicity Is Blunted by Colostrum. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 78, http://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8040078.
  467. Cooper, J.; Tkatchenko, A.V. A Review of Current Concepts of the Etiology and Treatment of Myopia. Eye Contact Lens 2018, 44, 231-247, http://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000499.
  468. Vagge, A.; Ferro Desideri, L.; Nucci, P.; Serafino, M.; Giannaccare, G.; Traverso, C.E. Prevention of Progression in Myopia: A Systematic Review. Diseases 2018, 6, 92, http://doi.org/10.3390/diseases6040092.
  469. Chua, W.-H.; Balakrishnan, V.; Chan, Y.-H.; Tong, L.; Ling, Y.; Quah, B.-L.; Tan, D. Atropine for the Treatment of Childhood Myopia. Ophthalmology 2006, 113, 2285-2291, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.062.
  470. Chia, A.; Chua, W.-H.; Cheung, Y.-B.; Wong, W.-L.; Lingham, A.; Fong, A.; Tan, D. Atropine for the Treatment of Childhood Myopia: Safety and Efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% Doses (Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 2). Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 347-354, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.031.
  471. Hodge, W.; Barnes, D.; Schachter, H.M.; Pan, Y.; Lowcock, E.C.; Zhang, L.; Sampson, M.; Morrison, A.; Tran, K.; Miguelez, M.; et al. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Eye Health: Summary; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2005;
  472. Kim, H.; Seo, J.S.; Yoo, W.-S.; Kim, G.-N.; Kim, R.B.; Chae, J.E.; Chung, I.; Seo, S.-W.; Kim, S.J. Factors associated with myopia in Korean children: Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey 2016-2017 (KNHANES VII). BMC Ophthalmol 2020, 20, 31-31, http://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-1316-6.
  473. Lim, L.S.; Gazzard, G.; Low, Y.-L.; Choo, R.; Tan, D.T.H.; Tong, L.; Yin Wong, T.; Saw, S.-M. Dietary Factors, Myopia, and Axial Dimensions in Children. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, 993-997.e4, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.003.
  474. Jacobsen, N.; Jensen, H.; Lund-Andersen, H.; Goldschmidt, E. Is poor glycaemic control in diabetic patients a risk factor of myopia? Acta Ophthalmologica 2008, 86, 510-514, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01104.x.
  475. Yarbağ, A.; Yazar, H.; Akdoğan, M.; Pekgör, A.; Kaleli, S. Refractive errors in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Pak J Med Sci 2015, 31, 1481-1484, http://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.316.8204.
  476. Fedor, M.; Socha, K.; Urban, B.; Soroczyńska, J.; Matyskiela, M.; Borawska, M.H.; Bakunowicz-Łazarczyk, A. Serum Concentration of Zinc, Copper, Selenium, Manganese, and Cu/Zn Ratio in Children and Adolescents with Myopia. Biol Trace Elem Res 2017, 176, 1-9, http://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-016-0805-1.
  477. Burke, N.; Butler, J.S.; Flitcroft, I.; McCartney, D.; Loughman, J. Association of Total Zinc Intake with Myopia in U.S. Children and Adolescents. Optometry and Vision Science 2019, 96, 647-654, http://doi.org/10.1097/opx.0000000000001418.
  478. Mutti, D.O.; Marks, A.R. Blood levels of vitamin D in teens and young adults with myopia. Optom Vis Sci 2011, 88, 377-382, http://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31820b0385.
  479. Yazar, S.; Hewitt, A.W.; Black, L.J.; McKnight, C.M.; Mountain, J.A.; Sherwin, J.C.; Oddy, W.H.; Coroneo, M.T.; Lucas, R.M.; Mackey, D.A. Myopia Is Associated With Lower Vitamin D Status in Young Adults. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 2014, 55, 4552, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14589.
  480. Tideman, J.W.L.; Polling, J.R.; Voortman, T.; Jaddoe, V.W.V.; Uitterlinden, A.G.; Hofman, A.; Vingerling, J.R.; Franco, O.H.; Klaver, C.C.W. Low serum vitamin D is associated with axial length and risk of myopia in young children. Eur J Epidemiol 2016, 31, 491-499, http://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0128-8.
  481. Kwon, J.-W.; Choi, J.A.; La, T.Y.; Epidemiologic Survey Committee of the Korean Ophthalmological Society Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level is associated with myopia in the Korea national health and nutrition examination survey. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016, 95, e5012-e5012, http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005012.
  482. PubChem 7-Methylxanthine Available online: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/68374.
  483. Hung, L.-F.; Arumugam, B.; Ostrin, L.; Patel, N.; Trier, K.; Jong, M.; Smith, E.L., III The Adenosine Receptor Antagonist, 7-Methylxanthine, Alters Emmetropizing Responses in Infant Macaques. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018, 59, 472-486, http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22337.
  484. Trier, K.; Olsen, E.B.; Kobayashi, T.; Ribel-Madsen, S.M. Biochemical and ultrastructural changes in rabbit sclera after treatment with 7-methylxanthine, theobromine, acetazolamide, or L-ornithine. Br J Ophthalmol 1999, 83, 1370-1375, http://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.12.1370.
  485. Trier, K.; Munk Ribel-Madsen, S.; Cui, D.; Brøgger Christensen, S. Systemic 7-methylxanthine in retarding axial eye growth and myopia progression: a 36-month pilot study. J Ocul Biol Dis Infor 2008, 1, 85-93, http://doi.org/10.1007/s12177-008-9013-3.
  486. Umigai, N.; Murakami, K.; Ulit, M.V.; Antonio, L.S.; Shirotori, M.; Morikawa, H.; Nakano, T. The pharmacokinetic profile of crocetin in healthy adult human volunteers after a single oral administration. Phytomedicine 2011, 18, 575-578, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2010.10.019.
  487. G. Gutheil, W.; Reed, G.; Ray, A.; Anant, S.; Dhar, A. Crocetin: an Agent Derived from Saffron for Prevention and Therapy for Cancer. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 2012, 13, 173-179, http://doi.org/10.2174/138920112798868566.
  488. Mori, K.; Kurihara, T.; Miyauchi, M.; Ishida, A.; Jiang, X.; Ikeda, S.-I.; Torii, H.; Tsubota, K. Oral crocetin administration suppressed refractive shift and axial elongation in a murine model of lens-induced myopia. Sci Rep 2019, 9, 295-295, http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36576-w.
  489. Mori, K.; Torii, H.; Fujimoto, S.; Jiang, X.; Ikeda, S.-I.; Yotsukura, E.; Koh, S.; Kurihara, T.; Nishida, K.; Tsubota, K. The Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Crocetin for Myopia Control in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med 2019, 8, 1179, http://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8081179.
  490. Allen D. Cataract. BMJ Clin Evid. 2011;2011:0708. PMID: 21718561;.
  491. Kaur, J.; Kukreja, S.; Kaur, A.; Malhotra, N.; Kaur, R. The Oxidative Stress in Cataract Patients. J Clin Diagn Res 2012, 6, 1629-1632, http://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/4856.2626.
  492. Shiels A, Hejtmancik JF. Molecular Genetics of Cataract. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;134:203‐218. http://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2015.05.004.
  493. Christen WG, Glynn RJ, Manson JE, MacFadyen J, Bubes V, Schvartz M, Buring JE, Sesso HD, Gaziano JM. Effects of multivitamin supplement on cataract and age-related macular degeneration in a randomized trial of male physicians. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:525-34. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.09.038.
  494. Rautiainen S, Lindblad BE, Morgenstern R, Wolk A. Total antioxidant capacity of the diet and risk of age-related cataract: a population-based prospective cohort of women. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:247‐252. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.6241.
  495. Mares JA, Voland R, Adler R, Tinker L, Millen AE, Moeller SM, Blodi B, Gehrs KM, Wallace RB, Chappell RJ, Neuhouser ML, Sarto GE; CAREDS Group. Healthy diets and the subsequent prevalence of nuclear cataract in women. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:738-49. http://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.84.
  496. Tan AG, Mitchell P, Flood VM, Burlutsky G, Rochtchina E, Cumming RG, Wang JJ. Antioxidant nutrient intake and the long-term incidence of age-related cataract: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;87:1899-905. http://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/87.6.1899.
  497. Moeller SM, Voland R, Tinker L, Blodi BA, Klein ML, Gehrs KM, Johnson EJ, Snodderly DM, Wallace RB, Chappell RJ, Parekh N, Ritenbaugh C, Mares JA; CAREDS Study Group; Women’s Health Initiative. Associations between age-related nuclear cataract and lutein and zeaxanthin in the diet and serum in the Carotenoids in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study, an Ancillary Study of the Women’s Health Initiative. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:354-64. http://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.3.354.
  498. Mathew MC, Ervin AM, Tao J, Davis RM. Antioxidant vitamin supplementation for preventing and slowing the progression of age-related cataract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD004567. http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004567.pub2
  499. Tunis SW,Brownlow R,Schmidt EE. The Post-Vitrectomy Lenstatin™ Study: A Randomized Double Blind Human Clinical Trial Testing the Efficacy of Lenstatin, an Oral Antioxidant Nutritional Supplement, in Inhibiting Nuclear Cataract Progression After Pars Plana Vitrectomy. EC Ophthalmology 9.5 (2018): 299-307.
  500. Weikel KA, Garber C, Baburins A, Taylor A. Nutritional modulation of cataract. Nutr Rev. 2014;72:30-47. http://doi.org/10.1111/nure.12077.
  501. Varma, S.D.; Richards, R.D. Ascorbic acid and the eye lens. Ophthalmic Res. 1988, 20, 164-173, http://doi.org/10.1159/000266579.
  502. Varma, S.D.; Srivastava, V.K.; Richards, R.D. Photoperoxidation in lens and cataract formation: preventive role of superoxide dismutase, catalase and vitamin C. Ophthalmic Res. 1982, 14, 167-175, http://doi.org/10.1159/000265189.
  503. Lohmann, W., Schmehl, W., & Strobel, J. (1986). Nuclear cataract: Oxidative damage to the lens. Experimental Eye Research, 43(5), 859-862. http://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-4835(86)80015-x.
  504. Taylor, A.; Jacques, P.F.; Nadler, D.; Morrow, F.; Sulsky, S.I.; Shepard, D. Relationship in humans between ascorbic acid consumption and levels of total and reduced ascorbic acid in lens, aqueous humor, and plasma. Curr. Eye Res. 1991, 10, 751-759, http://doi.org/10.3109/02713689109013869.
  505. Simon, J.A.; Hudes, E.S. Serum ascorbic acid and other correlates of self-reported cataract among older Americans. J Clin Epidemiol 1999, 52, 1207-1211, http://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00110-9.
  506. Jacques, P.F.; Chylack, L.T.; Hankinson, S.E.; Khu, P.M.; Rogers, G.; Friend, J.; Tung, W.; Wolfe, J.K.; Padhye, N.; Willett, W.C.; et al. Long-term nutrient intake and early age-related nuclear lens opacities. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2001, 119, 1009-1019, http://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.7.1009.
  507. Mares-Perlman, J.A.; Lyle, B.J.; Klein, R.; Fisher, A.I.; Brady, W.E.; VandenLangenberg, G.M.; Trabulsi, J.N.; Palta, M. Vitamin Supplement Use and Incident Cataracts in a Population-Based Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2000, 118, 1556-1563, http://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.11.1556.
  508. Chylack, L.T.; Brown, N.P.; Bron, A.; Hurst, M.; Köpcke, W.; Thien, U.; Schalch, W. The Roche European American Cataract Trial (REACT): a randomized clinical trial to investigate the efficacy of an oral antioxidant micronutrient mixture to slow progression of age-related cataract. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2002, 9, 49-80, http://doi.org/10.1076/opep.9.1.49.1717.
  509. Ravindran, R.D.; Vashist, P.; Gupta, S.K.; Young, I.S.; Maraini, G.; Camparini, M.; Jayanthi, R.; John, N.; Fitzpatrick, K.E.; Chakravarthy, U.; et al. Inverse Association of Vitamin C with Cataract in Older People in India. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 1958-1965.e2, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.03.016.
  510. Yonova-Doing, E.; Forkin, Z.A.; Hysi, P.G.; Williams, K.M.; Spector, T.D.; Gilbert, C.E.; Hammond, C.J. Genetic and Dietary Factors Influencing the Progression of Nuclear Cataract. Ophthalmology 2016, 123, 1237-1244, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.036.
  511. Chasan-Taber L, Willett WC, Seddon JM, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Hankinson SE. A prospective study of carotenoid and vitamin A intakes and risk of cataract extraction in US women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:509-16. http://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/70.4.509.
  512. Delcourt C, Carrière I, Delage M, Barberger-Gateau P, Schalch W; POLA Study Group. Plasma lutein and zeaxanthin and other carotenoids as modifiable risk factors for age-related maculopathy and cataract: the POLA Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2329‐2335. http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1235.
  513. Vu HT, Robman L, Hodge A, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Lutein and zeaxanthin and the risk of cataract: the Melbourne visual impairment project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3783‐3786. http://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0587.
  514. Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) Research Group, Chew EY, SanGiovanni JP, Ferris FL, Wong WT, Agron E, Clemons TE, Sperduto R, Danis R, Chandra SR, Blodi BA, Domalpally A, Elman MJ, Antoszyk AN, Ruby AJ, Orth D, Bressler SB, Fish GE, Hubbard GB, Klein ML, Friberg TR, Rosenfeld PJ, Toth CA, Bernstein P. Lutein/zeaxanthin for the treatment of age-related cataract: AREDS2 randomized trial report no. 4. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;131(7):843-50. http://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.4412.
  515. Sella R, Afshari NA. Nutritional effect on age-related cataract formation and progression. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30(1):63‐69. http://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000537.
  516. Pache M, Flammer J. A sick eye in a sick body? Systemic findings in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2006;51:179-212. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.02.008.

Severe Spinal Column Deformity from Scoliosis with Harrington Rods Implant

DOI: 10.31038/AWHC.2020344

 

Severe scoliotic deformity of the thoracolumbar spine imposes a significant anesthesia challenge for non-spine surgery. Patients with severe scoliosis are at increased risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality due to underlying pulmonary and cardiac dysfunctions [1-3]. Stress, pain, mechanical ventilation, and surgery-induced inflammation can further increase the risk of postoperative cardiopulmonary failure. We present a preoperative chest radiograph demonstrating extensive thoracolumbar scoliosis with Harrington rods implant, anatomic distortion, and bony dysmorphism (Panel A, white arrow). The patient underwent a living donor kidney transplant under general anesthesia. Preoperative anesthesia and surgical planning is crucial and should focus on airway difficulty, ventilation management, positioning, new kidney location, and postoperative pain management.

The kidney transplant is a heterotopic transplant surgery meaning the kidney is placed in a different location than existing kidneys. The new kidney is on the right or left side of the abdomen to allow the donor kidney to be easily anastomosed surgically to blood vessels and the bladder of the recipient. Due to the extensive deformity of the spinal column and right chest wall (Panel B, black arrow), the operation was performed in the left lateral decubitus position. Moreover, the donor kidney was placed to the right iliac fossa to decrease the risk of left lung atelectasis, restricted breathing, and sprinting from pain.

Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum was difficult in this patient due to atrophy of trunk muscles, chronic scarring, and artifacts from the implant, which required careful assessment of anatomical landmarks to perform a successful nerve block.

AWHC-3-4-324-g001

References

  1. APA Bradford, David S, Tay B, Hu S (1999) Adult Scoliosis: Surgical Indications, Operative Management, Complications, and Outcomes. Spine24: 2617-2629. [crossref]
  2. Albert TJ, Purtill J, Mesa J, McIntosh T, Balderston RA (1995) Health outcome assessment before and after adult deformity surgery. A prospective study. Spine 20: 2002-2005. [crossref]
  3. Kulkarni Anand H, Ambareesha M (2007) Scoliosis and anaesthetic considerations. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. 51: 486-495

Treatment of Vaginal Atrophy with the Aqueous Extract of Triticum vulgare: Comparison between Different Pharmaceutical Forms

DOI: 10.31038/AWHC.2020335

Abstract

Decreased estrogenization in post-menopausal women causes changes in the lower urinary tract. Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a pathological condition resulting from those changes. VVA has a negative effect on the quality of life therefore prompting a search for well tolerated therapeutic options. This article was aimed to evaluate whether the participation of the patient in the choice of the therapy may improve the adherence to the treatment. In particular, there are two distinct pharmaceutical forms in vaginal cream and pessaries based on the Triticum vulgare extract (TVE) for the treatment of post-menopausal VVA.  We examined the clinical reports of48 women with VVA who chose to be treated with Fitostimoline® 20% vaginal cream (based on TVE, 2-phenoxyethanol; glycerine; white vaseline; sodium cetyl stearyl sulfate; cetyl stearyl alcohol; decyl oiled; methyl parahydroxybenzoate; propyl parahydroxybenzoate; purified water. Produced by Farmaceutici Damor, Naples, Italy) and 43 who preferred Fitostimoline®600 mg pessaries (based on TVE,2-phenoxyethanol; macrogol 400; macrogol 1500; macrogol 12000.Produced by Farmaceutici Damor, Naples, Italy) for a 3-monthtreatment. Signs and symptoms of VVA were available during the baseline and after 12 and 90-day treatment visits.

Adhering to the patient’s choice allowed for a very high compliance to the prescribed therapy in the whole study population, and we recorded a significant reduction of the total symptom score (TSS) inboth women treated with the vaginal cream and in those who underwent pessary therapy, without any differencein TTS and in its single components between thetwo pharmaceutical formulation groups.

Thus, the availability of two distinct formulations of Fitostimoline® pessaries and vaginal cream seems to be particularly useful for the treatment of VVA.

Keywords

Vulvovaginal atrophy, Fitostimoline® pessaries, Fitostimoline® vaginal cream

Introduction

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a common condition associated with decreased estrogenization of the vaginal tissue. It can occur at any time in a woman’s life cycle, but it is more frequent in the postmenopausal phase, since it affects around 90% of postmenopausal women [1]. Other than menopause, VVA may appear during hypoestrogenic conditions, such as lactation, various breast cancer treatments, and use of certain medications. In these cases, VVA may resolve spontaneously when estrogen levels are restored [2]. VVA symptoms are all dependent from decreased estrogenization and include: Dryness, soreness, irritation and dyspareunia with increased urinary frequency, urgency, and urge incontinence [3]. Clinical findings include the presence of pale and dry vulvovaginal mucosa with petechiae. Vaginal rugae disappear, and the cervix may become flush with the vaginal wall. A vaginal pH of 4.6 or more supports the diagnosis of VVA because the low level of estrogen may decrease the number of lactobacilli thus causing increased pH of the vagina [4].

Only a quarter of women with VVA seek for treatment [5]. The

first- line treatment of VVA is a continuous sexual relationship, using non-hormonal lubricant over the counter vaginal [6]. The systemic and local estrogen administration is recommended for the treatment of VVA in postmenopausal women [7]. Although hormone therapy may alleviate the short and long term complications of menopause, such as hot flashes, night sweats, and VVA, it may increase the risk of breast and endometrial cancer [8]. Because of the adverse effects of estrogen therapy, some women prefer not to use this method for alleviating VVA, and they tend to use non-hormonal medication for this matter[9]. In this regard, it is noteworthy the evidence that a local treatment based on hyaluronic acid is more effective than hormonal therapy in improving VVA symptoms [10]. More recently, it has been showed that the aqueous extract of Triticum vulgare (TVE) in cream [11] and pessaries [12] formulation could reduce sign and symptoms of VVA in postmenopausal women. TVE containing mainly poly/ oligosaccharides’ components has been extensively used in different pharmaceutical forms. The Damor Farmaceutici TVE, because of its global patent based on its production process, has unique characteristics that lead to its application in VVA treatment. In fact, as recently demonstrated, Damor TVE has a regenerating [13,14], antinflammatory [15] and anti-MMP9 activity [16], and antioxidant activity [17], which play a crucial role in the treatment of VVA. Furthermore, these recent studies suggest that Damor TVE is at least as efficacious as hyaluronic acid in favoring tissue re-epithelization and in contrasting inflammation. For this reason, Damor TVE cream and pessaries formulations (Fitostimoline® vaginal cream and pessaries) are used in the gynecological clinical practice as an alternative to hyaluronic acid in the treatment of VVA.

Since in a long-term treatment it may be useful to involve the patient in the choice of the pharmaceutical formulation to use, in order to improve adherence to the treatment, the availability of two different pharmaceutical formulations based on Damor TVE, may be particularly useful to improve the adherence to the treatment. Thus, we used a large population of women with VVA treated with the vaginal cream or the pessaries of Damor TVE, according to their preference, to evaluate in real word clinical practice whether this “therapeutic agreement” may improve the compliance in a long-term treatment.

