Abstract
Background: The research aims to study the effect of the Moringa oleifera aqueous seeds extract (MSE) on some productive indicators of broiler chickens. The experiment was conducted using 300 broiler chicks of the Ross 308 strain. Starting from one day of age until 42 days. The broiler chickens were allocated into four equal groups: T1 (control), T2, T3 and T4, each of which included 75 broiler chickens. They were fed balanced and uniform diets according to their age. Drinking water was ad libitum provided, with the addition of the MSE at a rate of 0, 80, 100 and 120 ml/liter of water for T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively.
Results: The results showed a significant improvement (P<0.05) in the growth rate, and feed conversion ratio, with a decrease (P<0.05) in the percentage of dead broiler chickens, for the groups treated with MSE compared to the control group T1.
Conclusions: The study suggests that adding the aqueous of MSE to the drinking water of broiler chickens results in the improvement of the studied productivity indicators.
Keywords
Moringa oleifera, Seed extract, Productive indicators, Broiler chickens
Background
The poultry industry is one of the most important sectors of animal production, contributing to the provision of high-quality animal protein in large quantities to meet the growing nutritional needs of humans [1]. With increasing production, it has become necessary to rely on feed additives to improve growth, increase feed conversion efficiency, and enhance immunity against diseases. Antibiotics have been used for many years to achieve this goal [2], but their extensive use has led to the emergence of health problems, most notably the development of bacterial resistance to antibiotics and the accumulation of drug residues in poultry meat and eggs, which negatively impacts consumer health [3]. Therefore, recent studies have focused on safe and effective natural alternatives, with medicinal plants and their derivatives, such as oils and extracts, playing a prominent role in this field [4]. Moringa oleifera is a medicinal plant rich in active compounds such as phenols, flavonoids, antioxidants, amino acids, and minerals [5]. It is used as a plant-based supplement to improve health and immunity and increase production efficiency in poultry. Phenolic compounds and flavonoids are key factors in increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, reducing oxidative stress caused by free radical formation, and supporting the bird’s immune system by stimulating the production of antibodies and increasing the number of white blood cells [6]. Isothiocyanates and other plant compounds also act as antimicrobials, helping to reduce bacterial infections and disease, and improving the integrity of the intestinal mucosa, which positively impacts nutrient absorption and reduces mortality rates [7]. Several studies have indicated the important role of using Moringa in poultry nutrition to improve health and productivity [8]. Ali et al., [9] found that adding MSE to drinking water can lead to lower mortality rates and increased growth, which enhances production efficiency, as found by Rehman et al., [10]. Adding MSE to poultry drinking water has significant effects on improving growth rates, weight gain, meat quality, and its vitamin, mineral, protein, and fat content. Verma et al., [11] found that when studying the effect of adding an aqueous extract of Moringa oleifera leaves to the drinking water of four groups of broiler chickens, the first group received drinking water devoid of the extract, the second group received 60 ml of the extract per liter, the third group received 90 ml per liter, and the fourth group received 120 ml per liter. The results showed a significant increase (P<0.01) in the weights of broiler chickens and an improvement in the feed conversion ratio in the groups treated with the extract, with the highest increase recorded in the group receiving 90 ml per liter. Given the recent trend toward using medicinal plants and their extracts as a natural alternative to antibiotics to enhance chicken production efficiency, which enhances the safety of animal products and reduces reliance on chemicals that may negatively impact human health and the environment, the aim of this study was to study the effect of adding different levels of aqueous MSE to drinking water on some production indicators (weight gain, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio, and mortality rate) in broiler chickens.
