Abstract
In performing molecular profiling of secondary metabolites, a lot of research has focused on biogenic volatile organic compounds with medium to low polarity. In this study, chemical composition similarity relationships among the various organs of the Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton were assessed based on the analysis of hydrophilic volatile compounds. GC-MS analysis was conducted to characterize and classify the chemical compounds. A total of 36, 46, 42, 25, 64, 26 compounds have been respectively extracted from the root, stem, stem skin, leaf, flower and fruit. The six organs have 3 common compounds and large percentages of exclusive compounds ranging from 36.0% to 62.5% with a mean of 49.8%, indicating substantial component differences among the different organs. The percentage of overlapping compounds between each of the two organs ranges from 10.9% to 44.0%, which is relatively small, further demonstrating the strong organ specificity of the chemical composition. The overlapping index is used to reveal the similarity among the organs. The stem shares the maximum similarity while the fruit the minimum similarity with the other organs. Aside from fruit, the average overlapping indices between each of the other two organs correlate well to their physical proximity. In conclusion, hydrophilic volatile metabolites are a class of natural products that are rarely investigated but constitute a significant part of the plant chemical composition. Chemical profiling of these metabolites could provide a valuable tool for the plant taxonomy and help understand the chemically mediated biological phenomena.
Keywords
Chemical composition similarity, GC-MS, Hydrophilic volatile compounds, Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton, Plant taxonomy
Introduction
Plant taxonomy is traditionally conducted based on macroscopic and microscopic morphological characteristics. Growing evidence suggests that many biologically relevant entities could be missed in the studies that rely solely on morphological traits, particularly since speciation is not always accompanied by morphological change [1,2]. In recent years, plant chemical taxonomy has been developed to perform classification based on a wide array of biologically active secondary metabolites [3]. The expression of secondary metabolites could vary due to convergent evolution or differential gene expression [4], suggesting that the metabolite content of plants may reveal more information on the bioactive pattern of plants in comparison to morphology characterization [5].
In performing molecular profiling of secondary metabolites, a lot of research has focused on biogenic volatile organic compounds with medium to low polarity [6-9]. Volatile compounds are secreted and part of them are volatilized immediately after secretion [10,11]. The remaining part is stored in the special structure of the plant as in the case of essential oils [12-14]. Additionally, Berlinck and collaborators found that the vast majority of new compounds from natural sources reported in recent literature are compounds of medium to low polarity. Water-soluble, volatile, minor and photosensitive natural products are yet poorly known. One of the possible reasons for this trend could be that organic solvents of medium to low polarity used in isolation procedures require less time and less sophisticated instrumentation to be evaporated [15]. The author speculates that there is a class of hydrophilic volatile compounds in plants that are dispersed or dissolved in the water phase, evaporated with water vapor, and whose polarity and volatility are somewhere between essential oils and water-soluble compounds. To protect this type of ingredients from loss during extraction, water vapor distillation is used to collect volatile compounds that are dispersed or dissolved in the plant’s water phase. The root, stem, stem skin, leaf, flower and fruit of the Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton were analyzed as study samples. Volatile essential oils were removed by using Soxhlet extraction method. Hydrophilic volatile compounds obtained by water reflux extraction are characterized and classified by quantitative GC-MS. The study revealed the potential use of hydrophilic volatile metabolites in the plant taxonomy and understanding the chemically mediated biological phenomena.
Materials and Methods
Material
Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton was collected in Nanjing, China. Its roots, stems, stem skins, leaves, flowers and fruits were washed, cut into pieces, dried at 30°C and stored at 2-8°C prior to use.
Chemicals and Reagents
Ethyl acetate was purchased from Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd (Shantou, China). Hexane was purchased from Shanghai Titan Scientific Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Activated carbon was purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Procurement Center (Shanghai, China). C7-C40 saturated alkanes standard was purchased from Anpel Laboratory Technologies Inc. (Shanghai, China).
Sample Preparation
Each sample was sliced and dried at 30°C. After ground into powder, the samples were sieved through 80 mesh followed by 180 mesh. Approximately 6 g of the sample were subjected to Soxhlet extractor method with hexane for 24 hrs to remove essential oils and other lipophilic compounds. The remainder was then removed and dried at 30°C in the ventilation cabinet. Approximately 4 g of the dried powder was then added into a 6 x 7 cm nonwoven bag together with three glass balls of 4 cm diameter. At least 3 segments of thread were used to separate and tighten the bag into 3 parts, each containing a glass ball and even amount of the dried powder. The bag was then placed in a flask and 2100 mL of water was subsequently added to soak the powder for about 2 hrs. After reflux extraction for 6 hrs, 2 L of distilled water was collected. The same reflux extraction was repeated to collect another 1 L of distilled water for a total of 3 L. After cooling, activated carbon (4 g) was added to absorb the active ingredients from the 3 L of distilled water for about 8 hrs. The activated carbon containing the active ingredients was then filtered and dried at 30°C for 12 hrs. Ethyl acetate was subsequently added to isolate the active ingredients from the activated carbon using Soxhlet extractor method for 8 hrs. The resulting ethyl acetate extract was left in the ventilation cabinet to dry at 30°C. The dried active ingredients were finally re-dissolved using ethyl acetate, filtrated through 0.22 µm filter and analyzed using GC-MS.
GC-MS Analysis
Analysis of hydrophilic volatile compounds was performed using Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 Single Quadrupole GC-MS (Kyoto, Japan). A Rxi-1 ms GC capillary column (30 cm length, 0.25 mm inner diameter and 0.25 µm thick film) from Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) was used for analysis.