Patients and Treatments

In an Outpatient Gynecological Clinic database we selected 91 women, aging between 18 and 70 years, with evidence of VVA (physiological, pharmacologically induced or surgery-dependent) who had symptoms and objective signs of vaginal atrophy plus amenorrhea for at least 12 months, who chose to receive one of following treatments for a 3 months’ period:

• Fitostimoline 20% vaginal cream (based on TVE, 2-phenoxyethanol; glycerine; white vaseline; sodium cetyl stearyl sulfate; cetyl stearyl alcohol; decyl oiled; methyl parahydroxybenzoate; propyl parahydroxybenzoate; purified water. Produced by Farmaceutici Damor, Naples, Italy).

• Fitostimoline 600 mg pessaries (based on TVE, 2-phenoxyethanol; macrogol 400; macrogol 1500; macrogol 12000. Produced by Farmaceutici Damor, Naples, Italy).

The treatments were locally applied every evening for 3 months. Patients were asked to avoid vaginal sexual intercourse during the entire study period.

We excluded women with other gynecological diseases (in addition to VVA), like the presence of metabolic or endocrine diseases (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus) or of other local/systemic diseases that could potentially interfere with the study parameters (concomitant treatment with antibiotics/antiseptic agents, steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics (except paracetamol as pain killer)). All patients gave their informed written consent to the use of their clinical data for scientific purposes.

Outcome Measures

Signs and symptoms of VVA were available during the baseline visit and after 12 and 90 days of treatment. Six subjective symptoms (burning, pain, itching, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia and dysuria) and 5 objective signs (mucous dryness, pale mucosa, thin vaginal folds, mucous fragility, petechiae) of vaginal atrophy were evaluated by a semi-quantitative scale (0 = absence of the sign/symptom; 1 = mild sign/symptom; 2 = moderate sign/symptom; 3 = severe sign/ symptom) expressed for both single signs and symptoms and for their sum (total symptoms score, TSS). Adverse events occurrence and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature) were reported as safety parameters. At the end of the treatment period, a satisfaction opinion was expressed by the patient in terms of excellent, good, to be improved, negative. For the statistical analysis, post hoc simultaneous multiple comparisons were done by Bonferroni’s analysis.

Results

Out of 91 women recruited, 48 were treated with Damor TVE vaginal cream and 43 with the pessaries. The two groups of women were comparable by demographics and clinical characteristics (Table 1). The menopause origin for the majority of women was physiological (Table 2). Only a few women had a pharmacological or surgical menopause (Table 2). However, the origins of the menopause were comparable between the two groups of women. All the patients were completely adherent to the treatment since all completed the 90-day treatment period with a compliance, percentage of the prescribed therapy assumed, above 95%: 98% for Fitostimoline® vaginal cream and 95% for Fitostimoline® pessaries (Figure 1).

Table 1: Patient demographic characteristics.

Pessaries
(N = 34)

Cream
(N = 38)

p Value

Age (years)

51.4 ± 11.0

53.2 ± 10.3

NS

Menopause (months)

32.0 ± 34.5

37.5 ± 31.7

NS

Table 2: Menopause origin.

Pessaries
(N = 34)

Cream
(N = 38)

p Value

Physiological (%)

93.1

89.6

NS

Surgical (%)

4.7

6.3

NS

Pharmacological (%)

2.2

4.1

NS

AWHC-3-4-323-g001

Figure 1. Patients adherence to the treatment with Fitostimoline® vaginal cream and Fitostimoline® pessaries.

By evaluating together patients treated with the vaginal cream and the pessaries, a significant reduction of the TSS was detected both at visit 2 and at visit 3 (Figure 2). When the TSS score was evaluated separately for women treated with Fitostimoline® vaginal cream and those treated with Fitostimoline® pessaries no significant difference in the TSS was detected between the treatment groups (Figure 3). As shown in Figure 3, a significant reduction in the TSS occurred from visit 1 to visit 2 in the two study groups (TSS = 20,1 at visit 1 and 14,4 at visit 2 to for Fitostimoline® pessaries; TSS = 19,1 at visit 1 and 10,9 at visit 2 for Fitostimoline® vaginal cream). A further significant reduction of the TSS score was observed from visit 2 to visit 3 either in patients treated with the vaginal cream (TSS = 10,9 at visit 2 and 5,7 at visit 3) than in those treated with the pessaries (TSS = 14,4 at visit 2 and 8,8 at visit 3) (Figure 3).

AWHC-3-4-323-g002

Figure 2. TSS evaluation for treatment with both Fitostimoline® pessaries and Fitostimoline® vaginal cream.

AWHC-3-4-323-g003

Figure 3. TSS variation in patients treated with Fitostimoline® pessaries and Fitostimoline® vaginal cream.

Also the single components of the TSS score of VVA were evaluated for both groups of women (Figures 4 and 5). A significant reduction of the main VVA symptoms of pain, burn, itching, dryness, dyspareunia, dysuria, petechiae was observed both in patients treated with the vaginal cream and those receiving the pessaries at visit 2 and visit 3 versus the basal visit (Figures 4 and 5). Furthermore, a statistically significant progressive improvement of all these symptoms evaluated was observed from visit 2 to visit 3 (Figures 4 and 5) without any difference between the groups of treatment (Figures 4 and 5).

AWHC-3-4-323-g004

Figure 4. Symptoms variation after treatment with Fitostimoline® pessaries.

AWHC-3-4-323-g005

Figure 5. Symptoms variation after treatment with Fitostimoline® vaginal cream.

Finally, in order to assess whether the women were satisfied by the chosen treatment, vaginal cream or the pessaries, the patient’s satisfaction was evaluated. As indicated by Figure 6, 65,1% of women treated with Fitostimoline® pessaries and 68,8% of women treated with Fitostimoline® vaginal cream reported an “excellent satisfaction”, 32,6% and 31,2%, respectively had a “good satisfaction”, while only 2.3% of women treated with Fitostimoline® pessaries referred a “negative satisfaction’’.

AWHC-3-4-323-g006

Figure 6. Evaluation of the satisfaction to the treatment with Fitostimoline® pessaries and vaginal cream.

Discussion

The transition from evidence medicine, “one size fits for all”, to precision medicine, “tailored treatment”, requires not only the demonstration of the efficacy and tolerability of a given treatment obtained in randomized trials but also its detailed characterization which can be obtained exclusively in daily clinical practice using large groups of patients. Furthermore, in order to solve the problem of the low adherence and compliance to the prescribed therapy observed in all the long-term treatments, it has been suggested that the patient should be adequately informed and involved in the choice of the therapy.

Thus, the availability of large database of Outpatient Clinics seems particularly useful to satisfy these needs for very common diseases which require long-term treatments. In order to verify this assumption for VVA we obtained from the data base of an Outpatient Gynecological Clinic the clinical records of 91 women with VVA who had been involved in the choice of the treatment and had undergone a 90-day therapy with Fitostimoline® vaginal cream or with Fitostimoline® pessaries. The results of the present study confirm that the involvement of the patients in the choice of the treatment markedly improves the adherence and the compliance to the therapy prescription since at our knowledge there are no reports in the real world clinical practice describing a 100% adherence in a 3 month treatment with the assumption of more than 95% of the drug prescribed.

Our results do not allow any speculation of the efficacy of TVE pharmacological formulations in the treatment of VVA since we have no comparison with placebo or active drug. However, experimental studies suggest that there is a rationale for the use of TVE for the treatment of VVA [13-16] and evidence of their efficacy in the treatment of VVA obtained in clinical studies are available in the literature [11,12]. An indirect support to these data seems to be corroborated by the comparison between the percentage of success achieved in our population, as expressed by the reduction in TSS score, and that reported with the use of hyaluronic acid in the treatment of VVA (Figure 2) [10].

Furthermore, the observation that there are no differences between TVE pessaries and vaginal cream either in the evaluation of the TSS or in the evaluation of the single symptoms, support the possibility to allow a personal choice between the two pharmacological formulations. Finally, the time course of the therapeutic effect that appears to consolidate over time seems to suggest that the mechanism of action of the Fitostimoline® formulations is actually pathogenic rather than symptomatic. The limitations of this study are that this is not a clinical trial but an observational study on a wide range of cases. For this reason, we do not have a validation of efficacy which however already exists for this products and it was not in the objective of the study which consisted in assessing whether the availability of different pharmaceutical forms by favoring the “therapeutic concordance” can be useful in improving compliance.

Conclusion

For the purposes of therapeutic agreements between physicians and patients, which is the mechanism currently suggested to improve adherence to therapy, the availability of different pharmaceutical forms represents an issue of great relevance. In order to manage the choice by the physician, however, it is essential to have full knowledge of the potential of the different pharmaceutical forms. For this reason, we can conclude that the two distinct formulations of TVE, pessaries and vaginal cream, didn’t show any significant difference in the treatment of the VVA, both in terms of efficacy and of compliance, and could be alternatively used for the treatment of VVA.

References

  1. Palacios S, Nappi RE, Bruyniks N, Particco M, Panay N (2018) The European Vulvovaginal Epidemiological Survey (EVES): Prevalence, symptoms and impact of vulvovaginal atrophy of menopause. Climacteric 21: 286-291. [crossref]
  2. Mac Bride MB, Rhodes DJ, Shuster LT (2010) Vulvovaginal atrophy. Mayo Clin Proc 85: 87-94. [crossref]
  3. Castelo-Branco C, Cancelo MJ (2008) Compounds for the treatment of atropic vaginitis. Expert Opin Ther Pat 18: 1385-1394.
  4. Sturdee DW, Panay N (2010) Recommendations for the management of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Climacteric 13: 509-522. [crossref]
  5. Castelo-Branco C, Rostro F (2007) Treatment of atrophic vaginitis. Therapy 4: 349- 353.
  6. Noumova I, Castelo-Branco C (2018) Current treatment options for postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Int J Women’s Health 10: 387-395 [crossref]
  7. North American Menopause Society (2007) The role of local vaginal estrogen for treatment of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women: 2007 position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause 14: 355-369. [crossref]
  8. Wentzensen N, Trabert B (2015) Hormone therapy: Short-term relief, long-term consequences. Lancet 385.
  9. Ibe C, Simon JA (2010) Vulvovaginal atrophy: Current and future therapies. J Sex Med 7: 1042-1050. [crossref]
  10. Jokar A, Davari T, Asadi N, Ahmadi F, Foruhari S (2016) Comparison of the hyaluronic acid vaginal cream and conjugated estrogen used in treatment of vaginal atrophy of menopause women: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 4: 69-78. [crossref]
  11. Mollica G, Bonaccorsi G, Martinello R (2008) Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of Fitostimoline vaginal cream (Damor Farmaceutici) in the treatment of vaginal inflammation and vulvar dystrophy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 167: 87-95.
  12. Mollica G, Bonaccorsi G, Martinello R (2008) Valutazione di efficacia e tollerabilità di Fitostimoline Ovuli Vaginali (Damor Farmaceutici) nel trattamento delle affezioni flogistico-distrofiche della vagina. Studio controllato in doppio cieco. Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 167: 97-103
  13. Sanguigno L, Minale M, Vannini E, Arato G, Riccio R, et al. (2015) Oligosaccharidic fractions derived from Triticum vulgare extract accelerate tissue repairing processes in in vitro and in vivo models of skin lesions. J Ethnopharmacol 159: 198-208. [crossref]
  14. D’Agostino A, Pirozzi AVA, Finamore R, Grieco F, Minale M, et al. (2020) Molecular mechanisms at the basis of pharmaceutical grade triticum vulgare extract efficacy in prompting keratinocytes healing. Molecules 25: 431. [crossref]
  15. Sanguigno L, Casamassa A, Funel N, Minale M, Riccio R, et al. (2018)Triticum vulgare extract exerts an anti-inflammatory action in two in vitro models of inflammation in microglial cells. PLoS One. 13: 197493. [crossref]
  16. Funel N, Dini V, Janowska A, Loggini V, Minale M, et al. (2020) Triticum vulgare extract modulates protein-kinase b and matrix metalloproteinases 9 protein expression in bv-2 cells: Bioactivity on inflammatory pathway associated with molecular mechanism wound healing. Mediators of Inflammation 1-13.
  17. Antonucci I, Fiorentino G, Contursi P, Minale M, Riccio R, et al. (2018)Antioxidant capacity of rigenase®, a specific aqueous extract of triticum vulgare. Antioxidants (Basel) 7: 67. [crossref]

The Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Urolithiasis Management and Urologists in the Gulf Countries: A Survey of Urologists in GCC

DOI: 10.31038/IJNUS.2020211

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effects of COVID-19 on urolithiasis management and on the medical practice of urologists in Gulf countries.

Methods: A web-based survey was sent to urologists in the six countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The survey consisted of 23 questions about their working environment, urolithiasis management experience, and the policies of their facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: During the one-week survey period, responses were received from 191 urologists working in the six GCC countries. Responses were received from urologists in all six countries but the numbers differed markedly. Of the 191 urologists who responded, 160 (83.8%) were experienced urologists and 31 (16.2%) were urology residents. Eighty-four (44.0%) volunteered for COVID-19 management rather than urology, 22 (11.5%) were infected with COVID-19 and 38 (19.9%) sought mental health support. Clinical duties related to urolithiasis management were reduced for most of the urologists, with elective procedures postponed and urolithiasis management confined to emergency conditions. In the absence of COVID-19 infection, 67 (35.1%) preferred to actively manage ureteral stones, whereas the remaining urologists preferred less invasive methods, such as conservative or instant drainage.

Conclusion: COVID-19 is hazardous to urologists in GCC countries, with 11.5% being infected and most reducing their clinical duties related to urolithiasis management. Although urolithiasis management in GCC countries during the COVID-19 pandemic was generally consistent with worldwide guidelines, some differences were observed, with further studies warranted to compare different management strategies.

Introduction

COVID-19 is a species of coronavirus that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-COV-2) [1]. The first documented cases were in Wuhan, China, in September 2019. Infection subsequently spread worldwide, with the World Health Organization announcing an epidemic in March 2020 [2]. Since then, all countries worldwide have started to lockdown, with many activities being restricted, including flying, attending schools, participating in and watching sports activities, shopping at malls, and public gatherings. The health system has also been affected, with elective procedures and clinics being restricted. These restrictions have affected urologic practice and patient management [3]. Although the populations of the six countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have similar demographic characteristics, each country has devised its own lockdown strategy to deal with the pandemic. The present study explored the effects of the pandemic on the management of urolithiasis patients across the Gulf countries, as well as the impact of the pandemic on urologists practicing in these countries.

Methodology

A web-based survey was developed by a group of urologists from the six GCC countries. The survey, written in English, included 23 general and specific questions about COVID-19, including ten questions with free-response prompts. Upon developing the survey, it was sent to another few urologists as a pilot for validation.

The survey was sent to many urologists in the GCC countries who were easily approachable by the study investigators during the week of 10-16 May 2020. The 23 questions on the survey are detailed in Figure 1.

IJNUS-2-1-202-g001

Figure 1. Questions of the survey.

Results

Responses were received from 191 urologists, representing the six GCC countries. Of these respondents, 72 (37.7%) were from Qatar, 39 (20.4%) from Kuwait, 30 (15.7%) from the United Arab Emirates (UAE), 19 (9.9%) each from Oman and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and 12 (6.3%) from Bahrain (Figure 2).

IJNUS-2-1-202-g002

Figure 2. The effect of COVID-19 on urologists in each country.

Of the 191 urologists, 145 (75.6%) worked in governmental hospitals, including 27 (14.1%) at academic centers, and 46 (24.4%) worked in private practice. The respondents differed in working experience, with 82 (42.9%) being consultants, 54 (28.3%) being specialists, nine (4.7%) being senior registrars, ten (5.2%) being registrars, four (2.1%) being assistant registrars, and 31 (16.2%) being urology residents. Of the respondents, 124 (64.9%) were general urologists, 42 (22.0%) were endo-urologists, and 25 (13.1%) were primarily interested in subspecialties in addition to urolithiasis.

Interestingly, 128 (67%) respondents changed their regular urology practice in response to COVID-19, 48 (25.1%) continued their routine practice, and 15 (7.9%) stopped practicing medicine following the lockdown. The lockdown reduced duty hours for 118 (61.8%) of the respondents and increased duty hours for 22 (11.5%), whereas 49 (25.7%) had almost the same number of duty hours, and two (1.0%) stopped practicing medicine.

Outpatient clinics and elective surgeries were closed or limited to minimize contact with patients. Only 26 (13.6%) reported no changes in the management of their clinics, whereas 37 (19.4%) closed their clinics, 91 (47.6%) changed to telemedicine phone consultations, four (2.1%) are consulting by video conference, and one (0.5%) is communicating with patients through the facility website.

Of the 191 respondents, 118 (61.8%) are not operating on patients infected with COVID-19, and 139 (72.8%) have stopped performing elective urolithiasis procedures. In contrast, 44 (23%) have reduced the number of elective urolithiasis procedures, whereas eight (4.2%) have not changed the number of procedures. Ninety-two respondents (48.2%) continue to perform the same number of emergency urolithiasis procedures, whereas 66 (34.5%) have reduced and 27 (14.1%) have increased the number of procedures. The remaining five (2.6%) urologists have stopped performing any operations, even emergency operations.

ESWL management was stopped by 98 (51.3%) of the urologists and reduced by 64 (33.5%) but remained unchanged by 18 (9.4%).Most of these respondents have changed the mode of anaesthesia to spinal anaesthesia. For example, 76 (39.7%) reported using spinal anaesthesia for all their patients and 16 (8.5%) for patients with proven COVID-19 infection. In contrast, 67 (35.1%) reported no change in anaesthesia preference in response to the pandemic.

To prevent infection, 112 (58.6%) urologists are screening their patients preoperatively, and 32 (16.5%) have worn full PPE routinely since the start of the pandemic.

In managing ureteral stones in patients lacking urinary tract infection and with unknown COVID-19 status, 67 (35.1%) urologists prefer more conservative management, 53 (27.7%) favour instant drainage followed by ureteroscopy after the easing of lockdown measures, 40 (20.9%) reported no change in management and 27 (14.1%) favour ureteroscopy for stone clearance. This is illustrated in Figure 3. These physicians were highly susceptible to COVID-19 infection, with 22 (11.5%) urologists found to be infected by positive swab results. Hospitals have been advised to support their employees psychologically, as evidenced by the 38 (19.9%) who received mental health support. Assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on these urologists showed that 107 (56%) were not affected, 55 (28.8%) had mild salary reduction, 25 (13.1%) experienced an almost 50% reduction in salary, and three (1.6%) stopped working because of the lockdown. Urologists are actively involved in COVID-19 management, with 84 (44%) shifting their medical practice from urology to volunteer in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urologists is illustrated in Figure2.

Discussion

About one-third of the respondents were from the state of Qatar. Response rates do not reflect the relative number of urologists in the six countries but may reflect the short time provided for the return of the survey. A large country like KSA requires more than one focal urologist, as well as additional time to reach urologists throughout the entire country. In 2016, approximately 257 urologists were estimated to be working in governmental hospitals (2), suggesting that our survey included only a small percentage of practicing urologists-most of the urologists who participated in the survey work in the governmental sector. In contrast, more than 50% of practicing urologists in the United States work in private practice [3].

The outbreak of COVID19 led most of the GCC to adopt lockdown measures, including preventing people from entering these countries during the outbreak period. Furthermore, medical services to treat COVID-19 patients were increased in most of these countries, including an increase in staff to provide these services. This led to an increase in staff exposure to COVID-19, increasing the incidence of COVID-19 among the staff. This, in turn, reduced the number of staff members available to treat COVID-19, requiring the deployment of urologists to work in COVID-19 facilities and reducing the ability to provide non COVID-19 related services.

Similar to other countries, most countries in the GCC have utilized telephone communications or telemedicine to manage outpatients, restricting surgery to emergency and oncology procedures. Also, the duty hours for physicians increased from 8 to 12 hours per day, making more staff members available to work in COVID-19 facilities. This was reflected in the survey results, as nearly two-thirds of the urologists were treating COVID-19 infected patients, whereas only about 25% continued practicing urology, which likely consists of emergency and oncology services. Similar changes were applied during the outbreak of COVID19 in Singapore [4].