Materials and Methods
Animals, Treatments and Experimental Design
The study was conducted using 300 one-day-old chickens of Ross 308 strain, in a private farm on the outskirts of Hama city, which relies on a semi-closed breeding system and a bedding of sawdust. The experiment lasted for 42 days during the period from 01/09/2024 to 11/10/2024. The broiler chicks were distributed into four groups, each containing 75 broiler chickens. Each group contained three replicates, each containing 25 broiler chickens, according to a completely random design. The broiler chickens were placed in mesh cages with dimensions of 2 x 1.5 m, with a density of 8 chickens /m2. The broiler chickens of each replicate were placed in a place equipped with a feeder and a drinker, and all groups underwent the same treatment in terms of heating, ventilation, and everything related to the management and care system. The broiler chickens were cared for from one day old until 42 days old, and the temperature was controlled when receiving the broiler chicks at around 33°C during the first three days, then it was gradually reduced at a rate of 1°C daily for all the studied treatments to be fixed at 21°C, while light was provided 24 hours a day during the first three days of caring for the broiler chicks, then the lighting was gradually reduced at a rate of one hour a day until the age of one week, to fix the lighting program according to (20L: 4D) until the end of the fattening period [12]. The broiler chickens were also vaccinated according to a unified preventive vaccination program followed in the breeding area (Table 1), in addition to giving them vitamins to resist the stress caused by the used vaccine.
Table 1: Immunization program followed during the period of care.
|
Today’s |
Method of giving the vaccine |
Type of vaccine given |
|
1 |
Eye Drop | Newcastle and bronchitis |
|
10 |
Drinking Water | ND Clone 30 |
|
14 |
Drinking Water | Gumboro |
|
25 |
Drinking Water | ND Clone 30 |
The broiler chickens were fed with balanced protein and energy pellet feed mixtures produced by Feedmix (Hama, Syria). The care period was divided into three phases: the starter phase (1-14 days), the grower phase (15-25 days), and the finisher phase (26-42 days). The feed mixtures were provided in accordance with their needs according to the age phase (Table 2) according to the recommended nutritional requirements tables for the breed Aviagen [13]. The feed mixtures and water were ad libitum provided.
Table 2: Composition of feed mixtures used in feeding experimental broiler chickens.
|
Ingredients(g/kg) |
Starter Mixture (1-14 days) |
Grower Mixture (15-25 days) |
Finisher Mixture |
| Yellow corn |
556.4 |
594.3 |
624.3 |
| Soybean meal, 48% |
320 |
280 |
231.3 |
| Corn gluten, 60% |
59.8 |
55.7 |
65.7 |
| Soybean oil |
20 |
30 |
40 |
| Calcium carbonate |
13 |
12 |
10.5 |
| Calcium dibasic Phosphate |
15 |
13 |
13 |
| Common salt |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
| Premix* |
3 |
3 |
3 |
| DL-Methionine, 98% |
2.3 |
2 |
1.8 |
| Lysine, Hcl, 78% |
4.7 |
4.2 |
4.6 |
| Choline |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
| Threonine |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Phytase |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
| NaCo3 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
| Chemical composition (g/kg)** | |||
| ME kcal/kg diet |
3012.65 |
3108.199 |
3213.92 |
| Crude Protein% |
23.48 |
21.57 |
20.14 |
| Calcium |
9.7 |
8.7 |
8.1 |
| Available P |
4.8 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
| Lysine |
14.4 |
12.9 |
11.9 |
| Methionine |
5.6 |
5.1 |
4.8 |
| Threonine |
9.7 |
8.8 |
8.1 |
*Premix per kg of diet: vitamin A, 1500 IU; vitamin D3, 200 IU; vitamin E, 10 mg; vitamin K3, 0.5 mg; thiamine, 1.8 mg; riboflavin, 3.6 mg; pantothenic acid, 10 mg; folic acid, 0.55 mg; pyridoxine, 3.5 mg; niacin, 35 mg; cobalamin, 0.01 mg; biotin, 0.15 mg; Fe, 80 mg; Cu, 8 mg; Mn, 60 mg; Zn, 40 mg; I, 0.35 mg; Se, 0.15 mg.
**According to Ross manual Guide, Aviagen [12].
Preparation of the Aqueous Extract of Moringa Seeds
Moringa seeds were obtained from private shops selling medicinal herbs in Hama Governorate. They were cleaned, leaves and foreign bodies were removed, dried, and then ground using a special mill for medicinal plants until a fine powder was obtained. Then 100 g of the powder were collected and mixed with 1000 ml of distilled water (at a ratio of 10: 1) using an electric mixer. The mixture was then left for 24 hours at room temperature. After that, the mixture was filtered using several layers of medical gauze to get rid of suspended particles. Then, the mixture was placed in a centrifuge (Bio-Rad- USA) at a speed of 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. After that, the extract was filtered using Whatman No. 101 filter papers to obtain a clear solution. Then, the extract was diluted with clean drinking water to obtain the doses that were provided to the broiler chickens daily [14] as follows:
Group T1: Drinking water only (control group).