One microliter of sample was injected in split mode with split ratio of 5 to 1. GC inlet temperature is set at 280°C. High purity nitrogen (≥99.999%) was used as carrier gas in constant flow mode at 1 mL/min. The initial temperature of the GC oven is set at 60°C and held for 1 min, then ramped at 4°C/min to 160°C and held for 3 mins, followed by 2°C/min to 280°C and held for 6 mins. Finally, the temperature is raised to 300°C at 4°C/min and held for 6 mins. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive electron ionization mode at 70 eV and all spectra were recorded in full scan with a mass range of 40-700 Da. The interface temperature is set at 280°C and ion source temperature is set at 250°C.
Data Processing and Compound Identification
The GC-MS data processing was done with Shimazdzu GCMS Solution software. Compound identification was performed by applying several assignments, e.g., reference standard analysis, retention index calculation, and by NIST08 Spectrum Library comparison. Only peaks with area greater than 3 million are analyzed. The overlapping percentage is calculated by the number of overlapping compounds divided by the total number of hydrophilic volatile compounds from each of the two organ and times 100. Overlapping index is calculated by the number of overlapping compounds squared and divided by the total number of hydrophilic volatile compounds from each of the two organs. In addition, hierarchical clustering analysis was performed with Python to assess the similarities between each of the two organs by analyzing the number of overlapping hydrophilic volatile compounds.
Results and Discussion
The root, stem, stem skin, leaf, flower and fruit of the Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton contain compounds that are water soluble and can volatilize with water vapor. These hydrophilic compounds do not separate from the water phase and possess greater polarity than essential oils. The largest number (64) of hydrophilic volatile compounds are isolated from the flower and the smallest (25) from the leaf, indicating that the number of hydrophilic volatile compounds varies greatly from organ to organ. The hydrophilic volatile compounds include aromatics, fatty acids, furans, heterocycle, esters, alkanes, ketones, halogens and other types of small molecular compounds. This is a diverse group of molecules that could contribute to the expression of biological information about the plant. Tables 1-6 present the lists of hydrophilic volatile compounds identified from the root, stem, stem skin, leaf, flower and fruit, respectively. The bold and italic fonts in the table are used to refer to exclusive compounds that are only found in the specific organ and not contained in any other organ.
Table 1: List of the hydrophilic volatile compounds identified from the root of the Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton.
No | RT | RI | Compound | Formula |
1 | 8.434 | 1041 | 2(3H)-Furanone, dihydro-4-hydroxy- | C4H6O3 |
2 | 8.555 | 1044 | 2-Oxo-n-valeric acid | C5H8O3 |
3 | 8.623 | 1047 | 2,3-Anhydro-d-galactosan | C6H8O4 |
4 | 9.159 | 1064 | Acetic acid, hexyl ester | C8H16O2 |
5 | 9.767 | 1084 | 2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 3-ethyl-2-hydroxy- | C7H10O2 |
6 | 12.753 | 1173 | Octanoic Acid | C8H16O2 |
7 | 13.662 | 1199 | 2-Furancarboxaldehyde,5-(hydroxymethyl)- | C6H6O3 |
8 | 16.053 | 1269 | Nonanoic acid | C9H18O2 |
9 | 19.301 | 1364 | Benzaldehyde, 4-(methylthio)- | C8H8OS |
10 | 23.459 | 1492 | 1H-2-Benzopyran-1-one, 3,4-dihydro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl- | C10H10O3 |
11 | 23.660 | 1498 | 3-Acetoxydodecane | C14H28O2 |
12 | 25.161 | 1546 | 7-Hydroxy-3-(1,1-dimethylprop-2-enyl) coumarin | C14H14O3 |
13 | 25.496 | 1557 | Dodecanoic acid | C12H24O2 |
14 | 25.696 | 1564 | Estra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17. beta. – ol | C18H24O |
15 | 26.109 | 1577 | Butyric acid, 3-tridecyl ester | C17H34O2 |
16 | 26.829 | 1600 | Hexadecane | C16H34 |
17 | 27.305 | 1613 | Ethanone, 1-[2-(5-hydroxy-1,1-dimethylhexyl)-3-methyl-2-cyclopropen-1-yl]- | C14H24O2 |
18 | 28.020 | 1631 | Thieno[3,2-c]pyridin-4(5H)-one | C7H5NOS |
19 | 28.671 | 1649 | Dodecanoic acid, 3-hydroxy- | C12H24O3 |
20 | 30.636 | 1700 | 2-Bromotetradecane | C14H29Br |
21 | 32.780 | 1750 | 7-Methyl-Z-tetradecen-1-ol acetate | C17H32O2 |
22 | 35.860 | 1821 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester | C16H22O4 |
23 | 37.894 | 1867 | 2a-isopropyl-9,10a-dimethyl-6-methylenedodecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[4′,5′]cycloocta[1′,2′:1,5]cyclopenta[1,2-b]oxiren-4-ol | C20H32O2 |
24 | 39.903 | 1912 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl octyl ester | C20H30O4 |
25 | 41.687 | 1951 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 |
26 | 49.181 | 2119 | 7-Hexadecenal, (Z)- | C16H30O |
27 | 50.098 | 2139 | 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- | C18H35NO |
28 | 50.483 | 2148 | Octadecanoic acid | C18H36O2 |
29 | 59.601 | 2362 | 2-Methyloctadecan-7,8-diol | C19H40O2 |
30 | 65.148 | 2499 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, diisooctyl ester | C24H38O4 |
31 | 73.761 | 2726 | 13-Docosenamide, (Z)- | C22H43NO |
32 | 77.825 | 2840 | 3-Phenyl-2-ethoxypropylphthalimide | C19H19NO3 |
33 | 83.874 | 3017 | 9,10-Secocholesta-5,7,10(19)-triene-3,24,25-triol, (3.beta.,5Z,7E)- | C27H44O3 |
34 | 89.708 | 3197 | Heptanoic acid, docosyl ester | C29H58O2 |
35 | 92.123 | 3265 | Isophthalic acid, allyl pentadecyl ester | C26H40O4 |
36 | 102.267 | 3561 | Benzenepropanoic acid, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-, octadecyl ester | C35H62O3 |
Note: The bold and italic fonts are used to refer to exclusive compounds. RT: Retention time. RI: Reflex index.