EAU guidelines advise following local recommendations to test staff and patients for COVID-19 if resources are available [5]. Nearly two-thirds of the respondents are testing their patients for COVID-19 preoperatively, and only 16% reported wearing full PPE. This does not conform to EAU guidelines, perhaps because of a relative lack of availability of the test kits or the equipment for full PPE. The EAU guidelines advise full PPE, irrespective of the COVID status of the patient [5].

Testing patients for COVID-19 is crucial because asymptomatic patients from Wuhan, China, who tested positive for COVID-19 before surgery, had a postoperative mortality rate of 20% [6].

Since the EAU guideline considered that surgery is harmful to the patients if he is tested COVID positive, this should result in a change in the practice of management of urolithiasis. Our survey showed inconsistencies in the management of urolithiasis during the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, 20% of urologists surveyed did not alter their management of ureteral stones in the absence of infection, with only 38% selecting conservative management (Figure3).

IJNUS-2-1-202-g003

Figure 3. Management of ureteral stones in patients lacking urinary tract infection and with unknown COVID-19 status.

Studies have advised that, whenever possible, patients should be treated non-surgically or surgery should be deferred until the demands for ventilators and inpatient beds are reduced [7]. The EAU guidelines recommend treating intermediate priority patients if the capacity is available but not during COVID-19 surge [5].

Healthcare workers are members of the frontline response team and are therefore highly susceptible to infection. The WHO–China Joint Mission on COVID-19 reported that by 20 February 2020, there were 2,055 laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 among healthcare workers, with 22 (1.1%) deaths [8].In Italy, at least 2,629 health workers, or 8.3% of all infected individuals, have been infected with coronavirus since the pandemic broke out in February [9]. In our survey, 11.5% of respondents were laboratory confirmed as having COVID-19. In addition to the infection itself, COVID-19 may be an independent risk factor for mental health problems in health care workers, including depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress [10,11]. The WHO recommendations for health workers mention various hazards, including exposure to the pathogen, long working hours, psychological distress, fatigue, occupational burnout, stigma, and physical and psychological violence [12]. The WHO recommendations include providing access to mental health and counselling resources. This is supported by our survey, which found that 20% of the respondents had been provided mental health support by their facilities. The lockdown has also had an economic impact on the urologists working in this region. For example, our survey found that 75% of the urologists working in government hospitals, as well as some in private hospitals, were mildly affected economically, whereas around 15% experienced a greater economic impact, which may worsen the psychological impact of the pandemic on health care workers. The effect of COVID-19 on urologists in each country is illustrated in Figure 2.

Despite surveying a relatively large number of respondents, the results of this survey were limited by its narrow distribution among urologists in the region, which may have led to uneven distribution and collection bias. This may have been avoided had the survey been kept open for a longer period. However, this survey explored the common and variable practices among the health care organizations in the Gulf countries and emphasized the need for further studies to compare various practice strategies. The survey also showed the relatively high risk of COVID-19 infection to urologists, which warrants further evaluation by well-designed observational studies.

Conclusion

COVID-19 is hazardous to urologists in GCC countries, with 11.5% being infected and most reducing their clinical duties related to urolithiasis management. Although urolithiasis management in GCC countries during the COVID-19 pandemic was generally consistent with worldwide guidelines, some differences were observed, with further studies warranted to compare different management strategies.

References

  1. Gorbalenya AE, Baker SC, Baric RS, de Groot RJ, Drosten C, et al. (2020) The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: Classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2. Nature Microbiology 5: 536-544.
  2. Otaibi KE (2016) Challenge facing the urologist in Saudi Arabia in the future. Urol Ann 184-188.
  3. The State of the Urology Workforce and Practice in the United State (2018).
  4. Chan MC, Yeo SEK, Chong YL, Lee YM (2020) Stepping Forward: urologists’ Efforts during the COVID-19 outbreak in Singapore. EurUrol 78: 38-39. [crossref]
  5. European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Office-Rapid-Reaction-Group-An-organisation-wide-collaborative-effort-to-adapt-the-EAU-guidelines-recommendations-to-the-COVID-19-era.pdf
  6. Lei S, Jiang F, Su W, Chen C, Chen J, Wei W, et al. (2020) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection. EClinicalMedicine 21: 100331. [crossref]
  7. Stensland KD, Morgan TM, Moinzadeh A, Cheryl T, Briganti A, et al. (2020) Consideration in the triage of urologic surgeries During the COVID-19 pandemic. EurUrolEpub 77: 663-666.
  8. World Health Organization. 2020. Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
  9. Psychiatry Res (2020) Jun; 288: 112972. Published online 2020 of Apr 13. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112972. PMCID: PMC7152886
  10. SaiSpoorthy M, KarthikPratapa S, Supriya M (2020) Mental health problems faced by healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 pandemic- A review. Asian J Psychiatr 51: 102119. [crossref]
  11. Jianbo Lai, Simeng Ma, Ying Wang, ZhongxiangCai, Jianbo Hu, et al. (2020) Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open 3: 203976.
  12. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak: rights,roles and responsibilities of health workers, including key considerations for occupational safety and health. 18 March 2020. COVID-19: Schools, businesses and institutions. WHO reference no.: WHO/2019-nCov/HCW_advice/2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1272583/retrieve.

Facemasks are Not Effective for Preventing Transmission of the Coronavirus

DOI: 10.31038/JNNC.2020321

 

On February 29, 2020, Jerome Adams, the Surgeon  General of  the United States, tweeted that, “They [facemasks] are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching coronavirus.” Within a few months, he and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were stating that facemasks are effective for preventing transmission of viral illnesses in the community, and within a short time, governments in the United States and elsewhere were mandating the wearing of facemasks in public. The explanation for this reversal in policy focused on asymptomatic carriers in public. However, the evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials (RTCs) indicates that surgical facemasks have no effect on the transmission of viral illnesses in the community. Based on their physical characteristics, one would not expect surgical facemasks to reduce viral transmission by asymptomatic carriers. The size of a coronavirus is about 0.1 microns and the pore size of surgical masks is in the range of 50-100 microns: the pores are 500-1000 times the size of the virus. Aerosol droplets are about 3 microns in diameter, so surgical masks would not be expected to block them either.

A common rationale for wearing masks in public is that their purpose is not to protect you from others, but to protect others from you if you are an asymptomatic carrier: this is illogical. How can a mask protect someone else from you if it does not protect you from someone else? Also, asymptomatic carriers are, by definition, not coughing or sneezing in public, except very infrequently. Normal breathing and speaking emits primarily aerosols not droplets; droplets are the main concern for transmission of the coronavirus in public. Infectious symptomatic carriers who are emitting virus-laden droplets should be in quarantine, therefore it is not necessary to mandate facemasks to protect the public from them.

Four meta-analyses published to date report that no Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) has ever shown a significant difference in viral transmission rate with and without facemasks in the general public. Brainard, Jones, Lake, Hopper and Hunter  [1] reviewed 3 RCTs   and found no difference in any of them; Cowling, Zhou, Ip, Leung, and Aiello [2] reviewed 4 RCTs and found no difference in any of them; Xiao, Shiu, Gao, Wong, Fong, Ryu and Cowling [3] reviewed 10 RCTs and found no difference in any of them; and Aggarwal, Dwarakananthan, Gautam and Ray [4] reviewed 9 RCTs and found no difference in any of them. These meta-analyses by four different groups from around the world have not found a single RCT that demonstrates a protective effect of facemasks for viral transmission in the general public. In discussing the Xiao et al. [3] Meta-analysis, Greenlagh, Schmid, Czypionka, Bassler and Gruer [5] said that, “…the authors conclude that there was no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of facemasks.” The situation, then, is not that there is a lack of evidence: there is replicated, controlled evidence that facemasks do not reduce viral transmission in the community.

For the sake of discussion, what if we made an assumption that facemasks reduce the rate of viral transmission in the community by 5%? For this discussion, we will bear in mind that there is no evidence that facemasks reduce transmission by even  this  much.  Further, let’s assume that the infection rate in the community is 5% and the mortality rate for infected healthy people under 60 is 0.1%. This would mean that wearing facemasks would reduce one’s risk of infection as a healthy person under 60 from 5% to 4.75%; the risk of death from COVID-19 would drop from 0.005% to 0.00475% due to wearing facemasks. This does not seem like a sufficient risk reduction to justify mandatory facemasks in public.

Wearing masks is not terribly inconvenient, but it does have  costs in terms of dollars, an energy burden from manufacturing and distribution, and pollution pressure on landfills, bodies of water and the environment in general. Given these considerations, and the evidence from RTCs, it would seem that mandates for wearing facemasks in public should be, at the least, reduced to recommendations, until there is definitive evidence that they are effective. For any other topic in medicine, one would expect a consensus to exist if all the available RTCs and meta-analyses found that a given intervention has no effect on the target problem. One would expect authorities to state that there is no need for the intervention. If the same standards were applied to public wearing of facemasks for COVID-19, there would be neither a mandate nor a recommendation for them. As discussed recently, facemask policies are only one of many problems with how medical authorities have handled the COVID-19 epidemic; many public health recommendations and statements have not been based on science [6].

References

  1. Brainard JS, Jones N, Lake I, Hooper L, Hunter P (2020) Face masks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID-19: A rapid systematic review. Medrxiv doi:10.1101/2020.04.01.20049528.
  2. Cowling BJ, Zhou Y, Ip DK, Leung GM, Aiello AE (2010) Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review. Epidemiology of Infections 138: 449-456. [crossref]
  3. Xiao J, Shiv EYC, Gao H, Wong JY, Fong MW, et al. (2020) Nonpharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in non-healthcare settings – personal protective and environmental measures. Emerging Infectious Diseases 26: 967-975.
  4. Aggarwhal N, Dwarakananthan V, Gautham N, Ray A (2020) Facemasks for prevention of viral respiratory infections in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. IndianJournal of Public Health 64: 192-200.
  5. Greenhalgh T, Schmid MB, Czypionka T, Bassler D,  Gruer L (2020) Facemasks  for the public during the COVID-19 crisis. British Medical Journal 369: m1435. [crossref]
  6. Ross CA (2020) Thoughts on COVID-19. Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care 3: 1-3.

Therapeutic Effects of Ozone Therapy that Justifies Its Use for the Treatment of COVID-19

DOI: 10.31038/JNNC.2020314

Abstract

SARS-Cov2, the virus causing COVID-19, is distributed globally since December 2019, causing a pandemic and there are currently no specific treatments available. Patients evolve differently and extreme cases have fatal outcomes after 10 days of being infected. The virus is known to cause Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Cytokine storm is considered to be one of the major causes of ARDS and multiple-organ failure. Due to the high lethality of SARS-CoV2 infections and its economic and social impact, it is necessary to seek new therapeutic procedures. It has been demonstrated that ozone therapy produces a significant improvement in blood flow and oxygenation of ischemic tissues. Also, ozone can achieve an equilibrium between Nrf2 and NF-κB factors, modulating the oxidative stress and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In clinical studies, ozone has a significant role in the treatment of pulmonary and vascular diseases. Today, ozone therapy represents the most practical approach for integrating standard therapies to achieve homeostasis. Therefore, due to the ozone therapeutical effects, it can be proposed as an adjunct therapy in SARS-CoV-2. Three randomized control trials (NCT04359303, NCT04370223 and NCT04444531) are pending classification and approval to start in Spain, one in Iran (IRCT20190618043923N4) and two more (NCT04366089 and NCT04388514) started in Italy one month ago.

Keywords

COVID-19, Immunomodulation, NF-κB, Nrf2, Oxidative stress, Ozone therapy

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), viral diseases continue to emerge and represent a serious issue to public health. An epidemic of cases with unexplained low respiratory infections was first reported to the WHO Country Office in China, on December 31, 2019. The new virus was called SARS-CoV-2 and the disease cause was a “COVID-19” an acronym of “coronavirus disease 2019” [1]. Many of these patients deteriorated rapidly and required intubation and mechanical ventilation. Mortality rates are assumed to be around 3.7%. There is currently no effective treatment [2,3]. The therapeutic strategies to deal with the infection are only supportive. Prevention, aimed at reducing transmission rates within the community is our best weapon.

COVID-19 has characteristics of two known syndromes [4,5]:

• Macrophage activation syndrome [6]: a life-threatening complication characterized by hypercytokinemia (cytokine storm) with multi-organ failure. It is characterized by an uncontrolled activation and proliferation of T lymphocytes and macrophages, producing extensive tissue damage as endothelial lesions that lead to the production of microthrombi. Laboratory abnormalities include a decrease in white blood cells, platelet and hemoglobin. There is a production of a high level of transaminase, a marked increase in ferritin, and evidence for intravascular coagulation activation. The protagonist of this storm is mainly interleukin 6 (IL-6) which promotes the differentiation of B lymphocytes. The cytokine storm also stimulates the production of acute-phase proteins and further plays a role in thermoregulation, bone maintenance and the function of the central nervous system. During inflammatory diseases, infections, autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular diseases and some types of cancer, there is an increase in IL-6.

• Antiphospholipid syndrome [7]: it is an autoimmune system disorder that manifests clinically as recurrent venous or arterial thrombosis. This also alters the homeostatic regulation of blood coagulation. The D-dimer is elevated in most patients with pneumonia and other indicators of coagulation are abnormal. Thrombocytopenia is also observed, which seems to be associated with a poorer prognosis. Analytically, the presence of high levels of ferritin in the blood is striking. They appear to respond to an acute inflammatory process. Liver enzymes also tend to be elevated. The Fe2+ released into the blood, in the presence of hydrogen peroxide produces hydroxyl radicals (Fenton reaction). This is extremely toxic, causing oxidative damage, mainly pulmonary, but also systemic. The lung tissue damage stimulates the monocyte-macrophage system which contributes significantly to the inflammatory process. Taking into account all the ozone therapeutical properties, which will be explained below, it can be proposed as an adjunct therapy for patients with COVID-19.

Ozone Therapy and its Mechanism of Action

Ozone (O3) is an allotropic form of the element oxygen, containing one more atom than atmospheric oxygen. It is particularly unstable and decomposes spontaneously into diatomic oxygen, which, in practice, makes it very difficult to transport and store. Ozone therapy has been used for therapeutic purposes since the beginning of the last century and its use is increasingly demanded nowadays. It is characterized by the simplicity of its application, its great effectiveness and with good tolerance. International reports of adverse reactions to the application of ozone therapy place it among the lowest incidences with 0.0007% [8,9]. Ozone, at therapeutic doses, is capable of producing a small, transitory and controlled oxidative stress that stimulates a group of depressed biological functions without causing any adverse effect. This ozone’s preconditioning effect is capable of rebalancing the upset redox state in the organism [10]. Biochemically, when blood is exposed to ozone for several minutes, it reacts immediately with different molecules present in biological fluids, namely antioxidants, proteins, carbohydrates and, preferentially, polyunsaturated fatty acids (Criegee reaction), leading to the formation of alpha-hydroxy- hydroperoxides, hydrogen peroxide, ozonides and aldehydes such as 4-hydroxynonenal. These are important signaling molecules, with crucial roles modulating inflammation, cell proliferation, cell growth and cell death [11].

These alkenals can activate a nuclear transcriptional factor, called nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) present in the cell cytoplasm bound to Keap-1 protein. Such a protein has -NH2 and, mainly, -SH groups (Cys273 and Cys288) which, by binding alkenals [for example 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE)] at picomolar levels, causes a conformational change favoring the dissociation of Nrf2. This is then imported into the nucleus where, after forming a heterodimer with Maf (musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma) protein, interacts with the Antioxidant Response Element (ARE) on DNA. Consequently, the synthesis of several antioxidative enzymes (superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione reductase, glutathione S-transferases, NADPH- quinone oxidoreductase, heat shock protein 70, phase II enzymes and Heme-oxygenase-1) are upregulated in various organs [12]. Also, reduces iron overload, and subsequent oxidative stress that is induced by elevated ferritin [13]. The increase of antioxidant capacity is the crucial step to counteract the chronic inflammation typical of diseases aggravated by chronic oxidative stress. An improvement of the antioxidant response has been reported in patients with asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), as emphysema, treated with ozone therapy [14-16]. Specifically, improvements were seen in IgE levels, inflammatory response, respiratory tests and clinical status. Also, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ozone has exerted beneficial effects [17,18].

This ozone efficacy not only may be explained through its actions on cytokine control (diminished IL-1, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor α-TNFα) but also can reestablish cellular redox balance. It is known that reactive oxygen species can function as a second messenger to activate the nuclear transcription factor NF-κB, which orchestrates the expression of a spectrum of genes involved in the inflammatory response. Nrf2 is able to modulate inflammation through multiple mechanisms, such as the regulation of redox homeostasis and the suppression of pro-inflammatory genes, either directly or through the interaction with NF-κB [19]. Inflammation increases local and systemic Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) level while ROS enhance inflammation. The Nrf2-mediated ROS-homeostatic control can break this vicious cycle. Nrf2 reduces inflammation by preventing the recruitment of RNA polymerase II to start gene transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β [20]. The capability of Nrf2 to maintain redox homeostasis would prevent DNA damage, preserve proteostasis, and improve mitochondrial function while suppressing acute and chronic inflammation [20]. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of ozone involve activation of Nrf2, which is thus considered as a key factor for the efficacy of ozone treatments. A previous study reported that ozone preconditioning significantly reduced NF-κB expression and inhibited inflammatory responses in liver ischemia/reperfusion injury [21]. Ozone can achieve an equilibrium between Nrf2 and NF- κB, modulating the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines with an important effect in cytoprotection (Figure 1) [20].

JNNC-3-1-304-g001

Figure 1. Ozone and its relation with Nrf2 and NF-κB.
Ozone, at therapeutic doses, is capable of producing a small, transitory and controlled oxidative stress. The nuclear transcription factor Nrf2 is usually present within the cytosol as a complex with Keap-1 protein. The 4-HNE (ozone active metabolite) binds to Cys 151 of Keap1 and suppresses the constitutive inhibition of Nrf2, which then translocates into the nucleus. After binding to Maf, Nrf2 binds to ARE and switches on the synthesis of highly cytoprotective enzymes (SOD, catalase, GSH, heme-oxygenase-1, HSP, etc) maintaining a redox balance. NF-κB is also a redox- regulated transcription factor, involved in inflammation, immune function, cellular growth and apoptosis. In resting, it exists in an inactive form complexed with the inhibitor IκB. In the presence of oxidative stress, H2O2 (ozone active metabolite) activates a tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates IκB and causes its detachment from the inactive complex. The heterodimer moves promptly from the cytosol into the nucleus, where it regulates gene expression forming new proteins such as cytokines (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α), COX-2, iNOS, adhesion molecules (ICAM), tissue factor, immunoregulatory molecules. At the same time, these two pathways inhibit each other at their transcription level via protein-protein interactions or through secondary messenger effects [19]. Nrf2 opposes the transcriptional upregulation of proinflammatory cytokine genes. Nrf2 binds to the proximity of inflammatory cytokine genes, including IL-6 and IL-1β, and inhibits their transcription. Nrf2 pathway also inhibits NF-κB mediated transcription by preventing the degradation of IκB-α. At the same time, Nrf2 upregulates the expression of genes coding antioxidant proteins. Similarly, NF-κB mediated transcription reduces the Nrf2 activation by reducing the ARE gene transcription, among other factors. Therefore, it can be considered that ozone is involved in the balance between these two transcription factors.
Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2;Keap1, Kelch-like erythroid cell-derived protein; Maf, musculoaponeuroticfibrosarcoma; ARE, antioxidant response element; HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; 4-HNE, 4-Hydroxynonenal; HSP, Heat shock protein; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH, reduced glutathione; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase.

Besides, Nrf2-activator may attenuate the Toll-Like Receptor (TLR) mediated aberrant inflammation by activation of intrinsic cytoprotective proteins and suppression of pro-inflammatory mediators. Hence, these two major signaling pathways may interact differentially and their cross-talk can be manipulated to regulate inflammation [22]. TLR activation is critical in the initiation of an inflammatory response against pathogens by triggering the production of inflammatory cytokines, enhancing adaptive immunity [23]. Simultaneously, a negative feedback mechanism also exists that could prevent the over-activation of TLR signaling that may otherwise result in chronic inflammation or autoimmunity. Nrf2 activation interferes with the expression of pro-inflammatory proteins and suppresses inflammation. The interaction of TLR and Nrf2 helps in the regulation of the inflammation process. The linkage between TLR signaling and Nrf2-Keap1 pathway may serve as a bridge between immune regulation and oxidative stress responses through the regulation of inflammation [22]. It has been demonstrated that ozone preconditioning improved renal inflammation and damage by blocking the activation of TLR4-NF-κB pathway in renal ischemia/ reperfusion injury. Also, ozone significantly reduced the mRNA level of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, ICAM-1 (Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1) and MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1) [24]. On the other hand, medical ozone, in vitro, has proven to be effective against viruses, bacteria, fungi and spores, destroying cells membrane and viruses envelop [25].