Group T2: 80 ml of MSE/L of drinking water.
Group T3: 100 ml of MSE/L of drinking water.
Group T4: 120 ml of MSE/L of drinking water.
Chemical Analysis of Moringa Seed Extract Treatments
The MSE treatments (T2, T3, and T4) were analyzed for alkaloids, carbohydrates, flavonoids, glycosides, phenols, proteins, saponins, steroids, tannins, and terpenoids using the standard method by Ijarotimi et al. [15] and Nathaniel et al. [16], as shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Phytochemical content (mg/L) of moringa seed extract (MSE) treatments.
|
Phytochemicals |
T2 | T3 |
T4 |
| Alkaloids |
8.53 |
8.89 |
9.16 |
| Carbohydrates |
2.79 |
3.35 |
3.54 |
| Flavonoids |
3.98 |
4.23 |
4.52 |
| Phenols |
17.96 |
18.41 |
18.99 |
| Protein |
32.77 |
33.32 |
34.12 |
| Saponins |
5.87 |
6.18 |
6.63 |
| Steroids |
4.12 |
4.73 |
5.34 |
| Tannins |
47.63 |
53.2 |
55.32 |
| Terpenoids |
18.24 |
18.97 |
19.48 |
The calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, zinc, iron, and sodium content of MSE treatments was determined according to the methods described by Liang et al. [17]. The MSE treatments (T2, T3, and T4) were analyzed for vitamin A, B1, B2, B3, B6, B12, C, D3, E, K3, and β-carotene (Table 4) using the methods described by Sami et al. [18].
Table 4: Mineral and vitamin composition (mg/L) of moringa seed extract (MSE) treatments.
|
Micronutrients |
T2 | T3 |
T4 |
| Calcium |
601.3 |
621.7 |
637.8 |
| Magnesium |
38.47 |
41.20 |
43.50 |
| Phosphorus |
356.0 |
396.4 |
405.8 |
| Potassium |
69.00 |
74.00 |
77.10 |
| Zinc |
1.067 |
1.170 |
1.243 |
| Iron |
6.260 |
6.490 |
6.750 |
| Sodium |
243.8 |
262.7 |
275.7 |
| Vitamin A |
4.040 |
4.480 |
4.640 |
| Vitamin B1 |
0.140 |
0.170 |
0.250 |
| Vitamin B2 |
0.230 |
0.310 |
0.350 |
| Vitamin B3 |
0.230 |
0.320 |
0.390 |
| Vitamin B6 |
0.280 |
0.320 |
0.360 |
| Vitamin B12 |
0.110 |
0.130 |
0.170 |
| Vitamin C |
4.650 |
4.800 |
4.940 |
| Vitamin D3 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
| Vitamin E |
546.0 |
597.0 |
630.0 |
| Vitamin K3 |
ND |
ND |
ND |
| β-carotene |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND = not detected.
Studied Indicators
The production indicators were studied during 42 days of the chickens ‘ life, as follows:
Weight of hatched broiler chickens (g): The broiler chickens were weighed at one day of age in each replicate separately using a scale with an accuracy of 0.1 g.
Weekly live weight (g): The individual weight of the broiler chickens was recorded weekly for all chickens in the studied groups.
Weight gain (g): Live weight at the end of the period – live weight at the beginning of the period [19].
Average feed intake of the broiler chickens (g): According to the average weekly feed intake, by weighing the amount of feed provided to each group at the beginning of the week, then weighing the amount of feed remaining in the feeders for each group at the end of the week, and according to the difference in weight. The average feed intake of each chicken was calculated according to the following equation:
Average feed intake (g) = Amount of feed given (g) – Amount of feed remaining (g).
Feed conversion ratio: According to the conversion ratio for each group weekly according to the following relationship:
![]()
Mortality rate: The number of dead broiler chickens was recorded daily from each replicate, and their percentage was recorded during the care period extending up to 42 days of age.