Table 2: List of the hydrophilic volatile compounds identified from the stem of the Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton.
No | RT | RI | Compound | Molecular |
1 | 13.608 | 1198 | 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethyl)- | C6H6O3 |
2 | 19.258 | 1363 | 4-Hydroxy-2-methoxybenaldehyde | C8H8O3 |
3 | 21.565 | 1433 | Cyclopentanemethanol,.alpha.-(1-methylethyl)-2-nitro-, [1.alpha.(S*),2.alpha.]- | C9H17NO3 |
4 | 23.85 | 1504 | 4,8-Decadienal, 5,9-dimethyl- | C12H20O |
5 | 24.743 | 1533 | Megastigmatrienone | C13H18O |
6 | 25.469 | 1556 | Dodecanoic acid | C12H24O2 |
7 | 25.681 | 1563 | 1-Cyclohexene-1-methanol, .alpha.,2,6,6-tetramethyl- | C11H20O |
8 | 26.105 | 1577 | Pentanoic acid, 2,2,4-trimethyl-3-carboxyisopropyl, isobutyl ester | C16H30O4 |
9 | 26.245 | 1581 | Phenol, 3,4,5-trimethoxy- | C9H12O4 |
10 | 26.495 | 1589 | 2-Methyl-4-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enyl)-but-2-en-1-ol | C14H24O |
11 | 27.127 | 1608 | Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy- | C9H10O4 |
12 | 27.37 | 1614 | Ethanone, 1-[2-(5-hydroxy-1,1-dimethylhexyl)-3-methyl-2-cyclopropen-1-yl]- | C14H24O2 |
13 | 27.88 | 1628 | Thieno[3,2-c]-pyridin-4(5H)-one | C7H5NOS |
14 | 28.27 | 1638 | Spiro-[4.5]-decan-7-one, 1,8-dimethyl-8,9-epoxy-4-isopropyl- | C15H24O2 |
15 | 28.685 | 1649 | 2-Bromo dodecane | C12H25Br |
16 | 29.172 | 1662 | Ethanol, 2-(octadecyloxy)- | C20H42O2 |
17 | 29.971 | 1683 | 1-(2-Hydroxy-4,5-dimethoxy-phenyl)-ethanone | C10H12O4 |
18 | 30.271 | 1691 | 2-Propenal, 3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)- | C10H10O3 |
19 | 30.399 | 1694 | Butanol, 1-[2,2,3,3-tetramethyl-1-(3-methyl-1-penynyl)-cyclopropyl]- | C17H30O |
20 | 30.641 | 1700 | Heptadecane | C17H36 |
21 | 31.037 | 1710 | Hexadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl- | C20H42 |
22 | 31.345 | 1717 | 4a-Dichloromethyl-4,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-3H-naphthalen-2-one | C11H14Cl2O |
23 | 31.75 | 1726 | Adamantane, 1-thiocyanatomethyl- | C12H17NS |
24 | 32.052 | 1733 | 9-(3,3-Dimethyloxiran-2-yl)-2,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dien-1-ol | C15H26O2 |
25 | 32.512 | 1744 | 1-Decanol, 2-hexyl- | C16H34O |
26 | 32.788 | 1750 | Cyclopropane, 1-(1-hydroxy-1-heptyl)-2-methylene-3-pentyl- | C16H30O |
27 | 33.683 | 1771 | 3-Isobutyryl-6-isopropyl-2,3-dihydropyran-2,4-dione | C12H16O4 |
28 | 34.92 | 1800 | Heneicosane | C21H44 |
29 | 35.489 | 1813 | Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl- | C21H44 |
30 | 35.86 | 1821 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester | C16H22O4 |
31 | 37.316 | 1854 | 1-Hexadecanol | C16H34O |
32 | 37.898 | 1867 | 2a-isopropyl-9,10a-dimethyl-6-methylenedodecahydro-1H-cyclopenta[4′,5′]-cycloocta[1′,2′:1,5]-cyclopenta-[1,2-b]oxiren-4-ol | C20H32O2 |
33 | 39.907 | 1912 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl 8-methylnonyl ester | C22H34O4 |
34 | 41.693 | 1951 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 |
35 | 43.899 | 2000 | Eicosane | C20H42 |
36 | 49.179 | 2119 | 12-Methyl-E,E-2,13-octadecadien-1-ol | C19H36O |
37 | 50.464 | 2148 | Octadecanoic acid | C18H36O2 |
38 | 59.603 | 2362 | 2-Methyloctadecan-7,8-diol | C19H40O2 |
39 | 65.152 | 2499 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, diisooctyl ester | C24H38O4 |
40 | 73.757 | 2726 | 13-Docosenamide, (Z)- | C22H43NO |
41 | 83.861 | 3016 | Ethyl iso-allocholate | C26H44O5 |
42 | 89.711 | 3197 | Heptanoic acid, docosyl ester | C29H58O2 |
43 | 92.16 | 3266 | Isophthalic acid, allyl pentadecyl ester | C26H40O4 |
44 | 92.66 | 3280 | 17-(1,5-Dimethylhexyl)-10,13-dimethyl-3-styrylhexadecahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-2-one | C35H52O |
45 | 94.571 | 3331 | 4-Norlanosta-17(20),24-diene-11,16-diol-21-oic acid, 3-oxo-16,21-lactone | C29H42O4 |
46 | 102.263 | 3561 | Benzenepropanoic acid, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-, octadecyl ester | C35H62O3 |
Note: The bold and italic fonts are used to refer to exclusive compounds. RT: Retention time. RI: Reflex index.
Table 3: List of the hydrophilic volatile component identified from the stem skin of the Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton.