Ozone Therapy and its Positive Effects in the Treatment of Patients with COVID-19

Among the therapeutic effects of ozone therapy that favors the positive evolution of patients with COVID-19 are:

– Ozone improves oxygen metabolism increasing cellular oxygenation. Improving the hexose-monophosphate shunt, due to the activation of 2,3-DPG which, by binding to the β–chain of hemoglobin (Hb), causes a shift to the right of the Hb dissociation curve. This enhances the release of oxygen in the hypoxic tissues. There is also an improvement of the glycolytic pathway on erythrocytes significantly increasing their ATP content [11,13], recovering the elasticity of the red cell membrane thus improving blood rheology and capillarity [26]. There is a significant improvement in blood flow and oxygenation of ischemic tissues due to ozone treatment [27-30]. This is due to Nitric Oxide (NO), S-nitrosothiols cooperating with Carbon Monoxide (CO) and released prostacyclin [31,32]. Different preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the effect of ozone in modulating the NO levels and its importance in the protection of the vascular endothelium cells [32-34].

– Ozone is capable of inducing the release and modulation of interferons and related cytokines. Also, stimulates antioxidant defense systems, counteracting the state of hyperinflammation, cytokine storm and oxidative stress, suffered by patients with COVID-19. This is achieved through the increase in Nrf2 factors and restoring cellular redox balance [35,36]. There is also the activation of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) by increasing the release of CO and bilirubin. This contributes to reducing inflammation [37]. Several preclinical and clinical studies report a decrease in proinflammatory cytokines as IL-1, IL-6, TNFα, as well as ICAM-1, MCP-1, among others [24,38-45]. Ozone was able to modulate the phagocytic cells in peripheral blood and the mechanisms on how messengers can activate immunological response leading to the therapeutic biological effects [46,47]. This is a very positive effect on COVID-19 infection. The inflammatory response is a hallmark of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, cytokine storm can lead to the death of these patients. The protective effect of ozone therapy was achieved by its anti-inflammatory property through the modulation of nucleotide- binding oligomerization domain-like receptor containing pyrin domain 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, enhancing the antioxidant activity of Nrf2 and inhibiting apoptosis [48,49]. The NLRP3 inflammasome is a critical component of the innate immune system that mediates caspase-1 activation and the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β/IL-18 in response to microbial infection and cellular damage. On the other hand, activation of Toll-Like Receptor (for example TLR4) by SARS-CoV-2 causes a biochemical cascade that begins with the formation of pro-IL-1 cleaved by caspase-1 and followed by activation of the inflammasome. IL-1 is secreted outside the macrophage, mediating lung inflammation, fever and fibrosis, and provoking severe respiratory problems [50]. It has been demonstrated that ozone preconditioning protected the rat kidney from reperfusion injury via modulation of the TLR4-NF-κB pathway [24].

– COVID-19 patients suffer from microthrombi due to increased viscosity and erythrocyte aggregation, among other factors. Ozone has an antiplatelet effect, increases some prostacyclins (like PGI2) leading to vasodilatation, as well as modulates antithrombin III [31,51]. All these effects, in conjunction with better blood circulation, can help to decrease the hypercoagulation phenomena present in these patients.

– Ozone can block the virus’s ability to replicate by balancing the cellular redox state, through the control of Nrf2 [52,53]. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) and Transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2). SARS spike protein S will attach to ACE2. Following attachment to ACE2, viral entry requires S protein priming, which is performed by TMPRSS2 cleaving S protein. TMPRSS2 activity is essential for viral spread and pathogenesis in the infected host, and TMPRSS2 inhibitors have been investigated as a potential therapeutic target for SARS-CoV-2. Nrf2 activators have an important role in reducing viral pathogenesis via inhibiting virus entry through inhibit TRMPSS2 [54,55]. Nrf2 activators may offer multiple ways to regain control of important pathways to increase resistance and slow viral replication. Application of an NRF2 activating agent, ACE2 mRNA was down-regulated 3.5-fold and TMPRSS2 was down-regulated 2.8-fold in human liver-derived HepG2 cells [56]. Exacerbated lung injury in Nrf2−/− mice was associated with increased pulmonary expression of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) and with decreased pulmonary antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes relative to Nrf2+/+ mice [57]. Furthermore, pretreatment with the Nrf2-ARE inducer sulforaphane significantly attenuated Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)-induced bronchopulmonary inflammation, epithelial injury and pulmonary viral expression in Nrf2+/+ mice [58]. Results from the study confirmed an association of oxidative stress in RSV pathogenesis and provide compelling evidence for an important regulatory role of Nrf2-ARE as a host defense mechanism against RSV disease. Another study found an inverse relationship between the levels of Nrf2 expression and influenza A viral entry and replication within nasal epithelial cells [59]. In response to experimentally applied mechanical ventilation, greater levels of lung alveolar and vascular permeability and inflammatory responses were found in Nrf2−/− compared to Nrf2+/+ mice [60]. In mice, Nrf2 deficiency caused augmented ovalbumin-driven airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. In this study, the enhanced allergic response in Nrf2−/− mice was associated with more pronounced lung mucus cell hyperplasia, eosinophilic infiltration, increased Th2 cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 and suppressed multiple antioxidants relative to Nrf2+/+ mice [61]. In an experimental sepsis model, Nrf2 deficiency increased the inflammation and mortality of mice against bacterial endotoxin (LPS)- and cecal ligation and puncture-induced septic shock [62]. This indicates that Nrf2 is a novel modifier of sepsis that determines survival by mounting an appropriate innate immune response. Data, therefore, suggest that Nrf2-ARE activators exert protective effects on LPS-induced inflammation, and suggested their potential therapeutic role for intervening sepsis syndrome. Taking into account that ozone stimulates Nrf2 [28,36,37,63], this could be an important physiological mechanism to block endogenous COVID-19 reduplication by preventing contact with receptors of SARS-CoV-19 through downregulation of ACE2 and TMPRSS2, inactivating the ability of the virus to enter cells [55]. The re-equilibration of the cellular REDOX state achieved with the ozone therapy is also important in the induction of cytokines synthesis in monocytes and lymphocytes and in the release of HO-1 and heat shock proteins which are potent activators of the immune system [12,64].

Conclusion

In summary, the positive aspect of ozone therapy is the ability to activate several defense mechanisms that cooperate to regain a normal redox system and a modulation of the NFκB/Nrf2 pathway. Today, ozone therapy represents the most practical approach for integrating standard therapies to achieve homeostasis. Therefore, due to the ozone therapeutical effects, it can be proposed as an adjunct therapy in SARS- CoV-2. Three randomized control trials (NCT04359303, NCT04370223 and NCT04444531) are pending classification and approval to start in Spain, one in Iran (IRCT20190618043923N4) and two more (NCT04366089 and NCT04388514) started in Italy one month ago.

Highlights

Ozone Therapy can be used for the treatment of COVID-19.

Ozone can achieve an equilibrium between Nrf2 and NF-κB,
modulating oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Ozone counteracts hyperinflammation, cytokine storm and oxidative stress.

Ozone improves oxygen metabolism, blood flow and oxygenation of ischemic tissues.

Author Contributions

SMC – works on the conceptualization, drafting, editing and revision. JAMM, AHM, FJHT and JBN – work on the conceptualization and critical review of the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Lei Zhou, et al. (2020) Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med 382: 1199- 1207. [crossref]
  2. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Jianping Zhao, et al. (2020) Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 395: 497-506. [crossref]
  3. WHO (2020) Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when Novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection is suspected: Interim Guidance. Available: WHO/nCoV/Clinical/2020.2.
  4. Chen Y, Liu Q, Guo D (2020) Emerging coronaviruses: Genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J Med Virol 92: 418-423. [crossref]
  5. Prieto-Pérez L, Fortes J, Soto C, Vidal-González A (2020) Histiocytic hyperplasia with hemophagocytosis and acute alveolar damage in COVID-19 infection. Mod Pathol.
  6. Bracaglia C, Prencipe G, De Benedetti F (2017) Macrophage Activation Syndrome: different mechanisms leading to a one clinical syndrome. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 15: 5. [crossref]
  7. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Crowther M, Branch W, Khamashta MA (2010) Antiphospholipid syndrome. Lancet 376: 1498-509. [crossref]
  8. Menéndez S, González R, Ledea OE, Hernández F (2008) Ozono: Aspectos Básicos y Aplicaciones clínicas. 1ra Ed. La Habana, Cuba: Editorial CENIC 10-320.
  9. Jacobs, MT (1982) Investigation into pitfalls and typical complications in ozone- oxygen therapy. Untersuchung uber Zwischenfalle und typische Komplikationen in der Ozon Sauerstoff-Therapie. OzoNachrichten 1: 5.
  10. León OS, Menéndez S, Merino N, Castillo R, S Sam, et al. (1998) Ozone oxidative preconditioning: a protection against cellular damage by free radicals. Med Inflamm 7: 289-294. [crossref]
  11. Bocci V (2005) Ozone – A new medical drug. Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Springer 1-295.
  12. Bocci V, Zanardi I, Valacchi G, Borrelli E, Valter Travagli (2015) Validity of Oxygen- Ozone Therapy as Integrated Medication form in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets 15: 127-138. [crossref]
  13. Sagai M, Bocci V (2011) Mechanisms of action involved in ozone therapy: is healing induced via a mild oxidative stress? Med Gas Res 1: 29. [crossref]
  14. Hernández F, Calunga JL, Turrent J, Menéndez S, Adonis Montenegro Perdomo (2005) Ozone therapy effects on blood biomarkers and lung function of asthma patients. Arch Med Res 36: 549-554. [crossref]
  15. Borrelli E, Bocci V (2014) Oxygen ozone therapy in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: An integrative approach. Am J Clin Exp Med 2: 9-13.
  16. Calunga-Fernández JL, Paz-Agüero Y, Menéndez-Cepero S, Martínez-Aparicio A (2011) La ozonoterapia en pacientes con enfisema pulmonar. Revista Médica de Chile 139: 439-447.
  17. León-Fernández OS, Viebahn R, López-Cabreja G, Serrano-Espinosa I, Yanet Hernández Matos, et al. (2016) Medical ozone increases methotrexate clinical response and improves cellular redox balance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Pharmacol 789: 313-318. [crossref]
  18. Oru GT, Viebhan R, Cabreja GL, Espinosa IS (2017) Medical Ozone Reduces the Risk of γ-Glutamyl Transferase and Alkaline Phosphatase Abnormalities and Oxidative Stress in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Methotrexate. SM J Arthritis Res 1: 1004.
  19. Kobayashi EH, Suzuki T, Funayama R, Nagashima T, Makiko Hayashi, et al. (2016) Nrf2 suppresses macrophage inflammatory response by blocking proinflammatory cytokine transcription. NatCommun 7: 11624. [crossref]
  20. Galiè M, Covi V, Tabaracc Gi, Malatesta M (2019) The Role of Nrf2 in the Antioxidant Cellular Response to Medical Ozone Exposure. Int J Mol Sci 20: 4009. [crossref]
  21. León OS, Ajamieh HH, Berlanga J, Menéndez S, Renate Viebahn-Hánsler, et al. (2008) Ozone oxidative preconditioning is mediated by A1 adenosine receptors in a rat model of liver ischemia/reperfusion. Transpl Int 21: 39-48. [crossref]
  22. Mohan S, Gupta D (2018) Crosstalk of toll-like receptors signaling and Nrf2 pathway for regulation of inflammation. Biomed Pharmacother 108: 1866-1878. [crossref]
  23. Iwasaki A, Medzhitov R (2004) Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol 5: 987-995. [crossref]
  24. Xing B, Chen H, Wang L, Weng X, et al. Ozone oxidative preconditioning protects the rat kidney from reperfusion injury via modulation of the TLR4-NF-κB pathway. Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira 30.
  25. Ohmine S (2005) Investigation of the mechanisms of ozone-mediated viral inactivation (2005). Theses and Dissertations 597. Available: https://scholarsarchive. byu.edu/etd/597.
  26. Giunta R, Coppola A, Luongo C, Sammartino A, S Guastafierro, et al. (2001) Ozonized autohemotransfusion improves hemorheological parameters and oxygen delivery to tissues in patients with peripheral occlusive arterial disease. Ann Hematol 80: 745-748. [crossref]
  27. Ajamieh HH, Berlanga J, Merino N, Martínez Sánchez G, Anna M Carmona, et al. (2005) Role of protein synthesis in the protection conferred by ozone oxidative preconditioning in hepatic ischemia/reperfusion. Transpl Int 18: 604-612. [crossref]
  28. Meng W, Xu Y, Li D, Zhu E, Li Deng, et al. (2017) Ozone protects rat heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury: A role for oxidative preconditioning in attenuating mitochondrial injury. Biomed Pharmacother 88: 1090-1097. [crossref]
  29. Wang L, Chen H, Liu XH, Chen ZY, Xiao-Dong Weng, et al. (2014) Ozone oxidative preconditioning inhibits renal fibrosis induced by ischemia and reperfusion injury in rats. Exp Ther Med 8: 1764-1768. [crossref]
  30. Wu XN, Zhang T, Wang J, Liu X, Zhen-sheng Li, et al. (2016) Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging following major ozonated autohemotherapy for treatment of acute cerebral infarction. Neural Regen Res 11: 1115-1121. [crossref]
  31. Schulz S, Ninke S, Watzer B, Nusing RM (2012) Ozone induces synthesis of systemic prostacyclin by cyclooxygenase-2 dependent mechanism in vivo. BiochemlPharmacol 83: 506-513. [crossref]
  32. Ajamieh HH, Menéndez S, Martínez-Sánchez G, Candelario-Jalil E et al. (2004) Nitric oxide and their role in the oxidative preconditioning in hepatic ischemia- reperfusion. Liver Int 24: 55-62.
  33. Al-Dalain M, Martínez G, Candelario-Jalil E, Menéndez S, et al. (2001) Ozone treatment reduces markers of oxidative and endothelial damage in an experimental diabetes model in rats. Pharmacol Res 44: 391-396. [crossref]
  34. Martínez G, Al-Dalain SM, Menéndez S, Re L, et al. (2005) Therapeutic efficacy of ozone medical treatments in patients with diabetic foot. Eur J Pharmacol 523: 151-161. [crossref]
  35. Bocci V, Valacchi G (2015) Nrf2 activation as target to implement therapeutic treatments. Front Chem 3.
  36. Re L, Martinez-Sanchez G, Bordicchia M, MalcangiG, et al. (2014) Is ozone pre- conditioning effect linked to Nrf2/EpRE activation pathway in vivo? A preliminary result. Eur J Pharmacol 742: 158-162. [crossref]
  37. Pecorelli A, Bocci V, Acquaviva A, Belmonte G, et al. (2013) NRF2 activation is involved in ozonated human serum upregulation of HO-1 in endothelial cells. ToxicolApplPharmacol 267: 30-40. [crossref]
  38. Zamora Z, Borrego A, López O, Delgado R, et al. (2005) Effects of ozone oxidative preconditioning on TNF-α release and antioxidant-prooxidant intracellular balance in mice during endotoxic shock. MediatInflamm 1: 16-22.
  39. Bette M, Nüsing RM, Mutters R, Zamora ZB, et al. (2006) Efficiency of Tazobactam/ Piperacillin in lethal peritonitis is enhanced after pre-conditioning of rats with O3/ O2-pneumoperitoneum. Shock 25: 23-29. [crossref]
  40. Dranguet J, Fraga A, Díaz MT, Mallok A, et al. (2013) Ozone oxidative postconditioning ameliorates joint damage and decreases pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and oxidative stress in PG/PS-induced arthritis in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 714: 318-324. [crossref]
  41. Chang JDS, Lu HS, Chang YF, Wang D (2005) Ameliorative effect of ozone on cytokine production in mice injected with human rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblast cells. RheumatolInt 26: 142-151. [crossref]
  42. Aslaner A, Çakır T, Çelik B, Doğan U, et al. (2015) Does intraperitoneal medical ozone preconditioning and treatment ameliorate the methotrexate induced nephrotoxicity in rats? Int J ClinExp Med 8: 13811-13817.
  43. Xie TY, Yan W, Lou J, Chen XY (2016) Effect of ozone on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and related inflammatory cytokines in rats with diabetic retinopathy. GenetMol Res 15: 15027558. [crossref]
  44. Delgado-Roche L, Riera-Romo M, Mestab F, Hernández-Matos Y, et al. (2017) Medical ozone promotes Nrf2 phosphorylation reducing oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines in multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Pharmacol 811: 148-154. [crossref]
  45. Calunga-Fernández JL, Menéndez-Cepero S, Zamora-Rodríguez Z (2019) Ozone Therapy in rats submitted to subtotal nephrectomy: Role of interleukin 6 and antioxidant system. Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas 38.
  46. Diaz-Luis J, Menendez-Cepero S, Diaz-Luis A, Ascanio Garcia Y (2015) In vitro effectof ozone in phagocyticfunctionofleucocytes in peripheralblood. JO3T 1: 1-9.
  47. Díaz-Luis J, Menéndez-Cepero S, Macías-Abraham C, Fariñas-Rodríguez L (2018) Systemic ozone therapy by rectal insufflation for immunoglobulin A deficiency. MSMEDICC Review 20: 29-35.
  48. Wang Z, Zhang A, Meng W, Wang  T,  et al. (2018) Ozone protects the rat lung  from ischemia-reperfusion injury by attenuating NLRP3-mediated inflammation, enhancing Nrf2 antioxidant activity and inhibiting apoptosis. Eur J Pharmacol 835: 82-93. [crossref]
  49. Yu G, Bai Z, Chen Z, Chen H, et al. (2017)The NLRP3 inflammasome is a potential target of ozone therapy aiming to ease chronic renal inflammation in chronic kidney disease. IntImmunopharmacol 43: 203-209. [crossref]
  50. Conti P, Ronconi G, Caraffa A, Gallenga CE, et al. (2020) Induction of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1 and IL-6) and lung inflammation by COVID-19: Anti-inflammatory strategies. J BiolRegulHomeostAgents 34: 1. [crossref]
  51. Martínez Y, Zamora Z, González R, Guanche D (2010) Efecto del precondicionamiento oxidativo con ozono en el tiempo de sangrado y formación de trombo venoso en un modelo de choque séptico en ratas. Revista CENIC. Ciencias Biológicas 41.
  52. Ricevuti G, Franzini M, Valdenassi L (2020) Oxygen-ozone immunoceutical therapy in COVID-19 outbreak: facts and figures. Ozone Therapy 5.
  53. Hernández A, Viñals M, Isidoro T, Vilás F (2020) Potential Role of Oxygen–Ozone Therapy in Treatment of COVID-19 Pneumonia. Am J Case Rep 21: 925849.
  54. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, et al. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 Cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181: 271-280. [crossref]
  55. Hassan SM, Jawad MJ, Ahjel SW, Singh RB, et al. (2020) The Nrf2 activator (DMF) and Covid-19: Is there a possible role? Med Arch 74: 134-138. [crossref]
  56. McCord JM, Hybertson BM, Cota-Gomez A, Gao B (2020) Nrf2 activator PB125® as a potential therapeutic agent against COVID-19. bioRxiv.
  57. Cho HY, Kleeberger SR (2010) Nrf2 protects against airway disorders. ToxicolApplPharmacol 244: 43-56. [crossref]
  58. ChoHY, Imani F, Miller-DeGraff L, Walters D, et al. (2009) Antiviral activity of Nrf2 in a murine model of respiratory syncytial virus disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179: 138-150. [crossref]
  59. Kesic MJ, Simmons SO, Bauer R, Jaspers I (2011) Nrf2 expression modifies influenza A entry and replication in nasal epithelial cells. Free RadicBiol Med 51: 444-453. [crossref]
  60. Papaiahgari S, Yerrapureddy A, ReddySR, Reddy NM, et al. (2007) Genetic and pharmacologic evidence links oxidative stress to ventilator-induced lung injury in mice. AmJRespirCritCare Med 176: 1222-1235. [crossref]
  61. Rangasamy T, Guo J, Mitzner WA, Roman J, et al. (2005) Disruption of Nrf2 enhances susceptibility to severe airway inflammation and asthma in mice. J Exp Med 202: 47-59. [crossref]
  62. Thimmulappa RK, Lee H, Rangasamy T, Reddy SP, et al. (2006) Nrf2 is a critical regulator of the innate immune response and survival during experimental sepsis. JClinInvest 116: 984-995. [crossref]
  63. Siniscalco D, Trotta MC, Brigida AL, Maisto R, et al. (2018) Intraperitoneal administration of oxygen/ozone to rats reduces the pancreatic damage induced by streptozotocin. Biology 7: 10-22. [crossref]
  64. Bocci V, Aldinucci C, Mosci F, Carraro F, et al. (2007) Ozonation of human blood induces a remarkable upregulation of heme oxygenase-1 and heat stress protein-70. Mediators Inflamm 267-85.