Statistical Analysis
The results of all studied indicators were subjected to statistical analysis using analysis of variance according to the completely random design using the statistical program SPSS26, and the significant differences between the averages of the coefficients were compared using the LSD test at a significance level of p < 0.05.
The mathematical model was as follows: Yij = μ + Ti + eij
Where:
Yij = Individual observation.
μ = The overall mean for the trial under consideration.
Ti = The effect of the ith treatment.
eij = Random residual error. [20]
Results
Live Weight
The results in Table 5 show the effect of adding the aqueous of MSE to drinking water on the average live weight of the experimental broiler chickens. As it is noted, there is a significant increase (P<0.05) in the average weights of the broiler chickens in the treatment groups T2, T3, T4, as they reached 2626.89, 2669.96, and 2725.66 g at the end of the experiment for the three groups, respectively, compared to the control group T1, which reached 2499.28 g.
Table 5: The Effect of adding aqueous of MSE to drinking water on the average live weight of experimental broiler chickens. (g)
|
The age |
Experimental groups (Mean ± SD) | ||||
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
P- value |
|
|
Day 1 |
4.12 ± 43.25ns | 4.97 ± 43.32 ns | 4.55 ± 43.46 ns | 5.32 ± 43.37 ns | 0.531 |
| Week 1 | 8.74 ± 171.75 b | 9.93 ± 181.64a | 8.35 ± 185.46a | ± 187.479.27a |
0.046 |
|
Week 2 |
12.54 ± 446.86c | 13.01 ± 480.75b | 12.89 ± 500.65a | 13.42 ± 512.68a | 0.039 |
| Week 3 | 19.71 ± 915c | 22.34 ± 967.92b | 23.45 ± 993.26a | 24.98 ± 1018.87a |
0.042 |
|
Week 4 |
26.52 ± 1428.15c | 26.05 ± 1513.42b | 27.34 ± 1544.58b | 28.54 ± 1582.28a | 0.040 |
| Week 5 | 31.10 ± 1990.85b | 2099.62 ± 30.25a | 31.21 ± 2137.08a | 32.18 ± 2184.38 a |
0.043 |
|
Week 6 |
34.13 ± 2499.28b | 31.02 ± 2626.89a | 35.73 ± 2669.96a | 39.52 ± 2725.66 a |
0.041 |
T1: Drinking water only (control group). T2: 80 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water.
T3: 100 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water. T4: 120 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water.
ns indicates no significant differences within the same line between the experimental groups (P>0.05).
Different letters a, b, c within the same line indicates significant differences between groups at a level of (P≤0.05).
Weight Gain
The results in Table 6 show the effect of adding the aqueous of MSE to drinking water on the average weight gain of broiler chickens during the experimental stages. A significant increase (P<0.05) was observed in the average weight gain of broiler chickens in the treatment groups T2, T3, T4, which reached 2582.57, 2626.5, and 2682.29 g at the end of the experiment, respectively, compared to the control group T1, which reached 2456.03 g.
Table 6: Effect of adding aqueous of MSE to drinking water on the average weight gain of experimental broiler chickens. (g)
|
The age |
Experimental groups (Mean ± SD) | ||||
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
P- value |
|
|
Week 1 |
4.12 ± 128.5 ns | 4.55 ± 138.32ns | 3.95 ± 142 ns | 4.56 ± 144.1 ns | 0.121 |
| Week 2 | 5.10 ± 275.11b | 6.40 ± 299.11ab | 6.70 ± 315.19a | 6.32 ± 325.21a |
0.045 |
|
Week 3 |
12.70 ± 468.14b | 13.30 ± 487.17a | 14.11 ± 492.6a | 14.10 ± 506.19a | 0.043 |
| Week 4 | 22.30 ± 513.15b | 20.35 ± 545.5a | 21.45 ± 551.32a | 22.57 ± 563.41a |
0.034 |
|
Week 5 |
19.16 ± 562.7b | 18.67 ± 586.2ab | 19.87 ± 592.5a | 19.47 ± 602.1a | 0.031 |
| Week 6 | 7.62 ± 508.43b | 8.42 ± 527.27ab | 9.71 ± 532.88a | 9.32 ± 541.28a |
0.042 |
|
Full experience |
31.02 ± 2456.03b | ± 2582.5727.78a | 2626.5 ± 22.6a | 32.1 ± 2682.29a |
0.041 |
T1: Drinking water only (control group). T2: 80 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water.