No | RT | RI | Compound | Molecular |
1 | 12.765 | 1173 | Octanoic Acid | C8H16O2 |
2 | 13.818 | 1204 | 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethyl)- | C6H6O3 |
3 | 19.283 | 1364 | Benzaldehyde, 3-hydroxy-4-methoxy- | C8H8O3 |
4 | 21.526 | 1432 | 2H-Pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydro-6-pentyl- | C10H16O2 |
5 | 23.372 | 1489 | 4,6-di-tert-Butyl-m-cresol | C15H24O |
6 | 23.599 | 1496 | 12-Oxa-[tetracyclo[5.2.1.1(2,6).1(8,11)]]dodecan-10-ol, 3-acetoxy- | C13H18O4 |
7 | 23.856 | 1504 | 2,6-Dimethoxybenzoquinone | C8H8O4 |
8 | 25.171 | 1547 | 1H-Benzocyclohepten-7-ol, 2,3,4,4a,5,6,7,8-octahydro-1,1,4a,7-tetramethyl-, cis- | C15H26O |
9 | 25.317 | 1551 | 2(5H)-Furanone, 4-methyl-5,5-bis(2-methyl-2-propenyl)- | C13H18O2 |
10 | 25.462 | 1556 | Dodecanoic acid | C12H24O2 |
11 | 25.694 | 1564 | 2-Oxabicyclo[3.3.0]oct-7-en-3-one, 7-(1-hydroxypentyl)- | C12H18O3 |
12 | 25.922 | 1571 | Dodecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl- | C15H32 |
13 | 26.114 | 1577 | Pentanoic acid, 2,2,4-trimethyl-3-carboxyisopropyl, isobutyl ester | C16H30O4 |
14 | 26.335 | 1584 | 3-Butyl-4-nitro-pent-4-enoic acid, methyl ester | C10H17NO4 |
15 | 26.514 | 1590 | 2-Dodecen-1-yl(-)succinic anhydride | C16H26O3 |
16 | 26.838 | 1600 | Heptadecane | C17H36 |
17 | 27.227 | 1611 | Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy- | C9H10O4 |
18 | 27.929 | 1629 | 2,6,10,10-Tetramethyl-1-oxaspiro-[4.5]decan-6-ol | C13H24O2 |
19 | 28.288 | 1638 | 4-Isobenzofuranol, octahydro-3a,7a-dimethyl-, (3a.alpha.,4.beta.,7a.alpha.)-(.+-.)- | C10H18O2 |
20 | 29.187 | 1662 | Ethanol, 2-(hexadecyloxy)- | C18H38O2 |
21 | 29.827 | 1679 | 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-(3-hydroxybutyl)-2,4,4-trimethyl- | C13H22O2 |
22 | 29.956 | 1682 | Cyclopentanone, 2-(1-adamantyl)- | C15H22O |
23 | 30.308 | 1692 | alpha. Isomethyl ionone | C14H22O |
24 | 30.649 | 1700 | 2-Bromotetradecane | C14H29Br |
25 | 31.047 | 1710 | Hexadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl- | C20H42 |
26 | 31.774 | 1727 | Adamantane, 1-thiocyanatomethyl- | C12H17NS |
27 | 32.083 | 1734 | E,E-6,8-Tridecadien-2-ol, acetate | C15H26O2 |
28 | 32.522 | 1744 | 1-Decanol, 2-hexyl- | C16H34O |
29 | 32.801 | 1751 | 7-Methyl-Z-tetradecen-1-ol acetate | C17H32O2 |
30 | 33.682 | 1771 | 7-Bromo-3a,6,6-trimethyl-hexahydro-benzofuran-2(3H)-one | C11H17BrO2 |
31 | 35.475 | 1813 | Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl- | C21H44 |
32 | 35.876 | 1822 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester | C16H22O4 |
33 | 37.903 | 1867 | Dodecane, 1,2-dibromo- | C12H24Br2 |
34 | 39.916 | 1912 | Dibutyl phthalate | C16H22O4 |
35 | 41.653 | 1951 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 |
36 | 65.178 | 2500 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, diisooctyl ester | C24H38O4 |
37 | 73.760 | 2726 | 13-Docosenamide, (Z)- | C22H43NO |
38 | 93.411 | 3301 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, diundecyl ester | C30H50O4 |
39 | 93.650 | 3307 | Isophthalic acid, allyl pentadecyl ester | C26H40O4 |
40 | 100.522 | 3505 | 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, phenylmethyl ester | C25H40O2 |
41 | 101.150 | 3525 | 2,6-Lutidine 3,5-dichloro-4-dodecylthio- | C19H31Cl2NS |
42 | 102.301 | 3562 | Benzenepropanoic acid, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-, octadecyl ester | C35H62O3 |
Note: The bold and italic fonts are used to refer to exclusive compounds. RT: Retention time. RI: Reflex index.
Table 4: List of the hydrophilic volatile component of the leaf of the Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton.