Farmers Market Fruit & Vegetable Rx Program Shows Clinically Significant Quality of Life Outcomes Using Standardized SF-36 Health Survey

DOI: 10.31038/PEP.2020121

Abstract

Introduction: Fruit and vegetable prescription programs at farmers markets have shown some statistically significant changes in health markers. To date, little is known about whether these programs also improve Quality of Life (QoL). The current study examined if QoL improvements occurred after participation in a fruit and vegetable prescription program.

Methods: Our team of volunteer clinicians enrolled a cohort of 101 low-income adult participants over three years. Participants self-identified as food insecure and had previously been diagnosed with a diet-related disease. Each received a “prescription” to purchase fruits and vegetables from the local farmers market. Participants attended monthly clinic visits and attended plant-based cooking classes. Demographic, baseline and post-program outcome data (SF-36; Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form) were collected.

Results: All SF-36 subscales and composite scales showed statistical significance indicating subjectively improved quality of life/health among program graduates. SF-36 Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, Energy-Vitality and Role-Emotional subscales also demonstrated Reliable Changes (RCIs) indicating clinically significant outcomes across these domains of function. Individually, 32% and 27% of graduates exceeded the RCI for the Physical Composite Scale and Mental Composite Scales, respectfully.

Conclusion: This is the first study to apply the SF-36 RCI measure to assess generic quality of life outcomes of a fruit and vegetable prescription program based at a farmers market. It uniquely adds to the growing evidence supporting the benefits of improved access to healthy food through collaborative community interventions. Study participants reported both statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in functional health and QoL.

Keywords

Vegetable prescription, Clinical significance, Quality of life, Dietary behavior, Farmers market, Reliable change index

Introduction

Fruit and vegetable prescription programs such as the FVRx® have emerged as health interventions at farmers markets throughout the United States [1]. Such programs are premised on research showing a favorable link between increased fruit and vegetable consumption and markers of health [2-4]. Fruit and vegetable prescription programs also rely on emerging community food system studies examining public health collaborations designed to improve fresh produce accessibility and consumption [5,6].

The produce prescription model has been studied as a medical intervention for diet-related chronic diseases [7], as a measure of the psychosocial benefits of farmers markets [8,9], a catalyst for nutrition education [10], a vehicle for healthy food access in low-income/low-access neighborhoods [11,12] and a learning milieu for healthcare professionals [13]. Researchers have collected quantitative biological data as well as qualitative self-reported data [14,15]. Studies have also reported outcomes of improved health perception among participants [16].

Previously reported data from year-end program evaluations of the five FVRx programs in Georgia (of which our cohort was a part) conducted by Wholesome Wave Georgia showed both socioeconomic and health benefits. In 2017, this statewide data showed that, from baseline to the end of the six-month program, the percentage of program participants reporting that “food often didn’t last” and there “wasn’t money to buy more food” decreased by 79% (22% to 4%) across all sites. Further, the overall percentage of program participants reporting that they had often gone hungry “due to lack of money for food” decreased by 89% (44% to 11%) over the course of the program [17]. The 2018 program evaluation of this statewide data found that over the relatively short six-month program timeframe, Body Mass Index decreased 1.4% and waist circumference decreased 3.3% [18].

As fruit and vegetable prescription programs grow in number and design, studies must also seek to discover the clinical significance [19] resulting from community food-healthcare partnerships. In other words, do participants self-report evidence of improved quality of life upon completing these community-based programs?

This three-year study examined whether low-income/low- access adult graduates of an FVRx program experienced favorable improvement in their subjective Quality Of Life (QoL) and function. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess subjective change in QoL and function in fruit and vegetable prescription programs based at a farmers market using the Medical Outcomes Survey – Short Form 36 (SF-36), a standard in generic quality of life outcome metrics.

Methods & Materials

Participants

On average, 34 adults enrolled in the program annually, for three years in sum total, at no personal cost. The majority of participants came from areas with low access to healthy food options, self- identified as food-insecure and had been previously diagnosed with a diet-related disease such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and/or heart disease.

FVRx Program Description

The program targeted change in dietary behavior among participants and included three required components: (a) monthly clinic visits, (b) weekly farmers market attendance, (c) and plant-based cooking classes. The program was a six-month per year intervention conducted over three years (2017-2019).

Outcome Measurement

We selected the SF-36 as the outcome measure. The SF-36 is widely considered a gold standard in generic quality of life metrics, quantifying disease burden, and measuring patients self-report of functional health. It has been utilized in 4000+ peer reviewed scientific publications – of which more than 400 were randomized controlled clinical trials – and judged to be a useful tool in evaluating benefits of treatment interventions [20]. It is suitable for age ≥ 14 and requires 5-10 minutes to complete. The data is summarized in two higher order factors, termed Physical Health and Mental Health Composites which are equated to patients’ attitudes regarding overall physical and mental health status. Eight subscales are generated, reflecting physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each subscale attempts to quantify a patient’s attitude in specific physical or health domains. For example; the Role-physical scale measures how much a patient believes that their daily activity is limited by physical dysfunction whereas the energy-vitality scale ranges from feeling “tired and worn out” to “full of energy and pep”.

Procedures

Prior to enrollment, we outlined the program’s attendance expectations and incentive component before participants signed informed consent forms. Volunteer healthcare providers (i.e., physicians, nurses, registered dietitians), accompanied by first-year medical students, collected baseline program-related information to include demographics, SF-36 surveys, and other data not reported herein during the initial visit. Self-reporting surveys were issued with literacy support when needed. Clinicians provided healthy eating and lifestyle education and then wrote a “prescription” for each participant to redeem for only fruits and vegetables at the farmers market. The prescription had a no-cash value of $7/person/week for four weeks each month, based on family size. For example, an adult participant with a family of four received redeemable market tokens equivalent to
$28/week ($112/month).

Participants returned to the clinic monthly where volunteer clinicians offered encouragement, provided general health and nutrition education, and renewed prescriptions. Participants attended a weekly farmers market to redeem their prescriptions for fruits and vegetables, sold by local farmers, and attended a minimum of four required plant-based cooking classes at no cost. Health educators at the farmers market provided nutrition information and cooking demos for the general public, of which participants were a part. Farmers also provided recipes and preparation tips to help demystify lesser-known seasonal fruits and vegetables.

When absent from the program, participants reported schedule conflicts, illness and lack of transportation as the most common reasons for not attending. If absent from the farmers market three weeks in a row, and/or if non-compliant with clinic or cooking class attendance, participants were listed as non-completers and unenrolled. An average 26% of participants were recorded as non-completers. Participants who completed the above-mentioned requirements and the post-SF-36 on (or within one month of) the sixth clinic visit were considered program “graduates”/completers.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics of demographic and SF-36 outcome data at baseline and at six-month follow-up were calculated. Per Protocol (PP) and Intent to Treat (ITT) analyses using SPSS 26.0 statistical package were employed to investigate change in SF-36 scores occurred after participation in the FVRx six-month program. Within subject paired sample t-tests were used to examine if statistical differences existed in each of the eight subscales or either of the two composite scales on the SF-36 after six months of FVRx program participation relative to baseline. Given the exploratory nature of this study, a conventional p-value of ≤0.05 was selected to denote statistical significance. Adjunctively, RCI also were calculated for each participant’s SF-36 subscales and composite summary scales to appreciate where clinically significant change may have also occurred. RCI calculations have been validated using normative data for general populations and several disease states [21].

Results

Of the 101 participants enrolled, 75 completed the program and had a full data set. There were no significant differences between completers and non-completers in any measured demographic, health, or socioeconomic variable. Our average participant was a female (82%) African American (76%) who earned less than $2000/month (74%) and lived in a low access area. A majority were uninsured or covered by a federal insurance program (68%) and received supplemental benefits (64%) (Table 1).

Table 1: Demographics.

Demographics

% of Sample

Age 18-29

7.90%

30-39

11.9%

40-49

19.8%

50-59

34.70%

60+

25.7%

Sex Male Female

17.80%

82.2%

Race Hispanic,

6.9%

Asian, Asian American

1%

American Indian, Alaskan Native

3%

Black, AA, or Carib. American

76.20%

Hawaiian, Pacific Islander

13.90%

Other

5.90%

Educational background

10.90%

< High school diploma

19.80%

High school or GED certificate

36.60%

Some college or tech school

15.80%

2 year college or tech degree

12.90%

4 year college or tech degree

4%

>4 college degree

Employment status

Student

2%

Working part-time

10.90%

Working full-time

25.70%

Not employed, or homemaker

15.80%

On disability

27.70%

Retired

12.90%

“Other”

5%

Health Insurance

Uninsured

23.80%

Medicated or Medicare

44.60%

Insured through employer

21.80%

Insured, private insurance

4%

Other

5%

Income level

<$1000/month

38.60%

$1001 – $1300/month

19.80%

$1301 – $1700/month

4%

$1701 – $2000/month

11.90%

$2001 – $2400/month

6.90%

$2401 – $2700/month

5.90%

$2701 – $3000/month

5%

$3001 – $3400/month

5%

> $3401

3%

Supplemental benefits

No

35.60%

Received

64.40%

Average (SD) # of people aged 0-17 Living in home: 1.5 (1.6), ranging from 0 to 9.

Note 1: Final sample size was N = 101, reflecting 35 participants from year 2017, 39 from year 2018, and 27 from year 2019.

All eight of the SF36 individual subscales and both of the composite scales showed statistical significance in a favorable direction implicating improved self-reported quality of life/health direction after program participation. This was true in both the PP (all P-values ≤0.002) and ITT (all p-values ≤0.028) analyses (Table 2 and Figure 1).

Table 2: Descriptive Statistics and Over-Time Comparisons for SF-36.

Baseline

Follow-up

Paired Sample

Paired Sample

RCI

t-test

t-test

N = 101

N = 75

with case-wise

with missing

SF-36 Variable

AVG (SD)/Min-Max

AVG (SD)/Min-Max

deletiona

values replacedb

+

Physical Functioning

60.8 (28.5)/0-100

66.1 (26.1)/10-100

-3.16 (p = .002)

-2.23 (p = .028)

Role-Physical

47.5 (43.1)/0-100

66.7 (39.1)/0-100

-3.99 (p < .001)

-4.96 (p < .001)

Yes

Bodily Pain

47.6 (25.8)/0-100

57.6 (25.0)/0-100

-3.68 (p < .001)

-4.44 (p < .001)

Yes

General Health

51.8 (20.1)/5-100

61.5 (19.0)/20-97

-5.36 (p < .001)

-6.00 (p < .001)

Energy-Vitality

45.6 (20.6)/0-90

57.1 (19.7)/10-100

-5.29 (p < .001)

-6.01 (p < .001)

Yes

Social Functioning

64.5 (25.2)/0-100

77.2 (22.3)/13-100

-5.10 (p < .001)

-5.28 (p < .001)

Role-Emotional

58.8 (42.2)/0-100

80.4 (36.0)/0-100

-4.10 (p < .001)

-5.40 (p < .001)

Yes

Mental Health

71.6 (18.3)/28-100

77.1 (14.7)/40-100

-3.41 (p = .001)

-3.53 (p = .001)

PCS Composite

37.4 (11.7)/13-65

41.1 (10.8)/12-66

-4.78 (p < .001)

-4.28 (p < .001)

MCS Composite

47.3 (10.5)/28-68

52.5 (9.4)/25-68

-4.98 (p < .001)

-5.58 (p < .001)

aPer protocol analysis, in that IF data was missing at time 2, THEN entire case was deleted. Total of 26 cases had missing data at time 2 resulting in a final sample of N = 75.
bIntention to treat analysis, in that all 101 participants data was included with missing data at time 2 imputed by using the average of the group. N = 101.
Note 2: N = total sample size. AVG = computed average. SD = Standard Deviation. Min = Minimum Value. Max = Maximum Value. RCI + = Reliable Change Index (Jacobson &Truax, 1991) was exceeded, indicating that as a group a reliable change in overall obtained scores at follow-up relative to baseline had occurred.

PEP-1-2-107-g001

Figure 1. SF-36 Overtime Comparison.

As a cohort, the Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, Energy-Vitality and Role-Emotional scales all exceeded established SF-36 RCI for clinically meaningful change. Individually, 32% and 27% of graduates were judged to have demonstrated reliable change on the SF-36 Physical Composite Scale (PCS) and Mental Composite Scale (MCS), respectively (Figure 2).

PEP-1-2-107-g002

Figure 2. SF-36 Reliable Change.

Discussion

Fruit and vegetable prescription programs rely on emerging studies of community food systems. Farmers markets may provide uniquely collaborative spaces in which community health improvements can occur. Fruit and vegetable prescription programs at farmers markets are also premised on research showing a favorable link between increased fresh produce consumption and markers of health. However, little research has been published to date that has investigated the impact of participation in such programs on self- reported quality of life and function.

The present study highlights several important findings. First, the majority (75%) of participants were able to complete a six-month FVRx program requiring monthly clinic in-person check-ins and attendance in several cooking classes. The relatively low attrition rate supports the contention that this kind of programming is both viable and well regarded by study participants who have low access to healthy food options, are food insecure, and are challenged by medical morbidities including obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and/or heart disease. Second, these results highlight that after completion of the program, study participants self-reported experiencing improved physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, level of energy/pep, social functioning, and mental health while also experiencing less impact on their ability to perform expected roles because of emotions or physical challenges (all results were statistically significant). Third, over and above the aforementioned statistically significant differences, appreciation of RCIs also would highlight that clinically meaningful change in a favorable direction occurred in the areas of bodily pain experienced, level of energy/pep, and ability to perform expected roles.

Several study limitations are evident. First, as a cohort study, this endeavor was limited by lack of a control or comparison group as well as some variations in the year-to-year program requirements and implementation. We also recognize that while the socioeconomic mix of program cohorts, educators and farmers is not specifically addressed in this study, it likely represents a significant influence on its outcomes and would be a valuable area for future study. Future studies should also include a control or comparison group and be powered/ designed to estimate quality adjusted life years and cost effectiveness.

In summation, our study adds to the growing body of literature supporting fruit and vegetable prescription programs and expands knowledge of the benefits of increasing access to healthy food and wellness education within the milieu of farmers markets. The convergence of partners involved in providing these community- based collaborative health programs represents a behavioral health treatment approach with a wide variety of players and motivations. We believe increasing access to these types of programs should be a national priority.

Acknowledgements

Dozens of community members gave voluntary time as program participants; we appreciate their commitments. We also thank Augusta Locally Grown for program coordination; Wholesome Wave Georgia for program funding & design; Augusta District Dietetic Association for volunteer clinicians; Medical College of Georgia  & Augusta University for volunteer students; Harrisburg Family Healthcare for hosting; St Luke United Methodist for transportation; EAT Local CSRA & Icebox Ministries for cooking education; Women in Philanthropy, Community Foundation of the CSRA, Good Neighbor Ministries, Women’s Health of Augusta and Reid Memorial Presbyterian for education program funding. Finally, we thank all the farmers of the Veggie Park Farmers Market.

References

  1. Schwartz H (2018) Produce Rx programs for diet-based chronic disease prevention. AMA J Ethics 20: E960-973.
  2. Appel LJ, Moore TJ, Obarzanek E, Vollmer WM, Svetkey LP, et al. (1997) A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. N Engl J Med 336: 1117-1124. [crossref]
  3. Nguyen B, Ding D, Mihrshahi S (2017) Fruit and vegetable consumption and psychological distress: cross- sectional and longitudinal analyses based on a large Australian sample. BMJ Open 7: e014201.
  4. Liu X, Yan Y, Li F, Zhang D (2016) Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of depression: a meta-analysis. Nutrition 32: 296-302. [crossref]
  5. Oberholtzer L, Dimitri C, Schumacher G (2012) Linking farmers, healthy foods, and underserved consumers: exploring the impact of nutrition incentive programs on farmers and farmers’ markets. J Agriculture, Food Systems, Comm Dev 2: 63-77.
  6. Farmer JR, Babb A, Minard S, Veldman M (2019) Accessing local foods: households using SNAP Double Bucks and financial incentives at a midwestern farmers market. J Agriculture, Food Systems, Comm Dev 8: 153-178.
  7. Bryce R, Guajardo C, Ilarraza D, Milgrom N, Pike D, et al. (2017) Participation in a farmers’ market fruit and vegetable prescription program at a federally qualified health center improves hemoglobin A1C in low income uncontrolled diabetics. Prev Med Rep 7: 176-179. [crossref]
  8. George D, Manglani M, Minnehan K, Chacon A, et al. (2016) Examining feasibility of mentoring families at a farmers’ market and community garden. Amer J of Health Ed 47: 94-98.
  9. Ridberg RA, Bell JF, Merritt KE, Harris DM, et al. (2019) Effect of a fruit and vegetable prescription program on children’s fruit and vegetable consumption. Prev Chronic Dis 16: 180555.
  10. Buyuktuncer Z, Kearney M, Ryan CL, Thurston M, et al. (2014) Fruit and vegetables on prescription: a brief intervention in primary care. J Hum Nutr Diet 27: 186-193.
  11. Marcinkevage J, Auvinen A, Nambuthiri S (2019) Washington State’s fruit and vegetable prescription program: improving affordability of healthy foods for low- income patients. Prev Chronic Dis 16: 180617.
  12. Saxe-Custack A, LaChance J, Hanna-Attisha M, Ceja T (2019) Fruit and vegetable prescriptions for pediatric patients living in Flint, Michigan: a cross-sectional study of food security and dietary patterns at baseline. Nutrients 11: 1423. [crossref]
  13. Forbes JM, Forbes CR, Lehman E, George DR (2019) “Prevention produce”: integrating medical student mentorship into a fruit and vegetable prescription program for at-risk patients. Perm J 23: 18-238. [crossref]
  14. Cavanagh M, Jurkowski J, Bozlak C, Hastings J, Klein A (2017) Veggie Rx: an outcome evaluation of a healthy food incentive programme. Public Health Nutr 20: 2636-2641. [crossref]
  15. Schlosser AV, Smith S, Joshi K, Thornton A, Trapl ES, et al. (2019) “You guys really care about me…”: a qualitative exploration of a produce prescription program in safety net clinics. J Gen Intern Med 34: 2567-2574. [crossref]
  16. Jennings L, Marpadga S, Bonini C, Akers M, Levi R, et al. (2019) The impact of a community fruit and vegetable voucher program (Vouchers 4 Veggies) on improvements in dietary intake and food security. Current Dev in Nutr 3: 4-13-19. [crossref]
  17. Cook M, Ward R, Mister T, Webb Girard A (2018) Evaluation of the 2017 fruit and vegetable prescription program. Prepared for Open Hand Atlanta and Wholesome Wave Georgia.
  18. Cook M, McClintic E, High L, Webb Girard A. Evaluation of the 2018 fruit and vegetable prescription program. Prepared for Open Hand Atlanta and Wholesome Wave Georgia. [Preprint]. 2019 [cited 2020, Jun 23].
  19. Jacobson NS, Truax P (1991) Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 59: 12-19. [crossref]
  20. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30: 473-483. [crossref]
  21. Ferguson RJ, Robinson AB, Splaine M (2002) Use of the reliable change index to evaluate clinical significance in SF-36 outcomes. Qual Life Res 11: 509-516. [crossref]

Observational Study of the Effect of the Hydroxychloroquine/Azithromycin Combination in Patients Hospitalized for a Severe Form of COVID-19

DOI: 10.31038/JPPR.2020322

 

What is Already Known about This Subject?

The discussion on the efficiency of the hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin combination remains open. To date, no randomized trial has demonstrated the efficiency of this combination in patients with a severe form of COVID-19.

What This Study Adds?

We report the results of a non-randomized observational study compared hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin combination to any antiviral treatment for patients with a severe form of COVID-19. We warn of the difficulty of interpreting these results in the absence of randomization.