T3: 100 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water. T4: 120 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water.
ns indicates no significant differences within the same line between the experimental groups (P>0.05).
Different letters a, b within the same line indicates significant differences between groups at a level of (P≤0.05).
Feed Intake
The results in Table 7 show the effect of adding the aqueous of MSE to drinking water on the average amount of feed consumed by the experimental broiler chickens. It is noted that there was no significant effect (P>0.05) of the MSE on the amount of feed consumed by the treatment groups T2, T3, T4, as the average reached 4530.4, 4556.86, and 4572.47 g, compared to the control group, as the average reached 4518.19 g.
Table 7: Effect of adding aqueous of MSE to drinking water on the average amount of feed intake of experimental broiler chickens. (g)
|
The age |
Experimental groups (Mean ± SD) | ||||||
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
P- value |
|||
|
Week 1 |
5.17 ± 188ns | 5.20 ± 189.12ns | 4.90 ± 190.34ns | 5.88 ± 191.52ns | 0.131 | ||
| Week 2 | 5.80 ± 414.21ns | 6.25 ± 416.34ns | 6.98 ± 419.74ns | 7.22 ± 420.61ns |
0.081 |
||
|
Week 3 |
10.72 ± 732.14ns | 12.14 ± 733.44 ns | 14.19 ± 734.67ns | 13.35 ± 735.41ns | 0.075 | ||
| Week 4 | 24.35 ± 813.15ns | 22.30 ± 816.41 ns | 25.37 ± 827.42ns | 23.50 ± 835.81ns |
0.053 |
||
|
Week 5 |
29.46 ± .1129.2ns | 31.26 ± .1131.1 ns | 34.21 ± .1139.24ns | 35.56 ± .1141.21ns | 0.068 | ||
| Week 6 | 37.32 ± 1241.49ns | 35.72 ± 1243.99ns | ± 1245.4937.51ns | 36.75 ± 1247.91ns |
0.094 |
||
|
Full experience |
35.72 ± 4518.19ns | 4530.4 ± 30.52ns | 4556.86 ± 33.8 ns | 4572.47 ± 40.12ns |
0.055 |
||
T1: Drinking water only (control group). T2: 80 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water.
T3: 100 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water. T4: 120 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water.
ns indicates no significant differences within the same line between the experimental groups (P>0.05).
Feed Conversion Ratio
The results in Table 8 show the effect of adding the aqueous of MSE to drinking water on the average feed conversion ratio of the experimental broiler chickens. As indicated, there is a significant improvement (P<0.05) in the average feed conversion ratio of the broiler chickens of the treatment groups T2, T3, T4, as it reached 1.754, 1.735, and 1.705 g/g for the three groups, respectively, compared to the control group T1, as it reached 1.840 g/g.
Table 8: Effect of adding aqueous of MSE to drinking water on the average feed conversion ratio of experimental broiler chickens. g/g
|
The age |
Experimental groups (Mean ± SD) | ||||
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 |
P- value |
|
|
Week 1 |
5.17 ± 1.463b | 5.20 ± 1.397a | 4.90 ± 1.340a | 5.88 ± 1.329a | 0.047 |
| Week 2 | 5.80 ± 1.505b | 6.25 ± 1.392a | 6.98 ± 1.332a | 7.22 ± 1.293a |
0.045 |
|
Week 3 |
10.72 ± 1.564b | 12.14 ± 1.505a | 14.19 ± 1.491a | 13.35 ± 1.453a | 0.031 |
| Week 4 | 24.35 ± 1.585b | 22.30 ± 1.517a | 25.37 ± 1.501a | 23.50 ± 1.483a |
0.042 |
|
Week 5 |
29.46 ± .2.007b | 31.26 ± .1.929a | 34.21 ± .1.923a | 35.56 ± .1.895a | 0.033 |
| Week 6 | 37.32 ± 2.442b | 35.72 ± 2.359a | 37.51 ± 2.337a | 36.75 ± 2.306a |
0.035 |
|
Full experience |
35.72 ± 1.840b | 1.754 ± 30.45a | 1.735 ± 33.8a | 1.705 ± 36.12a |
0.024 |
T1: Drinking water only (control group). T2: 80 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water.