No | RT | RI | Compound | Molecular |
1 | 13.543 | 1196 | 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethyl)- | C6H6O3 |
2 | 14.110 | 1212 | 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 6-(hydroxymethyl)- | C6H6O4 |
3 | 14.318 | 1218 | 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 7-(hydroxymethyl)- | C6H6O5 |
4 | 25.089 | 1544 | Bicyclo[3.2.0]heptan-6-one, 2-acetyl-3,3-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)- | C14H22O2 |
5 | 25.453 | 1556 | Dodecanoic acid | C12H24O2 |
6 | 25.692 | 1564 | trans-Z-.alpha.-Bisabolene epoxide | C15H24O |
7 | 26.117 | 1577 | 4,6,10,10-Tetramethyl-5-oxatricyclo[4.4.0.0(1,4)]dec-2-en-7-ol | C13H20O2 |
8 | 26.493 | 1589 | 7-Heptadecene, 1-chloro- | C17H33Cl |
9 | 26.831 | 1600 | Hexadecane | C16H34 |
10 | 28.088 | 1633 | 3-Pyridinecarboxylic acid, 1,6-dihydro-4-hydroxy-2-methyl-6-oxo-, ethyl ester | C9H11NO4 |
11 | 30.644 | 1700 | Heptadecane | C17H36 |
12 | 31.038 | 1710 | Hexadecane, 2,6,11,15-tetramethyl- | C20H42 |
13 | 32.440 | 1742 | 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4-hydroxy-3,5,6-trimethyl-4-(3-oxo-1-butenyl)- | C13H18O3 |
14 | 32.801 | 1751 | 7-Methyl-Z-tetradecen-1-ol acetate | C17H32O2 |
15 | 34.479 | 1790 | Pentadecyl trifluoroacetate | C17H31F3O2 |
16 | 34.925 | 1800 | Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl- | C21H44 |
17 | 35.476 | 1813 | Nonadecane | C19H40 |
18 | 35.872 | 1822 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester | C16H22O4 |
19 | 41.601 | 1949 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 |
20 | 43.458 | 1991 | 1-Nonadecene | C19H38 |
21 | 59.608 | 2362 | 2-Methyloctadecan-7,8-diol | C19H40O2 |
22 | 73.760 | 2726 | 13-Docosenamide, (Z)- | C22H43NO |
23 | 92.239 | 3268 | Isophthalic acid, allyl pentadecyl ester | C26H40O4 |
24 | 93.235 | 3296 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 2-butoxyethyl butyl ester | C18H26O5 |
25 | 94.006 | 3317 | Phthalic acid, propyl octadecyl ester | C29H48O4 |
Note: The bold and italic fonts are used to refer to exclusive compounds. RT: Retention time. RI: Reflex index.
Table 5: List of the hydrophilic volatile component identified from the flower of the Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton.
No | RT | RI | Compound | Molecular |
1 | 9.359 | 1070 | 2,2-Dimethyl-3-vinyl-bicyclo[2.2.1]heptane | C11H18 |
2 | 9.987 | 1091 | Cyclohex-3-enecarboxaldehyde, 2,4,6-trimethyl-, oxime | C10H17NO |
3 | 12.197 | 1156 | Phenol, 3-ethyl- | C8H10O |
4 | 12.649 | 1170 | Benzoic acid | C7H6O2 |
5 | 12.797 | 1174 | Glucosamine, N-acetyl-N-benzoyl- | C15H19NO7 |
6 | 13.333 | 1190 | Benzothiazole | C7H5NS |
7 | 15.613 | 1256 | Phenol, 2,3,5-trimethyl- | C9H12O |
8 | 16.214 | 1273 | 5H-Inden-5-one, 1,2,3,6,7,7a-hexahydro- | C9H12O |
9 | 16.640 | 1286 | Hydroquinone | C6H6O2 |
10 | 17.145 | 1300 | Cyclohexanol, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethylidene)- | C10H18O |
11 | 17.280 | 1304 | Cyclohexanol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethenyl)-, (1.alpha.,2.beta.,5.alpha.)- | C10H18O |
12 | 17.772 | 1319 | 2,7-Octadiene-1,6-diol, 2,6-dimethyl- | C10H18O2 |
13 | 18.160 | 1330 | trans-Z-.alpha.-Bisabolene epoxide | C15H24O |
14 | 18.430 | 1338 | (3S,4R,5R,6R)-4,5-Bis(hydroxymethyl)-3,6-dimethylcyclohexene | C10H18O2 |
15 | 19.298 | 1364 | 4-Hydroxy-2-methoxybenaldehyde | C8H8O3 |
16 | 19.508 | 1370 | 2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-(2-propenyl)- | C9H12O2 |
17 | 21.040 | 1417 | Phenol, 2-pentyl- | C11H16O |
18 | 21.311 | 1425 | 2-Propen-1-ol, 2-methyl-3-(2,6,6-trimethyl-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-, (E)- | C13H22O |
19 | 21.602 | 1434 | 3-(2-Hydroxy-cyclopentylidene)-2-methyl-propionic acid | C9H14O3 |
20 | 21.838 | 1442 | 5-Benzofuranacetic acid, 6-ethenyl-2,4,5,6,7,7a-hexahydro-3,6-dimethyl-α-methylene-2-oxo-, methyl ester | C16H20O4 |
21 | 23.259 | 1486 | 8-Methylenecyclooctene-3,4-diol | C9H14O2 |
22 | 23.514 | 1494 | 1-(3,6,6-Trimethyl-1,6,7,7a-tetrahydrocyclopenta[c]pyran-1-yl)ethanone | C13H18O2 |
23 | 24.011 | 1509 | 1-Acetamido-1,2-dihydro-2-oxopyridine | C7H8N2O2 |
24 | 24.675 | 1531 | cis-Z-.alpha.-Bisabolene epoxide | C15H24O |
25 | 24.767 | 1534 | Cyclopentan-1-al, 4-isopropylidene-2-methyl- | C10H16O |
26 | 25.085 | 1544 | Ethanone, 1-(1a,2,3,5,6a,6b-hexahydro-3,3,6a-trimethyloxireno[g]benzofuran-5-yl)- | C13H18O3 |
27 | 25.514 | 1558 | Dodecanoic acid | C12H24O2 |
28 | 25.685 | 1563 | Bicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-9-one, 1,2,4-trimethyl-3-nitro-, (2-endo,3-exo,4-exo)-(.+-.)- | C12H19NO3 |
29 | 25.899 | 1570 | 2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-(3-hydroxybutyl)-2,4,4-trimethyl- | C13H22O2 |
30 | 26.127 | 1578 | Ledol | C15H26O |
31 | 26.498 | 1590 | 1-Hexadecanol | C16H34O |