Abstract

Following the demonstration in vitro of the efficiency of a synergistic effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) associated with azithromycin (AZI) against the SARS-CoV-2, some studies have aimed to evaluate its efficiency in a clinical setting. We present the results of a non-randomized observational study of patients admitted for a severe form of COVID-19 disease who have been treated by HCQ/AZI after collegial physicians’ decision. Of the 306 patients included (average age: 72.8 years), 53 received the HCQ/AZI association. Univariate analysis shows in non-survivors a higher average age, more severe clinical signs on admission (lung invasion rate> 50%, Dyspnea and creatinine>133µmol/L) and more comorbidities (cerebrovascular accident, chronic kidney disease, immunodeficiency).We evaluated the efficiency of the HCQ/AZI treatment on a population (n=96) with comparable characteristics (age, risk factor, gravity…). If mortality of the patients treated with HCQ/AZI seems different in this sub-study population (HCQ/AZI: 0% vs. Other: 8%), the methods of the study and its size do not allow the identification of a statistically significant difference (p=0.122).

At this time of the epidemic, the HCQ/AZI must be evaluated in a randomized trial at the right and safe dosage.

Introduction

At the end of 2019, a new coronavirus, designated SARS-CoV-2, was causing an epidemic of respiratory diseases in China. The city of Wuhan (China) went into full confinement on January 23, 20201. On March 12, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 pandemic. The importance of the number of symptomatic patients and the particular gravity of some of them lead the Hospitals to reorganize in emergencies on an almost daily basis both at the structural, organizational and medical level. Among the antiviral treatments likely to be effective on the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2, three molecules or associations stood out: remdesivir, the fixed combination ritonavir/lopinavir and (hydroxy)chloroquine associated or not with azithromycin [1].

In mid-March, remdesivir and the ritonavir/lopinavir combination were announced as a complete disruption by the laboratories producing them. The French Ministry of Health then supervised the off-label use of hydroxychloroquine, conditioning it to severity criteria and subject to a collegial decision by the medical profession. We present the results of a monocentric, observational, retrospective study aimed at evaluating the efficiency of the hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin combination on the COVID-19 disease.

Methods

All patients hospitalized at our center for a severe form of COVID-19 disease were included in the study.The diagnosis of COVID-19 disease combined the recording of symptoms (fever, caugh, fatigue, myalgia, headache, dyspnea, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, anosmia, aguesia, dizziness, fall, hypoxemia) with a SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) and/or standard low dose CT imaging.The following characteristics were sought in the study population: age, body mass index (BMI), active or history of smoking, chronic kidney/heart/respiratory disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, cerebrovascular accident and immunodeficiency (including cancer under treatment). The home drugs treatment of interest were sought: angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) calcium-chanel inhibitor, diuretics, betablockers, corticosteroids and aspirin. We have listed antivirals under evaluation:remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), azithromycin (AZI), ritonavir/lopinavir.The severity of the COVID-19 stage of the patients included was assessed on the basis of at least one of the following criteria: dyspnea, O2 saturation ≤93%, radiological pulmonary infiltrates >50% at 24-48 hours of admission [2].

HCQ/AZI

The dosage of HCQ/AZI was: HCQ (D1-D10; 600mg per day in 3 doses) combined with azithromycin (D1: 500mg in 1 dose; D2-D5: 250mg per day). Only patients not on dialysis, with no contraindication to HCQ/AZI treatment (e.g. severe kidney failure, widening of the QTc wave) received treatment with HCQ/AZI after collegial physician decision. All patients on HCQ/AZI underwent an electrocardiogram before initiating treatment. Once treatment was started, an electrocardiogram was performed daily during hospitalization, as well as a determination of serum potassium, magnesemia and blood sugar. In order to reduce the biases linked to the care of patients, to the comorbidities, to the typology of the medical service (e.g. palliative care, geriatry) and to the contraindication of HCQ/AZI treatment (dialysis), we have make a sub-study. In this sub-study only patients treated in internal medicine were included and we have excluding dialysis patients.

Clinical Outcomes

Critical disease defined by death or transfer to intensive care unit (ICU) and death alone were the two main outcomes.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous data are summarized as mean (standard deviation) and categorical data as frequency (percentage). For univariate comparisons T-test and Chi-2 tests were used as appropriate to compare differences between non-critical and critical disease or survivor and non-survivor. The multivariate analysis used logistic regression ajusted on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), chronic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis, chronic lung disease (asthma or chronic obstructive lung disease), personal history of stroke, current or former tobacco use, treatment with immunosuppressive drugs (including anticancer drugs), creatine and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, percentage of lung affected on CT-scan, low oxygen saturation, dyspnea, oxygen flow. A two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 26.0 package. Neither patients nor the public were involved in the conception or conduct of the study.

Results

Between March 15 and April 15, 2020, 314 patients were admitted into the different wards. Eight patients were transferred to another hospital and were considered loss of follow-up: 6 were transferred to another region to vacant intensive care beds and 2 were taken care of for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The median age was 75.6 ± 14.5 years. The number of days between the onset of symptoms and hospitalization was 6.6±7.8 days. Men were a little more represented (54%).

Comorbidities

Table 1 shows major comorbidities recorded on admission. The most common were chronic heart disease (71%), hypertension (58%), dyslipidemia (36%), chronic kidney disease (27%), diabetes mellitus (26%), immunodeficiency (21%) and chronic respiratory disease (19%). Eighty nine percent of the patients have comorbidity with an average number of comorbidities of 4.1±2.3. Three per cent (8/306) of patients were current smokers and 10% were former smokers.It can be noted that 26% of patients have a BMI> 30kg/m2.

Table 1: Demographic findings of patients on admission.

Demographic data

Total
(N=306)

Survivor
(N=231)

Non-survivor
(N=75)

p-value *

Age – yr

75.6 ± 14.5

72.8 ± 14.7

84.0 ± 9.9

<0.0001

Sex (male sex)

54%

55%

49%

0.394

Weight (kg)

74.8 ± 15.8

76.3 ± 15.7

70.2 ± 15.4

0.007

Body mass index (kg/m2)

26.8 ± 5.0

27.2 ± 5.0

25.6 ± 4.9

0.03

BMI<25 kg/m2 (%)

59%

61%

50%

0.11

BMI 25–29.9 kg/m2 (%)

32%

34%

28%

0.396

BMI≥30 kg/m2 (%)

26%

27%

22%

0.376

Nursing home resident (%)

13%

10%

23%

0.003

Severity and mortality

Death (%)

25%

0%

100%

–

ICU transfer (%)

3%

3%

3%

0.871

Critical cases (Death or transfer to ICU) (%)

27%

3%

100%

<0.0001

Time from symptom onset to admission (days)

6.6 ± 7.8

7.2 ± 7.5

4.5 ± 8.5

0.013

Length of stay in hospital (days)

11.3 ± 10.0

12.2 ± 9.4

8.5 ± 11.3

0.005

Time between admission and ICU transfer (days)

1.1 ± 1.7

1.2 ± 1.7

1.0 ± 1.9

0.802

Comorbidities (%)

Hypertension

58%

55%

67%

0.065

Diabetes mellitus

26%

27%

25%

0.797

Chronic heart disease

71%

67%

84%

0.005

Dyslipemia

36%

33%

44%

0.094

Chronic respiratory disease

19%

20%

15%

0.276

Chronic kidney disease

27%

23%

43%

0.001

Dialysis

4%

3%

7%

0.232

Immunodeficiency

21%

16%

36%

<0.0001

Cerebrovascular accident

20%

16%

32%

0.002

At least one comorbidity

89%

87%

97%

0.009

Smoking status (%)

Current smoker

3%

3%

1%

0.424

Former smoker

10%

9%

15%

0.134

Home drug treatments (%)

ACE inhibitors

20%

19%

24%

0.31

ARBs

22%

22%

21%

0.955

Calcium-chanel inhibitor

23%

22%

24%

0.729

Diuretics

27%

22%

44%

<0.0001

Betablockers

31%

27%

44%

0.007

Corticosteroids

5%

3%

11%

0.008

Aspirin

30%

25%

45%

0.001

*p-value univariate statistical test between Survivor VS Non-Survivor. – : statistical test non applicable.

Home Drug Treatments

Home drug treatments included beta-blockers (31%), aspirin (30%), diuretics (27%), calcium channel blockers (23%), ARBs (22%), ACE inhibitors (20%) and corticosteroids (5%). No patient was treated by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Table 1).

Severity of the Clinical Case

At the admission, 43% of the patients presented a C-reactive protein >100mg/L, 43% an oxygen saturation £93%, 21% a creatinine>133µmol/L and 7% of the patient presented a proportion of lung invasion rate>50% (average percentage of invasion: 29%±18) (Table 2). Among the 306 patients eligible for analysis, 250 had a lung CT scan and 213 a RT-PCR.

Symptoms

The most common symptoms were dyspnea (67%), fever (60%), fatigue (59%), cough (51%), diarrhea (30%), myalgia (18%) and dizziness/fall (17%). Only 6% of patients reported ageusia/anosmia on admission (Table 2).

Table 2: Clinical, laboratory and radiographic findings of patients on admission.

Symptoms at onset of illness (%)

Total
(N=306)

Survivor
(N=231)

Non-survivor
(N=75)

p-value*

Fever

60%

62%

55%

0.266

Cough

51%

52%

51%

0.898

Fatigue

59%

58%

60%

0.812

Myalgia

18%

20%

11%

0.058

Headache

8%

9%

4%)

0.184

Dyspnea

67%

64%

77%

0.028

Diarrhea

30%

33%

21%

0.058

Nausea or vomiting

9%

11%

1%

0.008

Anorexia

11%

12%

11%

0.809

Anosmia or ageusia

6%

7%

1%

0.054

Dizziness. fall

17%

16%

19%

0.657

Hypoxemia (oxygen saturation < 93%)

43%

40%

55%

0.024

Inpatient drug treatments (%)

Hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin

17%

22%

4%

<0.0001

Hydroxychloroquine alone

2%

1%

3%

0.417

Azithromycin alone

4%

5%

1%

0.184

Lopinavir with Ritonavir

4%

4%

5%

0.593

Oxygen therapy

87%

86%

91%

0.269

Invasiveventilation

9%

9%

9%

0.858

Laboratory findings

PCR confirmed diagnosis (%) n=213

79%

75%

90%

0.023

C-reactive protein (mg/L)

101.2 ± 83.6

95.9 ± 83.5

118.0 ± 82.3

0.05

CRP<5 mg/L (%)

5%

6%

1%

0.108

CRP<100 mg/L (%)

57%

60%

47%

0.051

CRP 100–199 mg/L (%)

28%

25%

36%

0.075

CRP≥200 mg/L (%)

15%

14%

17%

0.64

Creatinine (µmol/L)

115.7 ± 110.4

103.6 ± 93.2

154.6 ± 147.6

0.001

Creatinine ≥ 133µmol/L (%)

21%

17%

33%

0.003

Radiologic findings (n=250)

Percentage of lung affected on the CT scan (%)

29 ± 18

28 ± 17

31 ± 22

0.253

Proportion of lung affected on the CT scan > 50%(%)

7%

5%

14%

0.028

Typical CT-scan (%)

14%

15%

7%

0.125

Bilateral pulmonary infiltration (%)

46%

48%

36%

0.120

Ground-glass opacities (%)

29%

33%

14%

0.008

Analysis of Non-survivors as Compared with Survivors

Tables 1 and 2 show the distribution of demographic characteristics and coexisting conditions among survivors and non-survivors. Non-survivors were older (p<0.0001) and had a greater prevalence of chronic heart disease (p=0.005), cerebrovascular accident (p=0.002), chronic kidney disease (p=0.001), and immunodeficiency (p<0.0001). Among medication, aspirin (p=0.001), corticosteroids (p=0.008), betablockers (p=0.007) and diuretics (p<0.0001) were more commonly used by non-survivor patients. The non-survivors were faster hospitalized after the first symptoms (4.5±8.5 days vs. 7.2±7.5 days). Among non-survivors mortality rate was of 25% and transfer to ICU was of 3%. Laboratory and radiologic findings for non-survivors reveal fewer signs at admission of renal dysfunction (creatinine≥ 133µmol/L; p<0.003) and lung invasion rate (>50%; p<0.028). The multivariate analysis of factors associated with non-survival reveals that increasing age was a strong predictor of in hospital mortality after adjusting for major comorbidity (per additional year, OR 1.083; p=0.003) (Figure 1). Stroke history (OR:2.983; p=0.027), immunodeficiency (OR:4.665; p=0.002) and percentage of the lung affected on the CT scan were also statistically associated with increased hospital mortality (OR:1.032 per additional percent of lung affected; p=0.009). The other factors don’t show a significant implication on the patient outcomes.

JPPR-3-2-315-g001

Figure 1. Mortality by age.

Antiviral Treatment

Fifty-three patients received the HCQ/AZI association, 13 the lopinavir/ritonavir association, 12 azithromycin alone and 5 HCQ alone.The HCQ/AZI have been administered an average of 7.9±3.1 days of treatment. Among 16 patients who did not receive the 10 days of treatment, the causes were: transfer to ICU (N=6), widening of the QTc wave (N=6; occurring between 1 and 8 days after initiation of treatment), renal failure (N=1), death (N=2; after 1 and 3 days of treatment), pseudo-cerebellar syndrome attributed to viral damage combined with HCQ (N=1). Thepatients treated by HCQ/AZIhad severe form of COVID-19 (9% of lung affected on CT-scan), were younger patient (13 years) and tend to have more comorbidities except diabetes and immunodeficiency.Percentage of lung affected on CT-scan was the only variable statistically associated with death or ICU transfer (OR:1.033 [1.002-1.064], p=0.039) among patients admitted into the two internal medicine ward where HCQ-AZI were used. The sub-study (N=96) which evaluate the efficacy of treatment with HCQ/AZI for the patients admitted into the two internal medicine units included 96 patients. There was no significant difference in demographic, comorbidities, smoking status, home drug treatment and laboratory/radiologic findings between the treated and untreated population. If the mortality of patients treated with HCQ/AZI seems different, this result is not statistically significant (0% vs. 8%; p=0.122).

Discussion

The COVID-19 situation worldwide, as of 1 July 2020 based on the data transmitted by the different countries is 10 446 353 cases of COVID-19 including 511 037 deaths [1]. If the number of new cases seems to decrease in Europe, the world wide situation continues to worsen. The average incubation period for COVID-19 is 5 days [3]. The interval from symptom onset the hospital admission is 6, days in our study. The average age of patients in our study (75.6 years) is higher than the studies currently published (47-73 years) with a male preponderance3. The clinical manifestation of COVID-19 is various. We found standard symptoms in hospitalized patients included: dyspnea, fever, asthenia, cough, diarrhea, muscle ach and dizziness/fall. Anosmia ageusia may be identified in only 6% of patients. If comorbidities presented by 89% of our patients are among the most common (hypertension, diabetes mellitus), they are present in a remarkably high rate of our patients (chronic heart disease>70%, chronic kidney disease > 25%, immunodeficiency>20%) [4,5]. Obesity seems to play a special role affecting more than 25% of our patients. Obesity or excess ectopic fat deposition are suspected of unifying risk factor for severe COVID-19 infection, reducing both protective cardiorespiratory reserve as well as potentiating the immune dysregulation that appears, at least in part, to mediate the progression to critical illness and organ failure in a proportion of COVID-19 patients [6]. However, it should be noted that it does not appear as a factor of death. Concerning the long-term treatments taken by the patient, the patients treated with aspirin, diuretics, betablockers or corticoids are significantly higher in the non-survivor group. But, it is difficult to attribute excess mortality to these treatments, since they are generally used to manage the comorbidity previously mentioned. The search for a predictive sign of worsening of a patient’s condition at admission is a major issue in medical management. There is an excess mortality in patients more older (Figure 1), patients who on admission have dyspnea, oxygen saturation £ 93%, a lung invasion rate> 50% or a creatinine> 133 µmol/L. These elements are warning signs for the physician supported by other publications on the subject [7]. On the other hand, on the advanced side on antiviral treatment, there has been no notable progress to date. Among the treatments discussed, remdesivir, the ritonavir/lopinavir and HCQ/AZI combination were the first treatments offered in France. For reasons essentially of availability, hydroxychloroquine associated or not with azithromycin has become one of the only therapeutic options in the absence of any evidence of effectiveness. Gautretet al. published the first result of the HCQ/AZI efficiency in COVID-19 patients [8]. They demonstrated on a series of 80 patients an undetectability of viral load at the nasopharyngeal level in 83% of patients on day 7, 93% on day 8 [9]. Respiratory samples are negative in 97.5% of patients on day 5. However, patients in this study had a low rate of comorbidity for an average age of 52.5 years. They do not appear to be the most at risk of complications given the current state of knowledge. Thus, only 53.8% (43/80) had a CT-scanner lung disease and 15% (12/80) had oxygen need.This population appears to have a relatively mild impairment compared to our study population. In agreement with the relative viral RNA load reduction, in vitro tests show a cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV2 could be observed in only 16% (5/31) wells at 60 h post infection after HCQ/AZI exposition as compared to 100% (13/13) in positive controls [9]. Rosenberg et al. publish an observational study to report adverse events and mortality of HCQ and/or azithromycin among patients with COVID-19 (Number of patient: 735 with HCQ/AZI, 271 with HCQ, 211 with azithromycin, 221 any treatment – similar age:61.4 to 65.5 average) [10]. Cardiac arrest was more frequent in patients who received HCQ with azithromycin, compared with patients who received neither drug, even after adjustment. Moreover, treatment with HCQ, azithromycin, or both, compared with neither treatment, was not significantly associated with differences in in-hospital mortality. Mahevas et al report a study carried out on 181 patients requiring oxygen therapy excluding patients transferred to ICU [11]. In their study, 15 patients were treated with the HCQ/AZI combination, none were transferred to ICU and none died.

The treatment of patients was done according to modalities (collegial doctor’s decision) and within deadlines close to ours (7 days after the onset of symptoms). The mortality reported in this study is lower than ours. This can be attributed to the exclusion of patients without ICU need and the average age of the population (60 years vs. 75 years), even if the predictors of aggravation are relatively similar (CRP, percentage of pulmonary invasion). Interestingly, the authors put into perspective the importance of treatment with an antiviral during the virus contamination phase. However, HCQ exhibits immunomodulatory properties through its action on interleukin 1,2 and 6, TNFa and the inhibition of toll-like receptors. This explains its effectiveness in certain autoimmune pathologies which in the case of the inflammatory storm identified in certain forms of COVID-19 could be of theoretical interest. Nevertheless, the latest published clinical data, consistent with our series, point out that during the inflammatory phase (usually on the second week of symptoms) this treatment should have any effectiveness. Side effects, particularly of the heart, in patients with fragility induced by viral infection remain a warning point for physician using the HCQ/AZI combination. In our cohort of treated patients 11.3% (6/53) had heart rhythm problems. As rhythm disturbances were not systematically sought in the untreated group, it is difficult to conclude on an increase in disorders due to COVID-19 disease or to antiviral treatment. A study of 201 patients demonstrated that Baseline QTc intervals did not differ between patients treated with chloroquine/HCQ (monotherapy group) vs. those treated with combination group (chloroquine/HCQ and azithromycin) (440.6 ± 24.9 ms vs. 439.9 ± 24.7 ms, p = 0.834) [12]. More recently Mehraet al. presented a multinational registry analysis carried out on the largest population studied to date (96 032 patients; mean age 53.6±17.6; oxygen saturation <94%; 19.9% of non-survivors patient) [13]. This article which seemed to make everyone agree was retracted a few days after its publication by its authors. However we should note that the authors reported an excess mortality in patients treated with combination of HCQ (main dosage 587mg±128mg during 4.3±2.0 days) with a macrolide (azithromycin or clarithromycin; dosage not communicated) as well as a de-novo ventricular arrhythmia in 8.1% of patients treated (versus 0.3% of untreated patients). We find a similar percentage of ventricular rhythm disorders (11.3% vs. 8.1%) in our patients with a more advanced age (75 years vs. 54 years), a comorbidity rate, predictors of severity and duration longer treatment (7.9 vs. 4.3 days). However, we did not find an increase in the mortality of patients treated with the HCQ/AZI combination. In view of these various elements, it remains necessary to remain cautious. The need for QT interval monitoring remains necessary. We draw attention to the difficulty to interpret the results of a non-randomized observational study. Indeed, in the absence of randomization, the mortality comparison data in the group treated by HCQ/AZI and the group not treated are impacted by many biases. Thus, if mortality seems different in the total study population (HCQ/AZI: 6% vs. Other: 28%) and in the sub-study population (HCQ/AZI: 0% vs. Other 8%), it is distorted by populations that are not comparable (age, risk factor) and different treatment methods desired or not by physicians. We no longer observe any significant difference after identifying and taking into account the biases inherent in this type of study. As a conclusion, the question of the efficiency and safety of the HCQ/AZI combination in the treatment of COVID-19 disease remains open pending the results of randomized clinical studies (Figure 1 and Tables 1-3).