T3: 100 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water. T4: 120 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water.
Different letters a, b within the same line indicates significant differences between groups at a level of (P≤0.05).
Mortality
The results in Table 9 show the effect of adding the aqueous of MSE to drinking water on the mortality rates of the experimental broiler chickens. A significant decrease (P<0.05) is observed in the percentage of dead broiler chickens in the treatment groups T2, T3, T4, as it reached 4, 2.66, and 1.33% at the end of the experiment for the three groups, respectively, compared to the control group T1, which reached 8%.
Table 9: Effect of adding aqueous of MSE to drinking water on the Average total mortality rate of broiler chickens in the experimental groups (%).
|
Groups |
Total number of broiler chickens in the group | Number of live broiler chickens at the end of the experiment |
Mortality % |
|
T1 |
75 | 69 | 8b |
| T2 | 75 | 72 |
4a |
|
T3 |
75 | 73 | 2.66 a |
| T4 | 75 | 74 |
1.33a |
|
P- value |
0.043 |
T1: Drinking water only (control group). T2: 80 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water.
T3: 100 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water. T4: 120 ml of MSE/liter of drinking water.
Different letters a, b within the same line indicates significant differences between groups at a level of (P≤0.05).
Discussion
The results of the present study show the important role of MSE in improving the growth and weight gain of broiler chickens. These findings are consistent with that of Alabi et al. [21] when providing the aqueous extract of Moringa oleifera leaves to broiler chickens, as they noted that the average daily weight gain and final body weight were higher in the groups that received the extract at 120 ml/liter compared to the control group. Khan et al. [22] also recorded a significant increase in body weight when Moringa leaf powder was added at a rate of 1.2% to broiler chickens feed mixtures. In addition, adding Moringa oleifera leaves at a level of 5% to 20% to feed mixtures showed a significant improvement in the growth of broiler chickens [23]. The reason for the improved growth and weight gain may be explained by the richness of Moringa seeds in proteins rich in sulfur amino acids and their high content of oil and beneficial unsaturated fatty acids [24]. The results of the study show that there was no significant effect of MSE on the amount of feed consumed. This is consistent with previous researchers [25,26], who did not observe any effect of Moringa on the amount of feed consumed, while it contradicts the results reached by other authors [27,28,29], who found an increase in the amount of feed consumed. The results of the study also indicate an improvement in the feed conversion rate in broiler chickens in the treatment groups compared to the control group. These results are consistent with what was reached by previous researchers [28,29,30], who explained that Moringa leaves have an effect in improving the feed conversion rate, while the results differed from that of Naga et al. [31], who did not observe any effect of Moringa leaves on the feed conversion rate, while Cui et al. [25] found a significant increase in the feed conversion rate in Moringa leaf treatments. The improvement in the feed conversion rate may be attributed to the fact that MSE improves intestinal health, as it works to increase the length of the villi in the digestive tract [32], which in turn leads to better absorption of the nutrients available in Moringa leaves [33]. The results show a significant decrease in the percentage of dead broiler chicks during the experiment in the groups treated with MSE. This is consistent with the results of Alnidawi et al. [34] and contradicts that of other researchers [26,35,36]. The reason for the decrease in the mortality rate in the treatment groups may be attributed to the Moringa seeds containing a high percentage of antioxidants, vitamins and nutrients that contribute to enhancing the broiler chickens’ immunity and resistance to diseases.
Conclusions
The study concludes the positive effect of using the aqueous of MSE with drinking water in improving the productive performance of broiler chickens, as the live weight increased with stability in the amount of feed consumed, and the feed conversion ratio and the percentage of dead broiler chickens decreased.
Author Contributions
Researcher dr. Mohamed Alrez wrote the research, conducted the experiments, statistically analyzed the results, tabulated them, reviewed the research, and prepared it for publication.
Declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Approval was obtained from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and informed consent was obtained from the animal owner for the experiments and publication of the results, with a commitment to applying the best veterinary practices for animal care
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
The data obtained and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request and are also available on the website: https: //orcid.org/0009-0003-0735-1807.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
The research was funded with support from Hama University.