32 | 26.840 | 1600 | Hexadecane | C16H34 |
33 | 27.155 | 1609 | Spiro[androst-5-ene-17,1′-cyclobutan]-2′-one, 3-hydroxy-, (3.beta.,17.beta.)- | C22H32O2 |
34 | 27.486 | 1617 | Bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane-6-methanol, 2-hydroxy-1,4,4-trimethyl- | C10H18O2 |
35 | 28.099 | 1634 | 3-Pyridinecarboxylic acid, 1,6-dihydro-4-hydroxy-2-methyl-6-oxo-, ethyl ester | C9H11NO4 |
36 | 28.615 | 1647 | Bromoacetic acid, dodecyl ester | C14H27BrO2 |
37 | 28.684 | 1649 | Chloroacetic acid, 4-tetradecyl ester | C16H31ClO2 |
38 | 29.178 | 1662 | 2-Dodecen-1-yl(-)succinic anhydride | C16H26O3 |
39 | 29.777 | 1678 | 2-Hydroxy-1,1,10-trimethyl-6,9-epidioxydecalin | C13H22O3 |
40 | 29.951 | 1682 | 1-Cyclopropene-1-pentanol, .alpha.,.epsilon.,.epsilon.,2-tetramethyl-3-(1-methylethenyl)- | C15H26O |
41 | 30.651 | 1701 | 2-Bromotetradecane | C14H29Br |
42 | 31.045 | 1710 | Tetradecane, 1-chloro- | C14H29Cl |
43 | 31.355 | 1717 | 5.beta.,7.beta.H,10.alpha.-Eudesm-11-en-1.alpha.-ol | C15H26O |
44 | 31.582 | 1722 | 7-Hexadecenal, (Z)- | C16H30O |
45 | 31.771 | 1727 | Pentane-2,4-dione, 3-(1-adamantyl)- | C15H22O2 |
46 | 32.092 | 1734 | Butanol, 1-[2,2,3,3-tetramethyl-1-(3-methyl-1-penynyl)-cyclopropyl]- | C17H30O |
47 | 32.468 | 1743 | Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione, hexahydro-3-(2-methylpropyl)- | C11H18N2O2 |
48 | 32.769 | 1750 | Tetradecanoic acid | C14H28O2 |
49 | 33.645 | 1771 | 1-Decanol, 2-hexyl- | C16H34O |
50 | 34.485 | 1790 | Pentadecyl trifluoroacetate | C17H31F3O2 |
51 | 34.932 | 1801 | Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-tetramethyl- | C21H44 |
52 | 35.479 | 1813 | 1-Octanol, 2-butyl- | C12H26O |
53 | 35.873 | 1822 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester | C16H22O4 |
54 | 36.928 | 1845 | 5,10-Diethoxy-2,3,7,8-tetrahydro-1H,6H-dipyrrolo[1,2-a;1′,2′-d]pyrazine | C14H22N2O2 |
55 | 37.910 | 1867 | 2-Hexadecene, 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-, [R-[R*,R*-(E)]]- | C20H40 |
56 | 39.389 | 1900 | Nonadecane | C19H40 |
57 | 41.675 | 1951 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 |
58 | 43.480 | 1991 | 1-Nonadecene | C19H38 |
59 | 46.996 | 2069 | 3-Chloropropionic acid, heptadecyl ester | C20H39ClO2 |
60 | 48.984 | 2114 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- | C18H32O2 |
61 | 49.228 | 2120 | 9-Octadecenal, (Z)- | C18H34O |
62 | 50.660 | 2152 | Ethyl iso-allocholate | C26H44O5 |
63 | 52.394 | 2192 | 9-Tricosene, (Z)- | C23H46 |
64 | 73.770 | 2727 | 13-Docosenamide, (Z)- | C22H43NO |
Note: The bold and italic fonts are used to refer to exclusive compounds. RT: Retention time. RI: Reflex index.
Table 6: List of the hydrophilic volatile component identified from the fruit of the Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton.
No | RT | RI | Compound | Molecular |
1 | 9.133 | 1063 | Mequinol | C7H8O2 |
2 | 9.303 | 1069 | Phenol, 4-methyl- | C7H8O |
3 | 9.430 | 1073 | Hexane, 3-bromo- | C6H13Br |
4 | 9.923 | 1089 | Phenylethyl Alcohol | C8H10O |
5 | 10.510 | 1107 | 4-Acetylbutyric acid | C6H10O3 |
6 | 12.643 | 1169 | Benzoic acid | C7H6O2 |
7 | 13.559 | 1196 | 2-Furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethyl)- | C6H6O3 |
8 | 15.378 | 1249 | 1,5-Cyclooctadien-4-one | C8H10O |
9 | 17.652 | 1315 | Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy- | C8H10O3 |
10 | 19.180 | 1361 | Benzaldehyde, 3-hydroxy-4-methoxy- | C8H8O3 |
11 | 21.852 | 1442 | 2-Ethoxyphenylacetonitrile | C10H11NO |
12 | 22.103 | 1450 | Benzeneacetonitrile, 4-hydroxy- | C8H7NO |
13 | 22.466 | 1461 | Coumarin, 8-methyl- | C10H8O2 |
14 | 25.187 | 1547 | 1,4-Benzenediol, 2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)- | C10H14O2 |
15 | 25.508 | 1558 | Dodecanoic acid | C12H24O2 |
16 | 25.876 | 1569 | 3,5-Octadienoic acid, 7-hydroxy-2-methyl-, [R*,R*-(E,E)]- | C9H14O3 |
17 | 25.938 | 1571 | 2-Cyclopenten-1-one, 4-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-(2-propenyl)- | C9H12O2 |
18 | 26.125 | 1577 | 1b,5,5,6a-Tetramethyl-octahydro-1-oxa-cyclopropa[a]inden-6-one | C13H20O2 |
19 | 26.492 | 1589 | 4-Chloro-3-n-hexyltetrahydropyran | C11H21ClO |
20 | 27.323 | 1613 | Ethanone, 1-[2-(5-hydroxy-1,1-dimethylhexyl)-3-methyl-2-cyclopropen-1-yl]- | C14H24O2 |
21 | 30.643 | 1700 | Heptadecane | C17H36 |
22 | 32.760 | 1750 | Tetradecanoic acid | C14H28O2 |
23 | 35.878 | 1822 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester | C16H22O4 |
24 | 41.694 | 1952 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 |
25 | 48.863 | 2111 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester | C19H34O2 |
26 | 49.244 | 2120 | 9-Octadecenal, (Z)- | C18H34O |
Note: The bold and italic fonts are used to refer to exclusive compounds. RT: Retention time. RI: Reflex index.