Table 3: Multivariate analysis of factors associated with death.

Demographic data

Adjusted OR (CI 95%)

p-value**

Age – yr

1.083(1.028-1.142)

0.003

Sex (male sex)

0.52 (0.216-1.25)

0.144

Body mass index (kg/m2)

0.971 (0.886-1.063)

0.518

Nursing home resident

1.758 (0.457-6.757)

0.411

Comorbidities

Hypertension

1.923 (0.758-4.881)

0.169

Diabetes mellitus

0.566(0.201-1.591)

0.281

Chronic heart disease

1.032 (0.34-3.129)

0.955

Chronic respiratory disease

0.759 (0.274-2.103)

0.595

Dialysis

2.045 (0.295-14.149)

0.469

Immunodeficiency

4.665 (1.73-12.58)

0.002

Cerebrovascular accident

2.983 (1.13-7.875)

0.027

Smoking status

 

Current smoker

3.564 (0.31-40.92)

0.307

Former smoker

1.448 (0.389-5.393)

0.581

Symptoms at onset of illness

Dyspnea

1.332 (0.521-3.406)

0.549

Hypoxemia (oxygen saturation < 93%)

0.936 (0.383-2.284)

0.884

Laboratory findings

Creatinine (µmol/L)

1.002 (0.999-1.006)

0.182

Radiologic findings

Percentage of lung affected on the CT scan (%)

1.032 (1.008-1.057)

0.009

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

The study has been approved by the ethics committee of the GroupeHospitalier Saint Vincent (GRE 2020-01). Written informed consent has been waived in light of the urgent need to collectclinical data.

References

  1. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/geographical-distribution-2019-ncov-cases. Consulted on 2020/07/28.
  2. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332437/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2020.5-fre.pdf Consulted on 2020/07/28.
  3. Wiersinga WJ,Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Sharon J P, Hallie C P (2020)Pathophysiology. Transmission. Diagnosis. and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review. JAMA. [crossref]
  4. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Guohui F, Ying L,(2020) Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan. China: a retrospective cohort studyLancet 395.
  5. Petrilli CM, Jones SA, Yang J, Rajagopalan H, Luke O’Donnell,et al. (2020)Factors associated with hospital admission and critical illness among 5279 people with coronavirus disease 2019 in New York City: prospective cohort study. BMJ. [crossref]
  6. Yang J, Hu J, Zhu C (2020) Obesity aggravates COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol.
  7. Wynants L, Van Calster B, Collins GS, Richard D Riley , Georg Heinze, et al. (2020) Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ [crossref]
  8. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Van Thuan Hoang , Line Meddeb,et al. (2020)Clinical and microbiological effect of a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in 80 COVID-19 patients with at least a six-day follow up: A pilot observational study. Travel Med Infect Dis. [crossref]
  9. Andreani J, Le Bideau Mm, Duflot I, Priscilla Jardot, Clara Rolland, et al. (2020) In vitro testing of combined hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin on SARS-CoV-2 shows synergistic effect. Microb Pathog. [crossref]
  10. Rosenberg ES, Dufort EM, Udo T, Larissa A, Wilberschied, Jessica Kumar, et al. (2020)Association of Treatment With Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin With In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 in New York State. JAMA 323 : 2493-2502. [crossref]
  11. Mahévas M, Tran VT, Roumier M, Amélie Chabrol, Romain Paule,et al. (2020)Clinical efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in patients with covid-19 pneumonia who require oxygen: observational comparative study using routine care data. BMJ 369. [crossref]
  12. Saleh M, Gabriels J, Chang D, Beom SK, Amtul Mansoor, et al. (2020) The Effect of Chloroquine. Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on the Corrected QT Interval in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. [crossref]
  13. Mehra MR, Desai SS,Ruschitzka F, Amit N Patel (2020) Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis. Lancet.

A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Use Policy of Endodontic Instruments

DOI: 10.31038/JDMR.2020331

Abstract

Endodontic treatments involve accessing a sterile or non-sterile pulp chamber and root canal content, following an inflammation of the pulp or bacterial colonization of the pulp chamber and root canals, as a septic complication of decay. For this purpose, stainless steel instruments were developed in the last century and Ni-Ti files more recently, serving for different purposes during different procedures and manoeuvres having the unique goal to clean and seal the root canal. For this purpose stainless steel and more recently, nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) instruments have been developed. These instruments not only increased the speed of the treatment but also managed to assure a proper shape of the canal preparation and subsequently, of the canal filling. Being so useful, reliable, resistant, and ultimately, not cheap, the initially single-use instruments got to be reused by a wide number of practitioners. The present review critically evaluates the single-use policy of these instruments, debating on aspects like cross-infection, mechanical aspects, sterilization protocols and its effect in these instruments, highlighting what is known at the moment about it.

Keywords

Endodontic, Policy, Prions, Review, Root-canal, Single-use

Introduction

Endodontic treatments involve accessing a sterile or non-sterile pulp chamber and root canal content, following an inflammation     of the pulp or bacterial colonization of the pulp chamber and root canals, as a septic complication of decay. For this purpose, stainless steel instruments were developed in the  last  century  and  Ni-Ti  files more recently, serving for different purposes during different procedures and manoeuvres having the unique goal to clean and seal the root canal respecting the biologic and mechanical principles stated by Schilder [1]. Newer (Ni-Ti) files not only increased the speed of the treatment but also managed to assure a proper shape of the canal preparation and subsequently, of the canal filling. Being so useful, reliable, resistant, and ultimately, not cheap, the initially single-use instruments got to be reused by a wide number of practitioners for at least 5 times, with great success, being assured by the manufacturers that both files and the tooth are safe. There are reports of file reuse on 12 [2] or 24 [3] extracted roots having medium curvature.

Worldwide legislations are not prohibiting the reuse nor imposing the single-use, with very few exceptions. Medicine and Health Care Regulatory Agency in the United Kingdom have considered that an instrument used in the root canal should not be reused on multiple patients, not even on the same patient on a later occasion, and hence should be discarded [4]. The Department of Health has critically evaluated the importance of a single- use endodontic instrument during dental treatment, to supply the patients with a safe and infection controlled environment [5]. There was obvious evidence that showed the risks associated with the reuse of endodontic files, including secondary Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy disease (TSEs) and improper debris control [6]. But besides these aspects, it has also been shown that the use of endodontic file decontamination and sterilization methods can play a role in the development of various risks such as file fracture.

In modern dentistry, all clinicians should consider infection control maintenance, as it cannot be dismissed [7]. Microorganism has an obvious rule for developing infected necrotic pulp tissue which was isolated from infected root canals [8]. Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas Gingivalis, and Streptococcus mutants are the most common bacteria that were isolated from infected root canals [7]. Van Eldik [7] in his research done on stainless steel and NI-TI files, demonstrated the effect of thermal steam sterilisation and mechanical cleaning techniques on the microbial elimination. They concluded that there were no bacteria detected on new files or following steam sterilisation. On the other hand, the ultrasonic bath eliminated the majority but not all of the bacteria. Assaf, Mellor, and Qualtrough [9] illustrated that mechanically cleaning endodontic files by using washer-disinfectant treatment can lead to incomplete organic debris removal from endodontic files’s surfaces.

Aspects Related to Prion Disease

The prion proteins were discovered in 1982 as a fatal neurodegenerative protein with different groups like PrP. This can cause scrape veterinary diseases and veterinary Creutzfeld-Jacob Disease (vCJD) in humans [6,10]. Creutzfeld-Jacob Disease can be transmitted by direct blood contact or transfusion [10]. The Prion protein has a high resistance to many disinfectant and sterilisation techniques such as chemical, thermal, ionizing radiation, and ultraviolet decontamination resistance, with a high binding capacity to metal surfaces, compromising the sterilisation process especially in dried contaminated tissue on metal or glass surfaces [6,11,12].

The prion disease accumulates in the lymphoreticular tissue and the nervous system. Early diagnosis of human prion disease can be detected by lymphoreticular biopsy of tonsils, spleen, and lymph nodes [13]. Few studies have linked re-used endodontic files with transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSEs) which is a group of brain and nervous system diseases in humans and animals that can develop in the presence of prion prusiner protein. Although, no obvious research stated that Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (vCJD) has been transferred to humans during dental treatment [6] one of prion’s possible way of transmission from the brain to the mouth tissues and vice versa is assumed to be by means of prion protein accumulation in the trigeminal ganglia of patients with this disease [14]. There were four cases reported of possible transmission of CJD infection by means of blood transfusions but no evidence so far that CJD is contagious either by normal or sexual contact [15,16]. Even so, before seeking any endodontic treatment, it is mandatory to obtain from all patients appropriate family and medical history as well as sterilise the endodontic files for optimal infection control [11,17].

Currently, in the United Kingdom, The Health Department has considered root canal treatment files as single–used instruments and should be segregated immediately after clinical use [4,18]. Dental instruments (except files) used on patients with or ‘‘at increased  risk’’ of CJD can be handled in the same way as those used in any other low-risk surgery, can be reprocessed according to best practice and returned to use [4]. Other instrument types for which a reliable cleaning regime is not available should also be considered single- use types. Although the Department of Health UK guidelines does not recommend any special protocols  for  prion  decontamination, an improved cleaning process along with multiple cycles of vacuum steam sterilization procedure should be followed [19].

Aspects Related to Sterilization and Its Effect on the Rotary Instruments

Endodontic Nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) files were used for root canal treatment for more than 25 years because of their flexibility, flexural, and torsional resistance [20]. Many studies have been done observing the effects of sterilization on these instruments’ properties. Some of them found no significant effects [21]. Condorelli et al. [22] identified the same type of increased resistance to cyclic fatigue, although the thermal applications did not alter instrument surface morphology  but resulted in significant changes in the instrument bulk with the appearance of an R-phase and improved fatigue resistance. Sonntag and Peters [6] found a better fatigue life after five cycles of dry-heat sterilization at 180ºC.

Conversely, many studies found sterilization negatively impacting the file’s life span, features, characteristics, and properties [23-27]. Autoclaving and re-using of the endodontic files more than three times can lead to a change in the physical properties of the alloy, like blunt cutting edge, pitting chipping, and fritting [28]. Another study has confirmed that multiple or a single autoclave cycle of endodontic files can result in the file’s surface corrosion with a reduction of flexural and torsional fatigue resistance [29].

Most of the studies proved that cyclic fatigue resistance decreased and led to a high chance of file fracture especially when the root canal curvature increased [25,26,27].

Aspects Related to Corrosion and Its Effect on the Rotary Instruments

It is well documented that bacterial infection of the root canal is the primary cause of apical periodontitis [8,30,31]. The apical periodontitis is the result of bacterial invasion and consecutive colonization of the entire endodontic system. Thus treatment has to be directed toward the elimination of micro-organisms from within the endodontic system and prevention of re-infection [31]. Therefore, chemo- mechanical preparation of the root canal, which is a combination of mechanical instrumentation and antibacterial irrigation, is the critical stage in canal disinfection. These irrigants are also used to suspend and rinse away debris created during instrumentation, dissolve the organic tissue, or as a lubricant for instruments, to remove the smear layer.

Since there is obvious evidence that autoclave and chemical sterilisation technique goes the best hand in  hand  for  re-used  dental files and burs, causing a 100% microbial elimination [32], files corrosion has to be assessed as well. Rutala and Weber [33] demonstrated the proper decontamination steps of endodontic files with chemical agents by using Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution for 24 hours, 1 hour respectively, then using guanidine thiocyanate for 24 hours, 1 hour and 15 minutes respectively. Later on, they sterilised files by autoclave at 134oC for 18 minutes. Also, a short decontamination process by immersing the files with chlorhexidine solution, manual cleaning then submersion in 1% NaOCl solution, ultrasonic cleaning, and finally steam sterilising by autoclave was advocated [33].

It was shown that during extended periods in NaOCl solutions, corrosion may be enhanced [34] or minimized depending on the pH of the environment [35]. Though the impact of NaOCl did not show any difference in the cutting efficiency or resistance to fracture of Ni-Ti instruments [36,37], it did result in reduced resistance to cyclic fatigue [38,39] and the presence of corrosion [6]. Further studies in which the percentage of NaOCl was low (1%) showed no major impact on Ni-Ti instruments; however, those that studied the impact of a 5% solution noted significant changes [40]. Some studies showed that a sterilization cycle along with immersion in NaOCl did not result in any substantial instrument changes [41]. In Catania University of Italy [42], the authors conducted a study to show the effect of treating files with either 5% NaOCl, sterilisation or heat-sterilized Ni-Ti rotary files or both and whether there was an effect on the cyclic fatigue resistance
or not. They have collected 210 files, which were twisted files (TF) (SybronEndo, Orange, CA) and Hyflex CM (Coltene Whaledent, Cuyahoga Falls, OH) files size 25/0.06. They were divided into 7 groups, the first group was not sterilised by autoclave or immersed with NaOCl, group 2 and 3 did not autoclave files, but immersed them with 5% of NaOCl once and three times respectively, Group 4 and 5 files were only autoclaved once and three times without immersion into 5% NaOCl, while group 6 and 7 treated with both 5% NaOCl and autoclave once and three times respectively. The files were then tested using field-emission scanning electron microscopy and x-ray energy-dispersive spectrometric (EDS) analysis to determine file surface defects and fractures. TF showed lower fatigue resistance than CM files group after 3 times autoclave sterilisation. EDS showed that immersion of Hyflex CM files in 5 % NaOCl developed an oxide-rich layer on the file’s external surfaces. EDS also showed that repeatedly treating files with sterilisation or chemical cycles (NaOCl 5%) has no morphological changes on the CM files surface apart from TF files that have demonstrated low flexural resistance with an increased chance of fracture.

Aspects Related to Mechanical Failure

“A material will fail by torsion when the ultimate shear strength is exceeded” according to Walia [43]. Studies proved that an instrument will fracture if its ultimate strength is exceeded [44-47] or if a fracture line has extended to such an extent that the remaining intact cross- section of the file is unable to bear the functional load [48] thus complicating the whole treatment. Scanning electron microscopy observations proved that  instruments  deteriorate  while  in  use,  and develop defects and cracks on their surfaces inducing fracture propagation [3,28,49,50]. Although new instruments can fracture at their first canal use, those that are used for three or more canals may have a higher susceptibility for fracture. Gambarini [51] demonstrated that the used instruments had a lower resistance to fracture than new ones.

There are 2 possible mechanisms of fracture described in the literature:

a) Torsional or sheer fatigue. The fractographic image of shear failure is very spectacular, showing the plastic deformation of the flutes adjacent to the fracture site, along with concentric circular markings at the periphery with a ‘fibrous’ appearance in the center. The fibrous region corresponds to the microscopic dimples in high power, while the circular markings are due to abrasion of the opposing surfaces on either side of the fracture [52-56].

b) Cyclic fatigue. The term ‘cyclic fatigue’ has been used to describe the breakage of Ni-Ti instruments after continuous rotation in a curved canal. An instrument rotating with curvature is effectively subjected to a completely reversed cyclic loading at its surface. A form of fatigue loading, such rotational bending has been implicated as the reason for breakage of some 44–91% of Ni-Ti engine-files fractured clinically [52,53,55,56].

It has been emphasised that there is no fracture caused by purely one of the mechanisms, there is always a combined effect of the two. Frequent reuse of endodontic files can lead to change in their physical properties and cause file fracture particularly in curved and calcified canals [27]. Some reports found that the incidence of separation of unused rotary Ni-Ti files is about 1% [57-62] while distortion was noticed to occur in up to 60% of the instruments used [63], but it is estimated that the incidence of instrument fracture in instruments used multiple times varies between 0.39% and 21% [44,46,47,50,64- 66]. There are also reports that Ni-Ti engine-files may fracture without any warning signs [53,54,57].

Conclusion

For the high standard of dental care, it is mandatory to segregate single-use endodontic instruments like files and reamers according  to the department of health policy nevertheless, steam sterilisation   is essential to instruments that cannot be segregated like endodontic rulers, dental hand instruments, rubber dam clamps or handpieces. Furthermore, proper infection control and to obtain a healthy environment for patients and dental staff. Ni-Ti files are the most commonly used endodontic files in dentistry as they have a good shape memory with low risk of fatigue, in addition to that they are safe, easy to use, and discard [22]. The dental clinicians should have full knowledge and appropriate diagnosis about prion disease, its way of transmission, proper decontamination, and how to prevent    it even if there is no clear confirmation of its transmition by means of dental procedures. The high binding capacity of Prion protein to dental metal instrument surfaces can render disinfection very difficult and challenging, hence sterilisation methods can be a very big task to perform. Judging by mechanical point of view, the reuse of a rotary file, no matter the alloy it’s been made of and the stress it is capable to bare, is risky and might jeopardise the treatment itself along with its outcome. Using  rotary files as single-use instruments can lead    to increased clinical confidence and a positive outcome of dental treatment.