References
- Gupta S, Jain R, Kachhwaha S, Kothari SL. (2018). Nutritional and medicinal applications of Moringa oleifera Lam – Review of current status and future possibilities. J Herbal Med [crossref]
- Makkar HP, Francis G, Becker K. (2007). Bioactivity of phytochemicals in some lesser-known plants and their effects and potential applications in livestock and aquaculture production systems. Animal [crossref]
- Pandey A, Pandey RD, Tripathi P, Gupta PP, Haider J, Bhatt S, Singh AV. (2012). Moringa oleifera Lam. (Sahijan) – a plant with a plethora of diverse therapeutic benefits: an updated retrospection. Med Aromat Plants [crossref]
- Stohs SJ, Hartman MJ. (2015). Review of the safety and efficacy of Moringa oleifera. Phytother Res [crossref]
- Rachmawati I, Rifai M. (2014). In vitro immunomodulatory activity of aqueous extract of Moringa oleifera Lam. leaf to the CD4+, CD8+ and B220+ cells in Mus musculus. J Exp Life Sci [crossref]
- Anwar F, Sajid L, Muhammad A, Anwarul HG. (2007). Moringa oleifera: A food plant with multiple medicinal uses. Phytother Res [crossref]
- Egbu CF, Motsei LE, Yusuf AO, Mnisi CM. (2022). Evaluating the efficacy of Moringa oleifera seed extract on nutrient digestibility and physiological parameters of broiler chickens. Agriculture, 12(8):1102. [crossref]
- Gul S, Hussain F, Taj R, Ullah A. (2024). https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/8/1102 J Adv Vet Anim Res, 11(2):339–348. [crossref]
- Ali S, Masood S, Zaneb H, Rehman HF, Masood S, Khan MR, et al. (2017). Supplementation of zinc oxide nanoparticles has beneficial effects on intestinal morphology in broilers chicken. Pak Vet J [crossref]
- Rehman HF, Zaneb H, Masood S, Yousaf MS, Hayat K, Majeed KA, et al. (2022). Effect of selenium nanoparticles and mannan oligosaccharide supplementation on growth performance, stress indicators, and intestinal microarchitecture of broilers reared under high stocking density. Animals [crossref]
- Verma MP, Lavania P, Baswal AK, Kumar A. (2024). Efficacy of Moringa oleifera leaf aqueous extract supplementation on growth performance of native ‘Ankleshwar’ poultry birds. Biological Forum – Int J, 16(3):257–261. [crossref]
- Aviagen. (2018). Ross Broiler: Management Handbook. Available at: https://en.aviagen.com
- Aviagen R. (2009). Ross Broiler Management Manual. Available at: http://goldenpoultry.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Ross-Broiler-Handbook-2014i-EN.pdf
- Egbu CF, Motsei LE, Yusuf AO, Mnisi CM. (2022). Evaluating the efficacy of Moringa oleifera seed extract on nutrient digestibility and physiological parameters of broiler chickens. Agriculture, 12:1102. [crossref]
- Ijarotimi OS, Adeoti OA, Ariyo O. (2013). Comparative study on nutrient composition, phytochemical, and functional characteristics of raw, germinated, and fermented Moringa oleifera seed flour. J Food Sci Nutr [crossref]
- Nathaniel EU, Onyancha JM, Mugambi M, Ncene W, Moriasi GA. (2020). Chemical composition of Moringa oleifera Lam. and Moringa stenopetala Bac. leaves from Kenya. Int J Plant Res [crossref]
- Liang L, Wang C, Li S, Chu X, Sun K. (2019). Nutritional compositions of Indian Moringa oleifera seed and antioxidant activity of its polypeptides. Food Sci Nutr [crossref]
- Sami R, Li Y, Qi B, Wang S, Zhang Q, Han F, Ma Y, Jing J, Jiang L. (2014). HPLC analysis of water-soluble and fat-soluble vitamins of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). J Chem [crossref]
- Abou Sekken MSM. (2015). Performance, immune response, and carcass quality of broilers fed low-protein diets containing Moringa oleifera leaves meal or its extract. J Am Sci [crossref]
- Sastry EVD. (2007). Essentials of Agricultural Statistics. Pointer Publishers, Jaipur (India), pp. 260–266.