As shown in Table 7, the total number of hydrophilic volatile compounds isolated from the six organs ranges from 25 to 64. There are 3 common compounds in the six organs, i.e. Dodecanoic acid, 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester and n-Hexadecanoic acid. This accounts for 12.0% of total hydrophilic volatile compounds for the leaf and 4.7% for the flower with an average of 8.4% for all the six organs, indicating the little commonality of the six organs. Each organ also has its exclusive compounds which are not found in any other organ. The percentage of exclusive compounds follows the order of flower > fruit > stem skin > root > stem > leaf. The flower has the largest number and percentage of the exclusive compounds, 40 and 62.5%, respectively. The leaf has the smallest number and percentage of the exclusive compounds, 9 and 36.0%, respectively. The stem and stem skin display medium numbers of exclusive compounds. The average percentage of the exclusive compounds in the six organs was 49.8%, nearly half, indicating strong organ specificity. These results provide evidence to support the practice of the traditional herbal medicine to treat the diseases using either the whole plant or part of the plants depending on which part contains the substances that can be used for therapeutic purposes.
Table 7: The number and percentage of the common and exclusive hydrophilic volatile compounds identified from the six organs.
Organ | Root | Stem | Stem Skin | Leaf | Flower | Fruit |
Total Compounds | 36 | 46 | 42 | 25 | 64 | 26 |
Common Compounds | 3 | |||||
Percentage of Common Compounds | 8.3% | 6.5% | 7.1% | 12.0% | 4.7% | 11.5% |
Exclusive Compounds | 17 | 21 | 21 | 9 | 40 | 15 |
Percentage of Exclusive Compounds | 47.2% | 45.7% | 50.0% | 36.0% | 62.5% | 57.7% |
Table 8 presents the number of overlapping compounds, overlapping percentage and overlapping index. The stem and stem skin share the largest number (15) of overlapping compounds. The overlapping percentage is calculated to be 32.6% for the stem and 35.7% for the stem skin. The smallest number (5) of overlapping compounds are found between root and fruit, leaf and fruit. The percentage of overlapping compounds between each of the two organs ranges from 10.9% to 44.0%, which is relatively small, further demonstrating substantial component differences among the different organs. The overlapping index is used to reveal the similarity among the organs. Two organs share the same number of overlapping compounds, but the overlapping index could be different if the total number of the hydrophilic volatile compounds differs. The more total number of the hydrophilic volatile compounds, the less the percentage of the overlapping compounds and smaller the overlapping index. That is why the average overlapping indices between the two organs is introduced to normalize the difference. In addition, total average overlapping indices is derived to calculate the mean of the average overlapping indices between each organ and the other five organs. Based on Table 8, the total average overlapping indices for each organ follows the order of stem > stem skin > root > leaf > flower > fruit. The total average overlapping indices for the stem is the greatest at 3.056, indicating the stem share the maximum similarity with the plant. The total average overlapping indices for the fruit was the smallest at 1.090, indicating that the fruit share the minimum similarity with the plant. And there is not much difference in the average overlapping indices between fruit and the other five organs. Except fruit, the average overlapping indices between each of the two organs correlate well to their physical proximity. The root, stem and stem skin are the organs that the plant survive and grow, and their total average overlapping indices are greater than 2.5. The overlapping index differences among these three organs are small, and they share the most in common. As an evergreen plant, the leaf is symbiotically related to the plant although the relationship between each leaf and the plant is cyclical, so the leaf is secondarily related to the plant. The flower and fruit are also cyclically related to the plant and have the most distant relationship. The leaf, flower and fruit are necessary but not survival organs for the growth of the plant. The relationship between the organs and the plant generated from the analysis of the hydrophilic volatile compounds is consistent with their biological function.
Table 8: The number of overlapping compounds, overlapping percentage and overlapping index.