References

  1. Schilder H (1974) Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dental Clinics of North America 18: 269-296.[crossref]
  2. Stefanescu T, Galuscan A, Tudoran LB, Monea MD, Jumanca D (2016-a) Environmental effect on Ni-Ti rotary files: Steam sterilization & corrosion. A SEM study Rev Chim 67: 2114-18
  3. Stefanescu T, Antoniac IV, Popovici RA, Galuscan A, Tirca T (2016-b) Ni-Ti rotary instrument fracture analysis after clinical use. Structure changes in used instruments. EEMJ 15: 981-88
  4. Department of Health (2013) Decontamination Health Technical Memorandum 01- 05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices.
  5. Cockcroft B (2007) Government advises single use of endodontic instruments. Department of Health. 202: 442
  6. Sonntag D, Peters OA (2007) Effect of Prion Decontamination Protocols on Nickel- Titanium Rotary Surfaces. Journal of Endodontics 33: 442-446.[crossref]
  7. Eldik D Van, Zilm P, Rogers A, Marin P (2008) Microbiological evaluation of endodontic files after cleaning and steam sterilization procedures. Australian Dental Journal 49: 122-127.[crossref]
  8. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ (1965) Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology 20: 340-349
  9. Assaf, Mellor, & Qualtrough (2018) Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-treated Nickel-titanium Instruments after Immersion in Sodium Hypochlorite and/or Sterilization. Journal of Endodontic 44: 648-653.[crossref]
  10. Knight R (2017) Progress in Molecular Biology and translational Science 150: 293- 318
  11. Jayanthi P, Thomas P, Bindhu PR, Krishnapillai R (2013) Prion diseases in humans: Oral and dental implications. North American Journal of Medical Sciences 5: 399- 403
  12. Walker JT,  Dickinson J, Sutton JM, Raven NDH, Marsh PD (2007) Cleanability  of dental instruments – Implications of residual protein and risks from Creutzfeldt- Jakob disease. British Dental Journal 203: 395-401.[crossref]
  13. Porter SR (2002) Prions and dentistry. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 95: 178-181.
  14. Guiroy DC, Shankar SK, Gibbs J, Messenheimer JA, Das S et al. (1989) Neuronal degeneration and neurofilament accumulation in the trigeminal ganglia in Creutzfedt- Jakob disease. Ann Neurol 25:102-106.[crossref]
  15. Ingrosso L, Pisani F, Pocchiari M (1999) Transmission of the 263K scrapie strain by the dental route. J Gen Virol 80: 3043-3047.[crossref]
  16. Wells GAH, Hawkins SAC, Green RB (1998) Preliminary observations on the pathogenesis of experimental bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE): an update. Vet Rec 142: 103-106.[crossref]
  17. Hancock CO, Lambert PA, Dusseau JV (2013) Sterilization Processes. In: Fraise, AP, Maillard, JY, Sattar, S, eds. Russell, Hugo and Ayliffe’s Principles and Practice of Disinfection, Preservation and Sterilization. 5: 277-370.
  18. Sonntag D, Martin E, Raab WHM (2016) Representative survey on the reprocessing of endodontic instruments in Germany. British Dental Journal 220: 465-469.[crossref]
  19. Department of Health, UK (2009) Commissioning and Systems Management. Health Technical Memorandum 01–05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices. London, UK: Department of Health.
  20. Zhou H, Peng B, Zheng Y (2013) An overview of the mechanical properties of nickel–titanium endodontic instruments. Endodontic Topics 29: 42-54.
  21. Khabiri M, Ebrahimi M, Saei MR (2017) The Effect of Autoclave Sterilization on Resistance to Cyclic Fatigue of Hero Endodontic File #642 (6%) at Two Artificial Curvature. Journal of Dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) 18: 277-281.[crossref]
  22. Condorelli GG, Bonaccorso A, Smecca E, Scha¨fer E, Cantatore G et al. (2010). Improvement of the fatigue resistance of NiTi endodontic files by surface and bulk modifications. International Endodontic Journal 43: 866-873.[crossref]
  23. Mize SB, Clement DJ, Pruett JP, Carnes DL Jr (1998) Effect of sterilization on cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Journal of Endodontics 24: 843-847.[crossref]
  24. Alexandrou GB, Chrissafis K, Vasiliadis LP, Pavlidou E, Polychroniadis EK (2006) SEM observations and differential scanning calorimetric studies of new and sterilized nickeltitanium rotary endodontic instruments. Journal of Endodontics 32: 675-679.
  25. Valois CR, Silva LP, Azevedo RB (2008) Multiple autoclave cycles affect the surface of rotary nickel-titanium files: an atomic force microscopy study. Journal of Endodontics 34: 859-862.[crossref]
  26. Viana AC, Gonzalez BM, Buono VT, Bahia MG (2006) Influence of sterilization on mechanical properties and fatigue resistance of nickel–titanium rotary endodontic instruments. Int Endod J 39: 709-715.[crossref]
  27. Shen Y, Coil JM, Mo AJ, Wang Z, Hieawy A et al. (2016) Wave One Rotary Instruments after Clinical Use. Journal of Endodontics 42: 186-189.[crossref]
  28. Tripi TR, Bonaccorso A, Tripi V, Condorelli GG, RapisardaE (2001) Defects in GT rotary instruments after use:an SEM study. Journal of endodontics 27: 782-785.[crossref]
  29. Nair AS, Tilakchand M, Naik BD (2015) The effect of multiple autoclave cycles  on the surface of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic files: An in vitro atomic force microscopy investigation. J Conserv Dent 18: 218-22.[crossref]
  30. Moller AJ, Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Ohman AE, Heyden G (1981) Influence on periapical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 89: 475-484.[crossref]
  31. Sundqvist G (1976) Bacteriological studies of necrotic dental pulps. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University. Dissertation
  32. Kumar Kv, Kiran Kumar K, Supreetha S, Raghu K, Veerabhadrappa A et  al. (2015) Pathological evaluation for sterilization of routinely  used  prosthodontic and endodontic instruments. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry 5: 232-236.[crossref]
  33. Rutala WA, Weber DJ (2001) Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: recommendations for disinfection and sterilization. Clin Infect Dis, 32: 1348-1356.[crossref]
  34. O’Hoy PY, Messer HH, Palamara JE (2003) The effect of cleaning procedures on fracture properties and corrosion of NiTi files. International Endodontic Journal 36: 724-32.[crossref]
  35. Novoa XR, Martin-Biedma B, Varela-Patino P (2007) The corrosion of nickel- titanium rotary endodontic instruments in sodium hypochlorite. International Endodontic Journal 40: 36-44.[crossref]
  36. Ormiga Galvao Barbosa F, Antonio da Cunha Ponciano Gomes J, Pimenta de Araujo MC (2007) Influence of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of K3 nickel- titanium rotary instruments. Journal of Endodontics 33: 982-985.
  37. Cavalleri G, Cantatore G, Costa A, Grillenzoni M, Comin Chiaramonti L et al. (2009) The corrosive effects of sodium hypochlorite on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments: assessment by digital scanning microscope. Minerva Stomatologica 58: 225-231.[crossref]
  38. Berutti E, Angelini E, Rigolone M, Migliaretti G, Pasqualini D (2006) Influence   of sodium hypochlorite on fracture properties and corrosion of ProTaper Rotary instruments. International Endodontic Journal 39: 693-639.[crossref]
  39. Peters OA, Roehlike JO, Baumann MA (2007) Effect of immersion in sodium hypochlorite on torque and fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium instruments. Journal of Endodontics 33: 589-593.[crossref]
  40. Busslinger A, Sener B, Barbakow F (1998) Effects of sodium hypochlorite on nickel- titanium Lightspeed instruments. International Endodontic Journal 31: 290-294.[crossref]
  41. Haikel Y, Serfaty R, Wilson P, Speisser JM, Allemann C (1998) Cutting efficiency of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments and the effect of sodium hypochlorite treatment. Journal of Endodontics 24: 736-739.[crossref]
  42. Health & Medicine Week, “Findings from University of Catania Yields New Data on Hypochlorous Acid (2018 ) (Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Heat-treated Nickel- titanium Instruments after Immersion in Sodium Hypochlorite and/or Sterilization 3597.
  43. Walia HM, Brantley WA,  Gerstein H (1988) An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. Journal of Endodontics 14: 346-351.[crossref]
  44. Sattapan B, Palamara JE, Messer HH (2000-a) Torque during canal instrumentation using rotary nickel–titanium files. Journal of Endodontics 26: 156-60.[crossref]
  45. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH (2000-b) Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. Journal of Endodontics 26: 161-165.[crossref]
  46. Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH (2004) Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. JOE 30: 722-725.[crossref]
  47. Peng B, Shen Y, Cheung GS, Xia TJ (2005) Defects in ProTaper S1 instruments after clinical use: longitudinal examination. IEJ 38: 550-557.[crossref]
  48. Cheung G.S.P. (2009) Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes. Endodontic Topics 16: 1-26
  49. Svec TA, Powers JM (2002) The deterioration of rotary nickel– titanium files under controlled conditions. Journal of Endodontics 28: 105-107.
  50. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, Powers JM, Mitchell JC (2003) Scanning electron microscope observations of new and used nickel–titanium rotary files. Journal of Endodontics 29: 667-669.[crossref]
  51. Gambarini G (2001) Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after prolonged clinical use. International Endodontic Journal 34: 386-389.[crossref]
  52. Dalton BC, Ørstavik D, Phillips C, Pettiette M, Trope M (1998) Bacterial reduction with nickel–titanium rotary instrumentation. Journal of Endodontics, 24: 763-767.[crossref]
  53. Gulabivala K, Stock CJR (2004) Root canal system preparation, In: Stock CJR, Gulabivala K, Walker RT, eds. Endodontics 3: 135-172.
  54. Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG (2009) Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. International Endodontic Journal 10: 634-638
  55. Shuping GB, Ørstavik D, Sigurdsson A, Trope M (2000) Reduction of intracanal bacteria using nickel–titanium rotary instrumentation and various medications. Journal of Endodontics 26: 751-755.[crossref]
  56. Spångberg L (2001) The wonderful world of rotary root canal preparation, Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 92:479.[crossref]
  57. Ankrum MT, Hartwell GR, Truitt JE (2004) K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars, Journal of Endodontics, 30, 234–237.[crossref]
  58. Paqué F, Musch U, Hülsmann M (2005) Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary NiTi instruments. International Endodontic Journal 38: 8-16.[crossref]
  59. Rangel S, Cremonese R, Bryant S, Dummer P (2005) Shaping ability of RaCe rotary nickel–titanium instruments in simulated root canal. Journal of Endodontics 31: 460-463.
  60. Schäfer E, Schlingemann R (2003) Efficiency of rotary nickel–titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless-steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. International Endodontic Journal 36: 208-217.[crossref]
  61. Schäfer E, Vlassis M (2004) Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel– titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and instrumentation results in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. International Endodontic Journal 37: 239-248.[crossref]
  62. Yoshimine Y, Ono M, Akamine A (2005) The shaping effects of three nickel– titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals. Journal of Endodontic 31: 373-375.[crossref]
  63. Stewart JT, Lafkowitz S, Appelbaum K, Hartwell G (2010) Distortion and breakage of Liberator, EndoSequence, and ProFile systems in severely curved roots of molars. Journal of Endodontic 36: 729-731.[crossref]
  64. Di Fiore Di Fiore PM, Genov KA, Komaroff E, Li Y, Lin L (2006) Nickel-Titanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment. International Endodontic Journal 39: 700-708.[crossref]
  65. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Peng B (2006) Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use. JOE 32: 61-65.[crossref]
  66. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Peng B, Haapasalo M (2009) Defects in nickel-titanium instruments after clinical use. Part 2: fractographic analysis of fractured surface in a cohort study. JOE 35: 133-136.[crossref]

Convalescent Plasma Therapy for COVID-19

DOI: 10.31038/CST.2020532

Introduction

A novel flu-like coronavirus emerged from Wuhan, China in December 2019. It was named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2, (SARS-CoV-2), and causes Coronavirus Disease 2019, (COVID-19) [1]. SARS-CoV-2 rapidly spread, and on March 11th, 2020, the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic [2]. As of July 3rd there have been 10,719,946 confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide, including 517,337 deaths, reported to the World Health Organization [3]. Many therapies are being investigated for their anti-viral or immune modulation properties to treat COVID-19, with efficacy so far being demonstrated for dexamethasone [4] and remdesivir [5]. In recent pandemics, no standardized treatments were identified for SARS-CoV-1, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome or Ebola, due to the limited number of controlled clinical trials undertaken at the time, with none performed on SARS-CoV-1, and only 3 and 11 for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome and Ebola, respectively [6]. However, this has been addressed for COVID-19, and there are currently 1,358 clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, of which 209 are investigating the use of convalescent plasma to treat COVD-19 [7].

Principles of Convalescent Plasma

Convalescent plasma is plasma, obtained from patients who have recovered from an infectious disease such as COVID-19, which contains antibodies specific to the pathogen, in this case SARS-CoV-2. This passive immunotherapy works by neutralizing pathogens, thereby decreasing the likelihood of cytokine storm occurring in the recipients. Convalescent plasma has been used as a therapeutic agent for over a hundred years. One of its earliest interventions for treating viral diseases was the Spanish H1N1 influenza A in 1918. Since then it has been used to treat Avian H5N1 influenza A epidemic (2003), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS, SARS-CoV-1) epidemic (2003), H1N1 influenza pandemic (2009-10), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) epidemic (2012), Chikungunya, Ebola epidemic (2014-16) and Zika [2,3].

Is Convalescent Plasma Efficacious?

While it is important to await the findings for the clinical trials, there is some evidence that this approach will be successful. A meta- analysis of 32 papers evaluating the efficacy of convalescent plasma in SARS Coronavirus patients, (699 treated versus 568 untreated controls), demonstrated a reduced mortality rate in the plasma arm, compared with placebo or no treatment (odds ratio: 0.25%; 95% CI: 0.14-0.45). However, many studies included in the meta-analysis were of poor quality, lacked control groups, and demonstrated moderate or high risk of bias [8]. A meta-analysis of the use of convalescent plasma in Spanish flu also demonstrated a reduced mortality rate [9]. There is some evidence about the efficacy of convalescent plasma from several uncontrolled case series of convalescent plasma use in COVID-19 patients. A case-series of 5 critically ill COVID-19 patients, aged 36-65 years, received convalescent plasma, with a SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG binding titre greater than 1:1000 and a neutralization titre greater than 40, on days 10-22 following admission. The results were encouraging, with normalization of body temperature occurring within 3 days in 4 of the 5 patients. In addition, viral loads decreased and acute respiratory distress syndrome also resolved in 4 patients, both within 12 days of the transfusion, and 3 patients no longer required ventilation within 3 weeks [10]. Duan et al. 2020 also reported an improvement in 10 severely affected patients who received convalescent plasma [11]. Viremia disappeared within 7 days, due to significantly increased or maintained high levels of neutralizing antibody. In addition, lymphocyte counts increased and C-reactive protein values decreased, in comparison to the pre-transfusion levels. There were also varying levels of adsorption of lung lesions.

Zhang et al. 2020 reported the outcomes in 4 critically ill COVID-19 patients, who received various quantities of convalescent plasma, (300, 400 and 2,400ml) [12]. All patients became RT-PCR negative within 3-22 days of receiving the transfusion. However, the contribution from other therapeutic agents administered could not be discerned. A retrospective, observational study involving a small number of participants was less promising. Despite, all 6 patients testing negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA within 3 days of receiving the transfusion, 5 of them subsequently died. However, the patients who received plasma survived significantly longer than the control arm. The median day of transfusion was 21.5, and it was postulated this was too late to minimise the hyperimmune response, as the 1 patient who received treatment on day 11 survived [13]. Kong et al. 2020 reported a case of a centenarian, who demonstrated improved clinical and laboratory findings following 2 transfusions of convalescent plasma, and was successfully treated by this approach [14]. In the study by Ahn et al. 2020, 2 COVID-19 patients who presented with severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome demonstrated improved oxygenation, and decreased viremia and inflammatory markers, after the use of methylprednisolone and convalescent plasma [15].

A systematic review of five studies evaluating convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients demonstrated a reduced mortality rate in critically ill patients. In the majority of cases, an increase in the neutralizing antibody titres was apparent, alongside disappearance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, and an improvement in clinical symptoms. This study concluded that convalescent plasma was an effective means of reducing mortality in COVID-19 [16]. A Cochrane Rapid Review by Valk et al. 2020 included 32 patients, from seven case-series and one prospectively planned study [17]. Valk et al. 2020 reported a high level of bias, due to the small numbers of participants, study design, different disease severities and varying treatments of the patients [17]. They were unable to perform any statistical analysis and deemed very low-certainty evidence for efficacy, with the data available at present [17]. The first randomized clinical trial evaluating convalescent plasma was performed in Wuhan, China. It recruited 103 participants with severe or life-threatening COVID-19 and compared convalescent plasma in addition to standard treatment (n = 52) to standard treatment alone (control) (n = 51). However, no statistical significant benefit in mortality or clinical improvement 28 days after the plasma transfusion in all randomized patients was observed [18]. However, a possible benefit was seen in the severely ill subgroup, but not the critically-ill group, when the data was reanalysed according to disease severity. The lack of statistical significance was thought to arise from the early termination of the trial, due to enrolment difficulties as the virus was being contained. This resulted in only 103 of the expected 200 cases being recruited, which subsequently underpowered the trial [18].

Safety of Convalescent Plasma

So far the safety data for this treatment seems promising, despite concerns that antibody-mediated enhancement may exacerbate the condition via a proinflammatory effect, or complications may arise from transfusion-related lung injury and transfusion-related circulatory overload [19]. Other potential adverse events include breathing difficulties, transfusion transmitted infection, and hypersensitivity reactions, which manifest as rash, fever or chills. No severe adverse events were reported by Ahn et al. 2020 (n=2), Duan et al. 2020 (n=10), Olivares-Gazca et al. 2020 (n=10), Salazar et al. 2020 (n=25), Zhang et al. 2020 (n=4) or Zeng et al. 2020 (n=6) [11-13,15,20,21], and the meta-analysis also confirmed it was safe (Rajendran et al. 2020) [16], whereas Valk et al. 2020 reported very low- certainty evidence of adverse events [17]. In the trial by Li et al. 2020 [18], two of 52 recipients of convalescent plasma experienced adverse events within hours of receiving the transfusion. The chills and rash manifest in one of those patients suggested a transfusion reaction. The adverse events in both cases were managed by corticosteroids [18,22].

What do We Need to Know?

The controlled trials evaluating convalescent plasma will provide important information on the optimal dose and time to treat patients, donor selection, plasma collection and which patients are most likely to benefit. The meta-analysis on the use of convalescent plasma to treat Spanish flu by Luke et al. 2006 suggested that early treatment, (after < 4 days of pneumonia complications), resulted in improved mortality rates than late treatment, (after ≥ 4 days of pneumonia complications), which was similar to the mortality rate among controls [9]. The study by Zeng et al. 2020 supports the use of convalescent plasma as an early intervention [13], and also by Li et al. 2020, particularly in less severely ill patients [18]. The concentration of donor neutralizing antibodies is likely to affect the efficacy, and these levels can be influenced by the prior treatment of the donor, such as steroids, antiviral drugs and intravenous immunoglobulin. It will also be interesting to explore convalescent plasma in combination with antiviral agents, such as remdisivir, due to their different mechanisms of action [22]. There is previous evidence that they may work well together [23]. The results of the many clinical trials investigating the use of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 are eagerly awaited, but the data from case-series and the use of this treatment in previous infectious diseases appears promising.

Keywords

Convalescent plasma, Coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19, Passive immunotherapy, SARS-CoV-2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

References

  1. Peeri NC, Shrestha N, Rahman MS, Zaki R, Tan Z, et al. (2020) The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned? International Journal of Epidemiology.
  2. Franchini M (2020) Why should we use convalescent plasma for COVID-19? European Journal of Internal Medicine 77: 150-151. [crossref]
  3. Wong HK, Lee CK (2020) Pivotal role of convalescent plasma in managing emerging infectious diseases. Vox sanguinis World Health Organization Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard https://covid19.who.int/ [crossref]
  4. Mahase E (2020) Covid-19: Low dose steroid cuts death in ventilated patients by one third, trial finds. BMJ 369: m2422. [crossref]
  5. Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, Mehta AK, Zingman BS, et al. (2020) Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 – Preliminary Report. The New England journal of medicine NEJMoa2007764. [crossref]
  6. Body R and Felton T (2020) MAHSC Seminar Series COVID-19 – Current & future diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, 2nd July https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=oapbjes0es4
  7. ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ NIH US National Library of Medicine Accessed 03/07/2020
  8. Mair-Jenkins J, Saavedra-Campos M, Baillie JK, Cleary P, Khaw FM, et al. (2015) The effectiveness of convalescent plasma and hyperimmune immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe acute respiratory infections of viral etiology: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 211: 80-90. [crossref]
  9. Luke TC, Kilbane EM, Jackson JL, Hoffman SL (2006) Meta-analysis: convalescent blood products for Spanish influenza pneumonia: a future H5N1 treatment? Annals of Internal Medicine 145: 599-609. [crossref]
  10. Shen C, Wang Z, Zhao F, Yang Y, Li J, et al. (2020) Treatment of 5 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 With Convalescent Plasma. JAMA 323: 1582-1589. [crossref]
  11. Duan K, Liu B, Li C, Zhang H, Yu T, et al. (2020) Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117: 9490-9496. [crossref]
  12. Zhang B, Liu S, Tan T, Huang W, Dong Y, et al. (2020) Treatment with Convalescent Plasma for Critically Ill Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection. Chest 158: e9-e13. [crossref]
  13. Zeng QL, Yu ZJ, Gou JJ, Li GM, Ma SH, et al. (2020) Effect of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on Viral Shedding and Survival in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 222: 38-43. [crossref]
  14. Kong Y, Cai C, Ling L, Zeng L, Wu M, et al. (2020) Successful treatment of a centenarian with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using convalescent plasma. Transfusion and Apheresis Science 102820. [crossref]
  15. Ahn JY, Sohn Y, Lee SH, Cho Y, Hyun JH, et al. (2020) Use of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in Two COVID-19 Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Science 35: e149. [crossref]
  16. Rajendran K, Krishnasamy N, Rangarajan J, Rathinam J, Natarajan M, et al. (2020) Convalescent plasma transfusion for the treatment of COVID-19: Systematic review. J Med Virol. [crossref]
  17. Valk SJ, Piechotta V, Chai KL, Doree C, Monsef I, et al. (2020) Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19: a rapid review. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 5: CD013600. [crossref]
  18. Li L, Zhang W, Hu Y, Tong X, Zheng S, et al. (2020) Effect of Convalescent Plasma Therapy on Time to Clinical Improvement in Patients With Severe and Life- threatening COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA e2010044. [crossref]
  19. Dzik S (2020) COVID-19 convalescent plasma: now is the time for better science. Transfus Med Rev. [crossref]
  20. Olivares-Gazca JC, Priesca-Marín JM, Ojeda-Laguna M, Garces-Eisele J, Soto- Olvera S, et al. (2020) Infusion of convalescent plasma is associated with clinical improvement in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A pilot study. Revista de investigacion clinica; organo del Hospital de Enfermedades de la Nutricion 72: 159- 164.
  21. Salazar E, Perez KK, Ashraf M, Chen J, Castillo B, et al. (2020) Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients with Convalescent Plasma. The American Journal of Pathology 190: 1680-1690. [crossref]
  22. Casadevall A, Joyner MJ, Pirofski L (2020) A Randomized Trial of Convalescent Plasma for COVID-19—Potentially Hopeful Signals. JAMA. [crossref]
  23. Casadevall A, Scharff MD (1995) Return to the past: the case for antibody-based therapies in infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis 21: 150-161. [crossref]