- Alabi O, Malik A, Ng’ambi J, Obaje P, Ojo B. (2017). Effect of aqueous Moringa oleifera (Lam) leaf extracts on growth performance and carcass characteristics of Hubbard broiler chicken. Braz J Poult Sci, 19:273–280. [crossref]
- Khan I, Zaneb H, Masood S, Yousaf MS, Rehman HF, Rehman H. (2017). Effect of Moringa oleifera leaf powder supplementation on growth performance and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 101:114–121. [crossref]
- Moreki JC, Gabanakgosi K. (2014). Potential use of Moringa oleifera in poultry diets. Glob J Anim Sci Res, 2:109–115. [crossref]
- Macambira GMCB, Rabello MIV, Navarro CDC, Lopes EC, Lopes GRD, Nascimento JDCRD, Silva JDCRD. (2022). Effects of Moringa oleifera leaf meal on performance and carcass yield of broilers. Rev Bras Zootec, 51. [crossref]
- Cui YM, Wang J, Lu W, Zhang HJ, Wu SG, Qi GH. (2018). Effect of dietary supplementation with Moringa oleifera leaf on performance, meat quality, and oxidative stability of meat in broilers. Poult Sci, 97(8):2836–2844. [crossref]
- Hassan HMA, El-Moniary MM, Hamouda Y, El-Daly EF, Youssef AW, Abd El-Azeem NA. (2016). Effect of different levels of Moringa oleifera leaves meal on productive performance, carcass characteristics, and some blood parameters of broiler chicks under heat stress. Asian J Anim Vet Adv, 11(1):60–66. [crossref]
- Akande TD, Ogunyemi J, Okunlola PF, Owolabi E, Olakanmi O. (2022). Growth-promoting and anti-lipogenic characteristics of three phytogenic feed additives in broilers’ diets. Adv Anim Vet Sci, 10(5):999–1006. [crossref]
- Gorleku DO, Badu GPA, Afele JT, Kaba JS, Abunyewa AA. (2022). Assessing the efficiency of Moringa oleifera leaf meal on the growth performance of broiler chicken. J Appl Life Sci Environ, 54(4):370–376. [crossref]
- El-Moniary MM, Hemid AAA, El-Wardany I, Gehad AE, Gouda A. (2010). The effect of early age heat conditioning and some feeding programs for heat-stressed broiler chicks on productive performance. World J Agric Sci, 6:689–695. [crossref]
- Khalid N, Sakhawat SF, Mehmood H, Ali MM, Ali R, Amin Y, Ayaz M. (2021). Effects of Moringa oleifera leaf powder as feed additive on growth performance and blood parameters of broilers. J Anim Health Prod, 9(3):271–276.
- Naga MK, Ashour AA, Rahman SAA, Abed M. (2020). Performance and histomorphological parameters of broiler chicks fed low crude protein diet supplemented with Moringa oleifera leaves powder. Menoufia J Anim Poult Fish Prod, 4(5):65–85.
- Abdulsalam SM, Yahaya S, Yakasai MA. (2015). Performance of broiler chickens fed on Moringa oleifera leaf meal supplemented poultry feed. Niger Agric J, 46(1):139–146. [crossref]
- Nkukwana TT, Muchenje V, Masika PJ, Mushonga B. (2015). Intestinal morphology, digestive organ size, and digesta pH of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with or without Moringa oleifera leaf meal. S Afr J Anim Sci, 45(4):362–370. [crossref]
- Alnidawi A, Ali F, Abdelgayed S, Ahmed F, Farid MM. (2016). Moringa oleifera leaves in broiler diets: Effect on chicken performance and health. Food Sci Quality Manag, 58:40–48. [crossref]
- El-Tazi SM. (2014). Effect of feeding different levels of Moringa oleifera leaf meal on the performance and carcass quality of broiler chicks. Int J Sci Res, 3(5):147–151. [crossref]
- Ayo-Ajasa OY, Abiona JA, Fafiolu AO, Egbeyale LT, Njoku CP, Omotayo IG, Abel FAS. (2016). Performance characteristics of broilers fed graded levels of Moringa oleifera leaf meal. Malays J Anim Sci, 19(1):23–31. [crossref]