Organ1 | Organ 2 | Number of overlapping compounds | Overlapping percentage | Overlapping index for Organ 1 | Overlapping index for Organ 2 | Average overlapping indices between organ 1 and 2 | Total average overlapping Indices |
Root | Stem | 14 | 38.9% | 5.444 | 4.261 | 4.853 |
2.522 |
Stem skin | 11 | 30.6% | 3.361 | 2.881 | 3.121 | ||
Leaf | 9 | 25.0% | 2.250 | 3.240 | 2.745 | ||
Flower | 7 | 19.4% | 1.361 | 0.766 | 1.064 | ||
Fruit | 5 | 13.9% | 0.694 | 0.962 | 0.828 | ||
Stem | Root | 14 | 30.4% | 4.261 | 5.444 | 4.853 |
3.056 |
Stem skin | 15 | 32.6% | 4.891 | 5.357 | 5.124 | ||
Leaf | 9 | 19.6% | 1.761 | 3.240 | 2.501 | ||
Flower | 10 | 21.7% | 2.174 | 1.266 | 1.720 | ||
Fruit | 6 | 13.0% | 0.783 | 1.385 | 1.084 | ||
Stem skin | Root | 11 | 26.2% | 2.881 | 3.361 | 3.121 | 2.710 |
Stem | 15 | 35.7% | 5.357 | 4.891 | 5.124 | ||
Leaf | 9 | 21.4% | 1.929 | 3.240 | 2.585 | ||
Flower | 10 | 21.4% | 1.929 | 1.266 | 1.598 | ||
Fruit | 6 | 14.3% | 0.857 | 1.385 | 1.121 | ||
Leaf | Root | 9 | 36.0% | 3.240 | 2.250 | 2.745 |
2.435 |
Stem | 9 | 36.0% | 3.240 | 1.761 | 2.501 | ||
Stem skin | 9 | 36.0% | 3.240 | 1.929 | 2.585 | ||
Flower | 11 | 44.0% | 4.840 | 1.891 | 3.366 | ||
Fruit | 5 | 20.0% | 1.000 | 0.962 | 0.981 | ||
Flower | Root | 7 | 10.9% | 0.766 | 1.361 | 1.064 |
1.844 |
Stem | 10 | 15.6% | 1.563 | 2.174 | 1.859 | ||
Stem skin | 10 | 14.1% | 1.266 | 1.929 | 1.598 | ||
Leaf | 11 | 17.2% | 1.891 | 4.840 | 3.366 | ||
Fruit | 7 | 10.9% | 0.766 | 1.885 | 1.326 | ||
Fruit | Root | 5 | 19.2% | 0.962 | 0.694 | 0.828 |
1.090 |
Stem | 6 | 23.1% | 1.385 | 1.000 | 1.193 | ||
Stem skin | 6 | 23.1% | 1.385 | 0.857 | 1.121 | ||
Leaf | 5 | 19.2% | 0.962 | 1.000 | 0.981 | ||
Flower | 7 | 26.9% | 1.885 | 0.766 | 1.326 |
Conclusion
The root, stem, stem skin, leaf, flower and fruit of the Ilex cornuta Lindl. & Paxton contain hydrophilic volatile compounds that are evenly distributed in the water phase of the various organs of the plant and can volatilize with water vapor. The number and type of hydrophilic volatile compounds vary from organ to organ. There is only a small number of common compounds among the six organs and the number of overlapping compounds between each of the two organs is also relatively small. In addition, there are large number of exclusive compounds from each organ. Therefore, it is possible to identify the plant through the assessment of the hydrophilic volatile compounds isolated from each individual organ.
In conclusion, we found that hydrophilic volatile metabolites are a class of natural products that are rarely investigated but constitute a significant part of the plant chemical composition. Chemical profiling of these secondary metabolites could provide a valuable tool for identification and authentication of the plant samples, as well as resolving taxonomic problems and understanding the chemically mediated biological phenomena.
References
- Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, et al. (2007) Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 148-155. [crossref]
- Heinrichs J, Kreier HP, Feldberg K, Schmidt AR, Zhu RL, et al. (2011) Formalizing morphologically cryptic biological entities: New insights from DNA taxonomy, hybridization, and biogeography in the leafy liverwort Porella platyphylla (Jungermanniopsida, Porellales). Am J Bot 98: 1252-1262. [crossref]
- Ludwiczuk A (2014) Fingerprinting of secondary metabolites of liverworts: chemosystematic approach. J of AOAC Int 97: 1234-1243.
- Wink M (2003) Evolution of secondary metabolites from an ecological and molecular phylogenetic perspective. Phytochemistry 64: 3-19. [crossref]
- Liu K, Abdullah AA, Huang M, Nishioka T, Altaf-Ul-Amin M, et al. (2017) Novel Approach to Classify Plants Based on Metabolite-Content Similarity. BioMed Res Int. doi: 10.1155/2017/5296729
- Ghaste M, Narduzzi L, Carlin S, Vrhovsek U, Shulaev V, et al. (2015) Chemical Composition of Volatile Aroma Metabolites and Their Glycosylated Precursors that Can Uniquely Differentiate Individual Grape Cultivars. Food Chem 188: 309-319. [crossref]
- Peters K, Treutler H, Doll S, Kindt ASD, Hankemeier T, et al. (2019) Chemical Diversity and Classification of Secondary Metabolites in Nine Bryophyte Species. Metabolites 9: 222. [crossref]
- Staszek D, Orlowska M, Rzepa J, Wrobel MS, Kowalska T (2014) Fingerprinting of the Volatile Fraction from Selected Thyme Species by Means of Headspace Gas Chromatography with Mass Spectrometric Detection. J of AOAC Int 97: 1250-1258. [crossref]
- Tundis R, Peruzzi L, Menichini F (2014) Phytochemical and biological studies of Stachy Species in Relation to Chemotaxonomy: A Review. Phytochemistry 102: 7-39. [crossref]
- Peñuelas J, Llusià J (1999) Seasonal emission of monoterpenes by the Mediterranean tree Quercus ilex in field conditions: Relations with photosynthetic rates, temperature and volatility. Physiol Plant 105: 641-647.
- Llusia J, Penuelas J (2000) Seasonal patterns of terpene content and emission from seven mediterranean woody species in field conditions. Am J Bot 87: 133-140. [crossref]
- Ormeo E, Goldstein A, Niinemets ü (2011) Extracting and trapping biogenic volatile organic compounds stored in plant species. TRAC-Trend Anal Chem 30: 978-989.
- Claudia G, Roberta A, Daniela L, Giacomo T, Laura S, et al. (2018) Salvia verticillata: Linking glandular trichomes, volatiles and pollinators. Phytochemistry 155: 53-60.
- Wei X, Song M, Chen C, Tong H, Liang G, et al. (2018) Juice volatile composition differences between Valencia orange and its mutant Rohde Red Valencia are associated with carotenoid profile differences. Food Chem 245: 223-232. [crossref]
- Berlinck RGS, Monteiro AF, Bertonha AF, Bernardi DI, Gubiani JR, et al. (2019) Approaches for the isolation and identification of hydrophilic, light-sensitive, volatile and minor natural products. Nat Prod Rep 36: 981-1004. [crossref]